Skip to main content

The Nature of Causality: Beyond Traditional Evidence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Handbook on Noncommunicable Diseases and Health Promotion

Abstract

Regarding NCDs and health promotion there have been some significant conceptual changes in the past quarter century. Two such changes are in the realm of causality and evidence. The basic notion of causality has been infused with the complexity of the real world. The very simple idea that factor “x” causes outcome “y” has come to be regarded as far too simplistic and within the world of chronic disease etiology this is particularly true. Similarly in health promotion the ideology of such fundamental documents as the Ottawa Charter and others argued for a multicausal world (WHO 1986, 2009; WHO EURO 1984, 1998). At the same time that there was growing recognition of the complexity of causality in the medical world there was a powerful movement towards what was termed evidence-based medicine (Sackett et al. 1996). As a result the field of public health, including the NCDs and health promotion, was faced with showing evidence in the face of increasingly complex models of causality. This, in turn, has resulted in an ongoing “evidence debate” (McQueen 2001, 2002, 2003; McQueen and Anderson 2001) that to date remains largely unresolved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berkman, L. F., & Breslow, L. (1983). Health and ways of living: The Alameda County study. New York, NY: Oxford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy, L. V. (1969). General system theory: Foundations, development, and applications (Revised). New York, NY: George Braziler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1997). A realist theory of science (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D., Morris, J. N., Smith, C., & Whitehead, M. (1988). Inequalities in health. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P., & Draper, N. R. (1987). Empirical model-building and response surfaces. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braveman, P. A., Cubbin, C., Egerter, S., Williams, D. R., & Pamuk, E. (2010). Socioeconomic disparities in health in the United States: What the patterns tell us. American Journal of Public Health, 100(S1), S186–S196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briss, P. A., (2000). Developing an evidence-based guide to community preventive services – Methods. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18(1), 35–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, A. L. (1972). Effectiveness and efficiency: Random reflections on health services. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diez Roux, A. V. (2007). Integrating social and biological factors in health research: A systems view. Annals of Epidemiology, 17, 569–574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, R. M., & Lyberg, L. (2010). Total survey error: Past, present, and future. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(5), 849–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, W. L., & Meerbote, R. (Eds.). (1984). Kant on causality, freedom, and objectivity. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. B. (1965). The environment and disease: Association or causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 58, 295–300 (cf. http://www.drabruzzi.com/hills_criteria_of_causation.htm)

  • Hofrichter, R. (Ed.). (2003). Health and social justice: A reader on the politics, ideology, and inequity in the distribution of disease. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, A., & Redlich, F. C. (1958). Social class and mental illness: A community study. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (2007). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. Millican (ed. and intro.). First published 1748.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUHPE. (1999). The evidence of health promotion effectiveness. A report for the European Commission by the International Union for Health Promotion and Education, ECSC-EC-EAEC, Brussels, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1781). The critique of pure reason. In J. M. D. Meiklejohn (Ed. & Trans), from Project Gutenberg, www.gutenberg.org/catalog/world/readfile?fk_files=2681870&pageno=1

  • Kelly, M. P., & Moore, T. A. (2012). The judgement process in evidence-based medicine and health technology assessment. Social Theory and Health, 10, 1–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., & Schofield, M. (1983). The presocratic philosophers: A critical history with a selection of texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, N. (2011). Epidemiology and the people’s health. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, D., Ben-Shlomo, Y., Lynch, J., Hallqvist, J., & Power, C. (2003). Life course epidemiology. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 778–783.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V. (2001). Strengthening the evidence base for health promotion. Health Promotion International, 16(3), 261–268.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V. (2002). The evidence debate. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56, 83–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V. (2003). The evidence debate broadens: Three examples, Editorial. Social and Preventive Medicine, 48(5), 275–276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V. (2007). The evaluation of health promotion practice: 21st Century debates on evidence and effectiveness. In J. Douglas, S. Earle, S. Handsley, C. Lloyd, & S. M. Spurr (Eds.), A reader in promoting public health: Challenge and controversy (2nd ed., pp. 89–96). London: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V. (2009). Ethics and evidence in health promotion. In A. Killoran & M. Kelly (Eds.), Evidence-based public health: Effectiveness and efficiency (pp. 27–40). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V., & Anderson, L. (2001) What counts as evidence? Issues and debates, Chapter 4. In I. Rootman, et al. (Eds.), Evaluation in health promotion: Principles and perspectives (pp. 63–83). Denmark: WHO. (Reprinted in Debates and dilemmas in promoting health: A reader, by M. Sidell, et al. Ed., 2002, 2nd ed., Milton Keynes: Open University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V., & Jones, C. M. (Eds.). (2007). Global perspectives on health promotion effectiveness. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • NICE. (2008). Social value judgements: Principles for the development of NICE guidance (2nd ed.). London: NICE, http://www.nice.org.uk/media/C18/30/SVJ2PUBLICATION2008.pdf

  • NICE. (2009). Methods for the development of NICE public health guidance (2nd ed.). London: NICE, http://www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/howwework/developingnicepublichealthguidance/publichealthguidanceprocessandmethodguides/public_health_guidance_process_and_method_guides.jsp?domedia=1&mid=F6A97CF4-19B9-E0B5-D42B4018AE84DD51

  • Rosen, L., Manor, O., Engelhard, D., & Zucker, D. (2006). In defense of the randomized controlled trial for health promotion research. American Journal of Public Health, 96(7), 1181–1186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 312, 71–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, F. (Ed.). (1977). The structure of scientific theories (2nd ed.). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syme, S. L., Hyman, M. M., & Enterline, P. E. (1964). Some social and cultural factors associated with the occurrence of coronary heart disease. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 17, 277–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tones, K. (1997). Beyond the randomized controlled trial: A case for “Judicial Review”. Health Education Research, 12(2), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDHHS. (2010). How tobacco smoke causes disease: The biology and behavioral basis for smoking-attributable disease: A report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatapuram, S. (2011). Health justice: An argument from the capabilities approach. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (1986). Ottawa charter for health promotion. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO, EURO. (1998). Health promotion evaluation: Recommendations to policymakers. Copenhagen: WHO (cf. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/euro/1998-99/EUR_ICP_IVST_05_01_03.pdf)

  • WHO. (2009). Milestones in health promotion: Statements from global conferences. WHO: Geneva (cf. http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/Milestones_Health_Promotion_05022010.pdf)

  • WHO, EURO. (1984). Health promotion: A discussion document on the concepts and principles. Copenhagen: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHOCSDOH. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation. Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaza, S., Briss, P., & Harris, K. (Eds.). (2005). The guide to community preventive services. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Allison, K., & Rootman, I. (1996). Scientific rigor and community participation in health promotion research: Are they compatible? Health Promotion International, 11(4), 333–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L., & McQueen, D. V. (2010). Informing public health policy with the best available evidence, Chapter 30. In A. Killoran & M. Kelly (Eds.), Evidence-based public health: Effectiveness and efficiency (pp. 436–447). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, R. B. (1998). Foundations for evidence-based decision making (Evidence and information, Canada health action: Building on the legacy, Vol. 5). Quebec: Editions MultiMondes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • CDC. Internet site for the community guide. http://www.health.gov/communityguide

  • Davidson, K., (2003). Evidence-based behavioral medicine: What it is and how do we achieve it? Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 26(3), 161–171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J., Waters, E., Yach, D., McQueen, D., De Francisco, A., Stewart, T., et al. (2005). Global priority setting for Cochrane systematic reviews of health promotion and public health research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 193–197.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finegoood, D. T., (2012). Complexity and systems theory in oxford bibliographies in public health. http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199756797/obo-9780199756797-0049.xml

  • Juneau, C. E., Jones, C. M., McQueen, D. V., & Potvin, L. (2011). Evidence-based health promotion: An emerging field. Global Health Promotion, 18(1), 79–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. P., & Moore, T. A. (2010). Making a difference: Using the NICE public health guidance and embedding evaluation. London: IDEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. P., Morgan, A., Ellis, S., Younger, T., Huntley, J., & Swann, C. (2010). Evidence based public health: A review of the experience of the national institute of health and clinical excellence (NICE) of developing public health guidance in England. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 71, 1056–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killoran, A., Swann, C., & Kelly, M. (2006). Public health evidence: Tackling health inequalities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millican, P. (2007). Introduction to Hume’s enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence based policy: A realist perspective. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rootman, I., Goodstadt, M., McQueen, D., Potvin, L., Springett, J., & Ziglio, E. (Eds.). (2000). Evaluation in health promotion: Principles and perspectives. Copenhagen: WHO (EURO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Task Force on Community Preventive Services. (2000). Introducing the guide to community preventive services: Methods, first recommendations and expert commentary. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18(1S), 1–142.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David V. McQueen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McQueen, D.V. (2013). The Nature of Causality: Beyond Traditional Evidence. In: McQueen, D. (eds) Global Handbook on Noncommunicable Diseases and Health Promotion. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7594-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7594-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7593-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7594-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics