Skip to main content

Evidence-Based Decision-Making 4: Development and Limitations of Clinical Practice Guidelines

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Clinical Epidemiology

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1281))

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines are systematically developed statements to assist practitioners and patients reach appropriate health care decisions. If developed properly, clinical practice guidelines assimilate and translate an abundance of evidence published on a daily basis into practice recommendations and, in doing so, reduce the use of unnecessary or harmful interventions, and facilitate the treatment of patients to achieve maximum benefit and minimum risk at an acceptable cost. Traditionally, clinical practice guidelines were consensus-based statements, often riddled with expert opinion. It is now recognized that clinical practice guidelines should be developed according to a transparent process involving principles of bias minimization and systematic evidence retrieval and review, with a focus on patient-relevant outcomes. The process for the development, implementation, and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines is reviewed in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hayward RS, Wilson MC, Tunis SR, Bass EB, Guyatt G (1995) Users’ guides to the medical literature. VIII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. A. Are the recommendations valid? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 274:570–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. The National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (1999) A guide to the development, implementation, and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines. The National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Canberra, ACT

    Google Scholar 

  3. Browman GP (2001) Development and aftercare of clinical guidelines: the balance between rigor and pragmatism. JAMA 286:1509–1511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization (2003) Guidelines for WHO guidelines. Global programme on evidence for health policy. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guyatt G, Vist G, Falck-Ytter Y, Kunz R, Magrini N, Schunemann H (2006) An emerging consensus on grading recommendations? Evid Based Med 11:2–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Uhlig K, Macleod A, Craig J, Lau J, Levey AS, Levin A, Moist L, Steinberg E, Walker R, Wanner C, Lameire N, Eknoyan G (2006) Grading evidence and recommendations for clinical practice guidelines in nephrology. A position statement from kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int 70:2058–2065

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, Haugh MC, Henry D, Hill S, Jaeschke R, Leng G, Liberati A, Magrini N, Mason J, Middleton P, Mrukowicz J, O’Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, Schunemann HJ, Edejer TT, Varonen H, Vist GE, Williams JW Jr, Zaza S (2004) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 328:1490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Choudhry NK, Stelfox HT, Detsky AS (2002) Relationships between authors of clinical practice guidelines and the pharmaceutical industry. JAMA 287:612–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor R, Giles J (2005) Cash interests taint drug advice. Nature 437:1070–1071

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Editorial (2005) Clinical practice guidelines and conflict of interest. CMAJ 173:1297–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Campbell N, McAlister FA (2006) Not all guidelines are created equal. CMAJ 174:814–815

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Narins RG, Bennett WM (2007) Patient care guidelines: problems and solutions. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2:1–2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Coyne DW (2007) Influence of industry on renal guideline development. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2:3–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Field MJ, Lohr KN (1992) Guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use. Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shekelle PG, Ortiz E, Rhodes S, Morton SC, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, Woolf SH (2001) Validity of the agency for healthcare research and quality clinical practice guidelines: how quickly do guidelines become outdated? JAMA 286:1461–1467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zarnke KB, Campbell NR, McAlister FA, Levine M (2000) A novel process for updating recommendations for managing hypertension: rationale and methods. Can J Cardiol 16:1094–1102

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce Culleton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Culleton, B. (2015). Evidence-Based Decision-Making 4: Development and Limitations of Clinical Practice Guidelines. In: Parfrey, P., Barrett, B. (eds) Clinical Epidemiology. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1281. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2428-8_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2428-8_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2427-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2428-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics