Skip to main content

Analysis of Receptor Binding and Quantitative Autoradiography

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Current Laboratory Methods in Neuroscience Research

Part of the book series: Springer Protocols Handbooks ((SPH))

Abstract

Localizing and quantifying receptors in discrete, small tissue regions requires a method of visualizing these receptors at the light microscopic level combined with a means for measuring receptor number over a wide range. Quantitative autoradiography provides both. This technique requires radioligands with high specific activity that are also very selective for the receptor or receptors in question. A hallmark of such radioligands is a high affinity for the receptor and, usually, a low affinity for other similar receptors. It is also necessary to develop methods to allow selective and measureable labeling of the receptor, similar to any radioligand binding approach. This includes establishing the binding kinetics, both association rate and dissociation rate, under a specific set of conditions and demonstrating the radioligand binds with an appropriate pharmacology. Conditions must also maintain tissue integrity to a sufficient degree to allow identification of particular tissue regions, cellular groupings or nuclei.

It is also possible to demonstrate the functional linkage of receptors to other proteins using the quantitative autoradiographic approach. Receptors linked to G proteins, particularly Gi and/or Go, are especially amenable to this approach. Again, it is necessary to establish optimum conditions for each receptor subtype.

Through the use of these techniques, it is possible to examine receptor localization, density, and functional linkage as well as changes in these parameters during development or due to disease processes or drug treatments. This chapter describes the necessary steps to use these techniques correctly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ci/mmol (Curies per millimole) is the standard measure of the level of radioactivity incorporated into a molecule, how “hot” it is. A Curie is defined as 3.7 × 1010 disintegrations (radioactive decay events) per second or 2.22 × 1012 disintegrations per minute. While the International System of Units supports defining radioactivity levels as Becquerels (Bq) or one disintegration per second, the Curie remains the most common unit of measure in biological materials. A millimole is 10−3 mol of a molecule.

References

  • Boast CA, Snowhill EW, Altar CA (1985) Quantitative receptor autoradiography. In: Neurology and neurobiology, vol. 19. Alan R. Liss, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bylund DB, Murrin LC (2000) Radioligand saturation binding experiments over large concentration ranges. Life Sci 67:2897–2911

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng YC, Prusoff WH (1973) Relationship between the inhibition constant (Ki) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 percent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. Biochem Pharmacol 22:3099–3108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deupree JD, Hinton KA, Cerutis DR, Bylund DB (1996) Buffers differentially alter the binding of [3H]rauwolscine and [3H]RX821002 to alpha-2 adrenergic receptor subtypes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 278:1215–1227

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geary WA, Wooten GF (1985) Regional tritium quenching in quantitative autoradiography of the central nervous system. Brain Res 336:334–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gonsiorek W, Hesk D, Chen SC, Kinsley D, Fine JS, Jackson JV, Bober LA, Deno G, Bian H, Fossetta J, Lunn CA, Kozlowski JA, Lavey B, Piwinski J, Narula SK, Lundell DJ, Hipkin RW (2006) Characterization of peripheral human cannabinoid receptor (hCB2) expression and pharmacology using a novel radioligand, [35S]Sch225336. J Biol Chem 281:28143–28151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Happe HK, Bylund DB, Murrin LC (2001) Agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPγS autoradiography: optimization for high sensitivity. Eur J Pharmacol 422:1–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Happe HK, Murrin LC (1990) Tritium quench in autoradiography during postnatal development of rat forebrain. Brain Res 525:28–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Happe HK, Murrin LC (1993) High-affinity choline transport sites: use of [3H]hemicholinium-3 as a quantitative marker. J Neurochem 60:1191–1201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Happe HK, Peters JL, Bergman DA, Murrin LC (1994) Localization of nicotinic cholinergic receptors in rat brain: autoradiographic studies with [3H]cytisine. Neuroscience 62:929–944

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haylett DG (2003) Direct measurement of drug binding to receptors. In: Foreman JC, Johansen T (eds) Textbook of receptor pharmacology. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 153–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Herkenham M, McLean S (1986) Mismatches between receptor and transmitter localizations in the brain. In: Boast CA (ed) Quantitative receptor autoradiography. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 137–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenakin T (1997) Molecular pharmacology. A short course. Blackwell Science, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Laitinen JT (2003) [35S]GTPγS autoradiography: a powerful functional approach with expanding potential for neuropharmacological studies on receptors coupled to Gi family of G proteins. Curr Neuropharmacol 2:191–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JA, Zahniser NR (1987) The use of 14C-labeled tissue paste standards for the calibration of 125I-labeled ligands in quantitative autoradiography. Neurosci Lett 81:345–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Munson PJ, Rodbard D (1980) LIGAND: a versatile computerized approach for characterization of ligand-binding systems. Anal Biochem 107:220–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norman AB, Borchers MT, Wachendorf TJ, Price AL, Sanberg PR (1989) Loss of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors and muscarinic cholinergic receptors in rat brain following in vitro polytron homogenization. Brain Res Bull 22:633–636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pert CB, Snyder SH (1974) Opiate receptor binding of agonists and antagonists affected differentially by sodium. Mol Pharmacol 10:868–879

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers AW (1979) Techniques of autoradiography. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal HE (1967) A graphic method for the determination and presentation of binding parameters in a complex system. Anal Biochem 20:525–532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders JD, Happe HK, Bylund DB, Murrin LC (2005) Development of the norepinephrine transporter in the rat CNS. Neuroscience 130:107–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders JD, Happe HK, Bylund DB, Murrin LC (2011) Changes in postnatal norepinephrine alter alpha-2 adrenergic receptor development. Neuroscience 192:761–772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Scatchard G (1949) The attractions of proteins for small molecules and ions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 51:660–672

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sim LJ, Selley DE, Childers SR (1995) In vitro autoradiography of receptor-activated G proteins in rat brain by agonist-stimulated guanylyl 5'-[γau35S]thio]-triphosphate binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:7242–7246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sim LJ, Selley DE, Childers SR (1997) Autoradiographic visualization in brain of receptor-G protein coupling using [35S]GTPγS binding. Methods Mol Biol 83:117–132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamura HI, Enna SJ, Kuhar MJ (1985) Neurotransmitter receptor binding. Raven, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Young WS, Kuhar MJ (1979) A new method for receptor autoradiography: [3H]opioid receptors in rat brain. Brain Res 179:255–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Charles Murrin Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Murrin, L.C. (2014). Analysis of Receptor Binding and Quantitative Autoradiography. In: Xiong, H., Gendelman, H.E. (eds) Current Laboratory Methods in Neuroscience Research. Springer Protocols Handbooks. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8794-4_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8794-4_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8793-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8794-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics