Skip to main content

Early Childhood Assessment: An Integrative Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Early Childhood Assessment in School and Clinical Child Psychology
  • 2771 Accesses

Abstract

Early childhood assessment is a valuable prevention-based area of practice for school and clinical psychologists. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a thorough and practical foundation and framework for assessment of infants, toddlers, and young children for a variety of purposes. This framework integrates several key principles that guide best practices in early childhood assessment. Effective assessment of this population calls for a comprehensive approach involving the collection of information across multiple developmental domains and from parents, teachers, and other caregivers. Clinicians conducting early childhood assessments need to be comfortable and skilled in utilizing a variety of methods including interviews, observations, and standardized testing. They must also be competent in applying and integrating naturalistic approaches that involve collection of data in everyday contexts. In addition to expanding upon basic tenets that lead to sound assessment practices, this chapter discusses relevant legal standards as well as classification systems that might apply to children in the 0–6 population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackerman, D. J., & Coley, R. J. (2012). State Pre-K assessment policies: Issues and status. Policy Information Report of Education Testing Service. Retrieved from https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/PIC-PRE-K.pdf

  • American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, L. L. (2004). Appropriate and inappropriate interpretation and use of test scores in early intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 27(1), 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aos, S., Lieb, R., Mayfield, J., Miller, M., & Pennucci, A. (2004). Benefits and costs of prevention and early intervention programs for youth. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnato, S. J. (2006). Of helping and measuring for early childhood intervention: Reflections on issues and school psychology’s role. School Psychology Review, 35(4), 615–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D. B., Hebbeler, K., Scarborough, A., Spiker, D., & Mallik, S. (2004). First experiences with early intervention: A national perspective. Pediatrics, 113, 887–896. doi:10.1542/peds.113.4.887

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D. B., Skinner, D., Hatton, D., & Roberts, J. (2000). Family experiences and factors associated with the diagnosis of fragile X syndrome. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 21, 315–321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W. S. (2008). Preschool education and its lasting effects: Research and policy implications. Boulder and Tempe: Education and the Public Interest Center & Education Policy Research Unit. Retrieved January 21, 2015 from http://greatlakescenter.org/docs/Policy_Briefs/Barnett_EarlyEd.pdf

  • Belfield, C. (2008). Unpublished analyses of enrollment in any type of center-based program for children who turned 4 (or 3) prior to September of the current school year using data from the National Household Survey of Education, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., & Bourke-Taylor, H. (2014). Children and youth instrument development and testing articles published in the American journal of occupational therapy, 2009–2013: A content, methodology, and instrument design review. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(5), 154–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camilli, G., Vargas, S., Ryan, S., & Barnett, W. S. (2010). Meta-analysis of the effects of early education interventions on cognitive and social development. Teachers College Record, 112(3), 579–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, L., Enskär, K., Granlund, M., Simeonsson, R. J., Peterson, C., & Björk, M. (2015). Health and functioning in the everyday lives of young children with cancer: Documenting with the international classification of functioning, disability and health–children and youth (ICF-CY). Child: Care, Health and Development, 41(3), 475–482. doi:10.1111/cch.12191

    Google Scholar 

  • De Schipper, E., et al. (2015). A comprehensive scoping review of ability and disability in ADHD using the international classification of functioning, disability and health-children and youth version (ICF-CY). European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Retrieved: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00787-015-0727-z#page. doi:10.1007/s00787-015-0727-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center. (2015). http://ectacenter.org/partc/statepolicies.asp

  • Egger, H. L., & Angold, A. (2006). Common emotional and behavioral disorders in preschool children: Presentation, nosology and epidemiology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(3/4), 313–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emde, R. N., Egger, H., Fenichel, E., Guedeney, A., Wise, B. K., & Wright, H. H. (2005). Introducing DC:0-3R. ZERO TO THREE, 26(1), 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equit, M., Paulus, F., Fuhrmann, P., Niemczyk, J., & von Gontard, A. (2011). Comparison of ICD-10 and DC:0-3R diagnoses in infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. Child Psychiatry and Human Development 42(6), 623–633. doi:10.1007/s10578-011-0237-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Gan, S. M., Tung, L. C., Yeh, C. Y., & Wang, C. H. (2013). ICF-CY based assessment tool for children with autism. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35(8): 678–685. doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.705946

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorey, K. M. (2001). Early childhood education: A meta-analytic affirmation of the short- and long-term benefits of educational opportunity. School Psychology Quarterly, 16(1), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallam, R., Lyons, A., Pretti-Frontczak, K., & Grisham-Brown, J. (2014). Comparing apples and oranges: The mismeasurement of young children through the mismatch of assessment purpose and the interpretation of results. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 34(2), 106–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, A. W. (2015). Linkage of ICF-CY codes with environmental factors in studies of developmental outcomes of infants and toddlers with or at risk for motor delays. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36(2), 89–104. doi:10.3109/09638288.2013.777805

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K., Daley, D., Hutchings, J., Bywater, T., & Eames, C. (2008). Efficacy of the incredible years program as an early intervention for children with conduct problems and ADHD: Long-term follow-up. Child: Care, Health and Development, 34(3), 380–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karoly, L. A., Kilburn, M. R., & Cannon, J. S. (2005). Early childhood interventions: Proven results, future promise. MG-341. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küpper, L. (Ed.). (2012). The basics of early intervention (Module 1). Building the legacy for our youngest children with disabilities: A training curriculum on Part C of IDEA 2004. Washington, DC: National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. W. F. (2013). Adapting cognitive task analysis to explore young children’s thinking competence. Journal of Research in Child Education, 27, 208–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luby, J. L., Belden, A. C., Pautsch, J., Si, X., & Spitznagel, E. (2009). The clinical significance of preschool depression: Impairment in functioning and clinical markers of the disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 112, 111–119. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2008.03.026

    Google Scholar 

  • Luby, J. L., Sullivan, J., Belden, A., Stalets, M., Blankenship, S., & Spitznagel, E. (2006). An observational analysis of behavior in depressed preschoolers: Further validation of early-onset depression. Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 45(2), 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, E. W., & Hanson, M. J. (2011). Developing cross cultural competence-fourth edition: A guide for working with children and their families. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, M., Bricker, D., & Squires, J. (2005). An examination of the validity and reliability of a curriculum-based assessment approach used to determine eligibility for Part C early intervention services. Journal of Early Intervention, 28, 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macy, M., Marks, K., & Towle, A. (2014). Missed, misused, or mismanaged: Improving early detection systems to optimize child outcomes. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 34(2), 94–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G., Westhues, A., & MacLeod, J. (2003). A meta-analysis of longitudinal research on preschool prevention programs for children. Prevention and Treatment, 6, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New Hampshire’s Institute on Disability. (2014). Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics A NIDRR-Funded Center. Annual Disability Statistics Compendium: 2014. Section 11, Special Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Grady, M. G., & Dusing, S. C. (2015). Reliability and validity of play-based assessments of motor and cognitive skills for infants and young children: A systematic review. Physical Therapy, 95(1), 25–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, C. E., et al. (2014). Screening for developmental delays among young children—National Survey of Children’s Health, United States, 2007. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention—Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Supplement, 63(2), 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, S. A., Robinson, C. C., Shaw, E. F., & Ellison, M. C. (2013). Part C early intervention for infants and toddlers: Percentage eligible versus served. Pediatrics, 131(1), 38–46. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-1662

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, S. A., Zhang, D., & Robinson, C. C. (2008). Prevalence of developmental delays and participation in early intervention services for young children. Pediatrics, 121(6), 1503–1509. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-1680

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, J. (2008). Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay, and student achievement. Unpublished manuscript. Princeton University, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheeringa, M., Myers, L., Putnam, F. W., & Zeahnah, C. H. (2002). Research Diagnostic Criteria—Preschool Age (RDC–PA). Retrieved June 25, 2014 from http://www.infantinstitute.org/WebRDC-PA.pdf

  • Simeonsson, R. J. (2009). ICF-CY: A universal tool for documentation of disability. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 6, 70–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, N. E., DeCoste, C., Castiglioni, N., McMahon, T. J., Rounsaville, B., & Mayes, L. (2010). The Mothers and Toddlers Program, an attachment-based parenting program for substance-using women: Post-treatment results from a randomized clinical pilot. Attachment and Human Development, 12(5), 483–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, J. C. (2013). DSM-5: An overview of changes and controversies. Clinical Social Work Journal, 41, 139–154. doi:10.1007/s10615-013-0445-2

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2007). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health- Children and Youth Version. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43737/1/9789241547321_eng.pdf

  • World Health Organization. (2015). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Retrieved June 12, 2015 from http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/bluebook.pdf

  • Zeanah, C. H., et al. (2015). DC:0-3 to DC:0-3R to DC:0-5: A new edition. Zero to Three, 63–66. Retrieved from http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/opinions/101350204/dc-0-3-dc-0-3r-dc-0-5-new-edition

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrienne Garro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Age 912 months in infancyExpected milestones:

  • Has favorite toys and people

  • Understands “no”

  • Makes a lot of different sounds, including consonant-vowel-consonant combinations

  • Copies sounds and gestures of other people

  • Plays peek-a-boo, patty-cake or similar games

  • Points to objects in environment

  • Repeats sounds or actions to elicit attention

  • Attempts to imitate words; toward the end of this period, says single words or word approximations on her/his own

  • Looks at pictures in book

  • Puts objects in and takes objects out of containers

  • Toward end of this period, explores objects and toys in different ways

  • Starts to use objects for their intended purposes (e.g., drinking from cup)

  • Looks correctly at a specific object or picture named by another person

  • Responds to simple spoken requests or directions (e.g., “Get the ball”)

  • Shows fear in new or unusual situations

  • Toward end of this period, tests parent/caregiver responses to her or his behavior

  • Prefers mom/dad/caregiver to other people

  • Shows increasing shyness or nervousness with strangers

  • Uses simple, purposeful gestures (e.g., waves bye-bye)

  • Begins to finger-feed self

  • Attempts to imitate scribbles

Age 18 months2 years (toddlerhood)Expected milestones:

  • Able to use several single words independently and then begin to put 2 words together

  • Toward end of this period, uses short sentences (2–4 words)

  • Vocabulary expands between age 1 and 2 years

  • Names items in a picture book

  • Says “no” and shows refusal behavior when doesn’t want to do something

  • Points or otherwise gestures to indicate desired objects or to elicit attention from others

  • Understands the purpose of ordinary items (e.g., hairbrush)

  • Points to a few body parts

  • Engages in simple pretend play with doll or other toy (e.g., feeding, putting to sleep)

  • Able to point to several items or pictures named by others

  • Repeats words and/or phrases spoken by others

  • Interested in and begins to play with other children at basic level

  • Follows one-step directions without gestures and then progresses to following two-step directions

  • Initiates social interaction and shows joint attention (e.g., points to objects to show them to others, brings toys/objects to people)

  • Explores environment independently, but with parent/caregiver nearby

  • Knows names of other people

  • Begins to sort shapes and colors

  • Plays simple make-believe games

  • May show tantrum behavior when frustrated or upset

  • Shows affection with familiar people; fear of strangers is not unusual

  • Drinks from a cup; eats with a spoon

Age 3 yearsExpected Milestones:

  • Follows instructions involving two or three steps

  • Able to listen to and understand conversations, short stories, songs and poems

  • Copies behavior of adults and peers

  • Separates without difficulty from parents/caregivers

  • Shows concern for friends who are upset

  • May get frustrated or distressed by changes in routine

  • Demonstrates a range of emotions (e.g., happiness, frustration, anger, surprise)

  • Understands a variety of basic concepts (e.g., “same” and “different”) and prepositions (e.g., “in,” “under,” “behind,” etc.)

  • Uses pronouns such as “I,” “we,” and “you”

  • Shows significant improvements in pronunciation of words

  • Understands possessives such as “mine” and “yours”

  • Begins to notice print in their environment and understand uses for writing

  • Can carry on conversations using several sentences

  • Shows clear interest in playing with other children

  • Takes turns in games and other activities

  • Can state name, age, and gender

  • Can copy circle and square

  • Successfully manipulates toys with levers, buttons, etc.

  • Labels several basic colors

  • Plays make-believe and engages in fantasy play

  • Can complete puzzles with several pieces

  • Builds towers with blocks and can manipulate large-size Lego/Duplo blocks

  • Dresses and undresses self by pulling on/off clothing

  • Able to count out loud up to five or ten

  • Able to eat on own using kid utensils such as fork and spoon

  • Fears imaginary creatures, objects, etc. (e.g., monsters)

  • Starts to show decreases in separation anxiety (also depends upon other variables such as exposure to school)

  • Gender identity emerging

Age 4 yearsExpected Milestones:

  • Talks about interests, experiences, likes and dislikes

  • Speaks in sentences consisting of 5–6 words and uses compound sentences

  • Understands some basic rules of grammar, such as use of past tense

  • Shows increased ability to initiate and sustain conversations

  • Can state first and last name

  • Prefers to play with other children rather than by self

  • Understands the concepts of “same” and “different”

  • Play is more complex, imaginative, and can be carried out for longer periods of time

  • Engages in more extensive fantasy play

  • Cooperates with other children

  • Recalls and may start to retell parts of a story

  • Can carry out three-step instructions

  • Understands the concept of counting and can count between one and five objects using one-to-one correspondence

  • Shows basic ability to plan in carrying out tasks

  • More independent in daily activities (e.g., dressing, undressing)

  • Begins to discuss solutions to conflicts and shows sympathy toward others

  • Thinks that many unfamiliar images may be “monsters”

  • Considers self as a whole person with body, mind, and feelings

  • Still has difficulty differentiating between fantasy and reality

  • Starts to understand time

  • Draws a person with several body parts

  • Uses child scissors

  • Plays basic board or card games

  • Able to distinguish between two objects based on size and weight

  • Can recognize and write several letters

  • Able to recite songs, nursery rhymes, poems from memory

  • Can recognize and describe some emotions in other people

Age 5 yearsExpected Milestones:

  • Speaks clearly and uses both compound and complex sentences

  • Regularly uses sentences consisting of 5–6 words

  • Uses and understand position words such as “under,” “behind,” etc.

  • Can tell basic story using full sentences

  • Can apply basic sequencing to a set of events, pictures, etc.

  • Uses future tense when speaking

  • Able to state full name and address

  • Able to distinguish between real and make-believe for most situations

  • Can draw basic geometric forms and shapes, such as straight lines, circle, and square, and can copy more complex ones

  • Ties own shoelaces

  • Shows improved skills with simple tools and utensils

  • Accurately names a wide variety of colors

  • Continues to engage in a lot of imaginative and fantasy play

  • Dramatic play is more sustained and complex

  • Becomes more analytical in solving problems, responding to challenges and asking questions

  • Able to count out loud up to 20

  • Recognizes numerals 0–10

  • Counts objects of ten or more using one-to-one correspondence

  • Begins identifying coins

  • Visually recognizes many letters of alphabet

  • Begins to read by sounding out words and/or recognizing “sight” words

  • Able to understand and identify gender roles

  • Responds to “why” questions

  • Has multiple friends

  • Shows desire to please friends and be like friends

  • Shows decrease in earlier childhood fears

  • Begins to accept validity of other points of view

  • Able to manage social situations more independently; begins to use skills like negotiation and compromise

  • Gender identity becomes more prominent

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garro, A. (2016). Early Childhood Assessment: An Integrative Framework. In: Garro, A. (eds) Early Childhood Assessment in School and Clinical Child Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6349-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics