Skip to main content

Early Rule-Learning Ability and Language Acquisition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Language and Recursion

Abstract

Whether human language is a rule-based mental knowledge system has been debated since Chomsky’s proposal half a century ago. Today, most theories concur that adult native speakers possess a rule-based representation of their native language’s grammar, but it is still heatedly debated whether this rule system is in place already in the initial state, i.e., innate, or whether it emerges during development. This chapter reviews a series of behavioral and brain imaging experiments with newborns and young infants in an attempt to address this question. These studies chart the developmental trajectory of repetition-based structural regularities, and they suggest that the ability to represent at least this simple form of structural rule in an abstract way is present at birth. The implications of these results for theories of language and language learning as well as remaining questions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As NIRS is a relatively new technique in developmental cognitive neuroscience, we ran a behavioral validation study (Gervain et al., 2011) using the classical high-amplitude sucking procedure to make sure that the absence of a differential response for ABA vs. ABC was not simply due to the low sensitivity of the NIRS measure. The behavioral results confirmed the NIRS findings: newborns can discriminate between ABB vs. ABC, but not between ABA vs. ABC grammars.

References

  • Berent, I., & Shimron, J. (2003). Co-occurrence restrictions on identical consonants in the Hebrew lexicon: Are they due to similarity? Journal of Linguistics, 39(01), 31–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner’s verbal behavior. Language, 35(1), 26–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Hertz-Pannier, L., Dubois, J., & Dehaene, S. (2008). How does early brain organization promote language acquisition in humans? European Review, 16(4), 399–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elman, J., Bates, E., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1997). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development (Neural networks and connectionist modeling). Boston, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, A. D., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Mehler, J. (2007). Perceptual constraints and the learnability of simple grammars. Cognition, 105(3), 577–614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Endress, A. D., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2009). Perceptual and memory constraints on language acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(8), 348–353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Endress, A. D., Scholl, B. J., & Mehler, J. (2005). The role of salience in the extraction of algebraic rules. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 134(3), 406–419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, M. C., Slemmer, J. A., Marcus, G. F., & Johnson, S. P. (2009). Information from multiple modalities helps five-month-olds learn abstract rules. Developmental Science, 12(4), 504–509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gervain, J., Berent, I., & Werker, J. F. (2012). Binding at birth: The newborn brain detects identity relations and sequential position in speech. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(3), 564–574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gervain, J., Macagno, F., Cogoi, S., Pena, M., & Mehler, J. (2008). The neonate brain detects speech structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(37), 14222–14227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gervain, J., Mehler, J., Werker, J. F., Nelson, C. A., Csibra, G., Lloyd-Fox, S., et al. (2011). Near-infrared spectroscopy: A report from the McDonnell infant methodology consortium. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(1), 22–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gervain, J., & Werker, J. F. (2012). Learning non-adjacent regularities at age 0 ; 7. Journal of Child Language, FirstView, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giurfa, M., Zhang, S., Jenett, A., Menzel, R., & Srinivasan, M. V. (2001). The concepts of “sameness” and “difference” in an insect. Nature, 410(6831), 930–933.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. P., Fernandes, K. J., Frank, M. C., Kirkham, N., Marcus, G., Rabagliati, H., et al. (2009). Abstract rule learning for visual sequences in 8- and 11-month-olds. Infancy, 14(1), 2–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kemler Nelson, D. G., Jusczyk, P. W., Mandel, D. R., Myers, J., Turk, A. E., & Gerken, L. (1995). The head-turn preference procedure for testing auditory perception. Infant Behavior and Development, 18, 111–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. F., Fernandes, K. J., & Johnson, S. P. (2007). Infant rule learning facilitated by speech. Psychological Science, 18(5), 387.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. F., Vijayan, S., Rao, S. B., & Vishton, P. M. (1999). Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science, 283(5398), 77–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, H. L., & Maybery, M. T. (2002). Grouping in short-term verbal memory: Is position coded temporally? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 55(2), 391–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parisse, C. (2005). New perspectives on language development and the innateness of grammatical knowledge. Language Sciences, 27(4), 383–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 253, 530–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rabagliati, H., Senghas, A., Johnson, S., & Marcus, G. F. (2012). Infant rule learning: Advantage language, or advantage speech? PLoS ONE, 7(7), e40517.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saffran, J. R., Pollak, S. D., Seibel, R. L., & Shkolnik, A. (2007). Dog is a dog is a dog: Infant rule learning is not specific to language. Cognition, 105(3), 669–680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition, 74(3), 209–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. B., Fox, S. E., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Nelson, C. A. (2011). Neural processing of repetition and non-repetition grammars in 7- and 9-month-old infants. Frontiers in Psychology, 2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judit Gervain .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gervain, J. (2014). Early Rule-Learning Ability and Language Acquisition. In: Lowenthal, F., Lefebvre, L. (eds) Language and Recursion. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9414-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics