Abstract
Self-control is defined as the process in which thoughts, emotions, or prepotent responses are inhibited to efficiently enact a more focal goal. Self-control not only allows for more adaptive individual decision making but also promotes adaptive social decision making. In this chapter, we examine a burgeoning area of interdisciplinary research: the neuroscience of self-control in social decision making. We examine research on self-control in complex social contexts examined from a social neuroscience perspective. We review correlational evidence from neuroimaging studies and causal evidence from neuromodulation studies (i.e., brain stimulation). We specifically highlight research that shows that self-control involves the lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) across a number of social domains and behaviors. Research has also begun to directly integrate nonsocial with social forms of self-control, showing that the basic neurobiological processes involved in stopping a motor response appear to be involved in social contexts that require self-control. Further, neural traits, such as baseline activation in the lateral PFC, can explain sources of individual differences in self-control capacity. We explore whether techniques that change brain functioning could target neural mechanisms related to self-control capacity to potentially enhance self-control in social behavior. Finally, we discuss several research questions ripe for examination. We broadly suggest that future research can now turn to exploring how neural traits and situational affordances interact to impact self-control in social decision making in order to continue to elucidate the processes that allow people to maintain and realize stable goals in a dynamic and often uncertain social environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aron, A. R., & Poldrack, R. A. (2005). The cognitive neuroscience of response inhibition: Relevance for genetic research in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1285–1292. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.10.026.
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166. doi:10.1177/1088868306294907.
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.462.
Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., & Trötschel, R. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1014–1027. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.6.1014.
Baumgartner, T., Knoch, D., Hotz, P., Eisenegger, C., & Fehr, E. (2011). Dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortex orchestrate normative choice. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 1468-1474. doi:10.1038/nn.2933.
Beck, R. C., & Triplett, M. F. (2009). Test-retest reliability of a group-administered paper-pencil measure of delay discounting. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 17, 345–355. doi:10.1037/a0017078.
Benenson, J. F., Pascoe, J., & Radmore, N. (2007). Children’s altruistic behavior in the dictator game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 168–175. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.10.003.
Berkman, E. T., Burklund, L., & Lieberman, M. D. (2009). Inhibitory spillover: Intentional motor inhibition produces incidental limbic inhibition via right inferior frontal cortex. NeuroImage, 47, 705. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.084.
Berkman, E. T., Falk, E. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2011). In the trenches of real-world self-control: Neural correlates of breaking the link between craving and smoking. Psychological Science, 22, 498–506. doi:10.1177/0956797611400918.
Boettiger, C. A., Mitchell, J. M., Tavares, V. C., Robertson, M., Joslyn, G., D’esposito, M., & Fields, H. L. (2007). Immediate reward bias in humans: Fronto-parietal networks and a role for the catechol-O-methyltransferase 158(Val/Val) genotype. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 14383–14391. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2551- UROSCI.2.
Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S., & Richerson, P. J. (2003). The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America, 100, 3531–3535. doi:10.1073/pnas.0630443100.
Brass, M., & Haggard, P. (2007). To do or not to do: The neural signature of self-control. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 9141–9145. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0924- 07.2007.
Casey, B. J., Somerville, L. H., Gotlib, I. H., Ayduk, O., Franklin, N. T., Askren, M. K., Jonides, J., et al. (2011). Behavioral and neural correlates of delay of gratification 40 years later. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America, 108, 14988–15003. doi:10.1073/pnas.1108561108.
Chib, V. S., Rangel, A., Shimojo, S., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2009). Evidence for a common representation of decision values for dissimilar goods in human ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 29,12315–12320. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2575- 09.2009.
Clark, L., Manes, F., Antoun, N., Sahakian, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2003). The contributions of lesion laterality and lesion volume to decision-making impairment following frontal lobe damage. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1474–1483. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(03)00081- 2.
Cohen, J. R., & Lieberman, M. D. (2010). The common neural basis of exerting self-control in multiple domains. In R. R. Hassin, K. N. Ochsner, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Self control in society, mind, and brain. Oxford series in social cognition and social neuroscience (pp. 141–160). New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195391381003.0008.
Damasio, A. R. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 351, 1413–1420. doi:10.1098/rstb.1996.0125.
Declerck, C. H., Boone, C., & Emonds, G. (2013). When do people cooperate? The neuroeconomics of prosocial decision making. Brain and Cognition, 81, 95–117. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2012.09.009.
Dempster, F. N. (1992). The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging. Developmental Review, 12, 45–75. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(92)90003-K.
Dunki, R. M., Schmid, G. B., & Stassen, H. H. (2000). Intraindividual specificity and stability of human EEG: Comparing a linear vs a nonlinear approach. Methods of Information in Medicine-Methodik der Information in der Medizin, 39(1), 78.
Fallgatter, A. J., & Strik, W. K. (1999). The NoGo-anteriorization as a neurophysiological standard-index for cognitive response control. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 32, 233–238. doi:10.1016/S0167-8760(99)00018- 5.
Fallgatter, A. J., Bartsch, A. J., & Herrmann, M. J. (2002). Electrophysiological measurements of anterior cingulate function. Journal of Neural Transmission, 109, 977–988. doi:10.1007/s007020200080.
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415, 137–140. doi:10.1038/415137a.
Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in young children. Nature, 454, 1079–1083. doi:10.1038/nature07155.
Friedman, T. L. (2006). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century updated and expanded. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Frith, C. D., & Singer, T. (2008). The role of social cognition in decision making. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363, 3875–3886. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0156.
Garon, N., Bryson, S. E., & Smith, I. M. (2008). Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 31–60. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.31.
Ghaziri, J., Tucholka, A., Larue, V., Blanchette-Sylvestre, M., Reyburn, G., Gilbert, G., et al. (2013). Neurofeedback training induces changes in white and gray matter. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1550059413476031.
Gianotti, L. R., Figner, B., Ebstein, R. P., & Knoch, D. (2012). Why some people discount more than others: Baseline activation in the dorsal PFC mediates the link between COMT genotype and impatient choice. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 1–12. doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00054.
Gottesman, I. I., & Gould, T. D. (2003). The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: Etymology and strategic intentions. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 636–645. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp. 160.4.636.
Green, A. E., Munafò, M. R., DeYoung, C. G., Fossella, J. A., Fan, J., & Gray, J. R. (2008). Using genetic data in cognitive neuroscience: From growing pains to genuine insights. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 710–720. doi:10.1038/nrn2461.
Heatherton, T. F. (2011). Neuroscience of self and self-regulation. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 363–390. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131616.
Heatherton, T. F., & Wagner, D. D. (2011). Cognitive neuroscience of self-regulation failure. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 132–139. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.005.
Houben, K., & Jansen, A. (2011). Training inhibitory control: Recipe for resisting sweet temptations. Appetite, 56, 345–349. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2010.12.017.
Kanai, R., & Rees, G. (2011). The structural basis of inter-individual differences in human behaviour and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12, 231–242. doi:10.1038/nrn3000.
Karayanidis, F., Robaey, P., Bourassa, M., De Koning, D., Geoffroy, G., & Pelletier, G. (2000). ERP differences in visual attention processing between attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and control boys in the absence of performance differences. Psychophysiology, 37, 319–333. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3730319.
Kemner, C., Verbaten, M. N., Koelega, H. S., Buitelaar, J. K., van der Gaag, R. J., Camfferman, G., & van Engeland, H. (1996). Event-related brain potentials in children with attention-deficit and hyperactivity disorder: Effects of stimulus deviancy and task relevance in the visual and auditory modality. Biological Psychiatry, 40, 522–534. doi:10.1016/0006-3223(95)00429- 7.
Klingberg, T. (2010). Training and plasticity of working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 317–324. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.002.
Knoch, D., Pascual-Leone, A., Meyer, K., Treyer, V., & Fehr, E. (2006). Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science, 314, 829–832. doi:10.1126/science.1129156.
Knoch, D., Nitsche, M. A., Fischbacher, U., Eisenegger, C., Pascual-Leone, A., & Fehr, E. (2008). Studying the neurobiology of social interaction with transcranial direct current stimulation-the example of punishing unfairness. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 1987–1990. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm237.
Knoch, D., Schneider, F., Schunk, D., Hohmann, M., & Fehr, E. (2009). Disrupting the prefrontal cortex diminishes the human ability to build a good reputation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America, 106, 20895–20899. doi:10.1073/pnas.0911619106.
Knoch, D., Gianotti, L. R. R., Baumgartner, T., & Fehr, E. (2010). A neural marker of costly punishment behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 337–342. doi:10.1177/0956797609360750.
Kuhn, S., Haggard, P., & Brass, M. (2009). Intentional inhibition: How the “veto-area” exerts control. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 2834–2843. doi:10.1002/hbm.20711.
Kuhnen, C. M., & Chiao, J. Y. (2009). Genetic determinants of financial risk taking. PLoS One, 4, e4362. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004362..
Kurzban, R., & Leary, M. R. (2001). Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 187–208. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.127.2.187.
Lazar, S. W., Kerr, C. E., Wasserman, R. H., Gray, J. R., Greve, D. N., Treadway, M. T., et al. (2005). Meditation experience is associated with increased cortical thickness. NeuroReport, 16, 1893–1897. doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000186598.66243.19.
Lewin, K. (1946). Behavior as a function of total situation. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (pp. 238–304). New York: Harper & Row. doi:10.1037/10756-016.
Lopez, R. B., Vohs, K., Wagner, D. D., & Heatherton, T. F. (2014). Self-regulatory strength: Neural mechanisms and implications for training. In G.H.E. Gendolla, S. Koole, & M. Tops (Eds.), Handbook of Biobehavioral Foundations of Self-Regulation. New York: Springer.
Meyer-Lindenberg, A., & Weinberger, D. R. (2006). Intermediate phenotypes and genetic mechanisms of psychiatric disorders. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 818–827. doi:10.1038/nrn1993.
Mischel, W., Ayduk, O., Berman, M. G., Casey, B. J., Gotlib, I. H., Jonides, J., et al. (2011). ‘Willpower’ over the life span: Decomposing self-regulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6, 252–256. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq081.
Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–259. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.126.2.247.
Näpflin, M., Wildi, M., & Sarnthein, J. (2007). Test-retest reliability of resting EEG spectra validates a statistical signature of persons. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2519–2524. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.07.022.
Nash, K., & Knoch, D. (in press). Individual differences in decision-making: A neural trait approach to study sources of behavioral heterogeneity. In M. Reuter & C. Montag (Eds.), Neuroeconomics. Berlin: Springer. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Nash, K., Schiller, B., Gianotti, L. R. R., Baumgartner, T., & Knoch, D. (2013). Integrating executive function and social decision-making: Response inhibition predicts self-control in a social context. PLoS One. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Paloyelis, Y., Asherson, P., Mehta, M. A., Faraone, S. V., & Kuntsi, J. (2010). DAT1 and COMT effects on delay discounting and trait impulsivity in male adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and healthy controls. Neuropsychopharmacology: Official Publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 35, 2414–2426. doi:10.1038/npp. 2010.124.
Reimers, S., Maylor, E. A., Stewart, N., & Chater, N. (2009). Associations between a one-shot delay discounting measure and age, income, education and real-world impulsive behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 973–978. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.026.
Rigdon, M., Ishii, K., Watabe, M., & Kitayama, S. (2009). Minimal social cues in the dictator game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 358–367. doi:10.1016/j.joep. 2009.02.002.
Rilling, J. K., & Sanfey, A. G. (2011). The neuroscience of social decision-making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 23–48. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131647.
Rilling, J. K., Glenn, A. L., Jairam, M. R., Pagnoni, G., Goldsmith, D. R., Elfenbein, H. A., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2007). Neural correlates of social cooperation and non-cooperation as a function of psychopathy. Biological Psychiatry, 61, 1260–1271. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.07.021.
Robbins, T. W., Gillan, C. M., Smith, D. G., de Wit, S., & Ersche, K. D. (2012). Neurocognitive endophenotypes of impulsivity and compulsivity: Towards dimensional psychiatry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 81–91. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.009.
Robertson, E. M., Theoret, H., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2003). Studies in cognition: The problems solved and created by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 948–960. doi:10.1162/089892903770007344.
Rorden, C., & Karnath, H. O. (2004). Using human brain lesions to infer function: A relic from a past era in the fMRI age? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 812–819. doi:10.1038/nrn1521.
Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300, 1755–1758. doi:10.1126/science.1082976.
Shallice, T. I. M., & Burgess, P. W. (1991). Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 114, 727–741. doi:10.1093/brain/114.2.727.
Sharp, D. J., Scott, S. K., Mehta, M. A., & Wise, R. J. (2006). The neural correlates of declining performance with age: Evidence for age-related changes in cognitive control. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 1739–1749. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj109.
Spitzer, M., Fischbacher, U., Herrnberger, B., Grön, G., & Fehr, E. (2007). The neural signature of social norm compliance. Neuron, 56, 185–196. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.011.
Steinbeis, N., Bernhardt, B. C., & Singer, T. (2012). Impulse control and underlying functions of the left dorsolateral PFC mediate age-related and age-independent individual differences in strategic social behavior. Neuron, 73, 1040–1051. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.027.
Steinberg, L. (2009). Adolescent development and juvenile justice. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 459–485. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153603.
Stuss, D. T., & Benson, D. F. (1986). The frontal lobes. New York: Raven.
Suzuki, S., Niki, K., Fujisaki, S., & Akiyama, E. (2011). Neural basis of conditional cooperation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6, 338–347. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq042.
Tabibnia, G., Satpute, A. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2008). The sunny side of fairness preference for fairness activates reward circuitry (and disregarding unfairness activates self-control circuitry). Psychological Science, 19, 339–347. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02091.x.
Tabibnia, G., Monterosso, J. R., Baicy, K., Aron, A. R., Poldrack, R. A., Chakrapani, S., et al. (2011). Different forms of self-control share a neurocognitive substrate. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 4805–4810. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2859 − 10.2011.
Takeuchi, H., Sekiguchi, A., Taki, Y., Yokoyama, S., Yomogida, Y., Komuro, N., & Kawashima, R. (2010). Training of working memory impacts structural connectivity. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 3297–3303. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4611- 09.2010.
Tassy, S., Oullier, O., Duclos, Y., Coulon, O., Mancini, J., Deruelle, C., & Wicker, B. (2012). Disrupting the right prefrontal cortex alters moral judgement. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 282–288. doi:10.1093/scan/nsr008.
Thaler, R. H., & Shefrin, H. M. (1981). An economic theory of self-control. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 392–406. doi:10.1086/260971.
Tranel, D., Bechara, A., & Denburg, N. L. (2002). Asymmetric functional roles of right and left ventromedial prefrontal cortices in social conduct, decision-making, and emotional processing. Cortex; A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 38, 589–612. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70024-8.
van ’t Wout, M., Kahn, R. S., Sanfey, A. G., & Aleman, A. (2005). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects strategic decision-making. NeuroReport, 16, 1849–1852. doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000183907.08149.14.
van den Bos, W., van Dijk, E., Westenberg, M., Rombouts, S. A., & Crone, E. A. (2011). Changing brains, changing perspectives: The neurocognitive development of reciprocity. Psychological Science, 22, 60–70. doi:10.1177/0956797610391102.
Van Lange, P. A., De Bruin, E., Otten, W., & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733–746. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.733.
Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The psychological consequences of money. Science, 314, 1154–1156. doi:10.1126/science.1132491.
von Hippel, W. (2007). Aging, executive functioning, and social control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 240–244. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00512.x.
Zaki, J., & Mitchell, J. (2013). Intuitive prosociality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 466–470. doi: 10.1177/0963721413492764.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Conclusion
Conclusion
Historically, the study of self-control has been most heavily researched in nonsocial domains, including motor-response inhibition, memory and thought suppression, and emotion regulation (Aron and Poldrack 2005; Cohen and Lieberman 2010). Yet, social dilemmas confront us daily and self-control is critically involved in deciding between options that benefit ourselves and options that benefit others. In this chapter, we reported research in which neuroscience methods combined with social interaction paradigms reveal the neural mechanisms of self-control in social contexts. Moreover, it was revealed that self-control in social decision making reliably involves the lateral PFC, the same region involved in a host of other nonsocial forms of control. Such research highlights the potential for making long-lasting changes to lateral PFC structure and function, which could in turn change self-control capacity and help researchers better understand predispositions toward self-control problems in social conduct. Future research can turn to researching how individual differences and situational affordances interact to impact self-control in social decision making.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (Daria Knoch, PP00P1-123381) and from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Kyle Nash). We would like to thank Lorena Gianotti and Thomas Baumgartner for helpful comments.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Knoch, D., Nash, K. (2015). Self-Control in Social Decision Making: A Neurobiological Perspective. In: Gendolla, G., Tops, M., Koole, S. (eds) Handbook of Biobehavioral Approaches to Self-Regulation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1236-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1236-0_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1235-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1236-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)