Skip to main content

Improving Patient Satisfaction Through Flow

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Patient Flow

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 206))

  • 4450 Accesses

Abstract

Patient satisfaction has emerged as a key driver of health care service, quality and even patient safety. The increased prevalence of and reliance on patient satisfaction surveys and the patient experience has permeated health care practices ranging from solo physician offices to tertiary health care centers. The recent deployment of the HCAHPS (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) Survey and “pay for performance” initiatives have served to highlight an increased emphasis on national standards, public reporting, and hospital comparisons for patient satisfaction.

Patient satisfaction and patient flow are inextricably entwined aspects of patient care. This chapter describes factors behind the patient experience: what is assessed on surveys, the role of structure, process and teamwork, and the contributions of smooth patient flow. A number of strategies and tactics for enhancing and sustaining an optimal patient experience are discussed. Finally, for situations when waits are inevitable, this chapter reviews what can be done to manage the processes and expectations of the patient and the health care team.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beckman, H. B., Markakis, K. M., Suchman, A. L., 7#x0026; Frankel, R. M. (1994). The doctor-patient relationship and malpractice. Lessons from plaintiff depositions. Archives of Internal Medicine, 154, 1365–1370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreaux, E. D., d'Autremont, S., Wood, K., Jones, G. et al. (2004). Predictors of emergency department patient satisfaction: Stability over 17 months. Academic Emergency Medicine, 11, 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. L., Sadosty, A. T., Weaver, A. L., 7#x0026; Goyal, D. G. (2008). To sit or not to sit? Annals of Emergency Medicine, 51(2), 188–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maister, D. (1985). The psychology of waiting lines. In J. A. Czepiel, M. R. Solomon, 7#x0026; C. F. Suprenant (Eds.), The service encounter: Managing employee/customer interaction in service business (pp. 113–123). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, T. A., Cates, R. J., Mastorovich, M. J., 7#x0026; Royalty, D. L. (1998). Emergency department patient satisfaction: Customer service improves patient satisfaction and ratings of physician and nurse skill. Journal of Healthcare Management, 43(5), 427–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, T. A. (2010). Leadership for great customer service. Healthcare Executive, 25(3), 66–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, T., 7#x0026; Jensen, K. (2009). Hardwiring flow: Systems and processes for seamless patient care. Gulf Breeze, FL: Fire Starter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, T., 7#x0026; Cates, R. J. (2004). Leadership for great customer service: Satisfied patients, satisfied employees. Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, C. M., Kennedy, J., 7#x0026; Kaplan, J. (2010). The effects of emergency department staff rounding on patient safety and satisfaction. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 38(5), 666–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (2009). Designing waits that work. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(4), 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press-Ganey, March 2007. Taking 4s to 5s, as cited by Thom Mayer, MD at the ACEP Emergency Department Director’s Academy, Phase ll, May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press Ganey. (2010). National emergency department priority index. Emergency Department Pulse Report. South Bend, IN: Press Ganey Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Privett, C. (2011). Satisfied patients are the best measure of quality, Duke study finds. Fuqua.duke.edu/news.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, T. P., Schutte, W. P., Muelleman, R. L., 7#x0026; Wadman, M. C. (2002). Provision of clinically based information improves patients’ perceived length of stay and satisfaction with EP. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 20(6), 506–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, S. J., Hellstern, R. A., Jensen, K., Lyman, J. L., Mayer, T., Pilgrim, R., et al. (2010). Can’t get no satisfaction? The real truth behind patient satisfaction surveys. Emergency Medicine News, 32(6–7), 26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirk Jensen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jensen, K. (2013). Improving Patient Satisfaction Through Flow. In: Hall, R. (eds) Patient Flow. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 206. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9512-3_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics