Skip to main content

Cytometry and Pathology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Imaging Techniques in Clinical Pathology

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Pathology ((CCPATH))

  • 731 Accesses

Abstract

Flow cytometry is a technology that simultaneously measures and analyzes multiple physical characteristics of single particles, usually cells, using an optical-to-electronic coupling system. A wide range of applications are discussed for this tool, ranging from traditional immunology to monitoring of cell transfection and/or screening of protein libraries. Moreover, new exciting insights into ongoing developments are introduced, including automation, laboratory integration, and software advances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ashcroft RG, Lopez PA. Commercial high speed machines open new opportunities in high throughput flow cytometry (HTFC). J Immunol Methods. 2000;243:13–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hawley TS, Telford WG, Ramezani A, Hawley RG. Four-color flow cytometric detection of retrovirally expressed red, yellow, green, and cyan fluorescent proteins. Biotechniques. 2001;30:1028–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosen ED, Husi C, Wang X, Sakai S, et al. C/EBPα induces adipogenesis through PPAR: a unified pathway. Genes Dev. 2002;16:22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Feldhaus M, Siegel R. Flow cytometric screening of yeast surface display libraries. Methods Mol Biol. 2004;263:311–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moldavan A. Photo-electric technique for the counting of microscopical cells. Science. 1934;80:188–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gucker Jr FT, O’Konski CT, Pickard HB, Pitts Jr JN. A photoelectronic counter for colloidal particles. J Am Chem Soc. 1947;69:2422–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cornwall JB, Davison RM. Rapid counter for small particles in suspension. J Sci Instrum. 1950;37:414–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Coulter WH. High speed automatic blood cell counter and analyzer. Proc Natl Electron Conf. 1956;12:1034–40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bierne T, Hutcheon JM. A photoelectric particle counter for use in the sieve range. J Sci Instrum. 1957;34:196–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kamentsky LA, Melamed MR. Spectrophotometer: new instrument for ultrarapid cell analysis. Science. 1965;150:630–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamentsky LA, Melamed MR. Spectrophotometric cell sorter. Science. 1967;156:1364–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fulwyler MJ. Electronic separation of biological cells by volume. Science. 1965;150:910–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dittrich W, Göhde W. Impulsfluorometrie dei einzelzellen in suspensionen. Z Naturforsch. 1969;24b:360–1.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van Dilla MA, Trujillo TT, Mullaney PF, Coulter JR. Cell microfluorimetry: a method for rapid fluorescence measurement. Science. 1969;163:1213–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hulett HR, Bonner WA, Barrett J, Herzenberg LA. Cell sorting: automated separation of mammalian cells as a function of intracellular fluorescence. Science. 1969;166:747–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shapiro HM. Practical flow cytometry. 4th ed. New York: Wiley-Liss; 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Melamed MR, Mullaney PF, Shapiro HM. An historical review of the development of flow cytometers and sorters. In: Melamed MR, Lindmo T, Mendelsohn ML, editors. Flow cytometry and sorting. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1990. p. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Melamed MR. A brief history of flow cytometry and sorting. Methods Cell Biol. 2001;63:3–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Romanowsky D. Zur Frage der Parasitologie und Therapie der Malaria. St Petersburg Med Wochenschr. 1891;16:297–302, 307–15.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Horobin RW, Walter KJ. Understanding Romanowsky staining. I: The Romanowsky-Giemsa effect in blood smears. Histochemistry. 1987;86:331–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ehrlich P. Methodologische Beiträge zur Physiologie und Pathologie der verschiedenen Formen der Leukocyten. Z Klin Med. 1880;1:553–60.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dittrich W, Göhde W. Impulse fluorometry of single cells in suspension. Z Naturforsch B. 1969;24:360–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Crissman HA, Steinkamp JA. Rapid, simultaneous measurement of DNA, protein, and cell volume in single cells from large mammalian cell populations. J Cell Biol. 1973;59:766–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Crissman HA, Tobey RA. Cell-cycle analysis in 20 minutes. Science. 1974;184:1297–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Latt SA, Stetten G. Spectral studies on 33258 Hoechst and related bisbenzimidazole dyes useful for fluorescent detection of deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis. J Histochem Cytochem. 1976;24:24–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stöhr M, Eipel H, Goerttler K, Vogt-Schaden M. Extended application of flow microfluorometry by means of dual laser excitation. Histochemistry. 1977;51:305–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Coons AH, Creech HJ, Jones RN, Berliner E. Demonstration of pneumococcal antigen in tissues by use of fluorescent antibody. J Immunol. 1942;45:159–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kano K, Loza U, Gerbasi JR, Milgrom F. Studies on heterophile antibodies in transplantation sera. Transplantation. 1975;19:20–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. http://whcf.org/WHCF WallaceHCoulter.htm

  30. Ingram M, Preston Jr K. Automatic analysis of blood cells. Sci Am. 1970;223:72–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Prewitt JMS, Mendelsohn ML. The analysis of cell images. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1966;128:1035–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fulwyler MJ. An electronic particle separator with potential biological application. Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Annual Report of the Biological and Medical Research Group (H–4) of the Health Division, July 1964–June 1965, Written July 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mullaney PF, Dean PN. Cell sizing: a small-angle light-scattering method for sizing particles of low relative refractive index. Appl Opt. 1969;8:2361–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. “The History of the Cell Sorter Interviews”. Record Unit 9554. Smithsonian Institution Archives. Retrieved 9 Mar 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stubblefield E, Cram S, Deaven L. Flow microfluorometric analysis of isolated Chinese hamster chromosomes. Exp Cell Res. 1975;94:464–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. van den Engh GJ, Trask BJ, Gray JW, Langlois RG, et al. Preparation and bivariate analysis of suspensions of human chromosomes. Cytometry. 1985;6:92–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lloyd D. Flow cytometry in microbiology. London: Springer; 1993.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Shapiro HM. Microbial analysis at the single-cell level: tasks and techniques. J Microbiol Methods. 2000;42:3–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fugger EF, Black SH, Keyvanfar K, Schulman JD. Births of normal daughters after MicroSort sperm separation and intrauterine insemination, in-vitro fertilization, or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2367–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gledhill BL, Evenson DP, Pinkel D. Flow cytometry and sorting of sperm and male germ cells. In: Melamed MR, Lindmo T, Mendelsohn ML, editors. Flow cytometry and sorting. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1990. p. 531–51.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Reckerman M, Collin F. Aquatic flow cytometry: achievements and prospects. Science. 2000;64:235–46.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Marie D, Brussard CPD, Thyrhaug R, Bratbak G, et al. Enumeration of marine viruses in culture and natural samples by flow cytometry. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;59:905–11.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hedley DW. Flow cytometry using paraffin-embedded tissue: five years on. Cytometry. 1989;10:229–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gray JW, Cram LS. Flow karyotyping and chromosome sorting. In: Melamed MR, Lindmo T, Mendelsohn ML, editors. Flow cytometry and sorting. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Habbersett RC, Jett JH, Keller RA. Single DNA fragment detection by flow cytometry. In: Durack G, Robinson JP, editors. Emerging tools for single-cell analysis. New York: Wiley-Liss; 2000. p. 115–38.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. Carson RT, Vignali DAA. Simultaneous quantitation of 15 cytokines using a multiplexed flow cytometric assay. J Immunol Methods. 1999;227:41–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Brown M, Wittwer C. Flow cytometry: principles and clinical applications in hematology. Clin Chem. 2000;46:1221–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Dal Bó S, Pezzi A, Amorin B, Valim V, et al. Detection of minimal residual disease by flow cytometry for patients with multiple myeloma submitted to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. ISRN Hematol. 2013;2013:847672. doi:10.1155/2013/847672.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Harrington AM, Olteanu H, Kroft SH. A dissection of the CD45/side scatter “blast gate”. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012;137:800–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Stacchini A, Demurtas A, Godio L, Martini G, et al. Flow cytometry in the bone marrow staging of mature B-cell neoplasms. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2003;54:10–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ruiz-Arguelles A, Duque RE, Orfao A. Report on the first Latin American Consensus Conference for Flow Cytometric Immunophenotyping of Leukemia. Cytometry. 1998;34:39–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Di Giuseppe JA, Borowitz MJ. Clinical utility of flow cytometry in the chronic lymphoid leukemias. Semin Oncol. 1998;25:6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Davis BH, Foucar K, Szczarkowski W, Ball E, et al. U.S.-Canadian Consensus recommendations on the immunophenotypic analysis of hematologic neoplasia by flow cytometry: medical indications. Cytometry. 1997;30:249–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Grier DD, Al-Quran SZ, Cardona DM, Li Y, et al. Flow cytometric analysis of immunoglobulin heavy chain expression in B-cell lymphoma and reactive lymphoid hyperplasia. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2012;5:110–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Joensuu H, Klemi PJ. DNA aneuploidy in adenomas of endocrine organs. Am J Pathol. 1988;132:145–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Joensuu H, Klemi P, Eerola E. DNA aneuploidy in follicular adenomas of the thyroid gland. Am J Pathol. 1986;124:373–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Hedley DW, Shankey TV, Wheeless LL. DNA cytometry consensus conference. Cytometry. 1993;14:471.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Friedlander ML, Hedley DW, Taylor IW. Clinical and biological significance of aneuploidy in human tumours. J Clin Pathol. 1984;37:961–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Duque RE, Andreeff M, Braylan RC, Diamond LW, et al. Consensus review of the clinical utility of DNA flow cytometry in neoplastic hematopathology. Cytometry. 1993;14:492–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Albro J, Bauer KD, Hitchcock CL, Wittwer CT. Improved DNA content histograms from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded liver tissue by proteinase K digestion. Cytometry. 1993;14:673–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Look AT, Roberson PK, Williams DL, Rivera G, et al. Prognostic importance of blast cell DNA content in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 1985;65:1079–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Dressler LG, Bartow SA. DNA flow cytometry in solid tumors: practical aspects and clinical applications. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1989;6:55–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Gunawan B, Fuzesi L, Granzen B, Keller U, et al. Clinical aspects of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma with translocation t(1;13)(p36;q14) and hypotetraploidy. Pathol Oncol Res. 1999;5:211–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Gollin SM, Janecka IP. Cytogenetics of cranial base tumors. J Neurooncol. 1994;20:241–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Ormerod MG. Flow cytometry: a practical approach. 3rd ed. Oxford: IRL Press at Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 235–46.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Darzynkiewicz Z, Paul Robinson J, Crissman HA. Methods in cell biology: flow cytometry vol 42, Part B, 2nd ed., 1994. 15. Practical flow cytometry, 3rd ed., Shapiro, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Vindeløv LL, Christensen IJ, Nissen NI. A detergent-trypsin method for the preparation of nuclei for flow cytometric DNA analysis. Cytometry. 1983;3:323–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Hedley DW, Friedlander ML, Taylor IW, Rugg CA, et al. Method for analysis of cellular DNA content of paraffin embedded pathological material using flow cytometry. J Histochem Cytochem. 1983;31:1333–3335.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Leers MP, Schutte B, Theunissen PH, Ramaekers FC, et al. Heat pretreatment increases resolution in DNA flow cytometry of paraffin-embedded tumor tissue. Cytometry. 1999;35:260–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Rabinovitch PS. DNA content histogram and cell-cycle analysis. Methods Cell Biol. 1994;41:263–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Dean PN, Jett JH. Mathematical analysis of DNA distributions derived from flow microfluorometry. J Cell Biol. 1974;60:523–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Deere D, Shen J, Vesey G, Bell P, et al. Flow cytometry and cell sorting for yeast viability assessment and cell selection. Yeast. 1998;14:147–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Sekar R, Fuchs BM, Amann R, Pernthaler J. Flow sorting of marine bacterioplankton after fluorescence in situ hybridization. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:6210–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Jochem FJ. Short-term physiologic effects of mechanical flow sorting and the Becton-Dickinson cell concentrator in cultures of the marine phytoflagellata Emiliania huxleyi and Micromonas pusilla. Cytometry. 2005;65:77–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Ferguson-Smith MA, Yang F, Rens W, O’Brien PC. The impact of chromosome sorting and painting on the comparative analysis of primate genomes. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;108:112–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Dolezel J, Kubalakova M, Bartos J, Macas J. Flow cytogenetics and plant genome mapping. Chromosome Res. 2004;12:77–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Szaniszlo P, Wang N, Sinha M, et al. Getting the right cells to the array: gene expression microarray analysis of cell mixtures and sorted cells. Cytometry. 2004;59:191–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Battye FL, Light A, Tarlinton DM. Single cell sorting and cloning. J Immunol Methods. 2000;243:25–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Williams C, Davies D, Williamson R. Segregation of F508 and normal CFTR alleles in human sperm. Hum Mol Genet. 1993;2:445–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Molnar B, Bocsi J, Karman J, et al. Immediate DNA ploidy analysis of gastrointestinal biopsies taken by endoscopy using a mechanical dissociation device. Anticancer Res. 2003;23:655–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Virginia Tirino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tirino, V., Desiderio, V., Paino, F., Papaccio, G. (2016). Cytometry and Pathology. In: Sacerdoti, F., Giordano, A., Cavaliere, C. (eds) Advanced Imaging Techniques in Clinical Pathology. Current Clinical Pathology. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3469-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3469-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3467-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3469-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics