Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intelligence as a Malleable Construct

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Intelligence

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors describe research showing that people’s mindsets, or their “implicit theories,” about intelligence significantly impact their academic motivation and performance, sometimes in counter-intuitive ways. In particular, accumulating evidence shows that holding a “growth mindset”—the belief in intelligence as malleable as opposed to fixed—enhances challenge-seeking, interest in learning, effort investment, use of effective strategies, achievement outcomes, and even how the brain functions. They discuss converging evidence for the malleability of intelligence drawn from recent research in cognitive neuroscience that indicates greater brain plasticity and development resulting from learning than previously thought to exist, as shown by the impact of training on executive functions and fluid intelligence. Finally, they discuss how mindsets can be influenced and changed, and the practical implications of this research for educational policy and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aronson, J., Lustina, M., Good, C., Keough, K., Steele, C., & Brown, J. (1999). When white men can’t do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping mindsets of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, M., Rietveld, M., Van Baal, G., & Boomsma, D. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on the development of intelligence. Behavior Genetics, 32, 237–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beilock, S. L., Rydell, R. J., & McConnell, A. R. (2007). Stereotype threat and working memory: Mechanisms, alleviations, and spillover. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 256–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binet, A. (1975). Modern ideas about children. (trans: Heisler, S.). Menlo Park: Suzanne Heisler. (originally work published in 1909).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, L., Trzesniewski, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blascovich, J., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D. M., & Steele, C. M. (2001). African-Americans and high blood pressure: The Role of stereotype threat. Psychological Science, 12, 225–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borland, J. H. (2003). The death of giftedness. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 105–124). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borland, J. H. (2005). Gifted education without gifted children: The case for no conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borland, J. H., & Wright, L. (2001). Identifying and educating poor and underrepresented gifted students. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 587–594). London: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehmer, Y., Westerberg, H., & Backman, L. (2012). Working-memory training in younger and older adults: Training gains, transfer, and maintenance. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brescoll, V. L., & LaFrance, M. (2004). The correlates and consequences of newspaper reports of research on gender differences. Psychological Science, 15(8), 515–521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breslau, N., Chilcoat, H., Susser, E., Matte, T., Liang, K., & Peterson, E. (2001). Stability and change in children’s intelligence quotient scores: A comparison of two socioeconomically disparate communities. American Journal of Epidemiology, 154, 711–717. doi:10.1093/aje/154.8.711.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. P., & Day, E. A. (2006). The difference isn’t black and white: Stereotype threat and the race gap on Raven’s advanced progressive matrices. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 979–985.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cadinu, M., Maass, A., Rosabianca, A., & Kiesner, J. (2005). Why do women underperform under stereotype threat? Psychological Science, 16, 572–578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canivez, G., & Watkins, M. (1998). Long-term stability of the Wechsler intelligence scale for children—third edition. Psychological Assessment, 10, 285–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J. (1991). How much does schooling influence general intelligence and its cognitive components? A reassessment of the evidence. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 703–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cimpian, A., Mu, Y., & Erickson, L. C. (2012). Who is good at this game? Linking an activity to a social category undermines children’s achievement. Psychological Science, 23(5), 533–541.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). Performance-based assessment and educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 64, 5–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1995). Cracks in the bell curve: How education matters. The Journal of Negro Education, 64, 340–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dar-Nimrod, I., & Heine, S. J. (2006). Exposure to scientific theories affects women’s math performance. Science, 314, 435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Busch, V., Schuierer, G., Bogdahn, U., & May, A. (2004). Neuroplasticity: Changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature, 427, 311–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A., & Seligman, M. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939–944.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, K., Drevets, W., & Schulkin, J. (2003). Glucocorticoid regulation of diverse cognitive functions in normal and pathological emotional states. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 27, 233–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, C. A., Roderick, M., Allensworth, E., Nagaoka, J., Keyes, T. S., Johnson, D. W., & Beechum, N. O. (2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners. The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance: A critical literature review. Chicago: University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J. (2007). What is intelligence? New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, J. W., & Heyman, G. D. (2003). Preschoolers’ beliefs about the stability of antisocial behavior: Implications for navigating social challenges. Social Development, 12, 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 645–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 700–717. doi:10.1037/a0026659.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, E., Gripshoever, S., Romero, C., Dweck, C., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Levine, S. (2013). Parent praise to 1- to 3- year-olds predicts children’s motivational frameworks 5 years later. Child Development, 84(5), 1526–1541. doi:10.1111/cdev.12064.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, D., & Farah, M. (2009). Socioeconomic status and the developing brain. Trends in Cognitive Science, 13(2), 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, B., & Sutton, R. (2013). A stereotype threat account of boys’ academic underachievement. Child Development, 84, 1716–1733. doi:10.1111/cdev.12079.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, V. L., & Dweck, C. S. (1990). Motivation and achievement. In S. S. Feldman & G. R. Elliot (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 308–329). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzog, C., & Schaie, K. (1986). Stability and change in adult intelligence: 1. Analysis of longitudinal covariance structures. Psychology and Aging, 1, 159–171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heyman, G., Gee, C., & Giles, J. (2003). Preschool children’s reasoning about ability. Child Development, 74, 516–534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Y., Chiu, C., Dweck, C., Lin, D., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, C., Burnette, J., & Inella, A. (2012). I can do that: The impact of implicit theories on leadership role model effectiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 257–268. doi:10.1177/ 0146167211427922.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inzlicht, M., McKay, L., & Aronson, J. (2006). Stigma as ego depletion: How being the target of prejudice affects self-control. Psychological Science, 17, 262–269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, S. (2013). Ungifted: Intelligence redefined. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J., & Dauenheimer, D. (2003). Stereotype threat in the classroom: Dejection mediates the disrupting threat effect on women’s math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 371–381.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kray, L. J., & Haselhuhn, M. P. (2007). Implicit negotiation beliefs and performance: Experimental and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 49–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krendl, A. C., Richeson, J. A., Kelley, W. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (2008). The negative consequences of threat: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of the neural mechanisms underlying women’s underperformance in math. Psychological Science, 19, 168–175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lupien, S., McEwen, B., Gunnar, M., & Heim, C. (2009). Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 434–445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A. P., Hill, S., Stone, S., & Bunge, S. A. (2011). Differential effects of reasoning and speed training in children. Developmental Science, 14(3), 582–590. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01005.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A., Whitaker, K., & Bunge, S. (2012). Experience-dependent plasticity in white matter microstructure: reasoning training alters structural connectivity. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, 6, 1–9. doi:10.3389/fnana.2012.00032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A., Miller-Singley, A., & Bunge, S. (2013). Intensive reasoning training alters patterns of brain connectivity at rest. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(11), 4796–4803.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mangels, J. A., Butterfield, B., Lamb, J., Good, C. D., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social-cognitive-neuroscience model. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1, 75–86.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, D. M., & Stapel, D. A. (2006). Distinguishing stereotype threat from priming effects: On the role of the social self and threat-based concerns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 243–254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., Ayduk, O., Berman, M., Casey, B., Gotlib, J., Kross, E., Teslovich, T., Wilson, N., Zayas, V., & Shoda, Y. (2011). Willpower over the lifespan: Decomposing self-regulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(2), 252–256.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, J., Schroder, H., Heeter, C., Moran, T., & Lee, Y. (2011). Mind your errors: Evidence for a neural mechanism linking growth mindset to adaptive post-error adjustments. Psychological Science, 22(12), 1484–1489.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Intelligence praise can undermine motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 33–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J., & Goldstein, S. (2009). Practicioner’s guide to assessing intelligence and achievement. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neville, H., Stevens, C., Pakulak, E., Bell, T., Fanning, J., Klein, S., & Isbell, E. (2013). Family-based training program improves brain function, cognition, and behavior in lower socioeconomic status preschoolers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 12138–12143. doi:10.1073/pnas.1304437110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. (2009). Intelligence and how to get it: Why schools and cultures count. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, L. T., & Crandall, C. S. (2003). Stereotype threat and arousal: Effects on women’s math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 782–789.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. W. (2006). Gender, stereotype threat and anxiety: Psychophysiological and cognitive evidence. Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8, 109–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. W. (2007). Linking stereotype threat and anxiety. Educational Psychology, 27, 135–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, E. M., & Kempner, S. G. (2013). Mothers’ daily person and process praise: Implications for children’s theory of intelligence and motivation. Developmental Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). “It’s ok – not everyone can be good at math:” Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 731–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Rollett, W. (2000). Motivation and action in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Theory, research and application (pp. 503–529). San Diego: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, R. W., & Pals, J. L. (2002). Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: Implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change. Self and Identity, 1, 313–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, S., Mangels, J., Guerra-Carrillo, B., & Higgins, T. (2014). Frame of mind: Focusing students on performance or mastery yields a double dissociation of the neural processes predicting subsequent memory. Manuscript in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440–452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smiley, P. A., & Dweck, C. S. (1994). Individual differences in achievement goals among young children. Child Development, 65, 1723–1743.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. L., & White, P. H. (2002). An examination of implicitly activated, explicitly activated, and nullified stereotypes on mathematical performance: It’s not just a woman’s issue. Sex Roles, 47, 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, J., & McWhinnie, C. (2008). Evidence that blatant versus subtle stereotype threat cues impact performance through dual processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 445–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoman, D. B., White, P. H., Yamawaki, N., & Koishi, H. (2008). Variations of gender-math stereotype content affect women’s vulnerability to stereotype threat. Sex Roles, 58, 702–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vick, S. B., Seery, M. D., Blascovich, J., & Weisbuch, M. (2008). The effect of gender stereotype activation on challenge and threat motivational states. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 624–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Eccles, J., & Kenny, S. (2013). Not lack of ability but more choice: Individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Psychological Science, 24(5), 770–775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, T. (1973). Alfred Binet. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeager, D., Paunesku, D., Walton, G., & Dweck, C. (2013). How can we instill productive mindsets at scale? A review of the evidence and an initial R&D agenda. [white paper]. Retrieved from: http://homepage. psy.utexas.edu/homepage/group/YeagerLAB/ADRG/Pdfs/Yeager%20et%20al%20R&D%20agenda% 20-%206-10-13.pdf

  • Zatorre, R., Fields, R., & Johansen-Berg, H. (2012). Plasticity in gray and white: Neuroimaging changes in brain structure during learning. Nature Neuroscience, 15(4), 528–536. doi:10.1038/nn.3045.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mindset Works, Inc., 340 S. Lemon Ave. #6463, Walnut, CA, 91789, USA

    Lisa S. Blackwell Ph.D. & Sylvia Rodriguez Ph.D.

  2. University of California at Berkeley, 132 Barker Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94702, USA

    Belén Guerra-Carrillo

Authors
  1. Lisa S. Blackwell Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sylvia Rodriguez Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Belén Guerra-Carrillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa S. Blackwell Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Neurology, Learning and Behavior Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

    Sam Goldstein

  2. Neurology, Learning and Behavior Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

    Dana Princiotta

  3. University of Virginia Curry School of Education, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

    Jack A. Naglieri

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blackwell, L.S., Rodriguez, S., Guerra-Carrillo, B. (2015). Intelligence as a Malleable Construct. In: Goldstein, S., Princiotta, D., Naglieri, J. (eds) Handbook of Intelligence. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1562-0_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation