Skip to main content

Use of Laboratory Tests in Occupational and Environmental Lung Diseases

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Clinical Guide to Occupational and Environmental Lung Diseases

Part of the book series: Respiratory Medicine ((RM))

  • 1411 Accesses

Abstract

This article reviews and comments various laboratory tests that are commonly used in the investigation and assessment of environmental and occupational lung diseases affecting both the lung parenchyma per se as well as the airways and caused by exposure to various organic and inorganic materials. These conditions include asbestosis and silicosis, asthma, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis. The tests that are reviewed are (1) general lung function tests: lung volumes, CO diffusion, exercise testing; (2) specialized lung function tests: assessment of nonspecific bronchial responsiveness with methacholine and other agents, serial assessments of airway caliber with peak expiratory flows; specific inhalation tests; (3) assessment of airway inflammation by induced sputum and exhaled NO. The clinical indications and methodology of these tests are presented and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pepys J, Jenkins P. Precipitin (F.L.H.) test in farmer’s lung. Thorax. 1965;20:21–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernstein I, Chan-Yeung M, Malo J, Berstein D. Asthma in the workplace. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Francis & Taylor; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernstein I, Chan-Yeung M, Malo J, Bernstein D. Definition and classification of asthma in the workplace. In: Chan-Yeung M, Malo JL, Bernstein DI, Bernstein IL, editors. Asthma in the workplace. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Francis & Taylor; 2006. p. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vandenplas O, Henneberger P. Socioeconomic outcomes in work-exacerbated asthma. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;7:236–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Blanc P, Toren K. Occupation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic bronchitis: an update. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007;11:251–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Society AT. Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:309–29.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ryan G, Latimer K, Dolovich J, Hargreave F. Bronchial responsiveness to histamine: relationship to diurnal variation of peak flow rate, improvement after bronchodilator, and airway calibre. Thorax. 1982;37:423–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dautrebande L, Philippot E. Crise d’asthme expérimental par aérosols de carbaminoylcholine chez l’homme traitée par dispersat de phénylaminopropane. Presse Med. 1941;49:942–6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tiffeneau R, Beauvallet M. Épreuve de bronchoconstriction et de bronchodilatation par aérosols. Emploi pour le dépistage, la mesure et le contrôle des insuffisances respiratoires chroniques. Bull Acad Natl Med. 1945;129:165–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Curry J. The action of histamine on the respiratory tract in normal and asthmatic subjects. J Clin Invest. 1946;25:785–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chai H, Farr R, Froehlich L, Mathison D, McLean J, Rosenthal R, et al. Standardization of bronchial inhalation challenge procedures. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1975;56:323–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cockcroft D, Killian D, Mellon J, Hargreave F. Bronchial reactivity to inhaled histamine: a method and clinical survey. Clin Allergy. 1977;7:235–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bateman E, Hurd S, Barnes P, Bousquet J, Drazen J, FitzGerald M, et al. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary. Eur Respir J. 2008;31:143–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Adelroth E, Hargreave F, Ramsdale E. Do physicians need objective measurements to diagnose asthma? Am Rev Respir Dis. 1986;134:704–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ringsberg K, Akerlind I. Presence of hyperventilation in patients with asthma-like symptoms but negative asthma test responses: provocation with voluntary hyperventilation and mental stress. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;103:601–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson S. Provocative challenges to help diagnose and monitor asthma: exercise, methacholine, adenosine, and mannitol. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2008;14:39–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McFadden E, Ingram R. Exercise-induced asthma. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:763–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eggleston P, Rosenthal R, Anderson S, Anderton R, Bierman C, Bleecker E, et al. Guidelines for the methodology of exercise challenge testing of asthmatics. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1979;64:642–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Desjardins A, Luca S, Cartier A, L’Archevêque J, Ghezzo H, Malo J-L. Nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness to inhaled histamine and hyperventilation of cold dry air in subjects with respiratory symptoms of uncertain etiology. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988;137:1020–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cockcroft D, Davis B. Direct and indirect challenges in the clinical assessment of asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009;103:363–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Troyanov S, Malo J, Cartier A, Gautrin D. Frequency and determinants of exaggerated bronchoconstriction during shortened methacholine challenge tests in epidemiological and clinical set-ups. Eur Respir J. 2000;16:9–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Perpina M, Pellicer C, Diego A, Compte L, Macian V. Diagnostic value of the bronchial provocation test with methacholine in asthma. A Bayesian analysis approach. Chest. 1993;104:149–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lévesque M, Ghezzo H, L’archevêque J, Malo J. Does the methacholine test reproduce symptoms? Can Respir J. 2010;17:224–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Boulet L-P, Cartier A, Thomson N, Roberts R, Dolovich J, Hargreave F. Asthma and increases in nonallergic bronchial responsiveness from seasonal pollen exposure. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1983;71:399–406.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cartier A, Malo J-L, Forest F, Lafrance M, Pineau L, St-Aubin J-J, et al. Occupational asthma in snow crab-processing workers. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1984;74:261–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Malo J, Ghezzo H, L’Archevêque J, Cartier A. Late asthmatic reactions to occupational sensitizing agents: frequency of changes in nonspecific bronchial responsiveness and of response to inhaled beta-2 adrenergic agent. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1990;85:834–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sastre J, Fernandez-Nieto M, Novalbos A, Heras MDL, Cuesta J, Quirce S. Need for monitoring nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness before and after isocyanate inhalation challenge. Chest. 2003;123:1276–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vandenplas O, Delwiche J, Jamart J, Weyer RVD. Increase in non-specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness as an early marker of bronchial response to occupational agents during specific inhalation challenges. Thorax. 1996;51:472–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nam Y, Kim J, Um S, Lee S, Son C. Absence of hyper-responsiveness to methacholine after specific bronchial provocation tests in a worker with hydroxyapatite-induced occupational asthma. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2011;3:135–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tiffeneau R. Hypersensibilité cholinergo-histaminique pulmonaire de l’asthmatique; relation avec l’hypersensibilité allergénique pulmonaire. Acta Allergol Suppl (Copenh). 1958;5:187–221.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cockcroft D, Ruffin R, Frith P, Cartier A, Juniper E, Dolovich J, et al. Determinants of allergen-induced asthma: dose of allergen, circulating IgE antibody concentration, and bronchial responsiveness to inhaled histamine. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1979;120:1053–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cockcroft D, Murdock K, Kirby J, Hargreave F. Prediction of airway responsiveness to allergen from skin sensitivity to allergen and airway responsiveness to histamine. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987;135:264–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Quirce S, Fernández-Nieto M, Escudero C, Cuesta J, de Las Heras M, Sastre J. Bronchial responsiveness to bakery-derived allergens is strongly dependent on specific skin sensitivity. Allergy. 2006;61(10):1202–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Malo J, Cardinal S, Ghezzo H, L’archevêque J, Castellanos L, Maghni K. Association of bronchial reactivity to occupational agents with methacholine reactivity, sputum cells and immunoglobulin E-mediated reactivity. Clin Exp Allergy. 2011;41:497–504.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bousquet J, Chanez P, Lacoste J-Y, Barnéon G, Ghavanian N, Enander I, et al. Eosinophilic inflammation in asthma. N Eng J Med. 1990;323:1033–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sumi Y, Foley S, Daigle S, L’archeveque J, Olivenstein R, Letuve S, et al. Structural changes and airway remodelling in occupational asthma at a mean interval of 14 years after cessation of exposure. Clin Exp Allergy. 2007;37:1781–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bahous J, Cartier A, Ouimet G, Pineau L, Malo J-L. Nonallergic bronchial hyperexcitability in chronic bronchitis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984;129:216–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Society AT. Guidelines for the evaluation of impairment/disability in patients with asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;147:1056–61.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cocchiarella L, Andersson GBJ, editors. Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. 5th ed. Chicago, IL: AMA; 2001. p. 102–4.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Epstein S, Fletcher C, Oppenheimer E. Daily peak flow measurements in the assessment of steroid therapy for airway obstruction. Br Med J. 1969;1:223–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Turner-Warwick M. On observing patterns of airflow obstruction in chronic asthma. Br J Dis Chest. 1977;71:73–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Clark T, Hetzel M. Diurnal variation of asthma. Br J Dis Chest. 1977;71:87–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Verschelden P, Cartier A, L’Archevêque J, Trudeau C, Malo J. Compliance with and accuracy of daily self-assessment of peak expiratory flows (PEF) in asthmatic subjects over a three month period. Eur Respir J. 1996;9:880–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Burge P, O’Brien I, Harries M. Peak flow rate records in the diagnosis of occupational asthma due to colophony. Thorax. 1979;34:308–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Burge P, O’Brien I, Harries M. Peak flow rate records in the diagnosis of occupational asthma due to isocyanates. Thorax. 1979;34:317–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Burge P. Diagnosis of occupational asthma. Clin Allergy. 1989;19:649–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Gannon P, Newton D, Belcher J, Pantin C, Burge P. Development of OASYS-2: a system for the analysis of serial measurement of peak expiratory flow in workers with suspected occupational asthma. Thorax. 1996;51:484–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Malo J, Cartier A, Ghezzo H, Chan-Yeung M. Compliance with peak expiratory flow readings affects the within- and between- reader reproducibility of interpretation of graphs in subjects investigated for occupational asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996;98:1132–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Blackley C. Experimental researches on the causes and nature of Catarrhus aestivus. London: Dawson’s of Pall Mall; 1959. p. 80–1.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Colldahl H. A study of provocation test on patients with bronchial asthma. Acta Allergol. 1952;5:133–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Pepys J, Hutchcroft B. Bronchial provocation tests in etiologic diagnosis and analysis of asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1975;112:829–59.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Chan-Yeung M, Malo J. Occupational asthma. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:107–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Vandenplas O, Malo J. Inhalation challenges with agents causing occupational asthma. Eur Respir J. 1997;10:2612–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Vandenplas O, Cartier A, Malo J. Occupational challenge tests. In: Bernstein IL, Chan-Yeung M, Malo JL, Bernstein DI, editors. Asthma in the workplace. 3rd ed. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2006. p. 227–52.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Caron S, Boileau J, Malo J, Leblond S. New methodology for specific inhalation challenges with occupational agents. Respir Res. 2010;11:72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Gibson P, Dolovich J, Denburg J, Ramsdale E. Chronic cough: Eosinophilic bronchitis without asthma. Lancet. 1989;1(8651):1346–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Quirce S. Eosinophilic bronchitis in the workplace. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;4:87–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Berry M, Hargadon B, McKenna S, Shaw D, Green R, Brightling C, et al. Observational study of the natural history of eosinophilic bronchitis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005;35:598–601.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Takeda N, Maghni K, Daigle S, L’Archevêque J, Castellanos L, Al-Ramli W, et al. Long-term pathologic consequences of acute irritant-induced asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124:975–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Herxheimer H. The late bronchial reaction in induced asthma. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1952;3:323–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Pepys J. Inhalation challenge tests in asthma. New Engl J Med. 1975;293:758–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Orange R, Austen G, Austen K. Immunological release of histamine and slow-reacting substance of anaphylaxis from human lung. J Exp Med. 1971;134:136s–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Editorial. Slow-reacting substance of anaphylaxis—leukotrienes. Lancet. 1980;2:1226–7.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Amin K, Ludviksdottir D, Janson C, Nettelbladt O, Bjornsson E, Roomans G, et al. Inflammation and structural changes in the airways of patients with atopic and nonatopic asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:2295–301.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Brown HM. Treatment of chronic asthma with prednisolone. Significance of eosinophils in the sputum. Lancet. 1958;2:1245–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Pin I, Gibson P, Kolendowicz F, Girgis-Gabardo A, Denburg J, Hargreave F, et al. Use of induced sputum cell counts to investigate airway inflammation in asthma. Thorax. 1992;47:25–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Fahy J, Liu J, Wong H, Boushey H. Analysis of cellular and biochemical constituents of induced sputum after allergen challenge: A method for studying allergic airway inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1994;93:1031–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Deykin A, Lazaru S, Fahy J, Wechsler M, Boushey H, Chinchilli V, et al. Sputum eosinophil counts predict asthma control after discontinuation of inhaled corticosteroids. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;115:720–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Belda J, Parameswaran K, Lemière C, Kamada D, O’Byrne P, Hargreave F. Predictors of loss of asthma control induced by corticosteroid withdrawal. Can Respir J. 2006;13:129–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Girard F, Chaboillez S, Cartier A, Côté J, Hargreave F, Labrecque M, et al. An effective strategy for diagnosing occupational asthma. Induced sputum. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170:845–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Dehaut P, Rachiele A, Martin R, Malo J. Histamine dose-response curves in asthma: reproducibility and sensitivity of different indices to assess response. Thorax. 1983;38:516–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Boschetto P, Mapp C, Picotti G, Fabbri L. Neutrophils and asthma. Eur Respir J. 1989;2(Suppl):456s–9.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Lemière C, Romeo P, Chaboillez S, Tremblay C, Malo J. Airway inflammation and functional changes after exposure to different concentrations of isocyanates. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;110:641–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Maghni K, Lemière C, Ghezzo H, Yuquan W, Malo J. Airway inflammation after cessation of exposure to agents causing occupational asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169:367–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Malo J, L’archevêque J, Castellanos L, Lavoie K, Ghezzo H, Maghni K. Long-term outcomes of acute irritant-induced asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179:923–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Maghni K, Malo J, L’Archevêque J, Castellanos L, Gautrin D. Matrix metalloproteinases, IL-8 and glutathione in the prognosis of workers exposed to chlorine. Allergy. 2010;65:722–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Corradi M, Gergelova P, Mutti A. Use of exhaled breath condensate to investigate occupational lung diseases. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;10:93–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Society AT. ATS/ERS recommendations for standardized procedures for the online and offline measurement of exhaled lower respiratory nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide, 2005. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171:912–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Dweik R, Boggs P, Erzurum S, Irvin C, Leigh M, Lundberg J, et al. An official ATS clinical practice guideline: interpretation of exhaled nitric oxide levels (FENO) for clinical applications. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:602–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Ihre E, Gyllfors P, Gustafsson L, Kumlin M, Dahlén B. Early rise in exhaled nitric oxide and mast cell activation in repeated low-dose allergen challenge. Eur Respir J. 2006;27:1152–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Lemière C, D’Alpaos V, Chaboillez S, César M, Wattiez M, Chiry S, et al. Investigation of Occupational Asthma: Sputum Cell Counts or Exhaled Nitric Oxide? Chest. 2010;137:617–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Smith A, Cowan J, Brassett K, Herbison G, Taylor D. Use of exhaled nitric oxide measurements to guide treatment in chronic asthma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2163–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Cocker J. Biological monitoring for isocyanates. Ann Occup Hyg. 2011;68:176–82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The author sincerely thanks Kathe Lieber for reviewing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Luc Malo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Malo, JL. (2012). Use of Laboratory Tests in Occupational and Environmental Lung Diseases. In: Huang, YC., Ghio, A., Maier, L. (eds) A Clinical Guide to Occupational and Environmental Lung Diseases. Respiratory Medicine. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-149-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-149-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-148-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-149-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics