Skip to main content

Ovarian Tumor Characterization Using 3D Ultrasound

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ovarian Neoplasm Imaging

Abstract

Among gynecological malignancies, ovarian cancer is the most frequent cause of death. Preoperative determination of whether a tumor is benign or malignant has often been found to be difficult. Because of such inconclusive findings from ultrasound images and other tests, many patients with benign conditions have been offered unnecessary surgeries thereby increasing patient anxiety and healthcare cost. The key objective of our work is to develop an adjunct computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) technique that uses ultrasound images of the ovary and image mining algorithms to accurately classify benign and malignant ovarian tumor images. In this algorithm, we extract texture features based on Local Binary Patterns (LBP) and Laws Texture Energy (LTE) and use them to build and train a support vector machine (SVM) classifier. Our technique was validated using 1,000 benign and 1,000 malignant images, and we obtained a high accuracy of 99.9 % using a SVM classifier with a radial basis function (RBF) kernel. The high accuracy can be attributed to the determination of the novel combination of the 16 texture-based features that quantify the subtle changes in the images belonging to both classes. The proposed algorithm has the following characteristics: cost-effectiveness, complete automation, easy deployment, and good end-user comprehensibility. We have also developed a novel integrated index, Ovarian Cancer Index (OCI), which is a combination of the texture features, to present the physicians with a more transparent adjunct technique for ovarian tumor classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

CA125:

Cancer antigen 125

CAD:

Computer-aided diagnosis

DICOM:

Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine

FN:

False-negatives

FP:

False-positives

LBP:

Local Binary Pattern

LTE:

Laws Texture Energy

MS:

Mass spectrometry

OCI:

Ovarian Cancer Index

PPV:

Positive predictive value

RBF:

Radial basis function

SD:

Standard deviation

SVM:

Support vector machine

TEM:

Texture energy measurements

TN:

True-negatives

TP:

True-positives

References

  1. NCI (National Cancer Institute) on ovarian cancer. Information available at http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/ovarian. Last accessed Aug 2011.

  2. Bast Jr RC, Badgwell D, Lu Z, Marquez R, Rosen D, Liu J, Baggerly KA, Atkinson EN, Skates S, Zhang Z, Lokshin A, Menon U, Jacobs I, Lu K. New tumor markers: CA125 and beyond. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005;15:274–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zaidi SI. Fifty years of progress in gynecologic ultrasound. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;99:195–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Menon U, Talaat A, Rosenthal AN, Macdonald ND, Jeyerajah AR, Skates SJ, Sibley K, Oram DH, Jacobs IJ. Performance of ultrasound as a second line test to serum CA125 in ovarian cancer screening. BJOG. 2000;107:165–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nossov V, Amneus M, Su F, Lang J, Janco JM, Reddy ST, Farias-Eisner R. The early detection of ovarian cancer: from traditional methods to proteomics. Can we really do better than serum CA-125? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:215–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim KA, Park CM, Lee JH, Kim HK, Cho SM, Kim B, Seol HY. Benign ovarian tumors with solid and cystic components that mimic malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:1259–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lenic M, Zazula D, Cigale, B. Segmentation of ovarian ultrasound images using single template cellular neural networks trained with support vector machines. In: Proceedings of 20th IEEE international symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, Maribor, 2007, p. 205–12.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hiremath PS, Tegnoor JR. Recognition of follicles in ultrasound images of ovaries using geometric features. In: Proceedings of international conference on Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Singapore, 2009, p. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deng Y, Wang Y, Chen P. Automated detection of polycystic ovary syndrome from ultrasound images. In: Proceedings of the 30th annual international IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society conference, Vancouver, 2008, p. 4772–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sohail ASM, Rahman MM, Bhattacharya P, Krishnamurthy S, Mudur SP. Retrieval and classification of ultrasound images of ovarian cysts combining texture features and histogram moments. In: IEEE international symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, Rotterdam, 2010, p. 288–91.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sohail ASM, Bhattacharya P, Mudur SP, Krishnamurthy S. Selection of optimal texture descriptors for retrieving ultrasound medical images. In: IEEE international symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, Chicago, 2011, p. 10–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Molinari F, Liboni W, Giustetto P, Badalamenti S, Suri JS. Automatic computer-based tracings (ACT) in longitudinal 2-D ultrasound images using different scanners. J Mech Med Biol. 2009;9:481–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ojala T, Pietikäinen M, Harwood D. A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on feature distributions. Pattern Recogn. 1996;29:51–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ojala T, Pietikäinen M, Maenpaa T. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal. 2002;24:971–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liao S, Law MWK, Chung ACS. Dominant local binary patterns for texture classification. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2009;18:1107–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang B, Gao Y, Zhao S, Liu J. Local derivative pattern versus local binary pattern: face recognition with high-order local pattern descriptor. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2010;19:533–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Laws KI. Rapid texture identification. SPIE Conf Series. 1980;238:376–80.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Petrou M, Sevilla PG. Image processing – dealing with texture. Chichester: Wiley; 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Mirmehdi M, Xie X, Suri JS. Handbook of texture analysis. London: Imperial College Press; 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Vapnik V. Statistical learning theory. New York: Wiley; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Burgess CJC. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min Knowl Disc. 1998;2:1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn. 1995;20:273–97.

    Google Scholar 

  23. David V, Sanchez A. Advanced support vector machines and kernel methods. Neurocomputing. 2003;55:5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Muller KR, Mika S, Ratsch G, Tsuda K, Scholkopf B. An introduction to kernel based learning algorithms. IEEE Trans Neural Network. 2001;12:181–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Renz C, Rajapakse JC, Razvi K, Liang SKC. Ovarian cancer classification with missing data. In: Proceedings of 9th international conference on Neural Information Processing, Singapore, 2002, vol. 2, p. 809–13.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Assareh A, Moradi MH. Extracting efficient fuzzy if-then rules from mass spectra of blood samples to early diagnosis of ovarian cancer. In: IEEE symposium on Computational Intelligence and Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Honolulu, 2007, p. 502–6.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tan TZ, Quek C, Ng GS, Razvi K. Ovarian cancer diagnosis with complementary learning fuzzy neural network. Artif Intell Med. 2008;43:207–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Meng H, Hong W, Song J, Wang L. Feature extraction and analysis of ovarian cancer proteomic mass spectra. In: 2nd international conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai, 2008, p. 668–71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest Statement

None of the authors have any financial or personal conflict of interest that could inappropriately influence the writing or publication of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jasjit S. Suri PhD, MBA, Fellow AIMBE .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Acharya, U.R., Krishnan, M.M.R., Saba, L., Molinari, F., Guerriero, S., Suri, J.S. (2013). Ovarian Tumor Characterization Using 3D Ultrasound. In: Saba, L., Acharya, U., Guerriero, S., Suri, J. (eds) Ovarian Neoplasm Imaging. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8633-6_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8633-6_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8632-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8633-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics