Abstract
Adaptive designs use accumulating data to modify in a prospectively planned manner certain design aspects of a clinical study without undermining its validity and integrity. The aim of this chapter is to review adaptive design approaches for dose finding and optimal dose selection and to demonstrate that adaptivity is a fundamentally important concept, which can be applied to dose selection in different stages of clinical development. We review the major statistical methods available for planning and analyzing adaptive designs in Phase I, II, and III. To illustrate the ideas, we refer to examples and case studies from the literature, where available.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barnes PJ, Pocock SJ, Magnussen H, Iqbal A, Kramer B, Higgins M, Lawrence D (2010) Integrating indacaterol dose selection in a clinical study in COPD using an adaptive seamless design. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 23:165–171
Bornkamp B, Bretz F, Dmitrienko A, Enas G, Gaydos B, Hsu CH, Koenig F, Krams M, Liu Q, Neuenschwander B, Parke T, Pinheiro J, Roy A, Sax R, Shen F (2007) Innovative approaches for designing and analyzing adaptive dose ranging trials (with discussion). J Biopharm Stat 17:965–995
Bretz F, Pinheiro J, Branson M (2005) Combining multiple comparisons and modeling techniques in dose response studies. Biometrics 61:738–748
Bretz F, Koenig F, Brannath W, Glimm E, Posch M (2009) Adaptive designs for confirmatory clinical trials. Stat Med 28:1181–1217
Chaturvedi PR, Antonijevic Z, Mehta C (2014). Practical considerations for a two-stage confirmatory adaptive clinical trial design and its implementation: ADVENT trial. In W He, J Pinheiro, OM Kuznetsova, editors, Practical Considerations for Adaptive Trial Design and Implementation. Springer, New York, 77–93
Cheung YK (2011) Dose finding by the continual reassessment method. Chapman & Hall, New York
CHMP (2007) Reflection paper on methodological issues in confirmatory clinical trials with an adaptive design (CHMP/EWP/2459/02)
CHMP (2013) CHMP Draft Qualification Opinion of MCP Mod as an efficient statistical methodology for model-based design and analysis of Phase II dose finding studies under model uncertainty. EMA/CHMP/SAWP/592378/2013. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Regulatory_and_procedural_guideline/2014/02/WC500161027.pdf Accessed 24 Feb 2014
Chow S-C, Chang M (2008) Adaptive design methods in clinical trials—a review. Orphanet J Rare Dis 3:11
Cross J, Lee H, Westelinck A, Nelson J, Grudzinkas C, Peck C (2002) Postmarketing drug dosage changes of 499 FDA-approved new molecular entities, 1980–1999. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 11:439–446
Donohue JF, Fogarty C, Lötvall J (2010) Once-daily bronchodilators for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Indacaterol versus tiotropium. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 182:155–162
FDA (2010) Guidance for Industry: Adaptive design clinical trials for drugs and biologics (draft February 2010) www.fda.gov. Accessed 8 Feb 2011
Gallo P (2006) Confidentiality and trial integrity issues for adaptive designs. Drug Inf J 40:445–450
Gallo P, Chuang-Stein C, Dragalin V, Gaydos B, Krams M, Pinheiro J (2006) Adaptive designs in clinical drug development—An executive summary of the PhRMA Working Group. J Biopharm Stat 16:275–283
Garrett-Mayer E (2006) The continual re-assessment method for dose finding studies: a tutorial. Clinical Trials 3:57–71
Heerdink ER, Urquhart J, Leufkens HG (2002) Changes in prescribed dose after market introduction. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 11:447–453
Heritier S, Lˆo SN, Morgan CC (2011) An adaptive confirmatory trial with treatment selection: practical experiences and unbalanced randomization. Stat Med 30:1541–1554
ICH-E4 (1994) ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline. Topic E4: Dose response information to support drug registration. http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/efficacy/efficacy-single/article/dose-response-information-to-support-drug-registration.html. Accessed 24 Feb 2014
Krams M, Burman C-F, Dragalin V, Gaydos B, Grieve A, Pinheiro J, Maurer W (2007) Adaptive designs in clinical drug development: opportunities, challenges, and scope. Reflections following PhRMA’s November 2006 workshop. J Biopharm Stats 17:957–964
Lawrence D, Bretz F, Pocock S (2014) INHANCE: an adaptive confirmatory study with dose selection at interim. In: Trifilieff A (ed) Indacaterol—the first once-daily long-acting Beta2 agonist for COPD. Springer, Basel, pp 77–92
Maurer W, Hothorn L, Lehmacher W (1995) Multiple comparisons in drug clinical trials and preclinical assays: a-priori ordered hypotheses. In: Vollmar J (ed) Biometrie in der chemisch-pharmazeutischen Industrie. Stuttgart, Fischer Verlag, pp 3–18
Neuenschwander B, Branson M, Gsponer T (2008) Critical aspects to the Bayesian approach to phase I cancer trials. Stat Med 27:2420–2439
O’Quigley J, Pepe M, Fisher L (1990) Continual re-assessment method: a practical design for Phase I clinical trials in cancer. Biometrics 46:33–48
Senn S (1997) Statistical issues in drug development. Wiley, Chichester
Vandemeulebroecke M, Bornkamp B, Bretz F, Pinheiro J (2010) Adaptive dose ranging studies. In: Chow SC, Pong A (eds) Handbook of adaptive designs in pharmaceutical and clinical development. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, pp 11-1–11-22
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lawrence, D., Bretz, F. (2014). Approaches for Optimal Dose Selection for Adaptive Design Trials. In: He, W., Pinheiro, J., Kuznetsova, O. (eds) Practical Considerations for Adaptive Trial Design and Implementation. Statistics for Biology and Health. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1100-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1100-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1099-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1100-4
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)