Skip to main content

Integrating BIM, Optimization and a Multi-criteria Decision-Making Method in Building Design Process

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Informatics and Computing in Civil and Construction Engineering

Abstract

European Energy Performance of Building Directive (EPBD) defined a target as all new constructed buildings within the EU region must be a zero-energy building by the end of 2020. Furthermore, all European countries must ensure the minimum comfort threshold in energy calculations. Reducing energy consumption and improving indoor comfort, including visual and thermal comfort, can contribute to economic benefits. However, the main problem is the exitance of conflicts among visual comfort, thermal comfort, energy consumption and life cycle cost. To solve the abovementioned problem and to fulfil the EPBD’s target, this study aims to apply an integration between BIM, optimization and Analytical Hierarchy Process as a multi-criteria decision-making method on an office building in Sweden. Accordingly, 3 types of windows and 5 types of external wall, ground floor and external roof constructions were specified as optimization variables. The combination between the optimization variables generated 375 design alternatives. The performance of all 375 design alternatives were evaluated with respect to visual comfort, thermal comfort, energy consumption and life cycle cost. Later, AHP was used to find a trade-off design alternative. The results show that the combination between window type 1, external wall type 5, ground floor type 1 and external roof type 5 is the trade-off design alternative. Furthermore, the results show the integration enables to solve the abovementioned conflicts and to fulfil the EPBD’s target.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Total energy consumption comprised the energy need for space heating, cooling, domestic hot water, electricity need for lighting, ventilation and office equipment.

  2. 2.

    modeFRONTIER has various of nodes including logic nodes, data nodes, file nodes, application nodes, script nodes, CAD nodes, CAE nodes and networking nodes. Nodes are executable components, which have data and accomplish some transformations over the data, later forward the data to the next node [26]. DOSBatch node is one of the available script nodes.

References

  1. EPBD, ANNEX to the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council. Amending Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings. Annex I, point 2., Official Journal of the European Union (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Swedish Energy Agency, Energy statistics for non-residential building 2016 [In Swedish: Energistatistik i lokaler 2016], Bromma, Sweden, p. 56 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Swedish Energy Agency, Energy Situation [Title in Swedish: Energiläget], Bromma, Sweden, pp. 1–86 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. International Energy Agancy, Energy Policies of IEA Countries, Sweden, 2013 Review, France, pp. 0–28 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Al Horr, Y., Arif, M., Kaushik, A., Mazroei, A., Katafygiotou, M., Elsarrag, E.: Occupant productivity and office indoor environment quality: a review of the literature. Build. Environ. 105, 369–389 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kats, G., Alevantis, L., Mills, E., Perlman, J.: The costs and financial benefits of green buildings: a report to California’s sustainable building task force, Sustainable Building Task Force, California (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aries, M., Aarts, M., van Hoof, J.: Daylight and health: A review of the evidence and consequences for the built environment. Lighting Res. Technol. 47(1), 6–27 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Heerwagen, J.: Green buildings, organizational success and occupant productivity. Build. Res. Inf. 28(5–6), 353–367 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Muller, M.F., Loures, E.R., Canciglieri, O.: Interoperability Assessment for Building Information Modelling, 5th International Conference on Structures and Building Materials (ICSBM 2015), 2015

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rahmani Asl, M., Stoupine, A., Zarrinmehr, S., Yan, W.: Optimo: a BIM-based multi-objective optimization tool utilizing visual programming for high performance building design. In: Martens, B., Wurzer, G., Grasl, T., Lorenz, W.E., Schaffranek, R. (ed.) Proceedings of the 33rd eCAADe Conference, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria, pp. 673–682 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eastman, C.M., Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R.: BIM handbook: a guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. Wiley, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sakikhales, M., Stravoravdis, S.: Using BIM to facilitate iterative design, building information modelling (BIM) in design. Constr. Oper. 149, 9–19 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chand, S., Wagner, M.: Evolutionary many-objective optimization: a quick-start guide. Surv. Oper. Res. Manage. Sci. 20(2), 35–42 (2015)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Rahmani Asl, M., Zarrinmehr, S., Bergin, M., Yan, W.: BPOpt: a framework for BIM-based performance optimization. Energy Build. 108, 401–412 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mosavi, A.: Multiple criteria decision-making preprocessing using data mining tools, arXiv preprint arXiv:1004.3258 (2010)

  16. Revit.: https://www.autodesk.com/products/revit-family/overview. Retrieved Dec. 2017

  17. Design Builder.: www.designbuilder.co.uk (2017)

  18. ISO7730-Standard, 7730. Ergonomics of the thermal environment—analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria, International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. National board of housing building and planning, Building regulation, [In Swedish: Boverkets byggregler, BFS 2011: 6 med ändringar till och med 2015: 3], National board of housing, building and planning, [In Swedish: Boverket] 2015

    Google Scholar 

  20. Månsson, L., Schönbeck, Å.: Light & Room, guide for planning of indoor lighting [In Swedish: Ljus & rum: planeringsguide för belysning inomhus], Ljuskultur, Stockholm, Sweden (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. I.S.W.B. Wikells construction calculations, AB], Sectional Facts - NYB 12/13: Technical-Economic Compilation of Buildings, [In Swedish: Sektionsfakta - NYB 12/13: teknisk-ekonomisk sammanställning av byggdelar], 22 ed., Växjö: Wikells byggberäkningar, Växjö (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Elitfonster.: www.elitfonster.se (2016)

  23. Koziel, S., Yang, X.-S.: Computational optimization, methods and algorithms. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Uy, M., Telford, J.K.: Optimization by Design of Experiment Techniques, Aerospace Conference, 2009 IEEE, IEEE, pp. 1–10 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. esteco.: http://www.esteco.com/modefrontier. Accessed Nov. 2017

  26. Sousa, T.B.: Dataflow programming concept, languages and applications, Doctoral Symposium on Informatics Engineering (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pourshaghaghy, A., Omidvari, M.: Examination of thermal comfort in a hospital using PMV–PPD model. Appl. Ergon. 43(6), 1089–1095 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gustafsson, M., Gustafsson, M.S., Myhren, J.A., Bales, C., Holmberg, S.: Techno-economic analysis of energy renovation measures for a district heated multi-family house. Appl. Energy 177, 108–116 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Saaty, T.L.: Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1(1), 83–98 (2008)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Jalilzadehazhari, E., Johansson, P., Johansson, J., Mahapatra, K.: Application of analytical hierarchy process for selecting an interior window blind, Architectural Eng. Des. Manage. 1–17 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present study was accomplished as part of a PhD project, financed by Knowledge Foundation. Authors appreciate greatly for their contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Johansson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1

Appendix 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jalilzadehazhari, E., Johansson, P. (2019). Integrating BIM, Optimization and a Multi-criteria Decision-Making Method in Building Design Process. In: Mutis, I., Hartmann, T. (eds) Advances in Informatics and Computing in Civil and Construction Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00220-6_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00220-6_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00219-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00220-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics