Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Handbooks in Health, Work, and Disability ((SHHDW,volume 4))

  • 3919 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents an overview of the contribution of qualitative evidence to what is known about the addictions. There is a long history of conducting qualitative research in this field with major contributions to our understanding of issues from the perspectives of users. Additionally, our awareness of how wider social forces (whether historical, social, or economic) shape the everyday realities lived by drug and alcohol users has been increased through qualitative research. However, taken as a whole, knowledge production in the field has been dominated by quantitative approaches and the current trend in addictions policy and practice is that treatment approaches should be evidence-based, underpinned by the objective, unbiased findings of research. Qualitative research has played a major role in questioning such positivist assumptions and how we think about and respond to addictions, but in so doing it has created an epistemological divide. In an attempt to bridge this gap it has been suggested that transdisciplinary research, where qualitative researchers put aside their theoretical and epistemological commitments in order to engage with others, is used. It is argued in the chapter that this can only be a partial solution to the problem and that the integrity of single discipline approaches is important. Each research approach is most suited to certain questions—and it would be erroneous to presume that transdisciplinary work is the only way forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, P. (1985). Wheeling and dealing: An ethnography of an upper-level drug dealing and smuggling community. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agar, M. (1973). Ripping and running: A formal ethnography of urban heroin users. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agar, M. (2000). Towards a trend theory. In G. Greenwood & K. Robertson (Eds.), Understanding and responding to drug use: The role of qualitative research (EMCDDA scientific monograph series, Vol. 4, pp. 59–72). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agar, M. (2003). Qualitative epidemiology. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 974–986.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ALICE RAP. (2013). Addiction and lifestyles in contemporary Europe Reframing Addictions Project. http://www.alicerap.eu. Accessed March 29, 2013.

  • Amodeo, M., Ellis, M., & Samet, J. (2006). Introducing evidence-based practices into substance abuse treatment using organization development methods. The American Journal of Alcohol and Drug Abuse, 32(4), 555–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amodeo, M., Lundgren, L., Cohen, A., Rose, D., Chassler, D., Beltrame, C., et al. (2011). Barriers to implementing evidence-based practices in addiction treatment programs: Comparing staff reports on motivational interviewing, adolescent community reinforcement approach, assertive community treatment, and cognitive-behavioral therapy. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34(4), 382–389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, C., & Beschner, G. (Eds.). (1980). Ethnography: A research tool for policy-makers in the drug and alcohol fields. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services (Publication No ADM 80–946).

    Google Scholar 

  • Babor, T., Caulkins, J., Edwards, G., Fischer, B., Foxcroft, D., Humphreys, K., et al. (2010). Drug policy and the public good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. (1953). Becoming a marijuana user. American Journal of Sociology, 59, 235–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. London: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biederman, J., Fried, R., Hammerness, P., Surman, C., Mehler, B., Petty, C. R., et al. (2012). The effects of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate on the driving performance of young adults with ADHD: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study using a validated driving simulator paradigm. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 46, 484–491. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.01.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgois, P. (1995). In search of respect: Selling crack in el barrio. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgois, P. (1999). Theory, method and power in drug and HIV prevention research: A participant’-observer’s critique. Substance Use and Misuse, 33, 2323–2351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgois, P., Martinez, A., Kral, A., Edlin, B., Schonberg, J., & Ciccarone, D. (2006). Reinterpreting ethnic patterns among white and African American men who inject heroin: A social science of medicine approach. PLoS Medicine, 3, e452. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030452.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgois, P., & Schonberg, J. (2009). The righteous dopefiend. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, E., Webster, T., Baker, D., Schlesinger, M., Inouye, S., Barth, M., et al. (2004). Translating research into practice: Speeding the adoption of innovative health care programs. Issue Brief (pp. 1–11). Washington, DC: The Commonwealth Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C. (1994). Using ethnography in the evaluation of drug prevention and intervention programs. International Journal of the Addictions, 29, 791–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Budney, A. J., & Higgins, S. T. (1998). A community reinforcement plus vouchers approach: Treating cocaine. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse Addiction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, K. M. (1998). A cognitive-behavioral approach: Treating cocaine addiction. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse. NIH Publication 98-4308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin, M., & Friedrich, B. (2004). Evidence-based treatments in child abuse and neglect. Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 1097–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 7–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choo, E. K. (2012). Brief intervention for substance use and partner abuse among females in the ER (B-SAFER). http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01709552

  • Ciccarone, D., & Bourgois, P. (2003). Explaining the geographical variation of HIV among injection drug users in the United States. Substance Use and Misuse, 38, 2049–2063.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. (2007). The Cochrane Collaboration and systematic reviews. British Journal of Surgery, 94, 391–392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clatts, M. C., Heimer, R., Abdala, N., Goldsamt, L. A., Sotheran, J. L., Anderson, K. T., et al. (1999). HIV-1 transmission in injection paraphernalia: Heating drug solutions may inactivate HIV-1. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 22(2), 194–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coombes, L., & Wratten, A. (2007). The lived experience of community mental health nurses working with people who have dual diagnosis: A phenomenological study. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 14, 382–392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Courtwright, D. T. (2001). Forces of habit: Drugs and the making of the modern world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1993). The rhetoric of drugs: An interview. Differences, 5(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorn, N., Murji, K., & South, N. (1992). Traffickers: Drug markets and law enforcement. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, R., & Moore, D. (2010). Understanding illicit drug markets in Australia: Notes towards a critical reconceptualization. British Journal of Criminology, 50(1), 82–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, H., & Popay, J. (2000). How are policy makers using evidence? Models of research utilisation and local NHS policy making. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 54, 461–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, H. W., Agar, M., & Beschner, G. M. (Eds.). (1979). Angel dust: An ethnographic study of PCP users. Lexington, MA: Heath/Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, H., & Aldrich, M. (1990). The role of ethnography in substance abuse research and public policy. In E. Lambert (Ed.), The collection and interpretation of data from hidden populations. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse (Monograph 98).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2008). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, S. M. (2006). Speaking addictions: Substitution, metaphor and authenticity in newspaper representations of methadone treatment. Contemporary Drug Problems, 33(4), 669–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuqua, J., Stokols, D., Gress, J., Phillips, K., & Harvey, R. (2004). Transdisciplinary collaboration as a basis for enhancing the science and prevention of substance use and “abuse”. Substance Use & Misuse, 39(10–12), 1457–1514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, S. L. (1996). Some problems associated with “validated” forms of psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 218–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginexi, E., & Hilton, T. (2006). What’s next for translation research? Evaluation and the Health Professions, 29(3), 334–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goode, E., & Ben-Yahude, N. (2009). Moral panics: The social construction of deviance. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, P., Gossop, M., Powis, B., & Strang, J. (1993). Reaching hidden populations of drug users by privileged access interviewers: Methodological and practical issues. Addiction, 88(12), 1617–1626.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grund, J.-P. C. (1993). Drug use as a social ritual: Functionality, symbolism and determinants of self-regulation. Rotterdam: Instituut voor Verslavingsonderzoek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddock, G., Barrowclough, C., Tarrier, N., Moring, J., O’Brien, R., Schofield, N., et al. (2003). Cognitive behavioural therapy and motivational intervention for schizophrenia and substance misuse 18-month outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 183, 418–426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. (1992). What’s wrong with ethnography? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, S., Ciliska, D., DiCenso, A., Thomas, H., Underwood, E. J., & Rafael, A. (1996). Evaluation research in public health: Barriers to the production and dissemination of outcomes data. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 87, 413–417.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, H. (1961). The fantastic lodge: The autobiography of a drug addict. New York, NY: Fawcett World Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, P. (1977). Behind the wall of respect: Community experiments in heroin addiction control. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine. (1998). Bridging the gap between research and practice: Forging partnerships with community-based drug and alcohol treatment. http://iom.edu/Reports/1998/Bridging-the-Gap-Between-Practice-and-Research.aspx. Accessed March 29, 2013.

  • Jackson, B. (1978). Deviance as success: The double inversion of stigmatised roles. In B. A. Babcock (Ed.), The reversible world. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14–26. Koester, S. (1994) Applying ethnography to AIDS prevention among IV drug users and social policy implications. In: Van Vugt, J., ed. AIDS Prevention and Services. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindesmith, A. (1947). Opiate addiction. Bloomington, IN: Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, C., & McKeganey, N. (2010). Drugs research: An overview of evidence and questions for policy. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohr, K. N. (2004). Rating the strength of scientific evidence: Relevance for quality improvement programs. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 16, 9–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, K. (1997). Gender-related stereotypes of transformational and transactional leadership. Sex Roles, 37, 209–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, L., & Dixon, D. (1999). Policing and public health: Law enforcement and harm minimization in a street-level drug market. British Journal of Criminology, 39(4), 488–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlatt, G. A., Larimer, M. E., & Witkiewitz, K. (Eds.). (2012). Harm reduction: Pragmatic strategies for managing high-risk behaviors (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A., & Stenner, P. (2004). Talking about drug use: What are we (and our participants) doing in qualitative research? International Journal of Drug Policy, 15(5–6), 395–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, T., & Hough, M. (2004). Drug markets and distribution systems. Addiction Research and Theory, 12(6), 549–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeganey, N. (1995). Quantitative and qualitative research in the addictions: An unhelpful divide. Addiction, 90, 749–751.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, D., & Woody, G. (1999). Individual drug counseling. Treating cocaine addiction—Therapy Manual 3. Rockville, MD: NIH. NIH Publication No. 99-4380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S., & Fredericks, M. (2003). The nature of “evidence” in qualitative research methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(1). Article 4. http://www.ualberta.ca/~ijqm

  • Moore, D. (1993). Ethnography and illicit drug use: Dispatches from an anthropologist in the field. Addiction Research, 1, 11–15.Moore D. (2002) Ethnography and the Australian drug field: Emaciation, appropriation and multidisciplinary myopia. International Journal of Drug Policy. 13:271–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. (2004). Governing street-based injecting drug users: A critique of heroin overdose prevention in Australia. Social Science and Medicine, 59(7), 1547–1557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. (2011). The ontological politics of knowledge production: Qualitative research in the multidisciplinary drug field. In S. Fraser & D. Moore (Eds.), The drug effect: Health, crime and society. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Moore, D., Dray, A., Green, R., Hudson, S. L., Jenkinson, R., Siokou, C., Perez, P., Bammer, G., Maher, L., & Dietze, P. (2009). Extending drug ethno-epidemiology using agent-based modelling. Addiction, 104(12), 1991–1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, A. P., Ponterotto, J. G., & Cancelli, A. A. (2010). Daughters’ perspectives on maternal substance abuse: Pledge to be a different kind of mother. The Qualitative Report, 15(6), 1328–1364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natarajan, M., & Belanger, M. (1998). Varieties of upper-level drug dealing organizations: A typology of cases prosecuted in New York City. Journal of Drug Issues, 28(4), 1005–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2004). Report of the Blue Ribbon Task Force on Health Services Research at the National Institute on Drug Abuse. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. http://www.nida.nih.gov/about/organization/nacda/HSRReport.pdf

  • Neale, J., Allen, D., & Coombes, L. (2005). Qualitative research methods within the addictions. Addiction, 100, 1584–1593.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neale, J., Sheard, L., & Tompkins, C. N. E. (2007). Factors that help injecting drug users to access and benefit from services: A qualitative study. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 2, 31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nutbeam, D. (1996). Improving the fit between research and practice in health promotion: Overcoming structural barriers. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 87, 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen, A. (2012). To hell and back: Excessive drug use, addiction, and the process of recovery in mainstream rock autobiographies. Substance Use and Misuse, 47(2), 143–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orwin, R. (2000). Methodological challenges in study design and implementation: Assessing program fidelity in substance abuse health services research. Addiction, 95(3), S309–S327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, G. (1987). The new heroin users. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petry, N. M., Peirce, J. M., Stitzer, M. L., Blaine, J., Roll, J. M., Cohen, A., et al. (2005). Prize-based incentives improve outcomes of stimulant abusers in outpatient psychosocial treatment programs: A National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network Study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 1148–1156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preble, E., & Casey, J. (1969). Taking care of business: The heroin user’s life on the street. International Journal of the Addictions, 4, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preble, E., & Miller, T. (1977). Methadone, wine and welfare. In R. Weppner (Ed.), Street ethnography. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawson, R. (2006). Bridges have been built: Is anyone using them? Presentation supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse; Pacific Southwest Technology Transfer Center, United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime University of CA, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redman, D. (2010). A community engagement orientation among people with a history of substance misuse and incarceration. Journal of Social Work, 12(3), 246–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinarman, C. (1995). Addiction as accomplishment: The discursive construction of disease. Addiction Research and Theory, 13, 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, T., & Moore, D. (2001a). On the qualitative in drugs research: Part one. Addiction Research and Theory, 9, 279–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, T., & Moore, D. (2001b). On the qualitative in drugs research: Part two. Addiction Research and Theory, 9, 515–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, T., Stimson, G. V., Moore, D., & Bourgois, P. (2010). Qualitative social research in addictions publishing: Creating an enabling journal environment. International Journal of Drug Policy, 21(6), 441–444.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbach, L. A., Sussman, S., Dent, C. W., & Sun, P. (2005). Tobacco, alcohol, and other drug use among high-risk young people: A five-year longitudinal study from adolescence to emerging adulthood. Journal of Drug Issues, 35(2), 333–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, M. (1981). Women on heroin. Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfield, P. (1992). The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Social Science and Medicine, 35(11), 1343–1357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. M. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 312, 71–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. (1995). The effectiveness of psychotherapy: The Consumer Reports study. American Psychologist, 50, 965–974.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sibbald, B., & Roland, M. (1997). Getting research into practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2, 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloboda, Z., & Schildhaus, S. (2002). A discussion of the concept of technology transfer of research-based drug “abuse” prevention and treatment interventions. Substance Use and Misuse, 37(8–10), 1079–1087.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • South, N. (2004). Managing work, hedonism and ‘the borderline’ between the legal and the illegal markets: Two case studies of recreational heavy drug users. Addiction Research and Theory, 12(6), 525–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J. P. (1970). You owe yourself a drunk: An ethnography of urban nomads. Boston, MA: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutter, A. (1966). The world of the righteous dope fiend. Issues in Criminology, 2, 177–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transform. http://www.tdpf.org.uk/. Accessed March 29, 2013.

  • Walshe, K., & Rundall, T. G. (2001). Evidence-based management: From theory to practice in health care. Milbank Quarterly, 79, 429–457.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lindsey Coombes M.A. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coombes, L. (2016). Qualitative Evidence in Addictions. In: Olson, K., Young, R., Schultz, I. (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Health Research for Evidence-Based Practice. Handbooks in Health, Work, and Disability, vol 4. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2920-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics