Skip to main content

Abstract

The complex anatomical relationships within a small area make the diagnosis and management of both penetrating neck vascular injuries (PNVI) and blunt neck vascular injuries (BNVI) challenging. Radiographic evaluation continues to evolve, with a shift from invasive to noninvasive diagnostics. The epidemiology of penetrating and blunt vascular injuries to the neck is distinctly different. Among penetrating injuries, firearms are responsible for about 43 %, stab wounds for about 40 %, shotguns for about 4 %, and other weapons for about 12 %. Overall, about 35 % of all gunshot wounds (GSWs) and 20 % of stab wounds (SWs) to the neck cause significant injuries, but only 16 % of GSWs and 10 % SWs require surgical therapy. Even though transcervical GSWs cause significant injuries in 73 % of victims, only 21 % require surgery. Although BNVI is common, when cervical spine injuries are excluded, injuries to the remaining structures are rare. Though uncommon, blunt cerebrovascular injuries can be lethal. With increased appreciation and availability of noninvasive diagnostics, the rates of these injuries are now between 1.0 % and 2.0 %.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Demetriades D, Theodorou D, Cornwell E, et al. Evaluation of penetrating injuries of the neck: prospective study of 223 patients. World J Surg. 1997;21(1):41–7. discussion 47–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Demetriades D, Theodorou D, Cornwell E, et al. Transcervical gunshot injuries: mandatory operation is not necessary. J Trauma. 1996;40(5):758–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cothren CC, Moore EE, Biffl WL, et al. Anticoagulation is the gold standard therapy for blunt carotid injuries to reduce stroke rate. Arch Surg. 2004;139(5):540–5. discussion 545–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cothren CC, Moore EE, Biffl WL, et al. Cervical spine fracture patterns predictive of blunt vertebral artery injury. J Trauma. 2003;55(5):811–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stein DM, Boswell S, Sliker CW, Lui FY, Scalea TM. Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: does treatment always matter? J Trauma. 2009;66(1):132–43. discussion 143–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller PR, Fabian TC, Croce MA, et al. Prospective screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries: analysis of diagnostic modalities and outcomes. Ann Surg. 2002;236(3):386–93. discussion 393–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Biffl WL, Ray Jr CE, Moore EE, et al. Treatment-related outcomes from blunt cerebrovascular injuries: importance of routine follow-up arteriography. Ann Surg. 2002;235(5):699–706. discussion 706–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Biffl WL, Moore EE, Offner PJ, et al. Optimizing screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries. Am J Surg. 1999;178(6):517–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Berne JD, Reuland KS, Villarreal DH, McGovern TM, Rowe SA, Norwood SH. Sixteen-slice multi-detector computed tomographic angiography improves the accuracy of screening for blunt cerebrovascular injury. J Trauma. 2006;60(6):1204–9. discussion 1209–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mayberry JC, Brown CV, Mullins RJ, Velmahos GC. Blunt carotid artery injury: the futility of aggressive screening and diagnosis. Arch Surg. 2004;139(6):609–12. discussion 612–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Apffelstaedt JP, Muller R. Results of mandatory exploration for penetrating neck trauma. World J Surg. 1994;18(6):917–9. discussion 920.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer JP, Barrett JA, Schuler JJ, Flanigan DP. Mandatory vs selective exploration for penetrating neck trauma. A prospective assessment. Arch Surg. 1987;122(5):592–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Eddy VA. Is routine arteriography mandatory for penetrating injury to zone 1 of the neck? Zone 1 penetrating neck injury study group. J Trauma. 2000;48(2):208–13. discussion 213–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Demetriades D, Theodorou D, Cornwell 3rd E, et al. Penetrating injuries of the neck in patients in stable condition. Physical examination, angiography, or color flow doppler imaging. Arch Surg. 1995;130(9):971–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ordog GJ, Albin D, Wasserberger J, Schlater TL, Balasubramaniam S. 110 bullet wounds to the neck. J Trauma. 1985;25(3):238–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hirshberg A, Wall MJ, Johnston Jr RH, Burch JM, Mattox KL. Transcervical gunshot injuries. Am J Surg. 1994;167(3):309–12.

