Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On Objects and Actions: Situating Self-Objectification in a System Justification Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Objectification and (De)Humanization

Part of the book series: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation ((NSM,volume 60))

Abstract

Integrating objectification and system justification perspectives, this chapter offers a conception of self-objectification as a dominant cultural lens through which women come to view themselves that garners their compliance in the sexist status quo. This chapter begins with an overview of objectification theory (Fredrickson and Roberts 1997) and system justification theory (Jost and Banaji, 1994). Then, an integration of the two perspectives is presented that situates self-objectification in a system justification context, extending the scope of impact of self-objectification beyond the domains of body image and mental health. Empirical evidence is reviewed to demonstrate the direct and indirect ways that self-objectification works as a system-justifying device for many women. For example, as a self-perspective that increases in response to benevolently sexist ideology or as a potential obstacle to taking collective action on behalf of women, self-objectification functions as a motivational and ideological force that rationalizes and legitimizes a gender role hierarchy. This developing program of research attempts to deepen our understanding of self-objectification and the broader system-level implications of this self-perspective. The chapter concludes with a discussion of potential next steps and a call for continued scientific inquiry into the broader functions of self-objectification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association of University Women. (2012). The simple truth about the gender pay gap 2012 edition. Retrieved July 1, 2012, from http://www.aauw.org/learn/research/upload/simpletruthaboutpaygap1.pdf.

  • American Psychological Association [APA]. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on the sexualization of girls. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Retrieved June 10, 2008, from http://www.apa.org/pi/wpo/sexualization_report_summary.pdf.

  • Augustus-Horvath, C.L., & Tylka, T.L. (2009). A test and extension of objectification theory as it predicts disordered eating: Does women’s age matter? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 253–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 633–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartky, S. (1990). Femininity and domination. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J. C., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 62–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L., & Bem, D. J. (1970). Case study of a nonconscious ideology: Training the woman to know her place. In D. J. Bem (Ed.), Beliefs, attitudes, and human affairs (pp. 89–99). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, P., Gervais, S. J., Allen, J., Campomizzi, S., & Klein, O. (2012). Integrating sexual objectification with object versus person recognition: The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis. Psychological Science, 23, 469–471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, H., George, G., & Crocker, J. (2001). Contexts of system justification and system evaluation: Exploring the social comparison strategies of the (not yet) contented female worker. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 126–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, G., & Jost, J. T. (2006). System justification theory and research: Implications for law, legal advocacy, and social justice. California Law Review, 94, 1119–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, M. J. (2011). Sexism and gender inequality across 57 societies. Psychological Science, 22, 1413–1418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breines, J. G., Crocker, J., & Garcia, J. A. (2008). Self-objectification and well-being in women’s daily lives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 583–598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, A. (1993). Hostile hallways: The AAUW survey on sexual harassment in America’s schools. Journal of School Health, 63, 355–357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, T. S., Fischer, A. R., Tokar, D. M., & Yoder, J. D. (2008). Testing a culture-specific extension of objectification theory regarding African American women’s body image. The Counseling Psychologist, 36, 697–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calogero, R. M. (2004). A test of objectification theory: Effect of the male gaze on appearance concerns in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calogero, R.M. (2009). Objectification processes and disordered eating in British women and men. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 394–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calogero, R. M. (2013a). “Chivalry is dead”: Self-objectification and collective action in response to a broken gender system. : Manuscript in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calogero, R. M. (2013b). Objects don’t object: Evidence that self-objectification disrupts women’s social activism. Psychological Science, 24, 312–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calogero, R. M., Davis, W. N., & Thompson, J. K. (2005). The role of self-objectification in the experience of women with eating disorders. Sex Roles, 52, 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calogero, R. M., Grader, A., & Medrano, A. (2013a). Self-objectification and justification of gender inequality: Support for the beauty as currency hypothesis. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calogero, R. M., Herbozo, S., & Thompson, J. K. (2009). Complimentary weightism: The potential costs of appearance-related commentary for women’s self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 120–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calogero, R. M., & Jost, J. T. (2011). Self-subjugation among women: Exposure to sexist ideology, self-objectification, and the protective function of the need to avoid closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 211–228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calogero, R. M., Pina, A., Park, L. E., & Rahemtulla, Z. K. (2010). Objectification theory predicts college women’s attitudes toward cosmetic surgery. Sex Roles, 63, 32–41. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9759-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calogero, R. M., Pina, A., & Sutton, R. M. (2013b). Cutting words: Priming self-objectification increases the intention to pursue cosmetic surgery. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calogero, R. M., Tantleff-Dunn, S., & Thompson, J. K. (2011). Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and directions for research and practice. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Calogero, R. M., & Thompson, J. K. (2009). Potential implications of the objectification of women’s bodies for women’s sexual satisfaction. Body Image, 6, 145–148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calogero, R. M., & Tylka, T. L. (2013). Disrupting the system of sexual objectification: An integrative system justification perspective. Manuscript in preparation for Journal of Social Issues

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. R., & Szymanski, D. M. (2011). Sexual objectification and substance abuse in young adult women. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 39–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choma, B. L., Foster, M. D., & Radford, E. (2007). Use of objectification theory to examine the effects of a media literacy intervention on women. Sex Roles, 56, 581–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choma, B. L., Visser, B. A., Pozzebon, J. A., Bogaert, A. F., Busseri, M. A., & Sadava, S. W. (2010). Self-objectification, self-esteem, and gender: Testing a moderated mediation model. Sex Roles, 63, 645–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cikara, M., Eberhardt, J. L., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). From agents to objects: Sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 540–551.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cikara, M., Lee, T. L., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2009). Ambivalent sexism at home and at work: How attitudes toward women in relationships foster exclusion in the public sphere. In J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay, & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 444–462). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M., Lee, I., Portnoy, G., Gurung, A., Khati, D., Jha, P., et al. (2009). Objectified body consciousness in a developing country: A comparison of mothers and daughters in the US and Nepal. Sex Roles, 60, 174–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dardenne, B., Dumont, M., & Bollier, T. (2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women’s performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 764–779.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D. M., & Gerhardstein, R. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615–1628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, M. V., Kay, A. C., Holmes, J. G., & Napier, J. L. (2011). System justification and the defense of committed relationship ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 291–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dellinger, K., & Williams, C. L. (1997). Makeup at work: Negotiating appearance rules in the workplace. Gender & Society, 11, 151–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnerstein, E., & Hallam, J. (1978). Facilitating effects of erotica on aggression toward females. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1270–1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, M., Sarlet, M., & Dardenne, B. (2010). Be too kind to a woman, she’ll feel incompetent: Benevolent sexism shifts self-construal and autobiographical memories toward incompetence. Sex Roles, 62, 545–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991a). What is beautiful is good, but… A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Mladinic, A., & Otto, S. (1991b). Are women evaluated more favorably than men? An analysis of attitudes, beliefs, and emotions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 203–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairchild, K., & Rudman, L. A. (2008). Everyday stranger harassment and women’s objectification. Social Justice Research, 21, 338–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fea, C. J., & Brannon, L. A. (2006). Self-objectification and compliment type: Effects on negative mood. Body Image, 3, 183–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. (2010). System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 326–338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. R., Bettendorf, S. K., & Wang, Y.-W. (2011). Contextualizing sexual objectification. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., Bersoff, D. N., Borgida, E., Deaux, K., & Heilman, M. E. (1991). Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins. American Psychologist, 46, 1049–1060.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Harrison, K. (2005). Throwing like a girl: Self-objectification predicts adolescent girls’ motor performance. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 29, 79–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T.-A., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gapinski, K. D., Brownell, K. D., & LaFrance, M. (2003). Body objectification and ‘fat talk’: Effects on emotion, motivation, and cognitive performance. Sex Roles, 48, 377–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, C. B. (1980). Passing by: Street remarks, address rights, and the urban female. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 328–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gay, R. K., & Castano, E. (2010). My body or my mind: The impact of state and trait objectification on women’s cognitive resources. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 695–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gervais, S. J., Vescio, T. K., & Allen, J. (2011). When what you see is what you get: The consequences of the objectifying gaze for women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Lameiras, M., Fiske, S. T., Eckes, T., Masser, B., Volpato, C., et al. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 713–728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, J. L. (2013). Immortal objects: The objectification of women as terror management. In S. J. Gervais (Ed.), Objectification and Dehumanization (pp. 73–96). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, J. L., Cooper, D. P., Heflick, N. A., Routledge, C., & Arndt, J. (2011). Is objectification always harmful? Reactions to objectifying images and feedback as a function of self-objectification and mortality salience. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 443–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, S., Hyde, J. S., & Lindberg, S. M. (2007). Body objectification and depression in adolescents: The role of gender, shame, and rumination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 164–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, Z. A., Fredrickson, B. L., Pomerleau, C. S., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2006). The role of trait self-objectification in smoking among college women. Sex Roles, 54, 735–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heflick, N. A., & Goldenberg, J. L. (2009). Objectifying Sarah Palin: Evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully human. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 598–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henley, N. M. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, P. J., & Saul, A. (2006). The development of system justification in the developing world. Social Justice Research, 19, 365–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. S., & Fischer, A. R. (2008). Examining objectification theory: Lesbian and heterosexual women’s experiences with sexual and self-objectification. The Counseling Psychologist, 36, 745–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogue, M., & Yoder, J. D. (2003). The role of status in producing depressed entitlement in women’s and men’s pay allocations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 330–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K. (1937). The neurotic personality of our time. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Impett, E. A., Schooler, D., & Tolman, D. L. (2006). To be seen and not heard: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ sexual health. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 131–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2012). Parline Database on National Parliaments. Retrieved July 1, 2012, from http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/parlinesearch.asp.

  • Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, S. (2005). Beauty and misogyny: Harmful cultural practices in the West. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston-Robledo, I., Fricker, J., & Pasek, L. (2007a). Indecent exposure: Self-objectification and young women’s attitudes toward breastfeeding. Sex Roles, 56, 429–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston-Robledo, I., Sheffield, K., Voigt, J., & Wilcox-Constantine, J. (2007b). Reproductive shame: Self-objectification and young women’s attitudes toward their reproductive functioning. Women and Health, 46, 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T. (1995). Negative illusions: Conceptual clarification and psychological evidence concerning false consciousness. Political Psychology, 16, 397–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T. (1997). An experimental replication of the depressed-entitlement effect among women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 387–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. (1994). The role stereotyping in system justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Banaji, M., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and nonconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Blount, S., Pfeffer, J., & Hunyady, G. (2003a). Fair market ideology: It’s cognitive-motivational underpinnings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 53–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Burgess, D., & Mosso, C. (2001). Conflicts of legitimation among self, group, and system: The integrative potential of system justification theory. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 363–388). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. (2003b). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Kivetz, Y., Rubini, M., Guermandi, G., & Mosso, C. (2005). System-justifying functions of complementary regional and ethnic stereotypes: Cross-national evidence. Social Justice Research, 18, 305–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Simon, L. (1999). Effects of epistemic motivation on conservatism, intolerance, and other system-justifying attitudes. In L. L. Thompson, J. M. Levine, & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 91–116). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Ledgerwood, A., & Hardin, C. D. (2008a). Shared reality, system justification, and the relational bias of ideological beliefs. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., Gosling, S. D., Palfai, T. P., & Ostafin, B. (2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 989–1007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., & Carvallo, M. (2002). Non-conscious forms of system-justification: Cognitive, affective, and behavioural preferences for higher status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 586–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Sullivan, B. N. (2003c). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Pietrzak, J., Liviatan, I., Mandisodza, A. N., & Napier, J. L. (2008b). System justification as conscious and nonconscious goal pursuit. In J. Shah & W. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 591–605). New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & van der Toorn, J. (2011). System justification theory. In P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 313–343). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaschak, E. (1992). Engendered lives: A new psychology of women’s experience. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A. C., & Friesen, J. (2011). On social stability and social change: Understanding when system justification does and does not occur. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 360–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Napier, J. L., Callan, M. J., & Laurin, K. (2008). God and the government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 18–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A.C., Jimenez, M.C., & Jimenez, J.T. (2002). Sour grapes, sweet lemons, and the anticipatory rationalization of the status quo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1300-1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of ‘‘poor but happy’’ and ‘‘poor but honest’’ stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., & Young, S. (2005). Victim-derogation and victim-enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science, 16, 204–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilianski, S. E., & Rudman, L. A. (1998). Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism? Sex Roles, 39, 333–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, L., & Reeder, J. (1997). White trash girl: The interview. In M. Wray & A. Newitz (Eds.), White trash: Race and class in America (pp. 113–130). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klonoff, E. A., & Landrine, H. (1995). The schedule of sexist events: A measure of lifetime and recent sexist discrimination in women’s lives. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 439–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozee, H. & Tylka, T.L. (2006). A test of objectification theory with lesbian women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 348–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozee, H. B., Tylka, T. L., Augustus-Horvath, C. L., & Denchik, A. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the interpersonal sexual objectification scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 176–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W. (2006). The psychology of closed-mindedness. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanis, K., & Covell, K. (1995). Images of women in advertisements: Effects on attitudes related to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 32, 639–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurin, K., Kay, A. C., & Shepherd, S. (2011). Self-stereotyping as a route to system justification. Social Cognition, 29, 360–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavine, H., Sweeney, D., & Wagner, S. (1999). Depicting women as sex objects in television advertising: Effects on body dissatisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1049–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, J. L., & Fox, R. L. (2010). It still takes a candidate: Why women don’t run for office. Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, H. E. (1983). Female dependency in context: Some theoretical and technical considerations. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 53, 697–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, A. (2005). Female chauvinist pigs: Women and the rise of raunch culture. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liss, M., Erchull, M. J., & Ramsey, L. R. (2011). Empowering or oppressing? Development and exploration of the enjoyment of sexualization scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 55–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., Murnane, T., Vaes, J., Reynolds, C., & Suitner, C. (2010). Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 709–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loya, B. N., Cowan, G., & Walters, C. (2006). The role of social comparison and body consciousness in women’s hostility toward women. Sex Roles, 54, 575–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C. (1989). Towards a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, R., Nierobisz, A., & Welsh, S. (2000). Experiencing the streets: Harassment and perceptions of safety among women. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, 306–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appeals, and group membership. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 293–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., McFarlin, D. B., & Gagnon, D. (1984). Overworked and underpaid: On the nature of gender differences in personal entitlement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1399–1412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., Spencer, S., Schmader, T., Wolfe, C., & Crocker, J. (1998). Coping with negative stereotypes about intellectual performance: The role of psychological disengagement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 34–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, Y., Tiggemann, M., & Kirkbride, A. (2007). Those speedos become them: the role of self-objectification in gay and heterosexual men’s body image. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 634–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, S. T., & Major, B. (2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 341–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, N. M. (2006). The developmental and cultural contexts of objectified body consciousness: A longitudinal analysis of two cohorts of women. Developmental Psychology, 42, 679–687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercurio, A. E., & Landry, L. J. (2008). Self-objectification and well-being: The impact of self-objectification on women’s overall sense of self-worth and life satisfaction. Sex Roles, 58, 458–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, L. B., & Szymanski, D. M. (2011). Experiencing sexually objectifying environments: A qualitative study. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 67–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moradi, B. (2010). Addressing gender and cultural diversity in body image: Objectification theory as a framework for integrating theories and grounding research. Sex Roles, 63, 138–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moradi, B. (2011). Objectification theory: Areas of promise and refinement. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 153–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moradi, B. (2013). Discrimination, objectification, and dehumanization: Toward apantheoretical framework. In S. J. Gervais (Ed.), Objectification and dehumanization (pp. 153–182). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moradi, B., Dirks, D., & Matteson, A. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomatology: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 420–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moradi, B., & Huang, Y.-P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenkamp, J. J., Swanson, J. D., & Brausch, A. M. (2005). Self-objectification, risk taking, and self-harm in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2000). The experience of sexual harassment among grade-school students: Early socialization of female subordination? Sex Roles, 43, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napier, J. L., & Jost, J. T. (2008). Why are conservatives happier than liberals? Psychological Science, 19, 565–572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Napier, J. L., Mandisodza, A. N., Andersen, S. M., & Jost, J. T. (2006). System justification in responding to the poor and displaced in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 6, 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math=male, me=female, therefore math≠me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 44–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nowatzki, J., & Morry, M. (2009). Women’s intentions regarding, and acceptance of, self-sexualizing behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (1995). Objectification. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 24, 249–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, L. T., Blodorn, A., Alsbrooks, A., Dube, R., Adams, G., & Nelson, J. C. (2009). Understanding White Americans’ perceptions of racism in Hurricane Katrina-related events. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 431–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, L. T., & Major, B. (2005). System-justifying beliefs and psychological well-being: The roles of group status and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1718–1729.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oldmeadow, J., & Fiske, S. T. (2007). System-justifying ideologies moderate status=competence stereotypes: Roles for belief in a just world and social dominance orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1135–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parent, M.C., & Moradi, B. (2011). His biceps become him: An application of objectification theory to understanding drive for muscularity and propensity for steroid use in college men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58, 246–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puwar, N. (2004). Thinking about making a difference. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6, 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, D. M., Kallen, R. W., Twenge, J. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2006). The disruptive effect of self-objectification on performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 59–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangel, U., & Keller, J. (2011). Essentialism goes social: belief in social determinism as a component of psychological essentialism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1056–1078.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reichert, T., & Carpenter, C. (2004). An update on sex in magazine advertising: 1983–2003. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 823–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, T.-A. (2002). The woman in the body. Feminism & Psychology, 12, 324–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, T.-A. (2004). Female trouble: The menstrual self-evaluation scale and women’s self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 22–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, L. A., & Borgida, E. (1995). The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 87, 157–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, L. A., & Mescher, K. (2012). Of animals and objects: Men’s implicit dehumanization of women and likelihood of sexual aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 734–746.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saguy, T., Quinn, D. M., Dovidio, J. F., & Pratto, F. (2010). Interacting like a body: Objectification can lead women to narrow their presence in social interactions. Psychological Science, 21, 178–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saguy, T., Tausch, N., Dovidio, J. F., & Pratto, F. (2009). The irony of harmony: Positive intergroup contact produces false expectations for equality. Psychological Science, 20, 114–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, M., Erchull, M. J., Rosner, A., Taubenberger, L., Queen, E. F., & McKee, J. (2011). “I’ll get that for you”: The relationship between benevolent sexism and body self-perceptions. Sex Roles, 64, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, C. G., Overall, N. C., & Duckitt, J. (2007). When women become more hostiley sexist toward their gender: The system-justifying effect of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 57, 743–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, T., Eek, D., & Kazemi, A. (2010). Rape victim blaming as system justification: The role of gender and activation of complementary stereotypes. Social Justice Research, 23, 239–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, J. E., Roades, L., Rose, S., Ellis, L., & West, C. (1994). The women’s studies experience: Impetus for feminist activism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat is in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steer, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2008). The role of self-objectification in women’s sexual functioning. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27, 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strelan, P., & Hargreaves, D. (2005). Women who objectify other women: The vicious circle of objectification? Sex Roles, 52, 707–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strelan, P., Mehaffey, S. J., & Tiggemann, M. (2003). Self-objectification and esteem in young women: The mediating role of reasons for exercise. Sex Roles, 48, 89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L., & Ferguson, M. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrated theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiggeman, M., & Kuring, J. K. (2004). The role of body objectification in disordered eating and depressed mood. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M. (2011). Mental health risks of self-objectification: A review of the empirical evidence for disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual dysfunction. In R. M. Calogero, S. Tantleff-Dunn, & J. K. Thompson (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 139–159). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M., & Boundy, M. (2008). Effect of environment and appearance compliment on college women’s self-objectification, mood, body shame, and cognitive performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 399–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M., & Lynch, J. E. (2001). Body image across the life span in adult women: The role of self-objectification. Developmental Psychology, 37, 243–253. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.37.2.243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M., Verri, A., & Scaravaggi, S. (2005). Body dissatisfaction, disordered eating, fashion magazines, and clothes: A cross-cultural comparison between Australian and Italian young women. International Journal of Psychology, 40, 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M., & Williams, E. (2012). The role of self-objectification in disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual functioning among women: A comprehensive test of objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tylka, T. L., & Hill, M. S. (2004). Objectification theory as it relates to disordered eating among college women. Sex Roles, 51, 719–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tylka, T. L., & Sabik, N. J. (2010). Integrating social comparison theory and self-esteem within objectification theory to predict women’s disordered eating. Sex Roles, 63, 18–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unger, R. K. (1979). Female and male. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1995). Harmful traditional practices affecting the health and women of children: Fact Sheet No. 23. Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2000). World’s women 2000: Trends and statistics. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wakslak, C. J., Jost, J. T., Tyler, T. R., & Chen, E. S. (2007). Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychological Science, 18, 267–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049–1062.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, N. (1991). The beauty myth. New York: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2005). WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: Summary report of initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses. Geneva: WHO Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1990). Throwing like a girl and other essays in feminist philosophy and social theory. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurbriggen, E. L., Ramsey, L. R., & Jaworski, B. K. (2011). Self- and partner-objectification in romantic relationships: Associations with media consumption and relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 64, 449–462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Kent, Keynes College, University Road, Canterbury, CT2 7NP, UK

    Rachel M. Calogero

Authors
  1. Rachel M. Calogero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel M. Calogero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Dept of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 338 Burnett Hall, Lincoln, 68588, Nebraska, USA

    Sarah J. Gervais

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Calogero, R.M. (2013). On Objects and Actions: Situating Self-Objectification in a System Justification Context. In: Gervais, S. (eds) Objectification and (De)Humanization. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, vol 60. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6959-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation