Skip to main content

Early Modern Women, Science, and Natural Philosophy

The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Early Modern Women's Writing
  • 16 Accesses

Abstract

This article examines two similar but non-identical areas: early modern women (writers) and science, and early modern women (writers) and natural philosophy. Using the term “science” to indicate ways of knowing the natural world that developed especially from the program that Francis Bacon laid out in his Great Instauration—knowledge drawn from empirical observation or data gathered from the senses, from experimentation, and from inductive reasoning—implicitly suggests that “natural philosophy,” while rigorous in its own way, is not exactly or not quite science. The first section of this article surveys the many historians and critics from the last few decades who have argued forcefully that women were active participants in the scientific practices of early modernity, even though they may have been excluded from the formal institution of science of the seventeenth century, the Royal Society. The second section focuses on women writers of science, those who recorded their knowledges in print and manuscript. The third section argues that we should take seriously the role of natural philosophy in order to see a clearer picture of the rich range of “natural knowledges”—and the participation by women in those natural knowledges—in early modernity. The article as a whole highlights the difference it makes to think not just about women (women and science, women and natural philosophy), but about women writers: the occlusion of women’s scientific and natural philosophical work from the stories we tell about early modernity comes from the different access to publishing opportunities between the genders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akkerman, Nadine, and Marguérite Corporaal. 2004. “Mad Science Beyond Flattery: The Correspondence of Margaret Cavendish and Constantijn Huygens.” Early Modern Literary Studies 14 (2): 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Jayne. 2005. “A ‘Perfect Circle’?: Alchemy in the Poetry of Hester Pulter.” Literature Compass 2: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, Francis. 2000. The New Organon. Edited by Lisa Jardine and Michael Silverthorne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Battagelli, Anna. 1998. Margaret Cavendish and the Exiles of the Mind. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, Liza. 2017. “The Grounds of Literature and Science: Margaret Cavendish’s Creature Manifesto.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Early Modern Literature and Science, edited by Howard Marchitello and Lyn Tribble, 3–26. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020. “Hester Pulter’s Particle Physics and the Poetics of Involution.” JEMCS 20: 71–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2021. “The Physics of Poetic Form in Arthur Golding’s Translation of Ovid’s Metamorphoses.” English Literary Renaissance 51 (3): 1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. forthcoming 2023. “Non-Atomic Atomisms and Atomic Epistemologies in the Poetry of Margaret Cavendish and Lucy Hutchinson.” ELR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, Robert. 1661. Certain physiological essays. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Mary Baine. 2006. “Literature.” In Cambridge History of Science, volume 3: Early Modern Science, edited by Katharine Park and Lorraine Daston, 756–72. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capp, Bernard. 2004. “Jinner, Sarah (fl. 1658–1664), compiler of almanacs and medical practitioner.” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/60915

  • Cavendish, Margaret. 1653a. Philosophical Fancies. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1653b. Poems and Fancies. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1666. Observations upon Experimental Philosophy. To the which is added, the Description of a New Blazing World. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1668. Grounds of Natural Philosophy: Divided into Thirteen Parts: with an Appendix Containing Five Parts. The second edition, much altered from the first, which went under the name of Philosophical and Physical Opinions. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. The Blazing World and Other Writings. Edited by Kate Lilley. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Observations Upon Experimental Philosophy. Edited by Eileen O’Neill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Margaret Cavendish’s Poems and Fancies: A Digital Critical Edition. Edited by Liza Blake. http://library2.utm.utoronto.ca/poemsandfancies/

  • Charleton, Walter. 1676. Letters and Poems in honour of the incomparable princess, Margaret, Dutchess of Newcastle. In the Savoy: Printed by Thomas Newcombe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, Anne. 2008. The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Edited by Allison P. Coudert and Taylor Corse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Alix. 2006. “Homes and Households.” In Cambridge History of Science, volume 3: Early Modern Science, edited by Katharine Park and Lorraine Daston, 224–37. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, Patricia. 1985. “Women’s Published Writings 1600–1700.” In Women in English Society: 15001800, edited by Mary Prior, 158–209. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, Lara. 2019. “Affected and Disaffected Alike: Women, Print, and the Problem of Women’s Literary History.” In Political Turmoil: Early Modern British Literature in Transition, 1623–1660, edited by Stephen B. Dobranski, 20520. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garber, Daniel. 2006. “Physics and Foundations.” In Cambridge History of Science, volume 3: Early Modern Science, edited by Katharine Park and Lorraine Daston, 21–69. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, Jonathan. 2006. “Lucy Hutchinson Writing Matter.” ELH 73: 275–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grey, Elizabeth Countess of Kent. 1653. A Choice Manual, or Rare and Select Secrets. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, Deborah E. 2007. The Jewel House: Elizabethan London and the Scientific Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hock, Jessie. 2018. “Fanciful Poetics and Skeptical Epistemology in Margaret Cavendish’s Poems and Fancies.” Studies in Philology 115 (4): 766802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooke, Robert. 1665. Micrographia: or some physiological descriptions of minute bodies made by magnifying glasses. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, Lynette, and Sarah Hutton, editors. 1997. Women, Science and Medicine 1500–1700: Mothers and Sisters of the Royal Society. Stroud: Sutton Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, Lucy. 2001. Order and Disorder. Edited by David Norbrook. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, trans. 2012. De rerum natura. By Lucretius. In The Works of Lucy Hutchinson, Volume I: The Translation of Lucretius. Edited by Reid Barbour and David Norbrook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, Sarah. 2008. “Hester Pulter (c. 1596–1678). A Woman Poet and the New Astronomy.” Études Epistémè 14: n.p. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4000/episteme.729

  • Hyman, Wendy Beth. 2017. “‘Deductions from Metaphors’: Figurative Truth, Poetical Language, and Early Modern Science.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Early Modern Literature and Science, edited by Howard Marchitello and Lyn Tribble, 27–48. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jinner, Sarah. 1659a. An Almanack and Prognostication for the Year of our Lord 1659 being the Third After Bissextile Or Leap Year. London, Printed by J.S. for the Company of Stationers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1659b. The Womans Almanack Or, Prognostication for Ever: Shewing the Nature of the Planets, with the Events that Shall Befall Women and Children Born Under them. with several Predictions very Useful for the Female Sex. / by Sarah Ginnor Student in Physick London, Printed for J. J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, Elaine. 2018. Recipes and Everyday Knowledge: Medicine, Science, and the Household in Early Modern England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lesser, Madeline. 2020. “Unbinding the Maternal Body in Lucy Hutchinson’s Order and Disorder.” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 50 (2): 377–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchitello, Howard, and Evelyn Tribble, eds. 2017. The Palgrave Handbook of Early Modern Literature and Science. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Carolyn. 1983. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Samuel I. 1952. “The Duchess of Newcastle’s Visit to the Royal Society.” Journal of English and Germanic Philology 51: 168–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norbrook, David. 2012. “Introduction.” In De rerum natura, by Lucretius. In The Works of Lucy Hutchinson, Volume I: The Translation of Lucretius, translated by Lucy Hutchinson, edited by Reid Barbour and David Norbrook, xv–cxlvi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outram, Dorinda. 2006. “Gender.” In Cambridge History of Science, volume 3: Early Modern Science, edited by Katharine Park and Lorraine Daston, 797–817. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Jennifer. 2021. “Teaching Recipes, Race, and Erasure in the Early Modern Classroom.” Studies in Medieval and Renaissance Teaching 28, no. 2: 61–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Katharine, and Lorraine Daston, editors. 2006. The Cambridge History of Science, volume 3: Early Modern Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennell, Sara. 2004. “Perfecting Practice? Women, Manuscript Recipes and Knowledge in Early Modern England.” In Early Modern Women’s Manuscript Writing: Selected Papers from the Trinity/Trent Colloquium, edited by Victoria Elizabeth Burke and Jonathan Gibson, 237–58. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perdita Manuscripts. 2021. Adam Matthew Digital. http://www.perditamanuscripts.amdigital.co.uk.

  • Project Vox. 2015–2021. Duke University Libraries. https://projectvox.org/.

  • Pulter, Hester. 2018. The Pulter Project: Poet in the Making. Edited by Leah Knight and Wendy Wall. http://pulterproject.northwestern.edu.

  • Schiebinger, Londa. 2006. “Women of Natural Knowledge.” In Cambridge History of Science, volume 3: Early Modern Science, edited by Katharine Park and Lorraine Daston, 192–205. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, Steven. 1998. The Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. “The Man of Science.” In Cambridge History of Science, volume 3: Early Modern Science, edited by Katharine Park and Lorraine Daston, 179–91. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, Steven, and Simon Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Lisa. 2014. “Elisabeth, Princess of Bohemia.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/elisabeth-bohemia/.

  • Sharp, Jane. 1671. The Midwives Book. Or the whole Art of Midwifry Discovered. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. The Midwives Book. Edited by Elaine Hobby. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standish, Cecilia Bindloss. c. 1625–1675. “Astrological and horticultural notes.” D/Dst C2/2. Wigan Heritage Service. Accessed via Perdita Manuscripts. Adam Matthew Digital. http://www.perditamanuscripts.amdigital.co.uk.

  • Wall, Wendy. 2016. Recipes for Thought: Knowledge and Taste in the Early Modern English Kitchen. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wernimont, Jacqueline D. 2006. “Poetico-Mathematical Women and The Ladies’ Diary.” In Cambridge History of Science, volume 3: Early Modern Science, edited by Katharine Park and Lorraine Daston, 337–50. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, Katie. 2002. Mad Madge: The Extraordinary Life of Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle, the First Woman to Live by her Pen. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Women Writers Project. 1999–2016. Women Writers Project. Northeastern University. https://www.wwp.northeastern.edu.

  • Woodward, Marshelle. 2021. “Classrooms of Our Own: Authorizing Women’s Voices in the Early Modern Literature Survey.” Studies in Medieval and Renaissance Teaching 28, no. 2: 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. forthcoming 2022. “Hester Pulter’s Dissolving Worlds.” In Worldmaking Women: New Essays on the Centrality of Women in Early Modern Literature and Culture. Edited by Pamela Hammons and Brandie Siegfried. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, Hannah. 1664. The Cook’s Guide, Or, Rare Receipts for Cookery. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1675. The Accomplish’d Lady’s Delight in Preserving, Physick, Beautifying, and Cookery. London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liza Blake .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Blake, L. (2022). Early Modern Women, Science, and Natural Philosophy. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Early Modern Women's Writing. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01537-4_368-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01537-4_368-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01537-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01537-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Early Modern Women, Science, and Natural Philosophy
    Published:
    23 March 2023

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01537-4_368-2

  2. Original

    Early Modern Women, Science, and Natural Philosophy
    Published:
    24 August 2022

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01537-4_368-1