Abstract
In this chapter, I situate self-regulation in an evolutionary perspective, and explore the implications of an evolutionary approach for the study of individual differences in self-regulation. I begin by reviewing the two basic strategies of behavior control (feedback and feedforward control), compare their relative advantages and disadvantages, examine how they can be combined for optimal performance, and highlight the role of trade-offs in the evolution of control systems. I then discuss how organisms may flexibly shift the balance between feedback and feedforward control in a context- and task-specific manner, and outline an ecological theory of control strategies. Specifically, I analyze the differences between optimal self-regulation in predictable versus unpredictable environments, consider the role of delayed outcomes, and discuss the logic of defensive responses. I then go on to show how the same principles can be employed to understand stable individual differences in control strategies and impulsivity, usually characterized as “coping styles” in the biological literature. Finally, I introduce the framework of life history theory, and discuss how it provides a unifying perspective on the development of individual differences in self-regulation. After briefly introducing the fast-slow continuum of life history variation, I critically examine the associations between life history strategies and self-regulation in humans and nonhuman animals. I argue that, in humans, a primacy of feedforward regulation can be associated with both fast strategies characterized by high levels of impulsivity and slow strategies characterized by low impulsivity and high levels of future-oriented planning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In evolutionary biology, adaptive and maladaptive denote the effects of traits and behaviors on fitness, that is, the differential replication of genes in subsequent generations. In psychology and the social sciences, the same terms usually denote the subjective and/or social desirability of a trait or behavior. Traits that promote health, subjective well-being, and mutually rewarding social relations are viewed as adaptive, whereas socially undesirable, distressing, or health-damaging traits are viewed as maladaptive. Since natural selection promotes reproductive success rather than happiness or health, biologically adaptive traits may or may not be socially desirable or conducive to health and well-being.
References
Albertos, P., & Mareels, I. (2010). Feedback and control for everyone. Heidelberg: Springer.
Archer, J. (2009). Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 249–266. doi:10.1017/S0140525×09990951.
Aron, A. R. (2011). From reactive to proactive and selective control: Developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses. Biological Psychiatry, 69, e55–e68. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.024.
Azuma, Y., & Hirose, A. (2008). Influence of neural delay in sensorimotor systems on the control performance and mechanism in bicycle riding. Neural Information Processing, 12, 43–51. doi:10.1007/978-3-540- 69158-7113.
Barkley, R. A. (2001). The executive functions and self-regulation: An evolutionary neuropsychological perspective. Neuropsychology Review, 11, 1–29. doi:10.1023/A:1009085417776.
Bechhoefer, J. (2005). Feedback for physicists: A tutorial essay on control. Reviews of Modern Physics, 77, 783–836. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.783.
Belsky, J., Schlomer, G. L., & Ellis, B. J. (2012). Beyond cumulative risk: Distinguishing harshness and unpredictability as determinants of parenting and early life history strategy. Developmental Psychology, 48, 662–673. doi:10.1037/a0024454.
Biro, P. A., & Stamps, J. A. (2008). Are animal personality traits linked to life-history productivity? Trends in. Ecology and Evolution, 23, 361–368. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.04.003.
Block, J. (2002). Personality as an affect-processing system. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brumbach, B. H., Figueredo, A. J., & Ellis, B. J. (2009). Effects of harsh and unpredictable environments in adolescence on development of life history strategies: A longitudinal test of an evolutionary model. Human Nature, 20, 25–51. doi:10.1007/s12110-009-9059-3.
Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture and women’s aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(2), 203–252.
Careau, V., Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Thomas, D. W., Réale, D., & Humphries, M. M. (2009). Exploration strategies map along fast-slow metabolic and life-history continua in muroid rodents. Functional Ecology, 23, 150–156. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01468.x.
Carere, C., Cremaschi, D., & Fawcett, T. W. (2010). Covariation between personalities and individual differences in coping with stress: Converging evidence and hypotheses. Current Zoology, 56(6), 728–740.
Carver, C. S. (2005). Impulse and constraint: Perspectives from personality psychology, convergence with theory in other areas, and potential for integration. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 312–333. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0904_2.
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2011). Self-regulation of action and affect. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 3–21). New York: Guilford.
Chittka, L., Skorupski, P., & Raine, N. (2009). Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. Trends in. Ecology and Evolution, 24, 400–407. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.010.
Coppens, C. M., de Boer, S. F., & Koolhaas, J. M. (2010). Coping styles and behavioural flexibility: Towards underlying mechanisms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365, 4021–4028. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0217.
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1994). Origins of domain specificity: The evolution of functional organization. In L. Hirschfeld & S. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 85–116). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cross, C. P., Copping, L. T., & Campbell, A. (2011). Sex Differences in impulsivity: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 97–130. doi:10.1037/a0021591.
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (2005). Carpe diem: Adaptation and devaluing the future. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 80, 55–60. doi:10.1086/431025.
Del Giudice, M. (2012). Sex ratio dynamics and fluctuating selection on personality. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 297, 48–60. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.12.004.
Del Giudice, M. (in press). An evolutionary life history framework for psychopathology. Psychological Inquiry.
Del Giudice, M., Ellis, B. J., & Shirtcliff, E. A. (2011). The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1562–1592. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.11.007.
Denckla, M. B. (1996). A theory and model of executive function: A neuropsychological perspective. In G. R. Lyon & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Attention, memory, and executive function (pp. 263–277). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Dennett, D. (2009). Darwin’s “strange inversion of reasoning”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 10061–10065. doi:10.1073/pnas.0904433106.
DeYoung, C. G. (2011). Impulsivity as a personality trait. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (2nd ed., pp. 485–504). New York: Guilford.
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750.
Dickman, S. J. (1990). Functional and dysfunctional impulsivity: Personality and cognitive correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 95–102.
Dingemanse, N. J., & Réale, D. (2013). What is the evidence that natural selection maintains variation in animal personalities? In C. Carere & D. Maestripieri (Eds.), Animal personalities: Behavior, physiology, and evolution (pp. 201–220). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Ellis, B. J., Figueredo, A. J., Brumbach, B. H., & Schlomer, G. L. (2009). The impact of harsh versus unpredictable environments on the evolution and development of life history strategies. Human Nature, 20, 204–268. doi:10.1007/s12110-009-9059-3.
Ellis, B. J., Del Giudice, M., Dishion, T. J., Figueredo, A. J., Gray, P., Griskevicius, V., Hawley, P. H., Jacobs, W. J., James, J., Volk, A. A., & Wilson, D. S. (2012). The evolutionary basis of risky adolescent behavior: Implications for science, policy, and practice. Developmental Psychology, 48, 598–623. doi:10.1037/a0026220.
Filevich, E., Kühn, S., & Haggard, P. (2012). Intentional inhibition in human action: The power of ‘no’. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 1107–1118. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.01.006.
Frankenhuis, W. E., & Del Giudice, M. (2012). When do adaptive developmental mechanisms yield maladaptive outcomes? Developmental Psychology, 48, 628–642. doi:10.1037/a0025629.
Geary, D. C. (2003). Sexual selection and human life history. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 30, 41–101. doi:10.1016/S0065-2407(02)80039-8.
Green, L., & Myerson, J. (1996). Exponential versus hyperbolic discounting of delayed outcomes: Risk and waiting time. American Zoologist, 36, 496–505. doi:10.1093/icb/36.4.496.
Hill, K., & Kaplan, H. (1999). Life history traits in humans: Theory and empirical studies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 397–430.
Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 174–180. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.01.006.
Kaplan, H. S., & Gangestad, S. W. (2005). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 68–95). Hoboken: Wiley.
Kokko, H., & Jennions, M. (2008). Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 919–948. doi:10.1111/j.1420- 9101.2008.01540.x.
Koolhaas, J. M., Korte, S. M., de Boer, S. F., Van der Vegt, B. J., Van Reenen, C. G., Hopster, H., De Jong, I. C., Ruis, M. A., & Blockhuis, H. J. (1999). Coping styles in animals: Current status in behavior and stress physiology. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 23, 925–935. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(99)00026-3.
Koolhaas, J. M., de Boer, S. F., Buwalda, B., & van Reenen, K. (2007). Stress: A multidimensional approach of ultimate and proximate mechanisms. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 70, 218–226. doi:10.1159/000105485.
Kopp, B. (2012). A simple hypothesis of executive function. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 159. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00159.
Korte, S. M., Koolhaas, J. M., Wingfield, J. C., & McEwen, B. S. (2005). The Darwinian concept of stress: Benefits of allostasis and costs of allostatic load and the trade-offs in health and disease. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 29, 3–38. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.08.009.
Kruger, D. J., Reischl, T., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2008). Time perspective as a mechanism for functional developmental adaptation. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2(1), 1–22.
Kuzawa, C. W., & Bragg, J. M. (2012). Plasticity in human life history strategy: Implications for contemporary human variation and the evolution of genus. Homo. Current Anthropology, 53, S369–S382. doi:10.1086/667410.
Luttbeg, B., & Sih, A. (2010). Risk, resources and state-dependent adaptive behavioural syndromes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365, 3977–3990. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0207.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 8–14. doi:10.1177/0963721411429458.
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734.
Réale, D., Garant, D., Humphries, M. M., Bergeron, P., Careau, V., & Montiglio, P.-O. (2010). Personality and the emergence of the pace-of-life syndrome concept at the population level. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365, 4051–4063. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0208.
Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Temperament, development and personality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 207–212. doi:10.1111/j.1467- 8721.2007.00505.x.
Sæther, B.-E. (1987). The influence of body weight on the covariation between reproductive traits in European birds. Oikos, 48(1), 79–88.
Schlichting, C. D., & Pigliucci, M. (1998). Phenotypic evolution: A reaction norm perspective. Sunderland: Sinauer.
Shudo, E., Haccou, P., & Iwasa, Y. (2003). Optimal choice between feedforward and feedback control in gene expression to cope with unpredictable danger. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 223, 149–160. doi:10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00081-X.
Sih, A., & Del Giudice, M. (2012). Linking behavioural syndromes and cognition: A behavioural ecology perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 367, 2762–2772. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0216.
Stamps, J. A. (2007). Growth-mortality tradeoffs and ‘personality traits’ in animals. Ecology Letters, 10, 355–363. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01034.x.
Starrfelt, J., & Kokko, H. (2012). Bet-hedging-a triple trade-off between means, variances and correlations. Biological Reviews, 85, 742–755. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00225.x.
Stearns, S. C. (1992). The evolution of life histories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stephens, D. W., Kerr, J., & Fernández-Juricic, E. (2004). Impulsiveness without discounting: The ecological rationality hypothesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 271, 2459–2465. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2871.
Tops, M., & Boksem, M. A. S. (2010). Absorbed in the task: Personality measures predict engagement during task performance as tracked by error negativity and asymmetrical frontal activity. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 441–453. doi:10.3758/CABN.10.4.441.
Tops, M., Boksem, M. A. S., Luu, P., & Tucker, D. M. (2010). Brain substrates of behavioral programs associated with self-regulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 152. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00152.
Tucker, D. M., Luu, P., & Pribram, K. H. (1995). Social and emotional self-regulation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 769, 213–239. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb38141.x.
Uher, J. (2011). Individual behavioral phenotypes: An integrative meta-theoretical framework. Why “behavioral syndromes” are not analogs of “personality”. Developmental Psychobiology, 53, 521–548. doi:10.1002/dev.20544.
van Oers, K., & Sinn, D. L. (2013). Quantitative and molecular genetics of animal personality. In C. Carere & D. Maestripieri (Eds.), Animal personalities: Behavior, physiology, and evolution (pp. 149–200). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Wang, X. T., Kruger, D. J., & Wilke, A. (2009). Life history variables and risk-taking propensity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 77–84. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.09.006.
West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, M., Daly, M., & Pound, N. (2002). An evolutionary psychological perspective on the modulation of competitive confrontation and risk-taking. In D. W. Pfaff, A. P. Arnold, A. M. Etgen, S. E. Fahrbach & R. T. Rubin (Eds.), Hormones, brain and behavior (pp. 381–408). San Diego: Academic.
Wolf, M., van Doorn, G. S., Leimar, O., & Weissing, F. J. (2007). Life-history trade-offs favour the evolution of animal personalities. Nature, 447, 581–585. doi:10.1038/nature05835.
Wolf, M., van Doorn, G. S., Leimar, O., & Weissing, F. J. (2013). The evolution of animal personalities. In C. Carere & D. Maestripieri (Eds.), Animal personalities: Behavior, physiology, and evolution (pp. 252–276). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000). Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1212–1217. doi:10.1038/ 81497.
Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 358, 593–602. doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1238.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Conclusion
Conclusion
Self-regulation is a biological property of living organisms, and can only be fully understood in the light of evolution. In this chapter, I approached the topic from a theoretical vantage point, leaving aside the issue of how self-regulatory processes are implemented at the neurobiological level. I started my analysis from the basic concepts of control theory , and showed how the logic of feedback and feedforward control can be combined with insights from evolutionary biology to outline an ecological theory of control strategies. I then discussed how life history theory offers a general framework for understanding individual differences in impulsivity and coping styles , and concluded with a critical examination of the relation between life history strategies and self-regulation in humans. In particular, I argued that, at least in humans, a primacy of feedforward control may be associated not only with fast life history strategies and high levels of impulsivity but also with slow life history strategies and high levels of effortful control.
In total, I hope I have shown how an evolutionary perspective can enrich the study of self-regulation by fostering integration across levels of analysis and suggesting new, testable predictions to guide empirical research.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Del Giudice, M. (2015). Self-Regulation in an Evolutionary Perspective. In: Gendolla, G., Tops, M., Koole, S. (eds) Handbook of Biobehavioral Approaches to Self-Regulation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1236-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1236-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1235-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1236-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)