Abstract
The detailed study of ligand-gated channels often requires the reproducible, rapid, and temporally precise application of defined concentrations of ligands. There are numerous different systems for ligand application offering trade-offs between cost, ease of use, volume of compound needed, etc. When studying the extremely rapid kinetics of activation and desensitization in ionotropic ligand-gated receptors (iGluR), a prime consideration is how fast solutions can be exchanged. Of the available systems, rapid piezo-driven translation of parallel solutions streams over an outside-out patch offers the fastest and most versatile option, with open tip current rise-times in the 100–300 μs range, and occasionally as fast 20 μs (Bowie and Lange, J Neurosci 22:3392–3403, 2002; Carbone and Plested, Neuron 74:845–857, 2012; Maclean and Bowie, J Physiol 589:5383–5390, 2011; Robert and Howe, J Neurosci 23:847–858, 2003), and pulse durations ≤1 ms (Bowie and Lange, J Neurosci 22:3392–3403, 2002; Carbone and Plested, Neuron 74:845–857, 2012; Robert and Howe, J Neurosci 23:847–858, 2003). Indeed, under ideal conditions agonist applications as short as 100 μs may be possible (Auzmendi et al., PLoS One 7:e42275, 2012). However, from the experimenter’s perspective a “fast” system may also mean a system which rapidly changes test solutions, i.e., how fast can one switch between the various agonists or concentrations being tested. And while the former sense of “fast” is certainly more important in that it is necessary for certain experiments, time spent optimizing the latter yields substantial rewards. With fast switching amongst test solutions, one can complete experiments quicker, easier, and with fewer stressful moments hoping your best patch of the week hangs on for that last data point. This protocol outlines the construction of a double or multi-barrel solution exchange system which can rapidly jump between solutions (10–90 % rise-time 50–300 μs) but can also quickly switch amongst several test solutions (<0.5 s). This protocol can also be modified for constructing application pipettes for whole-cell recording.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Clements JD et al (1992) The time course of glutamate in the synaptic cleft. Science 258(5087):1498–1501
Scimemi A, Beato M (2009) Determining the neurotransmitter concentration profile at active synapses. Mol Neurobiol 40(3):289–306
Fenwick EM, Marty A, Neher E (1982) A patch-clamp study of bovine chromaffin cells and of their sensitivity to acetylcholine. J Physiol 331:577–597
Krishtal OA, Pidoplichko VI (1980) A receptor for protons in the nerve cell membrane. Neuroscience 5(12):2325–2327
Franke C, Hatt H, Dudel J (1987) Liquid filament switch for ultra-fast exchanges of solutions at excised patches of synaptic membrane of crayfish muscle. Neurosci Lett 77(2):199–204
Barberis A (2012) Fast perfusion methods for the study of ligand-gated ion channels. Neuromethods 67:173–187
Jonas P (1995) Fast application of agonists to isolated membrane patches. In: Sakmann B, Neher E (eds) Single-channel recording. Plenum, New York, pp 231–243
Tang CM (2001) Rapid solution application methods. Curr Protoc Neurosci Chapter 6:Unit 6.9
Colquhoun D, Jonas P, Sakmann B (1992) Action of brief pulses of glutamate on AMPA/kainate receptors in patches from different neurones of rat hippocampal slices. J Physiol 458:261–287
Raman IM, Trussell LO (1992) The kinetics of the response to glutamate and kainate in neurons of the avian cochlear nucleus. Neuron 9(1):173–186
Barberis A, Sachidhanandam S, Mulle C (2008) GluR6/KA2 kainate receptors mediate slow-deactivating currents. J Neurosci 28(25):6402–6406
Robert A, Howe JR (2003) How AMPA receptor desensitization depends on receptor occupancy. J Neurosci 23(3):847–858
Perrais D, Coussen F, Mulle C (2009) Atypical functional properties of GluK3-containing kainate receptors. J Neurosci 29(49):15499–15510
Bowie D, Lange GD (2002) Functional stoichiometry of glutamate receptor desensitization. J Neurosci 22(9):3392–3403
Carbone AL, Plested AJ (2012) Coupled control of desensitization and gating by the ligand binding domain of glutamate receptors. Neuron 74(5):845–857
Rosenmund C, Stern-Bach Y, Stevens CF (1998) The tetrameric structure of a glutamate receptor channel. Science 280(5369):1596–1599
Maclean DM, Bowie D (2011) Transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory protein regulation of competitive antagonism: a problem of interpretation. J Physiol 589(Pt 22):5383–5390
Schwenk J et al (2009) Functional proteomics identify cornichon proteins as auxiliary subunits of AMPA receptors. Science 323(5919):1313–1319
Tomita S et al (2005) Stargazin modulates AMPA receptor gating and trafficking by distinct domains. Nature 435(7045):1052–1058
von Engelhardt J et al (2010) CKAMP44: a brain-specific protein attenuating short-term synaptic plasticity in the dentate gyrus. Science 327(5972):1518–1522
Zhang W et al (2009) A transmembrane accessory subunit that modulates kainate-type glutamate receptors. Neuron 61(3):385–396
MacLean DM et al (2014) Stargazin promotes closure of the AMPA receptor ligand-binding domain. J Gen Physiol 144:503
Auzmendi J et al (2012) Achieving maximal speed of solution exchange for patch clamp experiments. PLoS One 7(8):e42275
Sachs F (1999) Practical limits on the maximal speed of solution exchange for patch clamp experiments. Biophys J 77(2):682–690
Sirrieh RE, MacLean DM, Jayaraman V (2013) Amino-terminal domain tetramer organization and structural effects of zinc binding in the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor. J Biol Chem 288(31):22555–22564
Zhang W et al (2008) Structural and single-channel results indicate that the rates of ligand binding domain closing and opening directly impact AMPA receptor gating. J Neurosci 28(4):932–943
Jones MV et al (1998) Defining affinity with the GABAA receptor. J Neurosci 18(21):8590–8604
Plested AJ, Mayer ML (2009) AMPA receptor ligand binding domain mobility revealed by functional cross linking. J Neurosci 29(38):11912–11923
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by an NSF grant MCB-1110501 to Dr. Vasanthi Jayaraman and an American Heart Association Postdoctoral Fellowship to Dr. MacLean. I wish to thank Dr. Andrew Plested for sharing samples and specifications of multi-barrel glass, Drs. James Howe, Derek Bowie, and Bryan Daniels as well as Patricia Brown and George Dawe for discussions on application pipette construction, Drs. Howe, Popescu, and Hansen for comments on the manuscript, and Dr. Bowie for instruction in an earlier version of this method.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
MacLean, D.M. (2016). Constructing a Rapid Solution Exchange System. In: Popescu, G. (eds) Ionotropic Glutamate Receptor Technologies. Neuromethods, vol 106. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2812-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2812-5_12
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2811-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2812-5
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols