Skip to main content

Ethical Conflicts that may Arise When Caring for Dying Children

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Paediatric Patient and Family-Centred Care: Ethical and Legal Issues

Abstract

Paediatric palliative care seeks to optimize quality of life for children with life-limiting conditions, and their families. Ideally this philosophy should be integrated throughout the child’s disease trajectory, from diagnosis until death, and extending into bereavement. Since the concept of paediatric palliative care as a sub-specialty is relatively new, there is limited literature to guide the management of the care of dying children. Disagreements between healthcare providers and families as a child approaches end-of-life often result when a patient-centred approach and a family-centred approach lead to different conclusions about the best way to proceed. When attempting to resolve these conflicts, healthcare providers need to be mindful of the fact that the family will continue to live with the memory of this experience. Using cases created by merging actual clinical experiences, this chapter will explore the potential divergences created by a patient-centred and family-centred approach to the care of a dying child, while offering suggestions on how to resolve these conflicts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Throughout this chapter, the term ‘child’ or ‘children’ will include children, infants and adolescents.

  2. 2.

    Throughout this chapter, the term ‘parent’ will be used to denote any legal guardian of a child for the purpose of medical decision-making.

  3. 3.

    This may not apply to all jurisdictions. In some jurisdictions the age of the patient is also taken into consideration when determining decision-making capacity.

References

  • American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. 1994. Guidelines on foregoing life-sustaining medical treatment. Pediatrics 93 (3): 532–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. 1996. Ethics and the care of critically ill infants and children. Pediatrics 98 (1): 149–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, K. W. 2000. Communication, negotiation, and mediation: Dealing with conflict in end-of-life decisions. Journal of Palliative Care 16 Suppl: S17–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beale, E. A., W. F. Baile, and J. Aaron. 2005. Silence is not golden: Communicating with children dying from cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 23 (15): 3629–3631.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breitbart, W. 2003. Reframing hope: Meaning-centered care for patients near the end of life. Interview by Karen S. Heller. Journal of Palliative Medicine 6 (6): 979–988.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association. 2006. Pediatric hospice palliative care guiding principles and norms of practice. Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Pediatric Society Bioethics Committee. 2004. Treatment decisions for infants, children and adolescents. Paediatrics & Child Health 9 (2): 99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, N. L. 2005. The bane of surrogate decision-making: Defining the best interests of never competent persons. Journal of Legal Medicine 26 (2): 155–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale, F. A., E. Alexander, M. Davis, et al. 2006. Daily living with distress and enrichment: The moral experience of families with ventilator-assisted children at home. Pediatrics 117 (1): e48–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, K. W., C. J. Mollen, and S. Aldridge, et al. 2012. Influences on decision making identified by parents of children receiving pediatric palliative care. AJOB Primary Research 3 (1): 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Bioethics, American Academy of Pediatrics. 1995. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 95 (2): 314–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditto, P. H., J. A. Druley, and K. A. Moore, et al. 1996. Fates worse than death: The role of valued life activities in health-state evaluations. Health Psychol 15 (5): 332–343.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farsides, B., and R. J. Dunlop. 2001. Is there such a thing as a life not worth living? British Medical Journal 322 (7300): 1481–1483.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kagawa-Singer, M., and L. J. Blackhall. 2001. Negotiating cross-cultural issues at the end of life: “You got to go where he lives”. The Journal of the American Medical Association 286 (23): 2993–3001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kasman, D. L. 2004. When is medical treatment futile? A guide for students, residents, and physicians. Journal of General Internal Medicine 19 (10): 1053–1056.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, D. A. 2011. Medical disparagement of the disability experience: Empirical evidence for the “Expressivist Objection”. AJOB Primary Research 2 (2): 8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopelman, L. M. 1997.The best-interests standard as threshold, ideal, and standard of reasonableness. The Journal of Medicine And Philosophy 22 (3): 271–289.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kreicbergs, U., U. Valdimarsdóttir, and E. Onelöv, et al. 2004. Talking about death with children who have severe malignant disease. New England Journal of Medicine 351:1175–1186.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, M. E., M. A. McCabe, and K. M. Patel, et al. 2004. What do adolescents want? An exploratory study regarding end-of-life decision-making. Journal of Adolescent Health 35:529.e1–529.e6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madrigal, V. N., K. W. Carroll, and K. R. Hexem, et al. 2012. Parental decision-making preferences in the pediatric intensive care unit. Critical Care Medicine 40 (10): 2876–2882.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McSherry, M., K. Kehoe, and J. M. Carroll, et al. 2007. Psychosocial and spiritual needs of children living with a life-limiting illness. Pediatric Clinics of North America 54 (5): 609–629, ix–x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meert, K. L., C. S. Thurston, and A. P. Sarnaik. 2000. End-of-life decision-making and satisfaction with care: Parental perspectives. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 1 (2): 179–185.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noyes J. 2006. Health and quality of life of ventilator-dependent children. Journal of Advanced Nursing 56 (4): 392–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, D. L., R. A. Pearlman, and H. E. Starks, et al. 1997. Validation of preferences for life-sustaining treatment: Implications for advance care planning. Annals of Internal Medicine 127 (7): 509–517.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reder, E. A., and J. R. Serwint. 2009. Until the last breath: Exploring the concept of hope for parents and health care professionals during a child’s serious illness. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 163 (7): 653–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schattner, A., D. Rudin, and N. Jellin. 2004. Good physicians from the perspective of their patients. BMC Health Services Research 4 (1): 26.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schnakers, C., and N. D. Zasler. 2007. Pain assessment and management in disorders of consciousness. Current opinion in neurology 20 (6): 620–626.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneiderman, L. J. 2011. Defining medical futility and improving medical care. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2): 123–131.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, L., J. Pratt, and J. Hunter. 2006. Family centred care: A review of qualitative studies. Journal of Clinical Nursing 15 (10): 1317–1323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steering Committee of the EPAC task force. 2007. IMPaCCT: Standards for paediatric palliative care in Europe. European Journal of Palliative Care 14 (3): 109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. 1994. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (1). The New England Journal of Medicine 330 (21): 1499–1508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, D. 2006. Is it in the best interests of an intellectually disabled infant to die? Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (8): 454–459.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Newman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Newman, C., Rapoport, A., Sangha, G. (2014). Ethical Conflicts that may Arise When Caring for Dying Children. In: Zlotnik Shaul, R. (eds) Paediatric Patient and Family-Centred Care: Ethical and Legal Issues. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 57. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0323-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0323-8_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0322-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0323-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics