Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Unmingling Commingled Museum Collections: A Photographic Method

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Commingled and Disarticulated Human Remains

Abstract

Post-curation commingling is complicated. Unlike commingling at deposition, curated remains have additional opportunities to become mixed. The importance and increasing use of osteological collections means that these collections must be carefully curated. It also means that there are additional opportunities for institutional commingling. Knowledge of a collection’s history prior to analysis is important for recognizing possible collection commingling and for sorting it out. Collection-associated documents, namely, photographs, are helpful for further refining the organization of a skeletal assemblage. A photo-matching method was applied to the Aztalan human remains collection. The method is simple but effective. It restored provenience for some skeletal elements, corrected misinterpretation, and helped in rediscovering the locally famous Aztalan Princess. The rearticulation of the princess was the most important result achieved using this method. It was a means of giving back to the community while expanding knowledge of the Aztalan site. The photo-matching method is easy and inexpensive. It can be broadly applied to almost any material in any context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ames, M. M. (1992). Cannibal tours and glass boxes: The anthropology of museums. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. L. (1994). The Aztalan site: A human skeletal inventory and excavation history (M.A. Thesis). University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baerreis, D. A. (1958). Aztalan revisted. Wisconsin Archeologist, 39, 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, A. (2004). Stewardship, collections integrity and long-term research value. In T. Childs (Ed.), Our collective responsibility: The ethics and practice of archaeological collections stewardship (pp. 25–42). Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. A. (1933). Ancient Aztalan. Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birmingham, R. A., & Eisenberg, L. E. (2000). Indian mound of Wisconsin. Madison: Wisconsin Historical Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birmingham, R. A., & Goldstein, L. G. (2006). Aztalan mysteries of an ancient Indian town. Madison: Wisconsin Historical Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. A. (1967). The Gentleman Farm site: La Salle county, Illinois. Springfield: Illinois State Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buikstra, J. E., & Gordon, C. C. (1981). The study and restudy of human skeletal series: The importance of long-term curation. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 376(1), 349–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs, S. T., & Sullivan, L. P. (2004). Archaeological stewardship: It’s about both collections and sites. In T. Childs (Ed.), Our collective responsibility: The ethics and practice of archaeological collections stewardship (pp. 3–21). Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, L. G. (1999a). Aztalan state park (47-JE-0001): Archaeological excavations 1919–1996 (map). Madison: Department of Anthropology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, and Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, L. G. (1999b). Aztalan state park (47-JE-0001): Modern and extant features and survey coverage (map). Madison: Department of Anthropology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, and Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, L. & Gaff, D.H. (2002). Recasting the Past: Examining Assumptions about Aztalan. The Wisconsin Archeologist 83(2):98–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, L.G. (2010). Aztalan Mortuary Practices Revisited. In L. P. Sullivan and R.C. Mainfort Jr. (Eds.), Mississippian Mortuary Practices Beyond Hierarchy and the Representationist Perspective (pp. 90–112). Gainsville, FL: University of Florida Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. B. (1981). The man who comes after; or, careful how you curate. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 376(1), 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemp, S. (n.d). Wisconsin Geneology Trails: Aztalan State Park. Retrieved from http://genealogytrails.com/wis/jefferson/Aztalan.html.

  • Holcomb, G. R. (1952). An analysis of human remains from Aztalan (M.A. Thesis). University of Wisconsin, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley W.M. (1977). Aztalan Revisited. The Wisconsin Archeologist 58(4):256–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyer, N. (1887, February 25). Letter to the Editor, Ruins of the ancient city of Aztalan, Milwaukee Advertiser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapham, I. A. (1855). Antiquities of Wisconsin as surveyed and described. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, C. O., Meindl, R. S., Pryzbeck, T. R., & Mensforth, R. P. (1985). Chronological metamorphosis of the auricular surface of the ilium: A new method for the determination of adult skeletal age at death. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 68, 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, R. F. (1958). Excavation and reconstruction of the southwest pyramidal mound at Aztalan. The Wisconsin Archeologist, 39, 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marden, K., & Ortner, D. J. (2011). A case of treponematosis from pre Columbian Chaco Canyon, New Mexico. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 21(1), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C. (2011). An ancient DNA perspective on angel mounds (12-Vg-1): A Mississippian archaeological site. Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKern, T. W., & Stewart, T. D. (1957). Skeletal age changes in young American males (EP-45). Natick, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meindl, R. S., & Lovejoy, C. O. (1985). Ectocranial suture closure: A revised method for the determination of skeletal age at death based on the lateral-anterior sutures. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 68, 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, G. R. (1998). The Cahokia chiefdom: The archaeology of a Mississippian society. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. B. (1908). Antiquities of the St. Francis, White and Black Rivers, Arkansas and Mississippi. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 13(2), 279–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, R. (2012).Rita Jean Moran Presents the Library of Mythology, Legends, Folklore, and History. Retrieved from http://ritajeanmoran.blogspot.com/2012/01/aztalan.html.

  • Peri, D. W., & Wharton, R. W. (1965). Samuel Alfred Barrett: 1879–1965. The Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers, 33(Fall), 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phenice, T. W. (1969). A newly developed visual method of sexing the os pubis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 30(2), 297–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. D. (1992). Ceramics and culture at Aztalan, a late prehistoric village in Southeast Wisconsin (Ph.D. Dissertation). University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. D. (2007). Viewing the ruins: The early documentary history of the Aztalan site. The Wisconsin Magazine of History, 91(2), 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzenthaler, R. (1958). Editor’s preface. The Wisconsin Archeologist, 39(1), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C. A., & Mays, S. (2011). Study and restudy of curated skeletal collections in bioarchaeology: A perspective on the UK and the implications for future curation of human remains. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 21(5), 626–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J. C., Green, T. J., & Green, V. D. (1996). NAGPRA is forever: Osteology and the repatriation of skeletons. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 81–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, C. W. (1958). A crematorium at Aztalan. The Wisconsin Archeologist, 39, 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, K. Z. (2009). A taphonomic analysis of human skeletal material from Aztalan: Cannibalism, hostility and mortuary variability. M.A. Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadow State (2013). Aztalan. Retrieved from http://beethoven23.tripod.com/Jefferson/Aztalan.html

  • Somers, A. N. (1920). Prehistoric cannibalism in America. The Wisconsin Archeologist, 19(1), 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • State, S. (2013). Aztalan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, W.T. (1920). A Visit to Aztalan in 1838. The Wisconsin Archeologist 19(1): 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, L. P., & Childs, S. T. (2003). Curating archaeological collections: From the field to the repository (Vol. 6). New York: Altamira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, M. (n.d.). The princess of Aztalan, Wisconsin princess mound. Retrieved from http://www.burlingtonnews.net/centerindiansc.html

  • Todd, T. W. (1920). Age changes in the pubic bone: I. The white male pubis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 3, 467–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittry, W. (1963). Current Research. American Antiquity 29(2): 255–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zejdlik, K. J. (in press). Opportunity knocks: Nonritual use of human bone at the Aztalan site, Jefferson county, Wisconsin. In E. Hargrave, K. Hedman, S. J. Shermer, & R. M. Lillie (Eds.), Redefining death: Modified human bone in the prehistoric Midwest. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, Indiana University, Student Building, Room 130, 701 E. Kirkwood Avenue, Bloomington, IN, 47405-7100, USA

    Katie J. Zejdlik

Authors
  1. Katie J. Zejdlik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katie J. Zejdlik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, USA

    Anna J. Osterholtz

  2. University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

    Kathryn M. Baustian

  3. Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

    Debra L. Martin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zejdlik, K.J. (2014). Unmingling Commingled Museum Collections: A Photographic Method. In: Osterholtz, A., Baustian, K., Martin, D. (eds) Commingled and Disarticulated Human Remains. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7560-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation