Skip to main content

Continuous Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Acoustics of Musical Instruments

Part of the book series: Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing ((MASP))

Abstract

The aim of this introductory chapter is to summarize the main mechanical models which describe the physics of musical instruments and of their constitutive parts. These models derive from the general principles of the mechanics of continuous media (solids and fluids). In this framework, the phenomena are described at a scale of the so-called particle, or element, whose dimensions are infinitesimal in the sense of differential calculus. Particular emphasis is given to the bending of structures and to the equations of acoustic waves in air, because of their relevance in musical acoustics. One section is devoted to the excitation mechanisms of musical instruments. Analogies between vibrations of solids (such as strings) and fluids (in pipes) are underlined. Elementary considerations on the numerical formulation of the models are also given. This chapter should be considered as a summary which contains reference results to help in reading the rest of the book. It focuses on the origin of the equations and on their underlying assumptions, living aside the complete demonstrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Equation (1.9), written here in Cartesian coordinates, can be generalized to other coordinate systems.

  2. 2.

    Here, we do not treat the cylindrical shells theory, which naturally applies to wind instruments, because it requires significant developments that are beyond the scope of this book. Nevertheless, we provide valuable references in Chap. 13 which deals with sound–structure interaction.

  3. 3.

    n is number of moles, and M the molar mass.

  4. 4.

    This difference in notation for pressure and density, although it is apparently illogical, is convenient for the following of the statement.

  5. 5.

    We could also add a source to Eq. (1.97): it would be a heat source, varying in time, which does not occur in musical instruments.

  6. 6.

    Exponentially time-increasing or time-decreasing solutions may also exist if the constant is positive (but this is rare). The case of complex values is treated in the following section. Furthermore we can continue this operation by separating the variables of space. This will happen several times in this book.

  7. 7.

    The average power \(\mathcal{P}_{m}\) is also called active power . A “reactive” power is also defined by

    $$\displaystyle{ \mathcal{P}_{r} = \frac{1} {2}\mathfrak{I}m(pv^{{\ast}}) = -\frac{1} {2}\left \vert p\right \vert ^{2}\mathfrak{I}m(Y ) = \frac{1} {2}\left \vert v\right \vert ^{2}\mathfrak{I}m(Z). }$$
    (1.130)

    We choose arbitrarily its sign, which will be positive or negative depending on whether the system is dominated by stiffness or mass (we do not go further here, because the chosen quantities are formal).

  8. 8.

    Assuming a given function of time for the displacement, the source term in Eq. (1.111) is entirely known. A “realistic” simple function is, for example, hH(t), where h is the amplitude and H(t) the unit step function (or Heaviside step function). In practice, this means that the membrane is suddenly moved, then blocked. In this case, the source term in (1.111) becomes \(-\rho hS_{m}\delta (\mathbf{r - a)}\partial \left [\delta (t)\right ]/\partial t\), since δ(t) is the derivative of H(t). In the next chapters, a particular case of elementary source called Green’s function , where the source is written \(\delta (\mathbf{r - a)}\delta (t - t_{0})\), will be examined in details. To achieve it in our “thought experiment,” the velocity should be a step function, and therefore, the displacement should increase indefinitely, which is not realistic! Another way to obtain this Green’s function is to write the acoustic wave equation in terms of velocity potential [see Eq. (1.105)]. In this latter case, the source term becomes hS m δ(r − a) δ(t).

  9. 9.

    A wave equation or a boundary condition including a source is called heterogeneous. It can be shown that it is always possible to transform a heterogeneous boundary condition into a homogeneous one by changing the wave equation.

  10. 10.

    The electroacoustic analogy called “acoustic impedance” associates acoustic pressure and velocity to electric voltage and current, respectively. Ohm’s law states that between two points the difference in one of the quantities is proportional to the other quantity.

  11. 11.

    We will encounter several times this concept of lumped-element systems. Notice that the finite difference calculation (Sect. 1.7.1) is based upon the division of a continuous system into lumped elements.

  12. 12.

    Sometimes we will also use an acoustic impedance called specific defined by the ratio pressure/velocity (see Sect. 1.2.4). This choice is convenient for some problems of unbounded media, or for energy transmission between two media with different sound speed or density.

  13. 13.

    This table has some specificity with regard to the dimensions. The quantity f ext, for example, is a force per unit length, whereas the quantity F in Eq. (1.110) is a force per unit mass. In addition, the equation of vibrating strings is written in terms of velocity: this is rather unusual, but it allows to easily highlight some analogies. Finally, the wave equations are written here for a homogeneous medium, although we will have to deal with heterogeneous strings and horns, for which the analogies remain valid.

References

  1. Akay, A.: Acoustics of friction. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111(4), 1525–1548 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ames, W.F.: Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations. Academic Press, New York (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Axisa, F., Trompette, P.: Modelling of Mechanical Systems: Structural Elements. Elsevier, Oxford (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bamberger, A.: Elastic and Electromagnetic Waves (in French). Cours de l’Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bank, B., Sujbert, L.: Generation of longitudinal vibrations in piano strings: from physics to sound synthesis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117(4), 2268–2278 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Batchelor, G.: An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Berthaut, J., Ichchou, M.N., Jézéquel, L.: Piano soundboard: structural behavior, numerical and experimental study in the modal range. Appl. Acoust. 64(11), 1113–1136 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berthelot, J.M.: Composites Materials. Springer, New York (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Besnainou, C.: From wood mechanical measurements to composite materials: new technologies for instruments makers. MRS Bull. 20(3), 34–36 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bilbao, S.: Numerical Sound Synthesis: Finite Difference Schemes and Simulation in Musical Acoustics. Wiley, Chichester (2009)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Bork, I.: Measuring the acoustical properties of mallets. Appl. Acoust. 30, 207–218 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bruneau, M.: Fundamentals of Acoustics. Wiley, London (2006)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Bucur, V.: Acoustics of Wood, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chadefaux, D., Le Carrou, J.L., Fabre, B., Daudet, L.: Experimentally based description of harp plucking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131(1), 844–855 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chadefaux, D., Le Carrou, J.L., Fabre, B.: A model of harp plucking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133(4), 2444–2455 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chaigne, A., Doutaut, V.: Numerical simulations of xylophones. I. Time-domain modeling of the vibrating bars. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 539–557 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chaigne, A., Ramdane, A.: Numerical simulations of membrane-mallet interaction in kettledrums. Tech. Rep. 98D010, ENST Paris (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen, G.C.: Higher-Order Numerical Methods for Transient Wave Equations. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Doutaut, V.: Experimental study and numerical simulation of keyboard percussion instruments (in French). Ph.D. thesis, ENST Paris (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fastl, H., Zwicker, E.: Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models. Springer, Berlin (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Géradin, M., Rixen, D.: Mechanical Vibrations: Theory and Application to Structural Dynamics. Wiley, Chichester (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ghosh, R.: A note on the elastic impact of the pianoforte hammer. Proc. Phys. Soc. 40, 224–225 (1927)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Gillan, F.S., Elliott, S.J.: Measurement of the torsional modes of vibration of strings on instruments of the violin family. J. Sound Vib. 130(2), 347–351 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Giordano, N., Winans, J.: Plucked strings and the harpsichord. J. Sound Vib. 224, 455–473 (1999)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Guyader, J.L.: Vibrations in Continuous Media. Wiley, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hall, D.E., Askenfelt, A.: Piano string excitation V: spectra for real hammers and strings. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83(4), 1627–1638 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Han, M., Benaroya, H., Wei, T.: Dynamics of transversely vibrating beams using four engineering theories. J. Sound Vib. 225(5), 935–988 (1999)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Hearmon, R.F.S.: An Introduction to Applied Anisotropic Elasticity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hertz, H.: Ueber die Beruehrung fester elasticher Koerper. J. Reine Angew. Math. 92, 156–171 (1882)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Johnson, K.: Contact Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Joly, P., Rhaouti, L.: A qualitative analysis of a simplified model for the nonlinear membrane-mallet interaction. Tech. Rep. 3234, INRIA (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lambourg, C., Chaigne, A.: Measurements and modeling of the admittance matrix at the bridge in guitars. In: Proceedings of the SMAC 93, pp. 448–453 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Landau, L., Lifchitz, E.: Theory of Elasticity, 2nd edn. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Le Carrou, J.L.: Vibro-acoustics of the concert harp. Ph.D. thesis, Ecole doctorale de l’Université du Maine, Le Mans (2006). http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/

  35. Lehtinen, J.: Time-domain numerical solution of the wave equation. Tech. rep., Helsinki University of Technology (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Leissa, A.: Vibrations of Plates. Acoustical Society of America, Melville (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Leissa, A.: Vibrations of Shells. Acoustical Society of America, Melville (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lemaitre, J., Chaboche, J.: Mechanics of Solid Materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Le Tallec, P.: Introduction to the Dynamics of Structures (in French). Ellipses, Paris (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mamou-Mani, A.: Prestresses and vibration of a soundboard: towards the modelling of the know-how of the musical instruments makers (in French). Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris 6 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Morse, P.M., Ingard, K.: Theoretical Acoustics. McGraw Hill, New York (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Pao, Y.: Extension of the Hertz theory of impact to the viscoelastic case. J. Appl. Phys. 26, 1083 (1955)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Pavlidou, M.: A physical model of the string-finger excitation on the classical guitar. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cardiff (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pierce, A.D.: Acoustics: An Introduction to Its Physical Principles and Applications. Acoustical Society of America, Melville (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rao, S.S.: Mechanical Vibrations. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rhaouti, L.: Fictitious domains for the modeling of a fluid-structure interaction problem. simulation of a kettledrum (in French). Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris Dauphine (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Richtmyer, R., Morton, K.W.: Difference Methods for Initial-Value Problems, 2nd edn. Interscience/Wiley, New York (1967)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Rienstra, S., Hirschberg, A.: An introduction to acoustics. Eindhoven University of Technology (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Salençon, J.: Hankbook of continuum mechanics: General concepts, thermoelasticity. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Serafin, S.: The sound of friction: real-time models, playability and musical applications. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Music, Stanford University, Stanford (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Soedel, W.: Vibrations of shells and plates, 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Stronge, W.J.: Contact problems for elasto-plastic impact in multi-body systems. In: B. Brogliato (ed.) Impact in mechanical systems. Springer (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Stulov, A.: Dynamic behavior and mechanical features of wool felt. Acta Mechanica 169, 13–21 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Vu-Quoc, L., Zhang, X.: An elastoplastic contact force-displacement model in the normal direction: displacement-driven version. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 455, 4013–4044 (1999)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. Wegst, U.G.K.: Wood for sound. American Journal of Botany 93(10), 1439–1448 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Weinreich, G., Caussé, R.: Elementary stability considerations for bowed-string motion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89(2), 887–895 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Woodhouse, J., Loach, A.: Torsional behaviour of cello strings. Acustica Acta Acustica 85(5), 734–40 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Yu, Y.Y.: Vibrations of elastic plates. Springer, New York (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  59. Zenatti, A.: Psychology of music (in French). Presses Universitaires de France, Paris (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antoine Chaigne .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chaigne, A., Kergomard, J. (2016). Continuous Models. In: Acoustics of Musical Instruments. Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3679-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3679-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3677-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3679-3

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics