Skip to main content

Birth Weight Percentiles: An International Comparison

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Caring for Children Born Small for Gestational Age

Abstract

Somatic development at birth is associated with a number of postnatal and life-long health outcomes [1]. In clinical practice, percentile curves of birth weight, length, and head circumference are calculated according to gestational age and, along with growth indices derived from these parameters, are used to estimate neonatal somatic development. These percentiles allow an estimation of, for example, the birth weight of a particular neonate compared to other neonates of the same sex who were born after the same duration of pregnancy. A birth weight in the 50th percentile means that 50% of neonates of the same sex and gestational age were smaller (lighter) than the child in question. A birth weight on the 10th or 90th percentile means that 10% or 90% of comparable children were smaller (lighter), respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Guilloteau P, Zabielski R, Hammon HM, Metges CC. Adverse effects of nutritional programming during prenatal and early postnatal life, some aspects of regulation and potential prevention and treatments. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2009 Oct;60(suppl 3):17-35.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Voigt M, Rochow N, Straube S, Briese V, Olbertz D, Jorch G. Birth weight percentile charts based on daily measurements for very preterm male and female infants at the age of 154-223 days. J Perinat Med. 2010;38:289-295.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Straube S, Voigt M, Hesse V, et al. Comparison of anthropometric characteristics of German-born vs. Asian-born mothers and their neonates – an analysis of the German perinatal survey (19th communication). Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 2010;70:472-477.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hsieh WS, Wu HC, Jeng SF, et al. Nationwide singleton birth weight percentiles by gestational age in Taiwan, 1998-2002. Acta Paediatr Taiwan. 2006;47:25-33.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mayer M, Voigt M, Schmitt K. Analyse des Neugeborenenkollektivs der Jahre 1999–2004 der Republik Osterreich. 1. Mitteilung: Neue Perzentilwerte fur die Korpermase Neugeborener (Einlinge) (German). Monatsschr Kinderheilkd. 2008;156:49-56.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kramer MS, Platt RW, Wen SW, et al. A new and improved population-based Canadian reference for birth weight for gestational age. Pediatrics. 2001;108:E35.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Voigt M, Rochow N, Hesse V, Olbertz D, Schneider KT, Jorch G. Kurzmitteilung zu den perzentilwerten fur die korpermase der neugeborenen (German). Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2010;214:24-29.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Joubert K. Magyar szuleteskori testtomeg- es testhossz-standardok az 1990–1996. evi orszagos elveszuletesi adatok alapjan. Magyar nöorvosok lapja. 2000;63:155-163.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davidson S, Sokolover N, Erlich A, Litwin A, Linder N, Sirota L. New and improved Israeli reference of birth weight, birth length, and head circumference by gestational age: a hospital-based study. Isr Med Assoc J. 2008:130-134.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alshimmiri MM, Al-Saleh EA, Alsaeid K, Hammoud MS, Al-Harmi JA. Birth weight percentiles by gestational age in Kuwait. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2004;269:111-116.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Skjaerven R, Gjessing HK, Bakketeig LS. Birthweight by gestational age in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:440-449.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carrascosa Lezcano A, Ferrandez Longas A, Yeste Fernandez D, et al. [Spanish cross-sectional growth study 2008. Part I: Weight and height values in newborns of 26-42 weeks of gestational age] (Spanish). An Pediatr (Barc). 2008;68:544-551.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Olsen IE, Groveman SA, Lawson ML, Clark RH, Zemel BS. New intrauterine growth curves based on United States data. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e214-e224.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Voigt M, Schneider KT, Jahrig K. [Comprehensive analysis of all the newborn during 1992 in the Federal Republic of Germany: Part 2: Multidimensional links between age, body weight, body height of the mother, and body weight at birth] (German). Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 1997;57:246-255.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Voigt M, Olbertz D, Rochow N, Hesse V, Schleussner E, Schneider KT. Geburtsgewichtsperzentilwerte fur Madchen und Knaben unter Berucksichtigung von Korperhohe und Korpergewicht der Mutter (12 Muttergruppen) (German). In: Zabransky S, ed. SGA-Syndrome Small for Gestational Age. IUGR Intrauterine Wachstumsrestriktion. Interdisziplinarer SGA Workshop. July 1, 2011: Kloster Schontal, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schmelzle HR, Quang DN, Fusch G, Fusch C. Birth weight categorization according to gestational age does not reflect percentage body fat in term and preterm newborns. Eur J Pediatr. 2007;166:161-167.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sainz RD, Urlando A. Evaluation of a new pediatric air-displacement plethysmograph for body-composition assessment by means of chemical analysis of bovine tissue phantoms. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:364-370.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fusch C, Slotboom J, Fuehrer U, et al. Neonatal body composition: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, magnetic resonance imaging, and three-dimensional chemical shift imaging versus chemical analysis in piglets. Pediatr Res. 1999;46:465-473.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schmelzle HR, Fusch C. Body fat in neonates and young infants: validation of skinfold thickness versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76:1096-1100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siegfried Zabransky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Healthcare

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zabransky, S. (2013). Birth Weight Percentiles: An International Comparison. In: Zabransky, S. (eds) Caring for Children Born Small for Gestational Age. Springer Healthcare, Tarporley. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-908517-90-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-908517-90-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Healthcare, Tarporley

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-908517-85-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-908517-90-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics