Skip to main content

Methods for Creating Mutations in C. elegans That Extend Lifespan

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Biological Aging

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1048))

Abstract

The principle of commonly used methods to create mutations in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) is straightforward. In general, worms are exposed to a dose of mutagen resulting in DNA damages and mutations. Screening the progeny of the mutagenized animals for a certain phenotype is the regular forward genetic approach in C. elegans. A mutant selected from such a population is stabilized to recover a pure homozygous strain. In this chapter, we categorize the protocol into mutagenesis, phenotype screen, and outcross and provide time-tested procedures for their implementation to create long-lived worm mutants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Luca D, d'Alessandro E, Bonacci S, Giraldi G (2011) Aging populations: the health and quality of life of the elderly. Clin Ter 162:e13–e18

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fontana L (2009) Modulating human aging and age-associated diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta 1790:1133–1138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pizza V, Agresta A, D'Acunto CW, Festa M, Capasso A (2011) Neuroinflamm-aging and neurodegenerative diseases: an overview. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 10:621–634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Helfand SL, Rogina B (2003) Genetics of aging in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. Annu Rev Genet 37:329–348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaeberlein M, Burtner CR, Kennedy BK (2007) Recent developments in yeast aging. PLoS Genet 3:e84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kenyon CJ (2010) The genetics of ageing. Nature 464:504–512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Klass MR (1983) A method for the isolation of longevity mutants in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and initial results. Mech Ageing Dev 22:279–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grishok A (2005) RNAi mechanisms in Caenorhabditis elegans. FEBS Lett 579:5932–5939

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Riddle DL, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ et al (eds) (1997) Section II, induced mutations. C. elegans II, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY

    Google Scholar 

  10. Flibotte S, Edgley ML, Chaudhry I, Taylor J, Neil SE, Rogula A, Zapf R, Hirst M, Butterfield Y, Jones SJ et al (2010) Whole-genome profiling of mutagenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 185:431–441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson P (1995) Mutagenesis. Methods Cell Biol 48:31–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. De Stasio E, Lephoto C, Azuma L, Holst C, Stanislaus D, Uttam J (1997) Characterization of revertants of unc-93(e1500) in Caenorhabditis elegans induced by N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea. Genetics 147:597–608

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Stasio EA, Dorman S (2001) Optimization of ENU mutagenesis of Caenorhabditis elegans. Mutat Res 495:81–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jansen G, Hazendonk E, Thijssen KL, Plasterk RH (1997) Reverse genetics by chemical mutagenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Genet 17:119–121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Barstead RJ, Moerman DG (2006) C. elegans deletion mutant screening. Methods Mol Biol 351:51–58

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Byerly L, Cassada RC, Russell RL (1976) The life cycle of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. I. Wild-type growth and reproduction. Dev Biol 51:23–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lesa GM (2006) Isolation of Caenorhabditis elegans gene knockouts by PCR screening of chemically mutagenized libraries. Nat Protoc 1:2231–2240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hosono R (1978) Sterilization and growth inhibition of Caenorhabditis elegans by 5-fluorodeoxyuridine. Exp Gerontol 13:369–374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mitchell DH, Stiles JW, Santelli J, Sanadi DR (1979) Synchronous growth and aging of Caenorhabditis elegans in the presence of fluorodeoxyuridine. J Gerontol 34:28–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gandhi S, Santelli J, Mitchell DH, Stiles JW, Sanadi DR (1980) A simple method for maintaining large, aging populations of Caenorhabditis elegans. Mech Ageing Dev 12:137–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hosono R, Mitsui Y, Sato Y, Aizawa S, Miwa J (1982) Life span of the wild and mutant nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Effects of sex, sterilization, and temperature. Exp Gerontol 17:163–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Aitlhadj L, Sturzenbaum SR (2010) The use of FUdR can cause prolonged longevity in mutant nematodes. Mech Ageing Dev 131:364–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dillin A, Hsu AL, Arantes-Oliveira N, Lehrer-Graiwer J, Hsin H, Fraser AG, Kamath RS, Ahringer J, Kenyon C (2002) Rates of behavior and aging specified by mitochondrial function during development. Science 298:2398–2401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hansen M, Hsu AL, Dillin A, Kenyon C (2005) New genes tied to endocrine, metabolic, and dietary regulation of lifespan from a Caenorhabditis elegans genomic RNAi screen. PLoS Genet 1:119–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lambie EJ (2011) Mapping mutations in C. elegans. Methods Cell Biol 106:3–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to A. Brown for editorial assistance. D.W. was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81172698). Y.D. and M.C. are supported by Creative Inquiry fund of Clemson University and Yamada Research Grant. Y.D. was supported by grant from AFAR.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Wang, D., Cao, M., Dinh, J., Dong, Y. (2013). Methods for Creating Mutations in C. elegans That Extend Lifespan. In: Tollefsbol, T. (eds) Biological Aging. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1048. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-556-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-556-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-555-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-556-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics