Skip to main content

Qualitative Differences in Men’s and Women’s Facial Movements in an Experimental Situation

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Discovering Hidden Temporal Patterns in Behavior and Interaction

Part of the book series: Neuromethods ((NM,volume 111))

  • 704 Accesses

Abstract

Studies indicate that men and women show quantitative differences in their production of facial movements. However, less is known regarding the qualitative aspect of facial differences between women and men. The aim of this study was to determine whether men and women could present a gender-specific temporal organization of facial movements. Eighteen Brazilian students (nine men and nine women) were filmed whilst performing a perceptual task involving verbal answers, the aim being to generate various types of facial expressions. The location of 29 facial points involved in facial movements were coded frame by frame and then analyzed with the THEME Software, allowing the detection of temporal patterns (T-patterns) of facial movements. Our results highlighted three typically feminine T-patterns (expressed only by women) in an experimental context, all involving mouth movements. No typically masculine T-patterns were detected in the same situation. This study shows the existence of some qualitative differences between women and men in their facial movements’ organization.

This chapter is dedicated to the memory of Professor César Ades who died tragically in an accident in March 2012.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This software has been developed by Magnus S. Magnusson as Invited Professor at the University of Paris 13.

References

  1. Bruce V, Burton AM, Hanna E, Healey P, Mason O, Coombes A et al (1993) Sex discrimination: how do we tell the difference between male and female faces? Perception 22:131–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown E, Perrett DI (1993) What gives a face its gender? Perception 22(7):829–840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baudouin J-Y, Humphrey GW (2006) Configural information in gender recognition. Perception 35(4):531–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruce V, Langton S (1994) The use of pigmentation and shading information in recognising the sex and identities of faces. Perception 23:803–822

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cunningham DW, Wallraven C (2009) Dynamic information for the recognition of conversational expressions. J Vis 9(13):1–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nusseck M, Cunningham DW, Wallraven C, Bülthoff HH (2008) The contribution of different facial regions to the recognition of conversational expressions. J Vis 8(8):1–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berry DS (1991) Child and adult sensitivity to gender information in patterns of facial motion. Ecol Psychol 3(4):349–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hill H, Johnston A (2001) Categorizing sex and identity from the biological motion of faces. Curr Biol 11:880–885

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hill H, Jinno Y, Johnston A (2003) Comparing solid-body with point-light animations. Perception 32(5):561–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morrison ER, Gralewski L, Campbell N, Penton-Voak I (2007) Facial movement varies by sex and is related to attractiveness. Evol Hum Behav 28:186–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brody LR, Hall JA (2000) Gender, emotion, and expression. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM (eds) Handbook of emotions. Guilford Press, New York, pp 338–349

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bullis C, Horn C (1995) Get a little closer: further examination of nonverbal comforting strategies. Commun Rep 8(1):10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hall JA (1985) Nonverbal sex differences. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  14. Giovanoli P, Tzou C-HJ, Ploner M, Frey M (2003) Three-dimensional video-analysis of facial movements in healthy volunteers. Br J Plastic Surg 56:644–652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Paletz JL, Manktelow RT, Chaban R (1994) The shape of a normal smile: implications for facial paralysis reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 93:784–789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Weeden JC, Trotman CA, Faraway JJ (2000) Three dimensional analysis of facial movement in normal adults: influences of sex and facial shape. Angle Orthod 71(2):132–140

    Google Scholar 

  17. Borod JC, Koff E, Yecker S, Sanschi C, Schmidt JM (1998) Facial asymmetry during emotional expression: gender, valence, and measurement technique. Neuropsychologia 36(11):1209–1215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hausmann M, Behrendt-Körbitz S, Kautz H, Lamm C, Radelt F, Güntürkün O (1998) Sex differences in oral asymmetries during word repetition. Neuropsychologia 36(12):1397–1402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Magnusson MS (2000) Discovering hidden time patterns in behavior: T-patterns and their detection. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 32(1):93–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tzou C-HJ, Giovanoli P, Ploner M, Frey M (2005) Are there ethnic differences of facial movements between Europeans and Asians? Br J Plast Surg 58:183–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Baudoin C, Lopes FA, Magnusson MS, Racca A, Knezevic A, Simeonovska-Nikolova D, Durand J-L (2009) Gender differences in facial movement production: a case study. XXXIst International Ethological Conference, Rennes (France)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cunningham MR (1986) Measuring the physical attractiveness: quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. J Pers Soc Psychol 50:925–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fink B, Penton-Voak I (2002) Evolutionary psychology of facial attractiveness. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 11:154–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Toole AJ, Deffenbacher KA, Valentin D, Mc-Kee K, Huff D, Abdi H (1998) The perception of face gender: the role of stimulus structure in recognition and classification. Mem Cogn 26:146–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Perrett DI, Lee KJ, Penton-Voak I, Rowland D, Yoshikawa S (1998) Effects of sexual simorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 394:884–887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Perrett DI, May KA, Yoshikawa S (1994) Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature 368:239–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gillen B (1981) Physical attractiveness: a determinant of two types of goodness. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 7:384–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Grammer K, Thornhill R (1994) Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. J Comp Psychol 108:233–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Keating CF (1985) Gender and the physiognomy of dominance and attractiveness. Soc Psychol Q 48:61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Penton-Voak IS, Chen JY (2004) High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. Evol Hum Behav 25:229–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rhodes G, Hickford C, Jefferey L (2000) Sex-typicality and attractiveness: are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive? Br J Psychol 91:125–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Penton-Voak IS, Perrett DI, Castles DL, Kobayashi T, Burt DM, Murray LK, Minamisawa R (1999) Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature 399:741–742

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Marion Hacquin as research assistant in a pilot study and Adélaïde Racca (adelaide@superblitz.org) for providing us with the illustration of the face used in Figs. 2 and 5.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claude Baudoin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Racca, A., Magnusson, M.S., Ades, C., Baudoin, C. (2016). Qualitative Differences in Men’s and Women’s Facial Movements in an Experimental Situation. In: Magnusson, M., Burgoon, J., Casarrubea, M. (eds) Discovering Hidden Temporal Patterns in Behavior and Interaction. Neuromethods, vol 111. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3249-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3249-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3248-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3249-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics