Skip to main content

Application of Perceptual Models to the Measurement of Pain and Affective Responses to Exercise

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Perceived Exertion Laboratory Manual

Abstract

Thus far, this laboratory manual has presented the conceptual models, background information, previous literature, and current methodologies for the measurement of perceived exertion responses to exercise. The application of perceptual responses to exercise assessment, prescription and program monitoring has been discussed. The study and development of the perceived exertion knowledge base, however, has expanded over the years to include other perceptual and psychosocial constructs, i.e., naturally occurring muscle pain, affect, and enjoyment. It has been argued that, in addition to an individual’s perception of physical exertion, variables such as pain, affect, and enjoyment may play an important role in determining the level of regular PA participation. Part 4 of this manual is titled Applied Perceptual and Psychosocial Research. This, the first chapter in Part 4, presents a series of power reviews, or brief summaries of the literature, concerning the measurement of naturally occurring muscle pain, affect, and enjoyment during exercise. Each section of this chapter can be linked retroactively to specific content presented previously regarding perceived exertion. Then, the remaining chapters of Part 4 present more extensive literature reviews for topics that are of growing interest concerning perceptual and psychosocial responses to exercise. These topics include the effects of caffeine supplementation, acute carbohydrate feeding, and music on perceptual, affective, and physiological responses to exercise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett JD, Close GL, MacLaren DPM, Gregson W, Drust B, Morton JP. High-intensity interval running is perceived to be more enjoyable than moderate-intensity continuous exercise: implications for exercise adherence. J Sports Sci. 2011;29:547–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borg G, Ljunggren G, Ceci R. The increase of perceived exertion, aches and pain in the legs, heart rate and blood lactate during exercise on a bicycle ergometer. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1985;54:343–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook DB, O’Connor PJ, Eubanks SA, Smith JC, Lee M. Naturally occurring muscle pain during exercise: assessment and experimental evidence. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;29:999–1012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook DB, O’Connor PJ, Oliver SE, Lee Y. Sex differences in naturally occurring muscle pain and exertion during maximal cycle ergometry. Int J Neurosci. 1998;95:183–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp NA, Fournier PA, Licari MK, Braham R, Guelfi KJ. Adding sprints to continuous exercise at the intensity that maximises fat oxidation: implications for acute energy balance and enjoyment. Metabolism. 2012a;61:1280–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp NA, Fournier PA, Licari MK, Braham R, Guelfi KJ. Optimising sprint interval exercise to maximise energy expenditure and enjoyment in overweight boys. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012b;37:1222–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva SG, Elsangedy HM, Krinski K, De Campos W. Effect of body mass index on affect at intensities spanning the ventilatory threshold. Percept Mot Skills. 2011;113:575–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dishman RK, Farquhar RP, Curetone KG. Responses to preferred intensities of exertion in men differing in activity levels. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994;26:783–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ekkekakis P. Pleasure and displeasure from the body: perspectives from exercise. Cogn Emot. 2003;17:213–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekkekakis P, Hall EE, Van Lunduyt LM, Petruzzello SJ. Walking in (affective) circles. Can short walks enhance affect? J Behav Med. 2000;23:245–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ekkekakis P, Hall EE, Petruzzello SJ. Variations and homogeneity in affective responses to physical activity of varying intensities: an alternative perspective on dose–response based on evolutionary considerations. J Sport Sci. 2005;23:477–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekkekakis P, Lind E. Exercise does not feel the same when you are overweight: the impact of self-selected and imposed intensity on affect and exertion. Int J Obes. 2006;30:652–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekkekakis P, Hall EE, Petruzzello SJ. The relationship between exercise intensity and affective responses demystified: to crack the 40-year-old nut, replace the 40-year-old nutcracker! Ann Behav Med. 2008;35:136–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emmons RA, Diener E. A goal-affect analysis of everyday situational choices. J Res Pers. 1986;20:309–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goss F, Robertson R, DaSilva S, Suminski R, Kang J, Metz K. Ratings of perceived exertion and energy expenditure during light to moderate activity. Percept Mot Skills. 2003;96:739–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haile L, Ledezma CM, Koch KA, Shouey LB, Aaron DJ, Goss FL, Robertson RJ. Predicted, actual and session muscle pain and perceived exertion during cycle exercise in young men. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:S301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haile L, Gallagher M, Haile AM, Dixon CB, Goss FL, Robertson RJ. Session, segmented session, and acute RPE and affective responses to self-selected treadmill exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013a;45:S167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haile L, Goss FL, Robertson RJ, Andreacci JL, Gallagher Jr M, Nagle EF. Session perceived exertion and affective responses to self-selected and imposed cycle exercise of the same intensity ion young men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013b;116:1755–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haile AM, Haile L, Taylor M, Shafer A, Wisniewski K, Deldin A, Panzak G, Goss FL, Nagle E, Robertson RJ. Concurrent validity of an exercise enjoyment scale using physiological and psychological criteria. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44:S645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall EE, Ekkekakis P, Petruzzello SP. The affective beneficence of vigorous exercise revisited. Br J Health Psychol. 2002;7:47–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy CJ, Rejeski WJ. Not what but how one feels: the measurement of affect during exercise. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1989;11:304–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt SE, DiAlesandro A, Lambright G, Williams D, Aaron D, Goss F, Robertson R. Predicted and actual leg pain and perceived exertion during cycle exercise in young women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:S485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane I, Robertson RJ, Fertman CI, McConnaha WR, Nagle EF, Rabin BS, Rubinstein EN. Predicted and actual exercise discomfort in middle school children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:1013–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney E, Rejeski WJ, Messier SP. Managing exercise distress: the effect of broad spectrum intervention on affect, RPE, and running efficiency. Can J Sport Sci. 1987;12:97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkcaldy BC, Shephard RJ. Therapeutic implications of exercise. J Sport Psychol. 1990;21:165–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind E, Joens-Matre RR, Ekkekakis P. What intensity of physical activity do previously sedentary middle-aged women select? evidence of a coherent pattern from physiological, perceptual, and affective markers. Prev Med. 2005;40:407–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lind E, Ekkekakis P, Vazou S. The affective impact of exercise intensity that slightly exceeds the preferred level: ‘pain’ for no additional ‘gain’. J Health Psychol. 2008;13:464–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ljunggren G, Ceci R, Karlsson J. Prolonged exercise at a constant load on a bicycle ergometer: ratings of perceived exertion and leg aches and pain as well as measurements of blood lactate accumulation and heart rate. Int J Sports Med. 1987;8:109–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moses J, Steptoe A, Mathews A, Edwards S. The effects of exercise training on mental well-being in the normal population: a controlled trial. J Psychosom Res. 1989;33:47–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor PJ, Cook DB. Moderate-intensity muscle pain can be produced and sustained during cycle ergometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:1046–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parfitt G, Rose EA, Burgess WM. The psychological and physiological responses of sedentary individuals to prescribed and preferred intensity exercise. Br J Health Psychol. 2006;11:39–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rachman S, Lopatka C. Accurate and inaccurate predictions of pain. Behav Res Ther. 1988;26:291–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rachman S, Arntz A. The overprediction and underprediction of pain. Clin Psychol Rev. 1991;11:339–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rejeski WJ, Best D, Griffith P, Kenney E. Sex-role orientation and the responses of men to exercise stress. Res Q. 1987;58:260–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Aaron DJ, Nagle EF, Gallagher Jr M, Kane IR, Tessmer KA, Schafer MA, Hunt SE. Concurrent muscle hurt and perceived exertion of children during resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:1146–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rose EA, Parfitt G. A quantitative analysis and qualitative explanation of the individual differences in affective responses to prescribed and self-selected exercise intensities. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2007;29:281–309.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rose EA, Parfitt G. Can the feeling scale be used to regulate exercise intensity? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:1852–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard KE, Parfitt G. Acute affective responses to prescribed and self-selected exercise intensities in young adolescent boys and girls. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2008;20:129–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley DM, Williams SE, Cumming J. Preliminary validation of a single-item measure of exercise enjoyment: the exercise enjoyment scale. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2009;31:S138–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate AK, Petruzzello SJ. Varying the intensity of acute exercise: implications for changes in affect. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1995;35:295–302.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trost SG, Owen N, Bauman AE, Sallis JF, Brown W. Correlates of adults’ participation in physical activity: review and update. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:1996–2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lunduyt LM, Ekkekakis P, Hall EE, Petruzzello SJ. Throwing the mountains into the lakes: on the perils of nomothetic conceptions of the exercise-affect relationship. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2000;24:151–69.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haile, L., Gallagher, M., J. Robertson, R. (2015). Application of Perceptual Models to the Measurement of Pain and Affective Responses to Exercise. In: Perceived Exertion Laboratory Manual. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1917-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics