Skip to main content

Robotics and Remote Surgery: Next Step

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotics in General Surgery

Abstract

Telesurgery is still in its infancy and significant challenges pervade including technical aspects, surgical robotic platforms, cost-effectiveness, and mostly data transfer speed. The potential benefits of telesurgery have become clearer with telementoring programs, but the “niche” applications such as space missions and military projects would be the primer for further developments in the allocation of funds and in the attribution of highly specialized human resources. This chapter highlights some of the challenges and the stepwise approach required for the maturation of this futuristic field.

“All glory comes from daring to begin.”

Eugene F. Ware

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Diana M, Hubner M, Eisenring MC, Zanetti G, Troillet N, Demartines N. Measures to prevent surgical site infections: what surgeons (should) do. World J Surg. 2011;35:280–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hubner M, Diana M, Zanetti G, Eisenring MC, Demartines N, Troillet N. Surgical site infections in colon surgery: the patient, the procedure, the hospital, and the surgeon. Arch Surg. 2011;146: 1240–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Diana M, Dhumane P, Cahill RA, Mortensen N, Leroy J, Marescaux J. Minimal invasive single-site surgery in colorectal procedures: current state of the art. J Minim Access Surg. 2011;7:52–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW. Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg. 2005;242:83–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988;35:153–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harris SJ, Arambula-Cosio F, Mei Q, et al. The Probot–an active robot for prostate resection. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1997;211:317–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cubano M, Poulose BK, Talamini MA, et al. Long distance telementoring. A novel tool for laparoscopy aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:673–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gagner M, Begin E, Hurteau R, Pomp A. Robotic interactive laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet. 1994; 343:596–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ballantyne GH. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1389–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore RG, Adams JB, Partin AW, Docimo SG, Kavoussi LR. Telementoring of laparoscopic procedures: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc. 1996; 10:107–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schlachta CM, Lefebvre KL, Sorsdahl AK, Jayaraman S. Mentoring and telementoring leads to effective incorporation of laparoscopic colon surgery. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:841–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lum MJ, Rosen J, King H, et al. Teleoperation in surgical robotics–network latency effects on surgical performance. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:6860–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rayman R, Croome K, Galbraith N, et al. Long-distance robotic telesurgery: a feasibility study for care in remote environments. Int J Med Robot. 2006; 2:216–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Satava RM. Emerging technologies for surgery in the 21st century. Arch Surg. 1999;134:1197–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, et al. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature. 2001;413:379–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. ‘Weightless’ surgery performed for first time. The Independent. 2006 Sep 28 [Cited 2012 May 10]. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/weightless-surgery-performed-for-first-time-417826.html)

  17. Kirkpatrick AW, Keaney M, Kmet L, et al. Intraperitoneal gas insufflation will be required for laparoscopic visualization in space: a comparison of laparoscopic techniques in weightlessness. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:233–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lum MJ, Rosen J, King H, et al. Telesurgery via Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) with a field deployable surgical robot. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;125:313–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Doarn CR, Anvari M, Low T, Broderick TJ. Evaluation of teleoperated surgical robots in an enclosed undersea environment. Telemed J E Health. 2009;15:325–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Haidegger T, Sandor J, Benyo Z. Surgery in space: the future of robotic telesurgery. Surg Endosc. 2011;25: 681–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rayman R, Croome K, Galbraith N, et al. Robotic telesurgery: a real-world comparison of ground- and satellite-based internet performance. Int J Med Robot. 2007;3:111–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ross MD. Medicine in long duration space exploration: the role of virtual reality and broad bandwidth telecommunications networks. Acta Astronaut. 2001; 49:441–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nicolau S, Soler L, Mutter D, Marescaux J. Augmented reality in laparoscopic surgical oncology. Surg Oncol. 2011;20:189–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. D’Agostino J, Diana M, Soler L, Vix M, Marescaux J. 3D virtual neck exploration prior to parathyroidectomy. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1072–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Marescaux J, Rubino F, Arenas M, Mutter D, Soler L. Augmented-reality-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy. JAMA. 2004;292:2214–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pappone C, Vicedomini G, Manguso F, et al. Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1390–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacques Marescaux M.D., F.A.C.S., (Hon.) F.R.C.S., (Hon.) J.S.E.S. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marescaux, J., Diana, M. (2014). Robotics and Remote Surgery: Next Step. In: Kim, K. (eds) Robotics in General Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8739-5_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8739-5_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8738-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8739-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics