Abstract
This chapter adopts an interaction analysis method using the notion of uptake to investigate the development of progressive inquiry learning in a classroom setting using Group Scribbles (GS). In progressive inquiry learning, students work together on elaborating a shared object such as a research problem, products in a shared digital space like GS, or experimental practices to be reflected on and transformed. An uptake analytical framework is applied to code different facets of interactions in a small group, comprising verbal interactions (utterances and gestures), artifacts created in GS, and hands-on experimental practices, into events as coordination acts and to identify uptakes and pivotal contributions (a contribution that plays the role of shifting the direction of the subsequent events seamlessly or abruptly) from such interactions. The analysis illuminates how the pivotal contributions influenced the direction of the group progressive inquiry and led the group to develop progressive understanding of the science concepts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arvaja, M., Salovaara, H., Häkkinen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2007). Combining individual and group-level perspectives for studying collaborative knowledge construction in context. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 448–459.
Chen, W., & Looi, C.-K. (this volume). Group Scribbles-supported collaborative learning in a primary grade 5 science class. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rose, C. Teplovs, & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 14. New York, NY: Springer.
Chen, W., Looi, C. K., & Tan, S. (2010). What do students do in a F2F CSCL classroom? The optimization of multiple communications modes. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1159–1170.
Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Progressive Inquiry in a computer-supported biology class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1072–1088.
Hakkarainen, K. (2009). A knowledge-practice perspective on technology-mediated learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(2), 213–231.
Hakkarainen, K., & Paavola, S. (2009). Toward a trialogical approach to learning. In B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, & R. Hershkowitz (Eds.), Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction (pp. 65–80). New York, NY: Routledge.
Jeong, H. (this volume). Development of group understanding via the construction of physical and technological artifacts. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rose, C. Teplovs, & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 18. New York, NY: Springer.
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.
Koschmann, T., Stahl, G., & Zemel, A. (2005). The video analyst’s manifesto (or the implications of Garfinkel’s policies for the development of a program of video analytic research within the learning sciences). In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning science. New York, NY: Routledge.
Lund, K., & Bécu-Robinault, K. (this volume). Conceptual change and sustainable coherency of concepts across modes of interaction. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rose, C. Teplovs, & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 17. New York, NY: Springer.
Medina, R. (this volume). Cascading inscriptions and practices: Diagramming and experimentation in the Group Scribbles classroom. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rose, C. Teplovs, & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 16. New York, NY: Springer.
Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2009). From meaning making to joint construction of knowledge practices and artefacts - A trialogical approach to CSCL. In C. Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann, & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning practices: CSCL2009 conference proceedings (pp. 83–92). International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS): Rhodes, Creek.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. 2 vols. Edited by Gail Jefferson with introductions by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Sanderson, P., & Fisher, C. (1994). Exploratory sequential data analysis: Foundations. Human-Computer Interaction, 9, 251–317.
Stahl, G. (Ed.). (2002). Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ.
Stahl, G. (2006). Sustaining group cognition in a math chat environment. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning (RPTEL), 1(2), 85–113.
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: A historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 406–427). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Suthers, D. D. (2006). A qualitative analysis of collaborative knowledge construction through shared representations. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(2), 1–28.
Suthers, D. D., Dwyer, N., Medina, R., & Vatrapu, R. (2010). A framework for conceptualizing, representing, and analyzing distributed interaction. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 5–42.
Suthers, D. D., Lund, K., Rosé, C., Dyke, G., Law, N., Teplovs, C., et al. (2011). Towards productive multivocality in the analysis of collaborative learning. In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake & N. Law (Eds.), Connecting computer-supported collaborative learning to policy and practice: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL 2011) (Vol. III, pp. 1015–1022). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.
Wee, J. D., & Looi, C. K. (2009). A model for analyzing math knowledge building in VMT. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying virtual math teams. New York, NY: Springer.
Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007). Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning & Instruction, 17(4), 416–426.
Acknowledgments
This material is based on the work supported by the National Research Foundation (Singapore) under Grant NRF2007-IDM003-MOE-001. We are grateful to Mayflower Primary School for collaborating with us on this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Transcripts of data on electricity for the uptake analysis (from 00:12:15 to 00:16:16)
Time | Label | Name | Observable action, discourse (including graphs), or content | ||
Face-to-face conversations and gestures | GS artifacts | Screenshots of student trial–error experiments | |||
12:15 | O1 | Others | (To S) You can try to use two batteries (using a gesture with his fingers). | Â | Â |
12:18 | J2 | Joel | (J overheard what O said and understood his gestures.) Bright idea. | Â | Â |
12:19 | B3 | Bruno | (To the group members) Yeah. | Â | Â |
12:21 | S4 | Serena | (To the group members) Let’s try two batteries. We connect all of them? (Using her fingers to make a gesture of two. All of them got excited.) |  |  |
12:38 | Je5 | Joel starting the experiment | (To B) Wait! Wait! I know! Quickly, connect the wire! B, hold here! Hold it hold it. Hold it properly. Ok, hold it. | Â |
|
12:47 | Ge6 | Group experiment | (B connected the wires with the two batteries to light the bulb, but the bulb was not lighted.) | Â |
|
12:49 | S7 | Serena | (To B) Hey! Wrong side (The bulb was not lighted.) | Â | Â |
12:52 | Ge8 | Group experiment | (The group tried again, and this time the bulb was lighted by B’s final touch.) |  |
|
12:53 | J9 | Joel | Hey, very bright. | Â | Â |
12:54 | S10 | Serena | (To the group members) How about we try two batteries, two bulbs? Two bulbs? | Â | Â |
13:05 | Gg11 | Group in GS | (The group board is empty. T looked at the group board.) | Â | Â |
13:06 | T12 | Teacher | (To the group) No draft, no draft [on the group board]. Then people will look at a blank board. | Â | Â |
13:07 | B13 | Bruno | (To T) I’ll draw, I’ll draw. |  |  |
13:10 | T14 | Teacher | (To the group) Where are the two batteries? | Â | Â |
13:13 | J15 | Joel | (To T) We can do with two batteries. | Â | Â |
13:15 | T16 | Teacher | (To the group) One draws, one member draws … (Stopped for a few seconds) One member draws. The other three do the fix and circuit. |  |  |
13:25 | Bg17 | Bruno in GS | (To T) I’m drawing, I’m drawing. |
| Â |
13:27 | Je18 | Joel starting the experiment | (To S) Hey, S. Hold this. Hold this. You hold here. Hold here. Hold here. (S and J begin to connect the wires with the two batteries to light the bulb again to make B understand how to draw the circuit.) | Â |
|
13:38 | Bg19 | Bruno in GS | (B is drawing and did not look up) Hey, don’t knock my hand. |
| Â |
13:47 | T20 | Teacher | (To the class) Try various ways. Use two wires. (Stopped for a few seconds.) Now children, 5E (this class number) gave me more varieties you know? 5E, I want team work. | Â | Â |
14:16 | Bg21 | Bruno in GS | (B finished the drawing of the graph of circuit with two wires and two batteries to light the bulb they experimented just now on his private board.) |
| Â |
14:28 | Ge22 | Group experiment | (Before posting the drawing to the group board, S and A lighted the bulb again for B’s further check.) |  |
|
14:29 | Bg23 | Bruno in GS | (B dragged the drawing of the circuit with two wires and two batteries on the left together with his previous drawing of the circuit with two wires and one battery to light the bulb on the right from the private board to the group board.) |
B posted his drawing (on the left) together with his previous drawing (on the right) onto the group board. | Â |
14:30 | B24 | Bruno | (To group members) Let’s try three batteries. There must be methods to do it. |  |  |
15:03 | Ag25 | Agnes in GS | (After observing the hands-on activity about using two batteries to light one bulb, A began to draw on B’s private board according to her understanding.) |
| Â |
15:10 | Ag + Bg26 | Bruno in GS | (While A is drawing, B is looking at and pointing to the drawing. He realized that his previous circuit graph was wrong. Ag had no time to finish the drawing; she asked Bruno to finish the rest.) |
| Â |
15:11 | T27 | Teacher | (To class) Now. Maximum two batteries. | Â | Â |
15:13 | J28 | Joel | (To B) Maximum two batteries la. | Â | Â |
15:19 | T29 | Teacher | (To class) All right, children, I think it’s enough now. Stop what you’re doing. Now, I want you to visit other people’s board and see whether there are new ideas. If you got different ideas, you can clone your friends’ board and paste it into your own group board. And circle it to show me that you borrow the ideas. Now you can visit your neighbor’s board. |  |  |
15:50 | S30 | Serena | (To group members) Teacher said we cannot do la. | Â | Â |
15:52 | Be31 | Bruno’s experiment | (Although the teacher asked the students to stop doing the experiment, B did the experiment again to light the bulb, trying to find out why his previous drawing of the circuit graph was not correct.) |  |
|
15:53 | Ag32 | Agnes in GS | (To B, pointing to the drawing of the circuit with two batteries to light the bulb on the group board that B drew previously.) It’s not like that. Not like that. Cancel this one la. |
A deleted the drawing from the group board | Â |
16:03 | A33 | Agnes | (To B, pointing to the drawing) B, you draw and finish. Draw and finish (A is observing B’s drawing). |  |  |
16:10 | Bg34 | Bruno in GS | (B is drawing.) |
B continued A’s drawing (16:03) |  |
16:16 | Gg35 | Bruno in GS | (B removed his previously published drawing and posted the revised drawing of the circuit with two batteries to light the bulb as the group work to the group board.) |
| Â |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Looi, CK., Song, Y., Wen, Y., Chen, W. (2013). Identifying Pivotal Contributions for Group Progressive Inquiry in a Multimodal Interaction Environment. In: Suthers, D., Lund, K., Rosé, C., Teplovs, C., Law, N. (eds) Productive Multivocality in the Analysis of Group Interactions. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 15. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8960-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8960-3_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8959-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8960-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)