Skip to main content

Blepharoplasty Incisional Modalities: 4.0 Radiowave Surgery vs. CO2 Laser

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pearls and Pitfalls in Cosmetic Oculoplastic Surgery
  • 181 Accesses

Abstract

Introduction: Numerous incisional modalities are available for blepharoplasty. Those modalities which allow better hemostasis are superior.

Materials: A cohort of 30 patients were treated with radiowave microneedle incision on one eye and CO2 laser incision on the other eye. The goal was to evaluate the postblepharoplasty surgical scar by blinded observers from multiple cosmetic specialties.

Results: The observers’ information was analyzed and conformed with the null hypothesis in that the surgical scars were judged to be equal.

Conclusion: Radiowave microneedle and CO2 laser both provide simultaneous incision with hemostasis. They perform equally in terms of the postoperative surgical scar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bosniak S, Cantisano-Zilkha M. Radio-surgery: a 24 year history of scarless mole removal. Oculop Orbital Reconstr Surg. 2001;4(22):109–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridenstine JB. Use of ultra-high frequency electrosurgery (radiosurgery) for cosmetic surgical procedures. Dermatol Surg. 1998;24:397–400.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalwarf KL, Kreici FR, Edison AR, Reinhardt RA. Lateral heat production secondary to electrosurgical incisions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1983;55(4):344–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niamtu III J. Cosmetic blepharoplasty. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2004;12:91–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niamtu J. 4.0 MHz radiowave surgery in cosmetic surgery. Australas J Cosmet Surg. 2005;1(1):52–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivar AC, Parouhar FA, Gillies CA, Servanski DR. Transmission electron microscopy: evaluation of damage in human oviducts caused by different surgical instruments. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1999;29:281–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Niamtu III DMD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Niamtu, J. (2015). Blepharoplasty Incisional Modalities: 4.0 Radiowave Surgery vs. CO2 Laser. In: Hartstein, MD, FACS, M., Massry, MD, FACS, G., Holds, MD, FACS, J. (eds) Pearls and Pitfalls in Cosmetic Oculoplastic Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1544-6_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1544-6_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1543-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1544-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics