Skip to main content

Health Services Information: Patient Safety Research Using Administrative Data

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Data and Measures in Health Services Research

Part of the book series: Health Services Research ((HEALTHSR))

Abstract

A wide variety of data is routinely collected by healthcare providers, insurers, professional organizations, and government agencies for administrative purposes. Readily available, computer readable, and covering large populations, these data have become valuable resources for patient safety research. A large number of exemplary studies have been conducted that examined the nature and types of patient safety problems, offered valuable insights into the impacts and risk factors, and, to some extent, provided benchmarks for tracking progress in patient safety efforts at local, state, or national levels. Various methods and tools have been developed to aid such research. The main disadvantage lies with the fact these administrative data are often collected without following any research design, protocol, or quality assurance procedure; therefore health services researchers using these data sources must make extra efforts in devising proper methodologies and must interpret their findings with extra caution. As more and more administrative data are collected and digitalized and more tailored methodologies and tools are developed, health services researchers will be presented with ever-greater opportunity to extract valid information and knowledge on patient safety issues from administrative data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackroyd-Stolarz S, Bowles SK, Giffin L. Validating administrative data for the detection of adverse events in older hospitalized patients. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2014;13(6):101–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). 2013 National healthcare quality report. http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhqr13/2013nhqr.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2014.

  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Patient safety indicators. http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/Modules/psi_resources.aspx. Accessed 1 Sept 2014.

  • Budnitz DS, Lovegrove MC, Shehab N, et al. Emergency hospitalizations for adverse drug events in older Americans. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(21):2002–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). CMS data navigator. http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems.html. Accessed 1 Sept 2014.

  • Dimick JB, Nicholas LH, Ryan AM, et al. Bariatric surgery complications before vs after implementation of a national policy restricting coverage to centers of excellence. JAMA. 2013;309(8):792–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi T, Kachalia A, Thomas E, et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: a study of closed malpractice claims. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:488–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin FA, Resar RK. IHI global trigger tool for measuring adverse events (Second Edition). IHI innovation series white paper. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/. Accessed 1 Sept 2014.

  • Iezzoni LI, Daley J, Heeren T, et al. Using administrative data to screen hospitals for high complication rates. Inquiry. 1994;31(1):40–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson M, et al. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens PL, Barrett ML, Raetzman S, et al. Surgical site infections following ambulatory surgery procedures. JAMA. 2014;311(7):709–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quan H, Drösler S, Sundararajan V, et al. Adaptation of AHRQ patient safety indicators for use in ICD-10 administrative data by an international consortium. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, et al., editors. Advances in patient safety: new directions and alternative approaches. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffertya AM, Clarkeb SP, Colesc J, et al. Outcomes of variation in hospital nurse staffing in English hospitals: cross-sectional analysis of survey data and discharge records. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44(2):175–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano PS, Geppert J, Davies S, et al. A national profile of patient safety in US hospitals based on administrative data. Health Aff. 2003;22(2):154–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Hripcsak G, Markatou M, et al. Active computerized pharmacovigilance using natural language processing, statistics and electronic health records: a feasibility studies. JAMIA. 2009;16:328–37.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan C, Miller M. Excess length of stay, costs, and mortality attributable to medical injuries during hospitalization: an administrative data-based analysis. JAMA. 2003;190(4):1868–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan C, Sangl J, Bierman A, et al. Inappropriate medication use in the community-dwelling elderly: findings from 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. JAMA. 2001;286(22):2823–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan C, Friedman B, Mosso A, et al. Medicare payment for selected adverse events under the prospective payment system: building the business cases for investing in patient safety improvement. Health Aff. 2006;25(5):1386–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan C, Smith SR, Keyes MA, et al. How useful are voluntary medication error reports? The case of warfarin-related medication errors. Joint Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34(1):36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhan C, Elixhauser A, Richards C, et al. Identification of hospital-acquired catheter-associated urinary tract infections from Medicare claims: sensitivity and positive predictive value. Med Care. 2009;47(3):364–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunliu Zhan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Zhan, C. (2015). Health Services Information: Patient Safety Research Using Administrative Data. In: Sobolev, B., Levy, A., Goring, S. (eds) Data and Measures in Health Services Research. Health Services Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7673-4_12-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7673-4_12-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7673-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics