Skip to main content

Both Sides of the Ditch: The Ethics of Narrating the Past in the Present

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethics and Archaeological Praxis

Part of the book series: Ethical Archaeologies: The Politics of Social Justice ((ETHARCHAEOL,volume 1))

Abstract

Archaeology is not just a technique for writing history: a statement that is very evident when working in Indigenous landscapes on both sides of the Tasman Sea. Social contexts inform the process of archaeology, with its underlying issues of scientific experts versus oral historians, colonisers versus colonised, etc. Although over the last 30 years there have been improvements in these relationships, and these should be celebrated, there is still a “ditch” to be bridged. Our paper examines the current discipline of archaeology in Australia and New Zealand, and traces the developments in ethics, legislation practice and theory that have led to its current position. Examples from both countries are explored to demonstrate the ditch that is still present between those undertaking the studies—who generally have a Western academic background—and those being studied—who may have traditional knowledge and a desire to relate to the past in a way that enhances their present. We suggest several mechanisms to overcome some of the legislative handicaps to such aspirations and continue the path towards truly equal partnerships and an ethical approach of narrating the past in the present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Tasman Sea is affectionately known as “the ditch” by both Kiwis and Aussies, however this paper also uses “the ditch” to mean the gap between Indigenous heritage custodians and archaeologists in both countries.

  2. 2.

    The English version of the Treaty used the term “sovereignty” to mean supreme or ultimate authority by the Crown. In the Maori translation, however, a word for “governorship” was used, which was understood by Maori to mean a more distant and limited power.

  3. 3.

    Now Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 and administered by Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga, All other elements mentioned here remain the same.

  4. 4.

    Maori words translated using the on-line Maori Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.maoridictionary.co.nz.

  5. 5.

    This officer prefers not to be identified.

  6. 6.

    Rangiatea is the Maori version of the Tahitian name Raiatea.

References

  • Allen, H. (1998). Protecting historic places in New Zealand. Auckland: University of Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, H. (2010). The crisis in 21st century archaeological heritage. In C. Phillips & H. Allen (Eds.), Bridging the divide: Indigenous communities and archaeology into the 21st century (pp. 157–180). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, H., Johns, D., Phillips, C., Day, K., O’Brien, T., & Mutunga, N. (2002). Wahi ngaro (the lost portion): strengthening relationships between people and wetlands in north Taranaki, New Zealand. World Archaeology, 34(2), 315–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, H., & Phillips, C. (2010). Maintaining the dialogue: archaeology, cultural heritage and indigenous communities. In C. Phillips & H. Allen (Eds.), Bridging the divide: Indigenous communities and archaeology into the 21st century (pp. 17–48). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, H., Phillips, C., Skipper, A., Te Moananui-Waikato, J., Reidy, C., & Cook, B. (1994). Taskforce Green/University of Auckland archaeological project, Waihou River. Auckland: University of Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, T. D., & Buggey, S. (2008). Authenticity in aboriginal cultural landscapes. APT Bulletin, 39(2/3), 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Archaeological Association (AAA). (2009). Submission to Review of the Indigenous Cultural Heritage Acts in Queensland. Brisbane: Queensland government. AAA files.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banner, S. (2005). Why Terra Nullius? Anthropology and property law in early Australia. Law and History Review, 23, 95–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, B. (2006). Hierarchies of knowledge and the tyranny of text: Archaeology, ethnohistory and oral traditions in Australian archaeological interpretation. In B. David, B. Barker, & I. McNiven (Eds.), The social archaeology of Australian indigenous societies (pp. 72–84). Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1692–1702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, J. (2008). When a stone tool is a dingo: Country and relatedness in Australian Aboriginal notions of landscape. In B. David & J. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of landscape archaeology (pp. 633–637). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (2008). Mute or mutable? Archaeological significance, research and cultural heritage management in Australia. Australian Archaeology, 67, 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1991). Western hegemony in archaeological heritage management. History and Anthropology, 5(2), 269–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1996). Deep nation: Australia’s acquisition of an Indigenous past. Aboriginal History, 20, 82–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (2002). An archaeology of attachment: Cultural heritage and the post-contact. In R. Harrison & C. Williamson (Eds.), After Captain Cook: the archaeology of the recent indigenous past in Australia (pp. 135–146). Sydney: Sydney University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (2003). The ethos of return: Erasure and reinstatement of Aboriginal visibility in the Australian historical landscape. Historical Archaeology, 37(1), 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D., (2005). Messages to Manila. In I. Macfarlane, M. J. Mountain, & R. Paton (Eds.), Many exchanges: archaeology, history, community and the work of Isabel McBryde (pp 53–62). Canberra: Aboriginal History Monograph 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (2008). Counter-mapping in the archaeological landscape. In B. David & J. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of landscape archaeology (pp. 609–616). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B. (2005). Changing protection policies and ethnographies of environmental engagement. Conservation and Society, 3(2), 280–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. (2011). Narrating the past in the present: Gorenpul-Dandrabin understandings of the archaeological record on North Stradbroke Island and Peel Island, southeastern Queensland. Unpublished BA Honours thesis, School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, B. (1994). Rethinking the paradigm: Cultural heritage management in Queensland. Queensland: University of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, M., Innes, J., & Ross, H. (2004). Managing sea country together: Key issues for developing co-operative management for the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area. Townsville: CRC Reef Research Centre Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, L. (2001). The bureaucracy, the law and blacks palace: A history of management of one site in the Central Queensland Highlands. Queensland: University of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, L. (2005). “Everyday archaeology:” Archaeological heritage management and its relationship to native title in development-related processes. Australian Aboriginal Studies, 1, 74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, L., & Weiner, J. (2006). Footprints of the ancestors: The convergence of anthropological and archaeological perspectives in contemporary Aboriginal heritage studies. In B. David, B. Barker, & I. McNiven (Eds.), The social archaeology of Australian indigenous societies (pp. 124–138). Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, S. (1999). Archaeology, history and identity in coastal Cape York. In J. Hall & I. McNiven (Eds.), Australian coastal archaeology (pp. 113–118). Canberra: Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • HPA (Historic Places Act). (2008). Historic Places Act 1993. Wellington: Department of Conservation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Igoe, J. (2004). Conservation and globalization: A study of National Parks and indigenous communities from East Africa to South Dakota. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennett, R., Robinson, C. J., Kiessling, I., Yunupingu, D., Munungurritj, M., & Yunupingu, D. (2004). Indigenous initiatives for co-management of Miyapunu/Sea Turtle. Ecological Management and Restoration, 5, 159–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, A. (2006). Community conserved areas: Towards ecological and livelihood security. Community Conserved Areas, 16, 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maori Heritage Council. (2009). Tapuwae: A vision for places of Maori heritage. Wellington: New Zealand Historic Places Trust/Pouhere Taonga.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadgen, B. (1966). Legislative probes in the protection of New Zealand prehistoric sites. New Zealand Archaeological Association Newsletter, 9, 92–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGovern-Wilson, R. (2008). New Zealand historic places trust research frameworks: Discussion paper. Archaeology in New Zealand, 51, 22–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNiven, I.J., & Russell, L. (2005). Appropriated pasts: Indigenous peoples and the colonial culture of archaeology. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. (2012). The nature of heritage: the new South Africa. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, K. (1996). Environmentalism and cultural theory: exploring the role of anthropology in environmental discourse. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moreton, D., & Ross, A. (2011). Gorenpul-Dandrabin knowledge. In P. Davie (Ed.), Wild guide to Moreton Bay and adjacent coasts (pp. 58–67). Brisbane: Queensland Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, R., & Stock, E. (1986). Pleistocene occupation in the south-east Queensland coastal region. Nature, 323, 618–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Archaeology. (2009). Members code of ethics – Principles of archaeological ethics. Retrieved from http://www.nzarchaeology.org.

  • New Zealand Historic Places Trust/Pouhere Taonga. (2006). Archaeological guidelines series No. 2: Guidelines for writing archaeological assessments. Wellington: New Zealand Historic Places Trust/Pouhere Taonga.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C. (2010). Working together? Maori and archaeologists in Aotearoa/New Zealand today. In C. Phillips & H. Allen (Eds.), Bridging the divide: Indigenous communities and archaeology into the 21st century (pp. 129–156). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C., & Allen, H. (2006). Damage assessment of Waihou River sites. Archaeology in New Zealand, 49, 82–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C., & Allen, H. (Eds.). (2010). Bridging the divide: Indigenous communities and archaeology into the 21st century. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C., & Allen, H. (2011). Archaeology in vicinity of Rangiatea Pa. Unpublished paper presented to Raukawa, 1 December 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton, E. (1992). Translating legal rights into management practice: Overcoming barriers to the exercise of co-management. Human Organization, 51, 330–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prangnell, J., Ross, A., & Coghill, B. (2010). Power relations and community involvement in landscape-based cultural heritage management practice: an Australian case study. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(1–2), 140–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rika-Heke, M. (2010). Archaeology and indigeneity in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Why do Maori not engage with archaeology? In C. Phillips & H. Allen (Eds.), Bridging the divide: Indigenous communities and archaeology into the 21st century (pp. 197–212). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, T. (2013). Intangible heritage, duty of care, and heritage legislation in NSW and Queensland. BA Honours thesis, School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, C. J., Ross, H., & Hockings, M. (2006). Development of co-operative management arrangements in the Great Barrier Reef: an adaptive management approach. Townsville: CRC Reef Research Centre Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, D., & Rika-Heke, M. (2011). Registration report for a wahi tapu Rangiatea Pa, Otorohanga. Unpublished report. New Zealand Historic Trust/Pouhere Taonga, Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. (1996). More than archaeology: New directions in cultural heritage management. Queensland Archaeological Research, 10, 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. (2008). Managing meaning at an ancient site in the 21st century: the Gummingurru Aboriginal stone arrangement on the Darling Downs, southern Queensland. Oceania, 78, 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. (2010). Defining cultural heritage at Gummingurru, Queensland, Australia. In C. Phillips & H. Allen (Eds.), Bridging the divide: Indigenous communities and archaeology into the 21st century (pp. 107–128). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A., & Coghill, S. (2000). Conducting a community-based archaeological project: anarchaeologist’s and a Koenpul man’s perspective. Australian Aboriginal Studies, 1(2), 76–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A., Prangnell, J., & Coghill, B. (2010). Archaeology, cultural landscapes, and Indigenous knowledge in Australian cultural heritage management legislation and practice. Heritage Management, 3(1), 73–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A., Sherman, K. P., Snodgrass, J., Delcore, H., & Sherman, R. (2011). Indigenous peoples and the collaborative stewardship of nature: knowledge binds and institutional conflicts. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, M. A., & Ratnapala, S. (1993). Mabo: A judicial revolution. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, M. (2006). The possibility of difference: rethinking co-management. Human Organization, 65, 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, S. (2005). Out of the box: Isabel McBryde’s radical contribution to the shaping of Australian archaeological practice. In I. Macfarlane, M-J. Mountain & R. Paton (Eds.), Many exchanges: archaeology, history, community and the work of Isabel McBryde, (pp 83–94). Canberra: Aboriginal History Monograph 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, S. (2008). More unconsidered trifles? Aboriginal and archaeological heritage values: Integration and disjuncture in cultural heritage management practice. Australian Archaeology, 67, 107–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Auckland. (2010). Guiding principles for conducting research with human participants. Auckland: University of Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, T. (2006). How big are pa? Archaeology in New Zealand, 49, 174–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (2011). Nation and government – the origins of Nationhood. In Te Ara – the Encyclopaedia of New Zealand. Retrieved from http://www.TeAra.govt.nz/en/nation-and-government/1.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank: Margaret Rika Heke, pouarahi (Maori heritage advisor), NZHPT for her thoughts on archaeology; Te Kenehi Teira, Kaihautu Maori (Senior Maori heritage advisor), NZHPT and Ngati Raukawa for permission to use Rangiatea as an example; Associate Professor Ian Smith and Professor Richard Walter, both at the Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Otago and Associate Professor Melinda Allen, Department of Anthropology, University of Auckland for their insightful comments; Lynette Williams for proof-reading.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Phillips .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Phillips, C., Ross, A. (2015). Both Sides of the Ditch: The Ethics of Narrating the Past in the Present. In: Gnecco, C., Lippert, D. (eds) Ethics and Archaeological Praxis. Ethical Archaeologies: The Politics of Social Justice, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1646-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics