Skip to main content

Confiscation Orders and Judicial Cooperation in the EU

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Law and Economics
  • 73 Accesses

Abstract

Following ongoing reflection and experience at European level, it is possible and necessary to reason about the main features of the EU’s legal strategy in building a simplified procedure for the recognition of confiscation orders among EU countries, in order to avoid the different barriers to the effectiveness of the EU’s regime on the confiscation of proceeds of crime. It’s significant in this context to focus on the consequences of the principle of mutual recognition on the rights of individuals. The proposal for a new regulation on the mutual recognition of freezing and confiscation orders aims to amend the EU’s regime and eliminate gaps, uncertainties that legal rules still present; however, its adoption might significantly improve effectiveness of the EU’s action if the emphasis on legal solutions doesn’t come at the expense of broader questions concerning the safeguards applicable to domestic criminal proceedings which are crucial to ensuring effective cooperation between Member States in recovery action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Reference

  • Alagna F (2015) Non-conviction based confiscation: why the EU directive is a missed opportunity. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 21(4):447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucht J (2013) Extended confiscation and the proposed directive on freezing and confiscation of criminal proceeds in the EU: on striking a balance between efficiency, fairness and legal certainty. European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 21(2):127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown AN (1996) Proceeds of crime, money laundering, confiscation and forfeiture. W. Green/Sweet&Maxwell, Edimburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazekas M, Nanopoulos E (2016) The effectiveness of EU law: insights from the EU legal framework on asset confiscation. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 24(1):39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feraldo Cabana P (2014) Improving the recovery of assets resulting from organised crime. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 22:13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flore D (2014) Droit pénal européen: les enjeux d’une justice pénale européenne. Larcier

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingah S (2015) Measures for asset recovery: a multiactor global fund for recovered stolen assets. World Bank Legal Review 6:457

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelieur J (2015) Freezing and confiscating criminal assets. European Union in Criminal Law Review 5(3):279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonato M (2015) Directive 2014/42/EU and social reuse of confiscated assets in the EU: advancing a culture of legality. New Journal of European Criminal Law 2:195

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen G (2014) Essential texts on international and European criminal law. Maklu, Antwerp-Apeldoorn

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Piattoli Girard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Girard, B.P. (2017). Confiscation Orders and Judicial Cooperation in the EU. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_632-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_632-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7883-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7883-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics