Abstract
European Energy Performance of Building Directive (EPBD) defined a target as all new constructed buildings within the EU region must be a zero-energy building by the end of 2020. Furthermore, all European countries must ensure the minimum comfort threshold in energy calculations. Reducing energy consumption and improving indoor comfort, including visual and thermal comfort, can contribute to economic benefits. However, the main problem is the exitance of conflicts among visual comfort, thermal comfort, energy consumption and life cycle cost. To solve the abovementioned problem and to fulfil the EPBD’s target, this study aims to apply an integration between BIM, optimization and Analytical Hierarchy Process as a multi-criteria decision-making method on an office building in Sweden. Accordingly, 3 types of windows and 5 types of external wall, ground floor and external roof constructions were specified as optimization variables. The combination between the optimization variables generated 375 design alternatives. The performance of all 375 design alternatives were evaluated with respect to visual comfort, thermal comfort, energy consumption and life cycle cost. Later, AHP was used to find a trade-off design alternative. The results show that the combination between window type 1, external wall type 5, ground floor type 1 and external roof type 5 is the trade-off design alternative. Furthermore, the results show the integration enables to solve the abovementioned conflicts and to fulfil the EPBD’s target.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Total energy consumption comprised the energy need for space heating, cooling, domestic hot water, electricity need for lighting, ventilation and office equipment.
- 2.
modeFRONTIER has various of nodes including logic nodes, data nodes, file nodes, application nodes, script nodes, CAD nodes, CAE nodes and networking nodes. Nodes are executable components, which have data and accomplish some transformations over the data, later forward the data to the next node [26]. DOSBatch node is one of the available script nodes.
References
EPBD, ANNEX to the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council. Amending Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings. Annex I, point 2., Official Journal of the European Union (2016)
Swedish Energy Agency, Energy statistics for non-residential building 2016 [In Swedish: Energistatistik i lokaler 2016], Bromma, Sweden, p. 56 (2017)
Swedish Energy Agency, Energy Situation [Title in Swedish: Energiläget], Bromma, Sweden, pp. 1–86 (2017)
International Energy Agancy, Energy Policies of IEA Countries, Sweden, 2013 Review, France, pp. 0–28 (2013)
Al Horr, Y., Arif, M., Kaushik, A., Mazroei, A., Katafygiotou, M., Elsarrag, E.: Occupant productivity and office indoor environment quality: a review of the literature. Build. Environ. 105, 369–389 (2016)
Kats, G., Alevantis, L., Mills, E., Perlman, J.: The costs and financial benefits of green buildings: a report to California’s sustainable building task force, Sustainable Building Task Force, California (2003)
Aries, M., Aarts, M., van Hoof, J.: Daylight and health: A review of the evidence and consequences for the built environment. Lighting Res. Technol. 47(1), 6–27 (2015)
Heerwagen, J.: Green buildings, organizational success and occupant productivity. Build. Res. Inf. 28(5–6), 353–367 (2000)
Muller, M.F., Loures, E.R., Canciglieri, O.: Interoperability Assessment for Building Information Modelling, 5th International Conference on Structures and Building Materials (ICSBM 2015), 2015
Rahmani Asl, M., Stoupine, A., Zarrinmehr, S., Yan, W.: Optimo: a BIM-based multi-objective optimization tool utilizing visual programming for high performance building design. In: Martens, B., Wurzer, G., Grasl, T., Lorenz, W.E., Schaffranek, R. (ed.) Proceedings of the 33rd eCAADe Conference, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria, pp. 673–682 (2015)
Eastman, C.M., Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R.: BIM handbook: a guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. Wiley, New York (2011)
Sakikhales, M., Stravoravdis, S.: Using BIM to facilitate iterative design, building information modelling (BIM) in design. Constr. Oper. 149, 9–19 (2015)
Chand, S., Wagner, M.: Evolutionary many-objective optimization: a quick-start guide. Surv. Oper. Res. Manage. Sci. 20(2), 35–42 (2015)
Rahmani Asl, M., Zarrinmehr, S., Bergin, M., Yan, W.: BPOpt: a framework for BIM-based performance optimization. Energy Build. 108, 401–412 (2015)
Mosavi, A.: Multiple criteria decision-making preprocessing using data mining tools, arXiv preprint arXiv:1004.3258 (2010)
Revit.: https://www.autodesk.com/products/revit-family/overview. Retrieved Dec. 2017
Design Builder.: www.designbuilder.co.uk (2017)
ISO7730-Standard, 7730. Ergonomics of the thermal environment—analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria, International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland (2005)
National board of housing building and planning, Building regulation, [In Swedish: Boverkets byggregler, BFS 2011: 6 med ändringar till och med 2015: 3], National board of housing, building and planning, [In Swedish: Boverket] 2015
Månsson, L., Schönbeck, Å.: Light & Room, guide for planning of indoor lighting [In Swedish: Ljus & rum: planeringsguide för belysning inomhus], Ljuskultur, Stockholm, Sweden (2003)
I.S.W.B. Wikells construction calculations, AB], Sectional Facts - NYB 12/13: Technical-Economic Compilation of Buildings, [In Swedish: Sektionsfakta - NYB 12/13: teknisk-ekonomisk sammanställning av byggdelar], 22 ed., Växjö: Wikells byggberäkningar, Växjö (2012)
Elitfonster.: www.elitfonster.se (2016)
Koziel, S., Yang, X.-S.: Computational optimization, methods and algorithms. Springer, Berlin (2011)
Uy, M., Telford, J.K.: Optimization by Design of Experiment Techniques, Aerospace Conference, 2009 IEEE, IEEE, pp. 1–10 (2009)
esteco.: http://www.esteco.com/modefrontier. Accessed Nov. 2017
Sousa, T.B.: Dataflow programming concept, languages and applications, Doctoral Symposium on Informatics Engineering (2012)
Pourshaghaghy, A., Omidvari, M.: Examination of thermal comfort in a hospital using PMV–PPD model. Appl. Ergon. 43(6), 1089–1095 (2012)
Gustafsson, M., Gustafsson, M.S., Myhren, J.A., Bales, C., Holmberg, S.: Techno-economic analysis of energy renovation measures for a district heated multi-family house. Appl. Energy 177, 108–116 (2016)
Saaty, T.L.: Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1(1), 83–98 (2008)
Jalilzadehazhari, E., Johansson, P., Johansson, J., Mahapatra, K.: Application of analytical hierarchy process for selecting an interior window blind, Architectural Eng. Des. Manage. 1–17 (2017)
Acknowledgements
The present study was accomplished as part of a PhD project, financed by Knowledge Foundation. Authors appreciate greatly for their contributions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jalilzadehazhari, E., Johansson, P. (2019). Integrating BIM, Optimization and a Multi-criteria Decision-Making Method in Building Design Process. In: Mutis, I., Hartmann, T. (eds) Advances in Informatics and Computing in Civil and Construction Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00220-6_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00220-6_43
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00219-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00220-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)