Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conclusion: What Works in Crime Prevention Revisited

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
What Works in Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation

Part of the book series: Springer Series on Evidence-Based Crime Policy ((SSEBCP))

Abstract

Just four decades ago, the predominant narrative about the effectiveness of crime prevention was simply that nothing works. In this concluding chapter, we ask whether systematic reviews of evidence in interventions in crime and justice have changed our overall understanding of what works. Our assessments of systematic reviews show that there is strong evidence of the effectiveness of crime prevention and rehabilitation programs, policies, and practices across a wide variety of intervention areas. That array of findings is broad and persuasive. It is time to abandon the nothing works idea not only in corrections, but also in developmental prevention, community prevention, situational prevention, policing, sentencing and deterrence, and drug treatment interventions. The reviews also suggest that not everything works, and that criminologists, practitioners, and policymakers must look to the evidence to identify effective programs. Having synthesized the evidence gained from our book, we turn to key gaps in the existing knowledge base. We observe that the crime prevention and rehabilitation reviews provide general evidence that crime prevention and rehabilitation programs work, but they do not provide the kind of everyday guidance to practitioners and policymakers that an evidence base needs to become useful to practice. In turn, we note the paucity of experimental studies, and a growing problem in what we compare our treatments to. We also argue, drawing from chapters in the volume, that crime prevention and rehabilitation studies and reviews need to give greater attention to cost-benefit analysis, qualitative methods, and descriptive validity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We rely heavily on the authors’ own comments in summarizing the studies below.

References

  • Baumer, E. P., & Wolff, K. T. (2014). Evaluating contemporary crime drop(s) in America, New York City, and many other places. Justice Quarterly, 31(1), 5‑38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett T., Holloway K., & Farrington, D. (2008). The effectiveness of neighborhood watch. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 4(18).

    Google Scholar 

  • Byford, S., Barrett, B., Dubourg, R., Francis, J., & Sisk, J. (2010). The role of economic evidence in formulation of public policy and practice. In: I. Shemilt, M. Mugford, L. Vale, K. Marsh, & C. Donaldson (Eds.). Evidence-based decisions and economics: Health care, social welfare, education and criminal justice. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. V. (1995). Situational crime prevention. In M. Tonry & D. P. Farrington (Eds.) Building a safer society: Strategic approaches to crime prevention. (Crime and justice: A review of research, Vol. 19). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coben, J. H., & Larkin, G. L. (1999). Effectiveness of ignition interlock devices in reducing drunk driving recidivism. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 16(1 Suppl), 81‑87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, D. B., & Clarke. R.V. (2003). Opportunities, precipitators and criminal decisions: A reply to Wortley's critique of situational crime prevention. In M. J. Smith & D. B. Cornish (Eds.), Theory for practice in situational crime prevention. (Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 16). Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T. (2005). The twelve people who saved rehabilitation: How the science of criminology made a difference. Criminology, 43(1), 1‑42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Tella, R., & Schargrodsky, E. (2004). Do police reduce crime? Estimates using the allocation of police forces after a terrorist attack. American Economic Review, 94(1), 115‑133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditter, S. M., Elder, R.W., Shults, R. A., Sleet, D. A., Compton, R. & Nichols, J. L. (2005). Effectiveness of designated driver programs for reducing alcohol-impaired driving: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 28, 280‑287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. (2003). Methodological quality standards for evaluation research. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587(1), 49‑68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D.P., Petrosino, A., & Welsh, B.C. (2001). Systematic reviews and cost-benefit analyses of correctional interventions. The Prison Journal, 81, 339‑359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feder, L., & Wilson, D. B. (2005). A meta-analytic review of court-mandated batterer intervention programs: Can courts affect abusers’ behavior? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(2), 239‑262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, C. E. (2011). Missing links: How descriptive validity impacts the policy relevance of randomized controlled trials in criminology. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(3), 201‑224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove L. E., Farrell, G., Farrington, D. P. & Johnson, S. D. (2012) Preventing repeat victimization: A systematic review. Report prepared for the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention. Stockholm: The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunaratna, R. (2008). The Islamabad Marriott in flames: The attack on the world’s most protected hotel. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 3(2), 99‑116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W. (2003). Those confounded moderators in meta-analysis: Good, bad, and ugly. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587(1), 69‑81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W., & Cullen, F. T. (2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 297‑320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W., Chapman, G. L., & Landenberger, N. A. (2001). Cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578(1), 144‑157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, D., Martinson, R., & Wilks, J. (1975). The effectiveness of correctional treatment: A survey of treatment evaluation studies. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lösel, F., & Köferl, P. (1989). Evaluation research on correctional treatment in West Germany: A meta-analysis. In H. Wegener, F. Lösel, & J. Haisch (Eds.), Criminal behavior and the justice system (pp. 334‑355). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lösel, F., & Schmucker, M. (2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(1), 117‑146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lum, C., Kennedy, L. W. & Sherley, A (2006) The effectiveness of counter-terrorism strategies. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 2(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lum, C., Koper, C. S., & Telep, C. W. (2011). The evidence-based policing matrix. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 3‑26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallender, J. (2012). Economic modelling in Public Health. Presentation to European Conference on Health Economics, July 20th, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, K. (2010). Economic evaluation of criminal justice interventions: A methodological review of the recent literature. In: J. K. Roman, T. Dunworth, & K. Marsh, Cost-benefit analysis and crime control. Washington: The Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, R. (1974). What works?—Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 35, 22‑54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, R. (1976). California research at the crossroads. Crime and Delinquency, 22, 180‑191.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCord, J. (2003). Cures that harm: Unanticipated outcomes of crime prevention programs. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 587, 16‑30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, C., Cohen, M., Swaray, R., & Perry, A. (2008). Benefit-cost analyses of sentencing. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 4(10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, F. G. (2000). Placebo-controlled trials in psychiatric research: An ethical perspective. Biological Psychiatry, 47(8), 707‑716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, O., Wilson, D. B., Eggers, A., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2012). Drug courts’ effects on criminal offending for juveniles and adults. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 8(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • NICE (2009). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: 10 years of excellence. Retrieved from http://www.nice.org.uk/mediacentre/factsheets/NICEMilestones.jsp.

