Abstract
The professionals who work in the child welfare system make critical decisions that have long-term impacts on the lives of children and families, and these case-level determinations must be made with careful consideration. Given the high stakes nature of child welfare work, there is tremendous pressure to “do” something at all times. There is a demand for child welfare workers and supervisors to act but less focus on the actual thinking about cases. Case decisions must be grounded in information secured from multiple sources of data. This task is notably difficult, time consuming, and complex due to high levels of uncertainty. Decisions at all critical junctures in the child welfare system are made with incomplete, insufficient and, at times, contradictory information. In the face of uncertainty, practices that assist workers in improving their decision making are both desirable and appreciated.
The process of reflective supervision and other reflective practices holds promise for addressing the needs of caseworkers and promoting child- and family-centered practice. These practices help workers manage the stressful nature of the work by providing a space to reflect on their own thoughts and feelings. Supervision that is less focused on compliance with discrete, concrete tasks and more on thoughtful decision-making provides an opportunity to move child welfare work beyond the narrow focus on investigation of abuse to a holistic assessment of child and family needs. It also increases the potential for keeping committed, compassionate, and well-educated workers in the field of child protection as abuse and neglect are complex issues and difficult to address. Moving child welfare to a point where thinking, problem-solving, and exploring emotions is part of standard practice has the potential to improve decisions that are made when working with children and families. The evidence for reflective practice, while still emerging in social work, has shown early positive outcomes in Early Head Start programs serving families and young children in the community. Continued research into how to implement reflective practices and ongoing examination of the results at the child, family, and organizational level is called for so that we can improve the lives of children, families, and the individuals who are charged with their safety.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Public Human Services Association. (2005). Report from the 2004 child welfare workforce survey: State Agency Findings. Washington, DC: APHSA.
Arnott, D. (2006). Cognitive biases and decision support systems development: A design science approach. Information Systems Journal, 16(1), 55–78.
Ashraf, H., & Rarieya, J. F. (2008). Teacher development through reflective conversations—possibilities and tensions: A Pakistan case. Reflective Practice, 9(3), 269–279.
Cahalane, H., & Sites, E. W. (2008). The climate of child welfare employee retention. Child Welfare, 87(1), 91–114.
Child Welfare Education and Research Programs. (2009). 2008–2009 Annual Report, School of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.
Cleaver, H., & Freeman, P. (1995). Parental perspectives in cases of suspected child abuse. London: HMSO.
Collins, P. M. (1994). Does mentorship among social workers make a difference? An empirical investigation of career outcomes. Social Work, 39(4), 413–419.
Collins-Camargo, C., & Groeber, C. (2003). Adventures in partnership: Using learning laboratories to enhance frontline supervision in child welfare. Professional Development: The International Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 6(1), 17–31.
Conway, P., Shaver, C., Bennett, P., & Aldrich, A. (2003). I can’t get no satisfaction: Exploring the relationship between supervision, job satisfaction and turnover in two rural child protection agencies. Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Atlanta, GA.
Croskerry, P. (2003). Cognitive forcing strategies in clinical decision-making. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 41(1), 110–120.
Department of Health. (2003). The Victoria Climbie Inquiry: Report of an Inquiry. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
Dickenson, N., & Perry, R. (2002). Factors influencing the retention of specially educated public child welfare workers. Journal of Health and Social Policy, 15(3/4), 89–103.
Ellett, A. J., Ellett, C. D., Ellis, J., Westbrook, T., & Dews, D. (2004). A state-wide qualitative study of 385 professionals: Toward a greater understanding of employee retention and turnover in child welfare. Paper presented at the Society for Social Work Research, New Orleans, LA.
Fenichel, E. (1992). Learning through supervision and mentorship to support the development of infants, toddlers and their families: A sourcebook. Washington DC: Zero to Three.
Gibbs, J. A. (2001). Maintaining front-line workers in child protection: A case for refocusing supervision. Child Abuse Review, 10, 323–335.
Gilkerson, L. (2004). Irving B. Harris Distinguished Lecture: Reflective supervision in infant-family programs: Adding clinical process to nonclinical settings. Infant Mental Health, 25(5), 424–439.
Jones, J., & Gallop, L. (2003). No time to think: Protecting the reflective space in children’s services. Child Abuse Review, 12, 101–106.
Jones, J., Treseder, J., & Glennie, S. (2002). An exploration of participation within an Action Research Project designed to improve service delivery to a small group of families with complex needs in an English new town. Paper presented at the Conference on Action Research Constructivism and Democracy, Stockholm.
Kadushin, A. (1992). Supervision in Social Work (3rd ed.). New York: University of Columbia Press.
McAllister, C., & Thomas, T. (2007). Infant mental health and family support: Contributions of Early Head Start to an integrated model for community-based early childhood programs. Infant Mental Health Journal, 28(2), 192–215.
McCarthy, M. (2003). Workforce retention research in New York State. Paper presented at the meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Atlanta GA.
Osmond, J. (2001). The practice of knowledge use: A study of explicit and tacit understandings of Practitioners. Ph.D. Thesis. The University of Queensland.
Osmond, J., & Darlington, Y. (2005). Reflective analysis: Techniques for facilitating reflection. Australian Social Work, 58(1), 3–14.
Parker, A., Nelson, C., Shelton, S. R., Dausey, D. J., Lewis, M. W., Pomeroy, A., & Leuschner, K. J. (2009). Measuring crisis decision making for public health emergencies. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response. RAND WR-577-DHHS.
Randall, J., Cowley, P., & Tomlinson, P. (2000). Overcoming barriers to effective child care practice. Child and Family Social Work, 5, 343–352.
Rauktis, M. E., & Koeske, G. (1994). Maintaining social worker morale: When supportive supervision is not enough. Administration in Social Work, 18(1), 39–59.
Rycraft, J. R. (1994). The party isn’t over: The agency role in the retention of public child welfare caseworkers. Social Work, 39(1), 75–80.
Ruch, G. (2002). From triangle to spiral: Reflective practice in social work education, practice and research. Social Work Education, 21(2), 199–216.
Ruch, G. (2005). Reflective practice in contemporary child-care social work: The role of containment. British Journal of Social Work, 37, 659–680.
Ruch, G. (2007a). Case discussion in child care social work. Child and Family Social Work, 12, 370–379.
Ruch, G. (2007b). ‘Thoughtful’ practice: Child care social work and the role of case discussion. Child and Family Social Work, 12, 370–379.
Weiss, E. M., & Weiss, S. (2001). Doing reflective supervision with student teachers in a professional development school culture. Reflective Practice, 2(2), 125–154.
Westbrook, T. M., Ellis, J., & Ellett, A. J. (2006). Improving retention among public child welfare workers: What can we learn from the insights and experiences of committed survivors? Administration in Social Work, 30(4), 37–62.
Acknowledgement
Special thanks to the caseworkers who participated in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rauktis, M.E., Thomas, T.L. (2013). Reflective Practices in Supervision: Why Thinking and Reflecting Are as Important as Doing. In: Cahalane, H. (eds) Contemporary Issues in Child Welfare Practice. Contemporary Social Work Practice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8627-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8627-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8626-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8627-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)