Abstract
Evaluators and treatment providers cannot confidently rely on the sexual abuser to be forthright or even fully aware of their sexual deviance. The penile plethysmograph, view time measures such as the Abel Assessment for sexual interest, and a clinical polygraph are psychophysiological tools that help overcome denial and minimization and aid in identifying, diagnosing, and clarifying sexual interests and aberrant appetites. In this chapter, I examine and discuss the literature and research concerning reliability and validity and the arguments that both support and criticize reliance on each of these tools. I outline procedural steps in test administration to help with standardization of stimuli, the test administration procedures, and interpretation of findings. This chapter also includes discussion about and suggestions on how to apply viewing time measures and polygraph examinations with penile plethysmograph results for evaluation purposes in clinical settings to increase and accelerate client disclosure of sexual deviance. Issues and concerns related to admissibility of this information in the courtroom are also discussed. I propose that using penile plethysmography, view time measures, and polygraph examination in tandem incrementally increases discriminant validity, especially with child molesters of males. In addition, this protocol can increase the client’s motivation to participate in treatment. Consequently, by increasing treatment motivation along with more comprehensive assessment of need areas, the client is more likely to overcome the problems that contribute to sexual recidivism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abel, G. G., Becker, J. V., Mittleman, M., Cuningham-Rather, J., Rouleau, J. L., & Murphy, D. W. (1988). Self-reported sex crimes of nonincarcerated paraphiliacs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2(1), 3–25.
Abel, G. G., Blanchard, E. D., & Barlow, D. H. (1981). Measurement of sexual arousal in several paraphilias: The effects of stimulus modality, instructional set and stimulus content on the objective. Behavior Research and Therapy, 19, 25–33.
Abel, G. G., Huffman, J., Warberg, B., & Holland, C. L. (1998). Visual reaction time and plethysmography as a measures of sexual interest in child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Researcher and Treatment, 10(2), 81–95.
Abel, G. G., Jordan, A., Hand, C. G., Holland, L. A., & Phipps, A. (2001). Classification models of child molesters utilizing the Abel assessment for sexual interest. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25, 703–718.
Abel, G. G., Jordan, A., Rouleau, J. L., Emerick, R., Barboza-Whitehead, S., & Osborn, C. (2004). Use of visual reaction time to assess male adolescents who molest children. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16(3), 255–265.
Abel, G., Mittelman, M. S., & Becker, J. (1985). Sexual offenders: Results of assessment and recommendations for treatment. In H. H. Ben-Aron, S. I. Hucker, & C. D. Wester (Eds.), Clinical criminology (pp. 191–205). Toronto, ON: MM Graphics.
Adams, H. E., Motsinger, P., McAnulty, R. D., & Moore, A. L. (1992). Voluntary control of penile tumescence among homosexual and heterosexual subjects. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 21, 17–31.
Ahlmeyer, S., Heil, P., McKee, B., & English, K. (2000). The impact of polygraphy on admissions of victims and offenses in adult sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12(2), 123–138.
American International Institute of Polygraph. (2009, July). Polygraph testing for the identification, treatment & monitoring of sex offenders. American Polygraph Association recognized course. Post conviction sex offender testing (PCSOT). Morrow, Georgia: American International Institute of Polygraphy.
American Polygraph Association: Polygraph Validity Research. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://www.polygraph.org/section/resources/polygraph-validity-research
American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved February 16, 2013, from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. (2001). Association for the treatment of sexual abusers: Practice standards and guidelines for evaluation, treatment, and management of adult male sexual abusers. Beaverton, OR: Author.
Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. (1993). Auditory stimuli for penile plethysmography (Cassette Recording DC No. 136C). Beaverton, OR: Author.
Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. (2013). Association for the treatment of sexual abusers: Practice standards and guide-lines for evaluation, treatment, and management of adult male sexual abusers. Beaverton, OR: Author.
Avery-Clark, C., & Laws, D. R. (1984). Differential erection response patterns of sexual child abusers to stimuli describing activities with children. Behavior Therapy, 15, 71–83.
Barbaree, H. E., Baxter, D. J., & Marshall, W. L. (1989). Brief research report: The reliability of the rape index in a sample of rapists and nonrapists. Violence and Victims, 4, 399–306.
Barbaree, H. E., Blanchard, R., & Kuban, M. (1999). A comparison of volume and circumference phallometry: Response magnitude and method agreement. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 28(4), 345–360.
Barbaree, H. E., & Marshall, W. L. (1984). Deviant sexual arousal, offense history, and demographic variables as predictors of reoffense among child molesters. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 6, 267–280.
Barker, J. G., & Howell, R. J. (1992). The plethysmograph: A review of recent literature. Bulletin American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 20(1), 13–25. Electronic revision.
Baxter, D. J., Marshall, W. L., Barbaree, H. E., Davidson, P. R., & Malcolm, P. B. (1984). Deviant sexual behavior: Differentiating sex offenders by criminal and personal history, psychometric measures, and sexual response. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 11, 477–501.
Bellis, M. (2013). Police technology and forensic science history of the lie detector or polygraph machine. About.com Guide. Retrieved February 17, 2013, from http://inventors.about.com/od/fstartinventions/a/forensic_2.htm
Berthiaume v. Caron, 142 F.3d 12 (1st Cir. 1998).
Bradford, J. M. W., Kingston, D., Ahmed, G., & Fedoroff, J. P. (2010). Commentary: Sildenafil in phallometric testing—An evidence-based assessment of sexual offenders. Journal of American Academic of Psychiatry and Law, 38, 512–515.
Card, R. D., & Dibble, A. (1995). Predictive value of the Card/Farrall stimuli in discriminating between gynephilic and pedophilic sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7(2), 129–141.
Coric, V., Feuerstein, S., Fortunati, F., Southwick, S., Hemporini, H., & Morgan, C. A. (2005). Assessing sex offenders. Psychiatry, 2(11), 26–29.
Crooks, R. & Baur, K. (2008). Our sexuality. Retrieved February 10, 2013, from http://www.soc.ucsb.edu/sexinfo/article/the-sexual-response-cycle
DSM-5 Proposed Revisions. (2010). Retrieved February 10, 2010, from http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/proposedrevision
DSM-5 Workgroup Proposals. (2013). Retrieved January 18, 2013, from http://www.psych.org/File%20Library/Advocacy%20and%20Newsroom/Press%20Releases/2012%20Releases/12-43-DSM-5-BOT-Vote-News-Release--FINAL--3-.pdf
DSM-V Workshop Proposed Development. (2013). U 03 Sexual Masochism. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=187#
Eccles, A., Marshall, W. L., & Barbaree, H. E. (1994). Differentiating rapists and non-offenders using the rape index. Behaviour Research Therapy, 32(5), 539–546.
Elaad, E., Ginton, A., & Jungman, N. (1992). Detection measures in real-life criminal guilty knowledge tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(5), 7757–7767.
English, K., Jones, L., Pasini-Hill, D., Patrick, D., & Cooley-Towell, S. (2000). The value of polygraph testing in sex offender management. Lakewood, CO: National Institute of Justice, Colorado Department of Public Safety Division of Criminal Justice, Office of Research & Statistics.
Fedora, O., Reddon, J. R., Morrison, J. W., Fedora, S. K., Pascoe, H., & Yeudall, L. T. (1992). Sadism and other paraphilias in normal control and aggressive and nonaggressive sex offenders. Archives of Sexual Behaviors, 21, 1–31.
Fernandez, Y., & Marshall, W. L. (2003). Victim empathy, social self-esteem and psychopathy in rapists. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 15(1), 11–26.
Fischer, L., & Smith, G. (1999). Statistical adequacy of the Abel assessment for interest in paraphilias. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11(3), 195–205.
Freund, K., & Blanchard, R. (1989). Phallometric diagnosis of pedophilia. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 100–105. Electric version.
Freund, K., & Watson, R. J. (1991). Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of a phallometric test: An update of phallometric diagnosis of pedophilia. Psychological assessment. A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 254–260.
Freund, K., Watson, R., Dickey, R., & Rienzo, D. (1991). Erotic gender differentiation in pedophilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 20, 555–566.
Freund, K., Watson, R., & Rienzo, D. (1988). Signs of feigning in phallometric test. Behavior Research and Therapy, 26, 105–112.
Gray, S. R., & Plaud, J. J. (2005). A comparison of the Abel assessment for sexual interest and penile plethysmography in an outpatient sample of sexual offenders. Journal of Sexual Offender Civil Commitment: Science and the Law, 1, 1–10.
Green, R. (2002). Is pedophilia a mental disorder? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31(6), 467–471.
Grubin, D., Madsen, L., Parsons, S., Susnowski, D., & Warberg, B. (2004). A prospective study on the impact of polygraph on high risk behavior on adult sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16(3), 209–222.
Grubin, D., & Madson, L. (2006). Accuracy and utility of post-conviction polygraph testing of sex offenders. British Journal of Psychiatry, 188, 479–483.
Haaven, J., & Schlank, A. (2001). The challenge of treating the sex offender with developmental disabilities. In A. Schlank (Ed.), The sexual predator: Legal issues, clinical issues, special populations (Vol. II, pp. 13-1–13-19). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
Hall, G. C. N., Hirschman, R., & Oliver, L. L. (1995). Sexual arousal and arousability to pedophilic stimuli in a community sample of normal men. Behavior Therapy, 269(4), 681–694. Electric version.
Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348–362.
Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163.
Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., & Chaplin, T. C. (1996). Viewing time as a measure of sexual interest among child molesters and normal heterosexual men. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34(4), 389–394.
Hecker, J. E., King, M. W., & Scoular, R. J. (2009). The startle probe reflex: An alternative approach to the measurement of sexual interest. In T. Ward & D. R. Laws (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Issues and controversies (pp. 82–102). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Heilbrun, K. (2003). Principles of forensic mental health assessment. Implications for the forensic assessment of sexual offenders. In R. A. Prentky, E. S. Janus, & M. C. Seto (Eds.), Sexually coercive behavior, understanding and management (pp. 167–184). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
Howe, R. (1995). A survey of plethysmographic assessment in North America. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7(1), 9–24.
Howe, R. J. (2003). Circumferential change scores in phallometric assessment: Normative data. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15(4), 365–375.
Iacono, W. G. (2008). Accuracy of polygraph techniques: Problems using confessions to determine ground truth. Physiology & Behavior, 95(1–2), 24–26. Electronic version.
Janssen, E., Everaerd, W., van Lunsen, R. H. W., & Oerlemans, S. (1994). Visual stimulation facilitates penile responses to vibration in men with and without erectile disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(6), 1222–1228.
Jensen, S. H., & Laws, D. R. (1994). A clinician’s guide to phallometry. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press. Videotape.
Kingston, D. A., Seto, M. C., Firestone, P., & Bradford, J. M. (2010). Comparing indicators of sexual sadism as predictors of recidivism among adult male sexual offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(4), 574–584.
Knight, R. (2009). Is a diagnostic category for paraphilic coercive disorder defensible? Archives Sex Behavior, 39(2), 419–426. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9571-x.
Kokish, R., Levenson, J. S., & Blasingame, G. D. (2005). Post-conviction sex offender polygraph examination: Client-reported perceptions of utility and accuracy. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17(2), 211–221.
Konopasky, R. J., & Konopasky, A. W. B. (2000). Remaking penile plethysmography. In D. R. Laws, S. M. Hudson, & T. Ward (Eds.), Remaking relapse prevention with sex offenders: A sourcebook (pp. 257–284). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Krueger, R. B., Bardford, J. M. W., & Glancy, G. D. (1998). Report from the committee on sex offenders: The Abel assessment for sexual interest—A brief description. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 26(2), 277–278.
Lalumière, M. L., & Harris, G. T. (1998). Common questions regarding the use of phallometric testing with sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10(3), 227–237.
Lalumière, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (1994). The discriminability of rapists from non-sex offenders using phallometric measures: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 1(150), 150–175.
Lalumière, M. L., Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Trautrimas, C. (2003). Are rapists differentially aroused by coercive sex in phallometric assessments? In R. A. Prentky, E. S. Janus, & M. C. Seto (Eds.), Sexually coercive behavior, understanding and management (pp. 211–224). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989.
Lanyon, R. I., & Thomas, M. L. (2008). Detecting deception in sex offender assessment. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 285–296). New York: Guilford Press. Electronic version.
Launay, G. (1999). The phallometric assessment of sex offenders: An update. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 9(3), 254–274. Electronic version.
Laws, D. R. (1996). Marching into the past: A critique of Card and Olsen. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 8(4), 273–277.
Laws, D. R. (2003). Penile plethysmography: Will we ever get it right? In T. Ward & D. R. Laws (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Issues and controversies (pp. 82–102). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Laws, D. R. (2009). Penile plethysmography: strengths, limitation, innovations, cognitive approaches to the assessment of sexual interest in sexual offenders. In D. Thornton & D. R. Laws (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to the assessment of sexual interest in sexual offenders (pp. 7–29). West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
Laws, D. R., Gulayets, M. J., & Frenzel, R. R. (1995). Assessment of sex offenders using standardized stimulus procedures: A multi site study. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 45–66.
Laws, D. R., Hanson, L. K., Osborn, C. A., & Greenbaum, P. E. (2000). Classification of child molesters plethysmographic assessment of sexual arousal and a self-report measure of sexual preference. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 1297–1312.
Letourneau, E. J. (2002). A comparison of objective measures of sexual arousal and interest: Visual reaction time and penile plethysmography. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 207–224.
Levenson, J. S. (2004). Reliability of sexually violent predator civil commitment criteria in Florida. Law and Human Behavior, 28(4), 357–368.
Mangan, D. J., Armitage, T. E., & Adams, G. C. (2008). A field study on the validity of the Quadri-track zone comparison technique. Physiology & Behavior, 95, 17–23.
Mann, R. E., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the psychological meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22(2), 191–217.
Maram, W. B. (2005). Comparison of PPG and AASI in assessing offenders. Perspective, California Coalition on Sexual Offending, 3(1), 1.
Maram, W. B., & Koetting, M. G. (2004). Phallometry and visual reaction time: Criterion-related validity using phallometric change scores and visual reaction time. Unpublished raw data.
Marshall, W. L. (1996). Assessment, treatment, and theorizing about sex offenders. In D. R. Laws & W. O’Donohue (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment (pp. 162–199). New York: Guilford.
Marshall, W. L. (2006a). Clinical and research limitations in the use of phallometric testing with sexual offenders. http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org
Marshall, W. L. (2006b). Diagnostic issues, multiple paraphilias, and Comorbid disorder in sexual offenders: Their incident and treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 16–35.
Marshall, W. L., & Fernandez, Y. M. (2000). Phallometric testing with sex offenders: Limits to its value. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 807–822.
Marshall, W. L., & Fernandez, Y. M. (2003). Phallometric testing with sexual offenders: Theory, research, and practice. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Foundation, Inc.
Matte, J. A. (1996). Forensic psychophysiological: Using the polygraph: scientific truth verification—Lie detection. Williamsville, NY: J. A. M. Publications.
McAnulty, R. D., & Adams, H. E. (1991). Voluntary control of penile tumescence: Effects of an incentive and a signal detection task. Journal of Sex Research, 28, 557–577.
McGrath, R. J., Cumming, G. F., Burchard, B. L., Zeoli, S., & Ellerby, L. (2009). Current practice and emerging trends in sexual abuser management: The Safer Society 2009 North American survey. Brandon, VT: The Safer Society Foundation, Inc.
McGrath, R. J., Cumming, G. F., & Burchard, B. L. (2003). Current practices and trends in sexual abuser management: The Safer Society 2002 nationwide survey. Brandon, VT: The Safer Society Foundation, Inc.
Murphy, W. D., & Barbaree, H. E. (1994). Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 783–792.
National Clearinghouse on Family Violence. (1998). Addressing the needs of developmentally delayed sex offenders, a guide. Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada.
Nichols, H. R., & Molinder, I. (1999). Psychosexual life history (adult male form). Fircrest, WA: Nichols & Molinder Assessments, Inc.
North Carolina v. Spencer, 459 S.E. 2d 812, 815 (N.C. Ct. App. 1995).
O’Donohue, W., & Letourneau, E. (1992). The psychometric properties of penile tumescence assessment of child molesters. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavior Assessment, 14, 123–174.
O’Donohue, W., Regev, L. G., & Hagstrom, A. (2000). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12(2), 95–105.
Paraphilia Work Group. (2013). Parawww.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/proposedrevision DSM-V Proposed Develop. U 03 Pedophilic Disorder. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=186#
People v. Stoll. (1989). 49 C3d 1136, 265 Cal Rptr 111.
Quinsey, V. L. (2010). Coercive paraphilic disorder. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 405–410.
Quinsey, V. L., & Carrigan, W. F. (1978). Penile response to visual stimuli: Instructional control with and without auditory sexual fantasy correlates. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 5, 333–341.
Quinsey, V. L., Chaplin, T. C., & Carrigan, W. F. (1979). Sexual preferences among incest and nonincestous child molesters. Behavior Therapy, 10, 562–565.
Quinsey, V. L., Steinman, C. M., Bergersen, S. G., & Holmes, T. F. (1975). Penile circumference, skin conductance, and ranking responses of child molesters and “normals” to sexual and nonsexual visual stimuli. Behavior Therapy, 6, 213–219.
R. v. J.-L.J., 2 S. C. R. 600 Canada Sup. Ct. (2000).
Raskin, D. C. (1988). Does science support polygraph testing? In A. Gale (Ed.), The polygraph test: Lies, truth and science (pp. 96–110). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Raskin, D., Barland, G. H., & Podlesny, J. A. (1976). Validity and reliability of detection of deception: Final report (Government Study Contract # 75-NI-00-0001). Salt Lake City, Utah: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, U.S. Department of Justice.
Rosen, R. C., & Keith, F. J. (1978). The measure of human penile tumescence. Psychophysiology, 15, 366–376.
Rosenzweig, S. (1942). The photoscope as an objective device for evaluating sexual interest. Psychosomatic Medicine, 4, 150–158. Electronic version.
Sachsenmaier, S. J., & Peters, J. M. (2002). Sexual offender risk assessment methods and admissibility as expert witness evidence. In J. M. Peters (Ed.), Assessment and management of sex offenders: What prosecutors need to know. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section. Electric version.
Schouten, P. G. W., & Simon, W. T. (1992). Validity of phallometric measures with sex offenders: Comments on Quinsey, Laws, and Hall debate. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(5), 812–814.
Schwartz, B.K., & Cellini, H.R. (1999). Sex offender recidivism and risk factors in the involuntary commitment process. In B. K. Schwartz (Ed.), The sex offender: Theoretical advances, treating special populations and legal developments (pp. 8-1-8-22). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
Scientific Validity of Polygraph Testing: A Research Review and Evaluation. (1983). Washington, DC: U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment, 1983. Author. Retrieved February 2, 2012.
Sensitivity and Specificity. (2013). Retrieved January 17, 2013, from http://courses.ncssm.edu/math/Stat_Inst/Stats2007/Stat%20and%20Calc/Sensitivity%20and%20Specificity
Smith, G., & Fischer, L. (1999). Assessment of juvenile sexual offenders: Reliability and validity of the Abel assessment for interest in paraphilias. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11(3), 207–216.
The British Psychological Society, Professional Practice Board. (2008, September). Penile plethysmography: Guidance for psychologists. British Psychological Society.
U. S. v. Powers, 59 F.3d 1460 (4th Cir. 1995).
U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment. (1983). Scientific validity of polygraph testing: A research review and evaluation: A technical memorandum. November 1983 (OTA-TM-H-15), Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. v. Dotson, 324 F. 3rd 256, 02-4208 (4th Cir. 1984).
U.S. v. Herrera, 928 F.2d 769, 772 (6th Cir. 1991).
U.S. v. Silverman, 976 F.2d 1502, 1511 (6th Cir. 1992).
U.S. v. Stoterau, 07-50124 524 F.3d 988 (9th Cir. 2008).
U.S. v. Weber, 05-50191 (9th Cir. 2006).
Wilson, R. J. (1998). Psychophysiological signs of faking in phallometric test. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 113–126.
Wilson, R. J., & Mathon, H. F. (2006). Remembering Kurt Freund (1914–1996). ATSA Forum. Beaverton, OR: Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers.
Wollert, R. (2007). Poor diagnostic reliability, the Null-Bayes logic model, and their implication for sexually violent predator evaluations. Psychology Public Policy and Law, 13(3), 167–203. Electronic version.
Wormith, J. S. (1986). Assessing deviant sexual arousal: Physiological and cognitive aspects. Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy, 6, 101–137.
Wright, L. W., & Adams, H. E. (1994). Assessment and sexual preference using a choice reaction time task. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 16, 211–231. Electronic version.
Zolondek, S. C., Abel, G., Northey, W. F., Jr., & Jordan, A. D. (2001). The self-reported behaviors of juvenile sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(1), 73–85.
Zuckerman, M. (1971). Physiological measures of sexual arousal in humans. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 297–329.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maram, W.B. (2016). Psychophysiological Assessment of Sexual Offenders: A Practitioner’s Perspective. In: Phenix, A., Hoberman, H. (eds) Sexual Offending. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2416-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2416-5_15
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2415-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2416-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)