  • NICE. (2009). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: 10 years of excellence. Retrieved from http://www.nice.org.uk/mediacentre/factsheets/NICEMilestones.jsp.

  • Olds, D., Henderson, C. R., Jr., Cole, R., Eckenrode, J., Kitzman, H., Luckey, D., et al (1998). Long-term effects of nurse home visitation on children’s criminal and antisocial behavior: 15-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(14), 1238‑1244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson G. T, Chung I. W, & Swan, P. G. (2012), The effects of stress management interventions among police officers and recruits. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 8(7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, A. E., Weisburd, D., & Hewitt, C. (2010). Are criminologists describing randomized controlled trials in ways that allow us to assess them? Findings from a sample of crime and justice trials. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 6(3), 245‑262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrosino, A., Turpin-Petrosino, C., Hollis-Peel, M. E., & Lavenberg, J. G. (2013). Scared Straight and other juvenile awareness programs for preventing juvenile delinquency: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 2013(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, K. J. & Michels, K. B. (1994). The continuing unethical use of placebo controls. New England Journal of Medicine, 331, 394‑398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarteschi, C. M., Vaughn, M. G., & Kim, K. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of mental health courts: A quantitative review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(1), 12‑20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2002). Evidence-based crime prevention. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swaray, R.B., Bowles, R., & Pradiptyo, R. (2005). The application of economic analysis to criminal justice interventions: A review of the literature. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16, 141‑163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telep, C. W., & Weisburd, D. (2012). What is known about the effectiveness of police practices in reducing crime and disorder? Police Quarterly, 15(4), 331‑357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visher, C. A., & Weisburd, D. (1998). Identifying what works: Recent trends in crime prevention strategies. Crime, Law and Social Change, 28(3‑4), 223‑242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., & Braga, A. A. (Eds.). (2006). Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., & Eck, J. E. (2004). What can police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 42‑65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D. & Telep, C. (2014). Hot spots policing: What we know and what we need to know. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 30(2), 200‑220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., Petrosino, A., & Mason, G. (1993). Design sensitivity in criminal justice experiments. Crime and Justice, 17, 337‑379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, B.C. & Farrington, D.P. (2000). Monetary costs and benefits of crime prevention programs. Crime and Justice, 27, 305‑361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh B. C., & Farrington D. P. (2008a). Effects of improved street lighting on crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 4(13).

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh B. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2008b). Effects of closed circuit television surveillance on crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 4(17).

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, B., Peel, M., Farrington, D., Elffers, H. & Braga, A. (2011). Research design influence on study outcomes in crime and justice: a partial replication with public area surveillance. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(2), 183‑198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. B., MacKenzie, D. L., & Mitchell, F. N. (2005). Effects of correctional boot camps on offending. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 1(6).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA

    David Weisburd & Charlotte Gill

  2. Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

    David Weisburd

  3. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    David P. Farrington

Authors
  1. David Weisburd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David P. Farrington
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Charlotte Gill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Weisburd .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA

    David Weisburd

  2. Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

    David P. Farrington

  3. Department of Criminology, Law & Society, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA

    Charlotte Gill

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weisburd, D., Farrington, D.P., Gill, C. (2016). Conclusion: What Works in Crime Prevention Revisited. In: Weisburd, D., Farrington, D., Gill, C. (eds) What Works in Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation. Springer Series on Evidence-Based Crime Policy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3477-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3477-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3475-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3477-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation