Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction: What Works in Crime Prevention?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
What Works in Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation

Part of the book series: Springer Series on Evidence-Based Crime Policy ((SSEBCP))

Abstract

Just four decades ago, the predominant narrative in crime prevention and rehabilitation was that nothing works. Since that time, criminologists have accumulated a wide body of evidence about programs and practices in systematic reviews. In this book we summarize what is known in seven broad criminal justice domains, drawing upon systematic reviews of over 3,000 studies. While not everything works, our “review of reviews” provides persuasive evidence of the effectiveness of programs, policies, and practices across a variety of intervention areas and highlights the need to improve the utility of systematic reviews for policymakers.

Portions of this chapter are based on Farrington, Weisburd, and Gill (2011).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bayley, D. (1994). Police for the future. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushway, S. (1998). The impact of an arrest on the job stability of young white American men. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35(4), 454‑479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushway, S. (2004). Labor market effects of permitting employer access to criminal history records. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 20, 276‑291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, P. J. (1980). Research in criminal deterrence: Laying the groundwork for the second decade. In N. Morris & M. Tonry (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 2, pp. 211‑268). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, P. J. (1986). The demand and supply of criminal opportunities. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 7, pp. 1‑28). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (2009). Research synthesis as a scientific process. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 3‑16). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T. (2005). The twelve people who saved rehabilitation: How the science of criminology made a difference—The American Society of Criminology 2004 presidential address. Criminology, 43(1), 1‑42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (2001). From nothing works to what works: Changing professional ideology in the 21st century. The Prison Journal, 81(3), 313‑338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., & Petrosino, A. (2000). Systematic reviews of criminological interventions: The Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group. International Annals of Criminology, 38(1/2), 49‑66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., & Petrosino, A. (2001). The Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 35‑49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., Ohlin, L. E., & Wilson, J. Q. (1986). Understanding and controlling crime: Toward a new research strategy. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., Weisburd, D. L., & Gill, C. E. (2011). The Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group: A decade of progress. In C. J. Smith, S. X. Zhang, & R. Barberet (Eds.), Routledge handbook of international criminology (pp. 53‑63). Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelling, G. L., Pate, A. M., Dieckman, D., & Brown, C. (1974). The Kansas City preventive patrol experiment: Technical report. Washington, DC: The Police Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laycock, G., & Tilley, N. (1995). Implementing crime prevention. In M. Tonry & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Building a safer society: Strategic approaches to crime prevention (pp. 535‑584). Crime and justice, Vol. 19. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, S. D. (1996). The effect of prison population size on crime rates: Evidence from prison overcrowding litigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(2), 319‑351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, S. D. (2004). Understanding why crime fell in the 1990s: Four factors that explain the decline and six that do not. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(1), 163‑190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In T. D. Cook, H. Cooper, D. S. Cordray, H. Hartmann, L. V. Hedges, R. J. Light, T. A. Louis, & F. Mosteller (Eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, D. S., Martinson, R., & Wilks, J. (1975). The effectiveness of correctional treatment. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 35, 22‑54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, R. (1976). California research at the crossroads. In R. Martinson, T. Palmer, & S. Adams (Eds.), Rehabilitation, recidivism, and research. Hackensack: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, T. (1975). Martinson revisited. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 12(2), 133‑152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrosino, A., Boruch, R. F., Soydan, H., Duggan, L., & Sanchez-Meca, J. (2001). Meeting the challenges of evidence-based policy: The Campbell Collaboration. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 15‑34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrosino, A., Boruch, R. F., Farrington, D. P., Sherman, L. W., & Weisburd, D. (2003a). Toward evidence-based criminology and criminal justice: Systematic reviews, the Campbell Collaboration, and the Crime and Justice Group. International Journal of Comparative Criminology, 3, 42‑61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrosino, A., Farrington, D. P., & Sherman, L. W. (2003b). The Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group: Early development and progress. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 38(1), 5‑18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P., & Blumstein, A. (2003). The criminal career paradigm. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice, a review of research (Vol. 30, pp. 359‑506). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, H. R., & Hopewell, S. (2009). Grey literature. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 103‑126). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (Eds.). (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment, and adjustments. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1992). Crime and deviance in the life-course. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 63‑84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sechrest, L., White, S. O., & Brown, E. D. (1979). The rehabilitation of criminal offenders: Problems and prospects. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W., & Weisburd, D. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: A randomized, controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 625‑648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spelman, W., & Brown, D. K. (1984). Calling the police: Citizen reporting of serious crime. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Campbell Collaboration. (2015). Campbell systematic reviews: Policies and guidelines. Campbell systematic reviews: Supplement 1. http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/artman2/uploads/1/C2_Policies_and_Guidelines_Doc_Version_1_1‑3.pdf.

  • Visher, C. A., & Weisburd, D. (1998). Identifying what works: Recent trends in crime prevention strategies. Crime, Law and Social Change, 28(3‑4), 223‑242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., & Braga, A. A. (Eds.). (2006). Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. H. (1978). Improving the linkage between social research and public policy. In L. E. Lynn (Ed.), Knowledge and policy: The uncertain connection. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, J. (2010). CCTV and its effectiveness in tackling crime. London: Library of the House of Commons. http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN05624.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA

    Prof. David Weisburd & Asst. Prof. Charlotte Gill

  2. Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

    Prof. David Weisburd

  3. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    David P. Farrington

Authors
  1. Prof. David Weisburd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David P. Farrington
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Asst. Prof. Charlotte Gill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Weisburd .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA

    David Weisburd

  2. Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

    David P. Farrington

  3. Department of Criminology, Law & Society, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA

    Charlotte Gill

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weisburd, D., Farrington, D.P., Gill, C. (2016). Introduction: What Works in Crime Prevention?. In: Weisburd, D., Farrington, D., Gill, C. (eds) What Works in Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation. Springer Series on Evidence-Based Crime Policy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3477-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3477-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3475-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3477-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation