Abstract
Images arising from low-intensity settings such as in X-ray astronomy and computed tomography scan often show a relatively weak but constant background noise across the frame. The background noise can result from various uncontrollable sources. In such a situation, it has been observed that the performance of a denoising algorithm can be improved considerably if an additional thresholding procedure is performed on the processed image to set low intensity values to zero. The threshold is typically chosen by an ad-hoc method, such as 5% of the maximum intensity. In this article, we formalize the choice of thresholding through a multiple testing approach. At each pixel, the null hypothesis that the underlying intensity parameter equals the intensity of the background noise is tested, with due consideration of the multiplicity factor. Pixels where the null hypothesis is not rejected, the estimated intensity will be set to zero, thus creating a sharper contrast with the foreground. The main difference of the present context with the usual multiple testing applications is that in our setup, the null value in the hypotheses is not known, and must be estimated from the data itself. We employ a Gaussian mixture to estimate the unknown common null value of the background intensity level. We discuss three approaches to solve the problem and compare them through simulation studies. The methods are applied on noisy X-ray images of a supernova remnant.
Research is partially supported by NSF grant number DMS-1106570.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Benjamini, Y., Hochberg, Y.: Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 57, 289–300 (1995)
Calinon, S.: Robot Programming by Demonstration: A Probabilistic Approach. EPFL/CRC Press, Boca Raton, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg (2009)
Esch, D.N., Connors, A., Karovska, M., van Dyk, D.A.: An image restoration technique with error estimates. Astrophys. J. 610, 1213–1227 (2004)
Ghosal, S., Roy, A.: Predicting false disovery proportion under dependence. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 106, 1208–1218 (2011)
Kolaczyk, E.D.: Nonparametric estmation of gamma-ray burst intensities using Haar wavelets. Astrophys. J. 483, 340–349 (1997)
Kolaczyk, E.D.: Bayesian multiscale models for Poisson processes. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 94, 920–933 (1999)
Kolaczyk, E.D., Nowak, R.D.: Multiscale likelihood analysis and complexity penalized estimation. Ann. Stat. 32, 500–527 (2004)
Nowak, R.D., Kolaczyk, E.D.: A statistical multiscale framwork for Poisson inverse problems. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 46, 1811–1825 (2000)
Pitman, J.: Exchangeable and partially exchangeable random partitions. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 102, 145–158 (1995)
Starck, J., Murtagh, F.: Astronomical Image and Data Analysis. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg (2006)
White, J.T.: Bayesian multi-scale smoothing of photon limited images with applications in astronomy and medicine. Ph. D. Thesis, North Carolina State Univeristy (2009)
White, J.T., Ghosal, S.: Bayesian smoothing of photon limited images with applications in astronomy. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 73, 579–599 (2011)
White, J.T., Ghosal, S.: Denoising three-dimensional and colored images using a Bayesian multi-scale model of photon counts. Signal Process. 93, 2906–2914 (2012)
Willett, R.M., Nowak, R.D.: Platelets: A multiscale approach for recovering edges and surfaces in photon-limited medical imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 22, 332–350 (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this paper
Cite this paper
White, J.T., Ghosal, S. (2014). Multiple Testing Approaches for Removing Background Noise from Images. In: Akritas, M., Lahiri, S., Politis, D. (eds) Topics in Nonparametric Statistics. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 74. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0569-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0569-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0568-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0569-0
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)