Skip to main content

Transtrochanteric Approach to the Hip

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mini-Invasive Surgery of the Hip

Abstract

Once used routinely, trochanteric osteotomy in total hip arthroplasty now is usually limited to difficult primary and revision cases. Many variations of the osteotomy and many various techniques for the trochanter reattachment have been described. Our specific surgical technique is presented as well as its advantages and drawbacks. Primary total hip arthroplasty procedures requiring the enhanced exposure provided by trochanteric osteotomy is needed in patients with hip ankylosis or fusion, protrusio acetabuli, proximal femoral deformities, developmental dysplasia, or abductor muscle laxity. Trochanteric osteotomy in revision arthroplasties facilitates the removal of well-fixed femoral components and enhances acetabular exposure. In all cases, trochanteric osteotomy remains useful to preserve the periarticular muscles and to restore the geometry of the artificial hip which are the best ways to prevent dislocation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Charnley J (1972) The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br 54:61–76

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Archibeck MJ, Rosenberg AG, Berger RA, Silverton CD (2003) Trochanteric osteotomy and fixation during total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 11:163–173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Courpied JP, Desportes G, Postel M (1991) A new trochanteric osteotomy method for a postero-lateral approach (330 operations with posterior transosseus and paramuscular curved approach). Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 77:506–512. French

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McGrory BJ, Bal BS, Harris WH (1996) Trochanteric osteotomy for total hip arthroplasty: six variations and indications for their use. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 4:258–267

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hersh CK, Williams RP, Trick LW, Lanctot D, Athanasiou K (1996) Comparison of the mechanical performance of trochanteric fixation devices. Clin Orthop 329:317–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kerboull M (1994) Arthroplastie totale de hanche par voie transtochanterienne: Editions Techniques. Encyclopedie Medico-Chirurgicale, Techniques Chirurgicales-Orthopedie-Traumatologie. Elsevier, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hamadouche M, Zniber B, Dumaine V, Kerboull M, Courpied JP (2003) Reattachment of the ununited greater trochanter following total hip arthroplasty. The use of a trochanteric claw plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1330–1337

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kerboull L, Hamadouche M, Courpied JP, Kerboull M (2004) Long-term results of Charnley-Kerboull hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years. Clin Orthop 418:112–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nercessian OA, Newton PM, Joshi RP, Sheikh B, Eftekhar NS (1996) Trochanteric osteotomy and wire fixation: a comparison of 2 techniques. Clin Orthop 333:208–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wroblewski BM, Shelley P (1985) Reattachment of the greater trochanter after hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67:736–740

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jensen NF, Harris WH (1986) A system for trochanteric osteotomy and reattachment for total hip arthroplasty with a ninety-nine percent union rate. Clin Orthop 208:174–181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hop JD, Callaghan JJ, Olejniczak JP, Pedersen DR, Brown TD, Johnston RC (1997) The Frank Stinchfield Award. Contribution of cable debris generation to accelerated polyethylene wear. Clin Orthop 344:20–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luc Kerboull .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kerboull, L., Hamadouche, M., Kerboull, M. (2014). Transtrochanteric Approach to the Hip. In: Poitout, D., Judet, H. (eds) Mini-Invasive Surgery of the Hip. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-79931-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-79931-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-79930-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-79931-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics