Abstract
In 1667, the same year that the poet Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle upon Tyne, famously became the first woman to visit the Royal Society, Thomas Sprat (author and Fellow) declared that literary and scientific discourses were antithetical. Sprat’s history of the Society resolved “to reject all the amplifications, digressions, and swellings of style,” instead “bringing all things as near the mathematical plainness” (Sprat, 1667). But Cavendish is one of many women poets who were excluded from the formal institutions of academia and science and yet carved out their own imaginative and intellectual spaces from this position of exclusion to produce writing that fused the literary and scientific. This entry provides an introduction to the scientific poetry of late sixteenth- and seventeenth-century women and to the critical discourse surrounding their work. Poets addressed include Isabella Whitney, Anne Bradstreet, Katherine Philips, Lucy Hutchinson, Hester Pulter, Margaret Cavendish, and Jane Barker. The entry details the ways in which the work of these poets engages with scientific and natural philosophic thought in the period, in particular medicine, alchemy, matter theory, astronomy, and anatomy.
References
Archer, Jayne. 2005. “A ‘Perfect Circle’? Alchemy in the Poetry of Hester Pulter.” Literature Compass 2, no. 1 (December): 1–14.
Barbour, Ashley Reid, David Norbrook, and Maria Cristina Zerbino, eds. 2011. The Works of Lucy Hutchinson, Vol. 1: The Translation of Lucretius. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barker, Jane. 1688. Poetical Recreations: Consisting of Original Poems, Songs, Odes, etc. London.
Blake, Liza. 2019. Margaret Cavendish’s Poems and Fancies: A Digital Critical Edition. Edited by Liza Blake. May 2019. http://library2.utm.utoronto.ca/poemsandfancies/
Behn, Aphra. 1683. “To Mr. Creech (under the Name of Daphnis) on his Excellent Translation of Lucretius.” In T Lucretius Carus, The Epicurean Philosopher, His Six Books…The Second edition corrected and enlarged. Translated by Thomas Creech. London
Bradstreet, Anne. 1650. The Tenth Muse, lately Sprung up in America. London.
Cavendish, Margaret. 1653. Poems and Fancies. London.
Chowdhury, Sajed. 2016. “Hermeticism in the Poetry of Katherine Philips.” Women’s Writing 23 (4): 465–82.
Cummins, Juliet, and David Burchell, eds. 2007. Science, Literature and Rhetoric in Early Modern England. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Davis, Alex. 2003. Chivalry and Romance in the English Renaissance (Studies in Renaissance Literature 11). Cambridge and Rochester: D. S. Brewer.
Gorman, Cassandra. 2016. “Poetry and Atomism in the Civil War and Restoration.” Literature Compass, 13 (9): 560–71.
Hunter, Lynette, and Sarah Hutton, eds. 1997. Women, Science and Medicine, 1500–1700: Mothers and Sisters of the Royal Society. Stroud: Sutton Publishing.
Hutchinson, Lucy. De rerum natura. MS Add. 19333. Additional Manuscripts. British Library.
———————. 1679. Order and Disorder, Or, The World Made and Undone. Being Meditations upon the Creation and the Fall; As it is recorded in the beginning of Genesis. London.
Hutton, Sarah. 2008. “Hester Pulter (c. 1596–1678). A Woman Poet and the New Astronomy.” Études Épistémè 14: 77–87.
Laroche, Rebecca. 2009. Medical Authority and Englishwomen’s Herbal Texts, 1550–1650. Farnham: Ashgate.
Lutes, Jean Marie. 1997. “Negotiating Theology and Gynecology: Anne Bradstreet’s Representations of the Female Body.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 22 (2): 309–40.
Mann, Rachel. 2019. “Jane Barker, Manuscript Culture, and the Epistemology of the Microscope.” Eighteenth-Century Life 43 (1): 50–75.
Marchitello, Howard, and Evelyn Tribble, eds. 2017. The Palgrave Handbook of Early Modern Literature and Science. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Philips, Katherine. 1667. Poems by the Most deservedly admired Mrs Katherine Philips, The Matchless Orinda. London.
Pulter, Hester. Poems breathed forth by the nobel Hadassas, and The Unfortunate Florinda, by Lady Hesther Pulter. MS Lt q 32. Brotherton Library, University of Leeds.
Scott-Baumann, Elizabeth. 2013. Forms of Engagement: Women, Poetry and Culture 1640–1680. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sprat, Thomas. 1667. The History of the Royal Society of London, for the Improving of Natural Knowledge. London.
Speght, Rachel. 1621. Mortalities Memorandum with a Dreame Prefixed. London.
Whitney, Isabella. 1573. A Sweet Nosegay, or pleasant posy conteyning a hundred and ten phylosophicall flowers &c. London.
Further Reading
Calloway, Katherine. 2019. “Imagining the Scientific Revolution in England.” In Political Turmoil: Early Modern British Literature in Transition, 1623–1660, edited by Stephen Dobranski, 221–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Campbell, Mary Baine. 2006. “Literature.” In The Cambridge History of Science. Volume III: Early Modern Science, edited by Lorraine Daston and Katharine Park, 756–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wall, Wendy. 2016. Recipes for Thought: Knowledge and Taste in the Early Modern English Kitchen. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Allan, K. (2023). Poetry and Science. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Early Modern Women's Writing. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01537-4_33-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01537-4_33-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01537-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01537-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Poetry and Science- Published:
- 09 November 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01537-4_33-2
-
Original
Poetry and Science- Published:
- 20 September 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01537-4_33-1