    Google Scholar 

  17. van As AB, van Deurzen DF, Verleisdonk EJ. Gunshots to the neck: selective angiography as part of conservative management. Injury. 2002;33(5):453–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Inaba K, Munera F, McKenney M, et al. Prospective evaluation of screening multislice helical computed tomographic angiography in the initial evaluation of penetrating neck injuries. J Trauma. 2006;61(1):144–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Osborn TM, Bell RB, Qaisi W, Long WB. Computed tomographic angiography as an aid to clinical decision making in the selective management of penetrating injuries to the neck: a reduction in the need for operative exploration. J Trauma. 2008;64(6):1466–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nunez Jr DB, Torres-Leon M, Munera F. Vascular injuries of the neck and thoracic inlet: helical CT-angiographic correlation. Radiographics. 2004;24(4):1087–98. discussion 1099–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Armstrong WB, Detar TR, Stanley RB. Diagnosis and management of external penetrating cervical esophageal injuries. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1994;103(11):863–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fan ST, Lau WY, Yip WC, Poon GP, Yeung C, Wong KK. Limitations and dangers of gastrografin swallow after esophageal and upper gastric operations. Am J Surg. 1988;155(3):495–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Srinivasan R, Haywood T, Horwitz B, Buckman RF, Fisher RS, Krevsky B. Role of flexible endoscopy in the evaluation of possible esophageal trauma after penetrating injuries. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(7):1725–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vishteh AG, Marciano FF, David CA, Schievink WI, Zabramski JM, Spetzler RF. Long-term graft patency rates and clinical outcomes after revascularization for symptomatic traumatic internal carotid artery dissection. Neurosurgery. 1998;43(4):761–7. discussion 767–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Becquemin JP, Cavillon A, Brunel M, Desgranges P, Melliere D. Polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for carotid repair. Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;4(6):740–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Losken A, Rozycki GS, Feliciano DV. The use of the sternocleidomastoid muscle flap in combined injuries to the esophagus and carotid artery or trachea. J Trauma. 2000;49(5):815–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rostomily RC, Newell DW, Grady MS, Wallace S, Nicholls S, Winn HR. Gunshot wounds of the internal carotid artery at the skull base: management with vein bypass grafts and a review of the literature. J Trauma. 1997;42(1):123–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Miller PR, Fabian TC, Bee TK, et al. Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: diagnosis and treatment. J Trauma. 2001;51(2):279–85. discussion 285–6.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fabian TC, Patton Jr JH, Croce MA, Minard G, Kudsk KA, Pritchard FE. Blunt carotid injury. Importance of early diagnosis and anticoagulant therapy. Ann Surg. 1996;223(5):513–22. discussion 522–5.

    Google Scholar 

  30. DuBose J, Recinos G, Teixeira PG, Inaba K, Demetriades D. Endovascular stenting for the treatment of traumatic internal carotid injuries: expanding experience. J Trauma. 2008;65(6):1561–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Biffl WL, Moore EE, Ryu RK, et al. The unrecognized epidemic of blunt carotid arterial injuries: early diagnosis improves neurologic outcome. Ann Surg. 1998;228(4):462–70.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Eachempati SR, Vaslef SN, Sebastian MW, Reed 2nd RL. Blunt vascular injuries of the head and neck: is heparinization necessary? J Trauma. 1998;45(6):997–1004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Thal ER, Snyder 3rd WH, Hays RJ, Perry MO. Management of carotid artery injuries. Surgery. 1974;76(6):955–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ramadan F, Rutledge R, Oller D, Howell P, Baker C, Keagy B. Carotid artery trauma: a review of contemporary trauma center experiences. J Vasc Surg. 1995;21(1):46–55. discussion 55–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bowley DM, Degiannis E, Goosen J, Boffard KD. Penetrating vascular trauma in Johannesburg, South Africa. Surg Clin North Am. 2002;82(1):221–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Teehan EP, Padberg Jr FT, Thompson PN, et al. Carotid arterial trauma: assessment with the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) as a guide to surgical management. Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;5(2):196–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

DuBose, J. (2015). Cervical Vascular Injuries. In: Scalea, T. (eds) The Shock Trauma Manual of Operative Techniques. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2371-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2371-7_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2370-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2371-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics