Abstract
This chapter intends to provide the different DNA and protein methods for analysis of the repeat in the FMR1 gene, both in humans and in mouse models. The methods to determine the CGG repeat size include Southern blot analysis, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and methylation status analysis, including bisulfite treatment. The methods to determine expression include analysis of RNA levels and protein levels.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Oostra BA, Willemsen R (2009) FMR1: a gene with three faces. Biochim Biophys Acta 1790:467–477
Fu YH, Kuhl DP, Pizzuti A et al (1991) Variation of the CGG repeat at the fragile X site results in genetic instability: resolution of the Sherman paradox. Cell 67:1047–1058
Hagerman RJ, Leehey M, Heinrichs W et al (2001) Intention tremor, parkinsonism, and generalized brain atrophy in male carriers of fragile X. Neurology 57:127–130
Bakker CE (1994) Fmr1 knockout mice: a model to study fragile X mental retardation. The Dutch-Belgian Fragile X Consortium. Cell 78:23–33
Mientjes EJ, Nieuwenhuizen I, Kirkpatrick L et al (2006) The generation of a conditional Fmr1 knock out mouse model to study Fmrp function in vivo. Neurobiol Dis 21:549–555
Bontekoe CJ, Bakker CE, Nieuwenhuizen IM et al (2001) Instability of a (CGG)98 repeat in the Fmr1 promoter. Hum Mol Genet 10:1693–1699
Brown WT, Houck GE Jr, Jeziorowska A et al (1993) Rapid fragile X carrier screening and prenatal diagnosis using a nonradioactive PCR test. JAMA 270:1569–1575
Lavedan C, Grabczyk E, Usdin K et al (1998) Long uninterrupted CGG repeats within the first exon of the human FMR1 gene are not intrinsically unstable in transgenic mice. Genomics 50:229–240
Genc B, Muller-Hartmann H, Zeschnigk M et al (2000) Methylation mosaicism of 5′-(CGG)(n)-3′ repeats in fragile X, premutation and normal individuals. Nucleic Acids Res 28:2141–2152
Kunst CB, Leeflang EP, Iber JC et al (1997) The effect of FMR1 CGG repeat interruptions on mutation frequency as measured by sperm typing. J Med Genet 34:627–631
Das S, Kubota T, Song M et al (1997) Methylation analysis of the fragile X syndrome by PCR. Genet Test 1:151–155
Panagopoulos I, Lassen C, Kristoffersson U et al (1999) A methylation PCR approach for detection of fragile X syndrome. Hum Mutat 14:71–79
Rousseau F, Heitz D, Biancalana V et al (1991) Direct diagnosis by DNA analysis of the fragile X syndrome of mental retardation. N Engl J Med 325:1673–1681
Gold B, Radu D, Balanko A et al (2000) Diagnosis of Fragile X syndrome by Southern blot hybridization using a chemiluminescent probe: a laboratory protocol. Mol Diagn 5:169–178
Oostra BA, Jacky PB, Brown WT et al (1993) Guidelines for the diagnosis of fragile X syndrome. National Fragile X Foundation. J Med Genet 30:410–413
Acknowledgments
The authors like to thank Wout Deelen for providing information about the nonradioactive Southern blot method, in particular primer information, Leontine van Unen for development of ÂQ-MS-PCR technique, and Marianne Hoogeveen for the help with the PCR methodology. Updates on methodologies will be published by Rob Willemsen on the Web site http://www.erasmusmc.nl/47421/51019/2004677/2004971/2020792/protocols.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Hukema, R.K., Oostra, B.A. (2013). The CGG Repeat and the FMR1 Gene. In: Kohwi, Y., McMurray, C. (eds) Trinucleotide Repeat Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1010. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-411-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-411-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-410-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-411-1
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols