Skip to main content

On Analysis of Low Incidence Adverse Events in Clinical Trials

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Topics in Applied Statistics

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 55))

  • 1598 Accesses

Abstract

In drug or vaccine development, some adverse events (AEs) of interest may occur infrequently. Because of their clinical importance, those AEs may be studied in a clinical trial with large sample size, long-term follow-up, or in meta-analysis of combined data from multiple trials. The conventional summary and analysis methods based on frequency of first occurrence and comparing the proportion difference between treatment groups may not be the best approach because (1) the drug exposure information is not considered in the frequency summary and analysis and (2) any recurrence of an event in the long-term follow-up is not accounted for. When recurrence events are considered, issues on the analysis such as intra-subject correlation among the recurrence events, over-dispersion, and zero inflation may need to be considered. In this paper, we review several approaches for summary and analysis of safety data in these settings. Considerations are given on the assumptions of the risk function, adjustment for differential follow-up, and handling of over-dispersion and excessive zero for low incidence events. Applications to drug and vaccine clinical trials will be used for demonstration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Almenoff J, Tonning JM, Gould AL, Szarfman A, Hauben M, Ouellet-Hellstrom R, Ball R, Hornbuckle K, Walsh L, Yee C, Sacks ST, Yuen N, Patadia V, Blum M, Johnston M, Gerrits C, Seifert H and LaCroix K (2005). Perspectives on the use of data mining in pharmacovigilance. Drug Safety, 2005: 981-1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae S, Famoye F, Wulu JT, Bartolucci AA and Singh KP (2005). A rich family of generalized poisson regression models with applications. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 69: 4-11.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Barker C (2010). Exploratory method for summarizing concomitant medication data – the mean cumulative function. Pharmaceutical Statistics 9: 331-336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan ISF and Zhang Z (1999). Test-based exact confidence intervals for the difference of two binomial proportions. Biometrics 55: 1202-1209.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X (2002). A quasi-exact method for the confidence intervals of the difference of two independent binomial proportions in small sample cases. Statistics in Medicine 21: 943-956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang-Stein C (1998). Safety analysis in controlled clinical trials. Drug Information J. 32:1363S–1372S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keene ON, Jones MRK, Lane PW and Anderson J (2007). Analysis of exacerbation rates in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: example from the TRISTAN study. Pharmaceut. Statist. 2007: 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li XM, Mehrotra DV and Barnard J (2006). Analysis of incomplete longitudinal binary data using multiple imputation. Statistics in Medicine 25: 2107-24.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu G, Wang J, Liu K and Snavely DB (2006). Confidence Intervals for an Exposure Adjusted Incidence Rate Difference with Applications to Clinical Trials. Statistics in Medicine 25:1275-1286.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu G (2012). A note on effective sample size for constructing confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions. Pharmaceut. Statist. 11: 163–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen O and Nurminen M (1985). Comparative analysis of two rates. Statistics in Medicine 4:213-226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe RG (1998). Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Statistics in Medicine 17: 857-872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui O (2009). Statistical Methods to Analyze Adverse Events Data of Randomized Clinical Trials. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 19:889-899.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Li X and Liu G (2012). Analysis of zero-inflated count data from clinical trials with potential dropouts. Stat in Biopharm Research. 4: 273-283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Frank Liu Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Liu, G.F. (2013). On Analysis of Low Incidence Adverse Events in Clinical Trials. In: Hu, M., Liu, Y., Lin, J. (eds) Topics in Applied Statistics. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 55. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7846-1_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics