Skip to main content

Methods to Improve the Use of Breastfeeding

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nutrition in Infancy

Part of the book series: Nutrition and Health ((NH))

  • 2316 Accesses

Abstract

The nutritional benefits of breast milk as well as the psychosocial benefits of bonding between mother and infant have been well established in the literature, and widely disseminated to the public. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the initial 6 months postpartum, with continued breastfeeding through at least the first year of life, or as long as desired by both mother and infant [1]. The Department of Health & Human Services Healthy People 2020 goals aimed to increase breastfeeding rates to 81.9 % immediately postpartum, 60.6 % at 6 months, and 34.1 % at 1 year [2]. However, the United States has continued to fall short of these goals, with the latest statistics from the National Immunization Survey (NIS) revealing breastfeeding continuation at merely 43 % at 6 months and 22 % at 1 year [3]. Exclusive breastfeeding rates are even lower, at only 33 % at 3 months and 13 % at 6 months [3]. Furthermore, only one state in the U.S. has met all five Healthy People 2020 objectives (Table 16.1). In order to improve breastfeeding rates internationally, the World Health Organization (WHO) in conjunction with the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) developed the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative in 1991 (Table 16.2), and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) made evidence-based primary care-based intervention recommendations in 1999 to support breastfeeding. Despite increasing awareness of the importance of breastfeeding, as well as the various efforts to improve breastfeeding rates, there remains a need for strategies and programs to increase exclusive and predominant breastfeeding initiation and continuation in the U.S and abroad.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics, Work Group on Breastfeeding. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 1997;100:1035–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2020. http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist.aspx?topicId=26. Updated 2011. Accessed 26 Aug 2011.

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breastfeeding: data and statistics: breastfeeding practices—results from the National Immunization Survey. http://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/. Updated 2007. Accessed 20 June 2011.

  4. Wolf JH. Low breastfeeding rates and public health in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(12):2000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Howie PW, Forsyth JS, Ogston SA, Clark A, Florey CD. Protective effect of breast feeding against infection. Br Med J. 1990;300(6716):11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Duncan B, Ey J, Holberg CJ, Wright AL, Martinez FD, Taussig LM. Exclusive breast-feeding for at least 4 months protects against otitis media. Pediatrics. 1993;91(5):867.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Grummer-Strawn LM, Mei Z. Does breastfeeding protect against pediatric overweight? Analysis of longitudinal data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Pediatric Nutrition Surveillance System. Pediatrics. 2004;113(2):e81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liese AD, Hirsch T, von Mutius E, Keil U, Leupold W, Weiland SK. Inverse association of overweight and breastfeeding in 9 to 10-y-old children in Germany. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25(11):1644–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schack-Nielsen L, Michaelsen KF. Advances in our understanding of the biology of human milk and its effects on the offspring. J Nutr. 2007;137(2):503S.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dewey KG, Heinig MJ, Nommsen LA. Maternal weight-loss patterns during prolonged lactation. Am J Clin Nutr. 1993;58(2):162.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kennedy KI, Visness CM. Contraceptive efficacy of lactational amenorrhoea. Lancet. 1992;339(8787):227–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cumming RG, Klineberg RJ. Breastfeeding and other reproductive factors and the risk of hip fractures in elderly women. Int J Epidemiol. 1993;22(4):684.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Beneficio P. Breast cancer and breastfeeding: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 47 epidemiological studies in 30 countries, including 50302 women with breast cancer and 96973 women without the disease. Lancet. 2002;360(9328):187–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jernström H, Lubinski J, Lynch HT, et al. Breast-feeding and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(14):1094.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Newcomb PA, Trentham-Dietz A. Breast feeding practices in relation to endometrial cancer risk, USA. Cancer Causes Control. 2000;11(7):663–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. TryggvadĂłttir L, Tulinius H, Eyfjord JE, Sigurvinsson T. Breastfeeding and reduced risk of breast cancer in an Icelandic cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154(1):37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tung KH, Goodman MT, Wu AH, et al. Reproductive factors and epithelial ovarian cancer risk by histologic type: a multiethnic case–control study. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158(7):629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. La Leche League International. http:\\www.lli.org. Updated 2007. Accessed 25 May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vance M. Breastfeeding legislation in the United States: a general overview and implications for helping mothers. Leaven. 2005;41(3):51–4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. World Health Organization. International code of marketing of breast-milk substitutes. http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/code_english.pdf. Updated 1981. Accessed 26 July 2011.

  21. Molina Torres M, Dávila Torres RR, Parrilla Rodríguez AM, Dennis CL. Translation and validation of the breastfeeding self-efficacy scale into Spanish: data from a Puerto Rican population. J Hum Lact. 2003;19(1):35–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Philipp BL, Merewood A, Miller LW, et al. Baby-friendly hospital initiative improves breastfeeding initiation rates in a US hospital setting. Pediatrics. 2001;108(3):677.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Biagioli F. Returning to work while breastfeeding. Am Fam Physician. 2003;68(11):2201–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. DiGirolamo AM, Grummer-Strawn LM, Fein SB. Effect of maternity-care practices on breastfeeding. Pediatrics. 2008;122(Supplement 2):S43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Guise JM, Palda V, Westhoff C, Chan BKS, Helfand M, Lieu TA. The effectiveness of primary care-based interventions to promote breastfeeding: systematic evidence review and meta-analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1(2):70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shealy K, Li R, Benton-Davis S, Grummer-Strawn L. The CDC guide to breastfeeding interventions. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cincilla B. Differences and similarities between La Leche League leaders and La Leche League peer counselors. Leaven. 2000;36(4):74–5.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kufeldt P. Coaching for effective communication. Leaven. 2000;36(3):56–7.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Corbett-Dick P, Bezek SK. Breastfeeding promotion for the employed mother. J Pediatr Health Care. 1997;11(1):12–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Frank E. Breastfeeding and maternal employment: two rights don’t make a wrong. Lancet. 1998;352(9134):1083–4. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)79752-X.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. McLeod D, Pullon S, Cookson T. Factors influencing continuation of breastfeeding in a cohort of women. J Hum Lact. 2002;18(4):335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bar-Yam NB. Workplace lactation support, part 1: a return-to-work breastfeeding assessment tool. J Hum Lact. 1998;14(3):249.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bar-Yam NB. Workplace lactation support, part II: working with the workplace. J Hum Lact. 1998;14(4):321.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Cohen R, Mrtek MB, Mrtek RG. Comparison of maternal absenteeism and infant illness rates among breast-feeding and formula-feeding women in two corporations. Am J Health Promot. 1995;10:148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mitra AK, Khoury AJ, Hinton AW, Carothers C. Predictors of breastfeeding intention among low-income women. Matern Child Health J. 2004;8(2):65–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. McLorg PA, Bryant CA. Influence of social network members and health care professionals on infant feeding practices of economically disadvantaged mothers. Med Anthropol. 1989;10(4):265–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Fairbank L, O’Meara S, Renfrew MJ, Woolridge M, Sowden AJ, Lister-Sharp D. A systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to promote the initiation of breastfeeding. Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(25):1.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The CDC guide to breastfeeding interventions. http://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/resources/guide.htm. Updated 2009. Accessed 9 Aug 2011.

  39. Libbus MK. Breastfeeding attitudes in a sample of Spanish-speaking Hispanic American women. J Hum Lact. 2000;16(3):216.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Rempel LA, Rempel JK. Partner influence on health behavior decision-making: increasing breastfeeding duration. J Soc Pers Relat. 2004;21(1):92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wolfberg AJ, Michels KB, Shields W, O’Campo P, Bronner Y, Bienstock J. Dads as breastfeeding advocates: results from a randomized controlled trial of an educational intervention. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(3):708–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asefeh Faraz M.S.N., F.N.P.B.C. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Faraz, A. (2013). Methods to Improve the Use of Breastfeeding. In: Watson, R., Grimble, G., Preedy, V., Zibadi, S. (eds) Nutrition in Infancy. Nutrition and Health. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-224-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-224-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-223-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-224-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics