Skip to main content

Approaches for Optimal Dose Selection for Adaptive Design Trials

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practical Considerations for Adaptive Trial Design and Implementation

Part of the book series: Statistics for Biology and Health ((SBH))

Abstract

Adaptive designs use accumulating data to modify in a prospectively planned manner certain design aspects of a clinical study without undermining its validity and integrity. The aim of this chapter is to review adaptive design approaches for dose finding and optimal dose selection and to demonstrate that adaptivity is a fundamentally important concept, which can be applied to dose selection in different stages of clinical development. We review the major statistical methods available for planning and analyzing adaptive designs in Phase I, II, and III. To illustrate the ideas, we refer to examples and case studies from the literature, where available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barnes PJ, Pocock SJ, Magnussen H, Iqbal A, Kramer B, Higgins M, Lawrence D (2010) Integrating indacaterol dose selection in a clinical study in COPD using an adaptive seamless design. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 23:165–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornkamp B, Bretz F, Dmitrienko A, Enas G, Gaydos B, Hsu CH, Koenig F, Krams M, Liu Q, Neuenschwander B, Parke T, Pinheiro J, Roy A, Sax R, Shen F (2007) Innovative approaches for designing and analyzing adaptive dose ranging trials (with discussion). J Biopharm Stat 17:965–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretz F, Pinheiro J, Branson M (2005) Combining multiple comparisons and modeling techniques in dose response studies. Biometrics 61:738–748

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bretz F, Koenig F, Brannath W, Glimm E, Posch M (2009) Adaptive designs for confirmatory clinical trials. Stat Med 28:1181–1217

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi PR, Antonijevic Z, Mehta C (2014). Practical considerations for a two-stage confirmatory adaptive clinical trial design and its implementation: ADVENT trial. In W He, J Pinheiro, OM Kuznetsova, editors, Practical Considerations for Adaptive Trial Design and Implementation. Springer, New York, 77–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung YK (2011) Dose finding by the continual reassessment method. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • CHMP (2007) Reflection paper on methodological issues in confirmatory clinical trials with an adaptive design (CHMP/EWP/2459/02)

    Google Scholar 

  • CHMP (2013) CHMP Draft Qualification Opinion of MCP Mod as an efficient statistical methodology for model-based design and analysis of Phase II dose finding studies under model uncertainty. EMA/CHMP/SAWP/592378/2013. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Regulatory_and_procedural_guideline/2014/02/WC500161027.pdf Accessed 24 Feb 2014

  • Chow S-C, Chang M (2008) Adaptive design methods in clinical trials—a review. Orphanet J Rare Dis 3:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross J, Lee H, Westelinck A, Nelson J, Grudzinkas C, Peck C (2002) Postmarketing drug dosage changes of 499 FDA-approved new molecular entities, 1980–1999. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 11:439–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue JF, Fogarty C, Lötvall J (2010) Once-daily bronchodilators for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Indacaterol versus tiotropium. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 182:155–162

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (2010) Guidance for Industry: Adaptive design clinical trials for drugs and biologics (draft February 2010) www.fda.gov. Accessed 8 Feb 2011

  • Gallo P (2006) Confidentiality and trial integrity issues for adaptive designs. Drug Inf J 40:445–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallo P, Chuang-Stein C, Dragalin V, Gaydos B, Krams M, Pinheiro J (2006) Adaptive designs in clinical drug development—An executive summary of the PhRMA Working Group. J Biopharm Stat 16:275–283

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett-Mayer E (2006) The continual re-assessment method for dose finding studies: a tutorial. Clinical Trials 3:57–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heerdink ER, Urquhart J, Leufkens HG (2002) Changes in prescribed dose after market introduction. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 11:447–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heritier S, Lˆo SN, Morgan CC (2011) An adaptive confirmatory trial with treatment selection: practical experiences and unbalanced randomization. Stat Med 30:1541–1554

    Google Scholar 

  • ICH-E4 (1994) ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline. Topic E4: Dose response information to support drug registration. http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/efficacy/efficacy-single/article/dose-response-information-to-support-drug-registration.html. Accessed 24 Feb 2014

  • Krams M, Burman C-F, Dragalin V, Gaydos B, Grieve A, Pinheiro J, Maurer W (2007) Adaptive designs in clinical drug development: opportunities, challenges, and scope. Reflections following PhRMA’s November 2006 workshop. J Biopharm Stats 17:957–964

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence D, Bretz F, Pocock S (2014) INHANCE: an adaptive confirmatory study with dose selection at interim. In: Trifilieff A (ed) Indacaterol—the first once-daily long-acting Beta2 agonist for COPD. Springer, Basel, pp 77–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer W, Hothorn L, Lehmacher W (1995) Multiple comparisons in drug clinical trials and preclinical assays: a-priori ordered hypotheses. In: Vollmar J (ed) Biometrie in der chemisch-pharmazeutischen Industrie. Stuttgart, Fischer Verlag, pp 3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuenschwander B, Branson M, Gsponer T (2008) Critical aspects to the Bayesian approach to phase I cancer trials. Stat Med 27:2420–2439

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • O’Quigley J, Pepe M, Fisher L (1990) Continual re-assessment method: a practical design for Phase I clinical trials in cancer. Biometrics 46:33–48

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Senn S (1997) Statistical issues in drug development. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandemeulebroecke M, Bornkamp B, Bretz F, Pinheiro J (2010) Adaptive dose ranging studies. In: Chow SC, Pong A (eds) Handbook of adaptive designs in pharmaceutical and clinical development. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, pp 11-1–11-22

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Lawrence .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lawrence, D., Bretz, F. (2014). Approaches for Optimal Dose Selection for Adaptive Design Trials. In: He, W., Pinheiro, J., Kuznetsova, O. (eds) Practical Considerations for Adaptive Trial Design and Implementation. Statistics for Biology and Health. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1100-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics