Skip to main content

In Search of Organization Laws: A New Way of Doing Science? (The Uprising of Systemic Attitude)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Systemic Turn in Human and Natural Sciences

Part of the book series: Contemporary Systems Thinking ((CST))

  • 432 Accesses

Abstract

The ever increasing need (especially in biology) to cope with problems asking for a network-like formalization in which the focus is a sensible description of the correlation structure among the constituent parts is catalyzing what appears as a change in the style of doing science.

The blurring of the distinction between hypothesis generating and testing processes and the substitution of theories peculiar of the specific investigation field with largely independent of the microscopic details organization principles are reshaping the scientific culture.

The above sketched style still refers to a minority of scientific works; nevertheless, it embeds a great promise of making science to exit the actual lack of efficacy crisis due to hyper-specialization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Csermely, P., et al. (2013). Structure and dynamics of molecular networks: A novel paradigm of drug discovery: A comprehensive review. Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 138, 333–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Paola, L., De Ruvo, M., Paci, P., Santoni, D., & Giuliani, A. (2012). Protein contact networks: An emerging paradigm in chemistry. Chemical Reviews, 113(3), 1598–1613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani, A. (2017). The application of principal component analysis to drug discovery and biomedical data. Drug Discovery Today, 22(7), 1069–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani, A., et al. (2014). Why network approach can promote a new way of thinking in biology. Frontiers in Genetics, 5(83), 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorban, A. N., Smirnova, E. V., & Tyukina, T. A. (2010). Correlations, risk and crisis: From physiology to finance. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 389(16), 3193–3217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, T. U., Fiore, V. G., Moutoussis, M., & Dolan, R. J. (2016). Computational psychiatry of ADHD: Neural gain impairments across Marrian levels of analysis. Trends in Neurosciences, 39(2), 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S. (2004). Back to the biology in systems biology: What can we learn from biomolecular networks? Briefings in Functional Genomics, 2(4), 279–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, R. B., Pines, D., Schmalian, J., Stojković, B. P., & Wolynes, P. (2000). The middle way. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(1), 32–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mickulecki, D. (2001). Network thermodynamics and complexity: A transition to relational systems theory. Computers and Chemistry, 25, 369–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicosia, V., De Domenico, M., & Latora, V. (2014). Characteristic exponents of complex networks. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 106(5), 58005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuzzo, R. (2014). Scientific method: Statistical errors. Nature News, 506(7487), 150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K. (1901). On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 2(11), 559–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen, B. (1952). A general network theorem with application. Philips Research Reports, 7, 259–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transtrum, M. K., Machta, B. B., Brown, K. S., Daniels, B. C., Myers, C. R., & Sethna, J. P. (2015). Perspective: Sloppiness and emergent theories in physics, biology, and beyond. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 143(1), 07B201_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA’s statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, W. (1948). Science and complexity. American Scientist, 36, 536–549.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Giuliani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Giuliani, A. (2019). In Search of Organization Laws: A New Way of Doing Science? (The Uprising of Systemic Attitude). In: Urbani Ulivi, L. (eds) The Systemic Turn in Human and Natural Sciences. Contemporary Systems Thinking. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00725-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics