Skip to main content

Working with Complexity in Integrated Behavioral Health Settings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrated Behavioral Health in Primary Care

Abstract

This chapter provides a practical approach for understanding and dealing with patient “complexity” in a health care context. Complexity is defined as the interaction of patient, provider, and care delivery variables, which intermingle to create situations where usual treatments are not working—or not working as well as patients and clinicians are expecting. These situations can only be understood by looking at the complex interaction of those variables and adopting new models of understanding and implementing new care-giving strategies. The chapter begins with a review of different approaches to dealing with complexity within the USA and in Europe. A particular method and clinical checklist is described in detail. A “real world” application, the Complex Continuity Clinic, using this and other methods of engaging patients in complex situations, is outlined, with clinical examples. Finally, the important implications of a complexity approach to emerging health care reform is described, shedding light on how effective approaches that embrace complex biopsychosocial health issues can result in greater quality and reduced costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    1In Minnesota, the medical complexity “tier” is provided by a state system based in “Ambulatory Diagnostic Groups” (ACG or ADGs), a system for predicting the utilization of ambulatory health services within a patient group – based on the person’s age, gender, and broad clusters of diagnoses and conditions (Starfield, Weiner, Mumford, & Steinwachs, 1991; Weiner, Starfield, Steinwachs, & Mumford, 1991).

References

  • Althoff, R. R., & Waterman, G. S. (2011). Commentary: Psychiatric training for physicians: A call to modernize. Academic Medicine, 86, 285–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amundson, B. (2001). America’s rural communities as crucibles for clinical reform: Establishing collaborative care teams in rural communities. Families, Systems & Health, 19, 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrell-Carrio, F., Suchman, A. L., & Epstein, R. M. (2004). The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: Principles, practice, and scientific inquiry. Annals of Family Medicine, 2, 576–582.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlat, D. (2010a). The trouble with psychiatry: A doctor’s revelations about a profession in crisis. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlat, D. (2010b). Mind over meds. The New York Times. Retrieved April 29, 2013, from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/25/magazine/25Memoir-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

  • de Jonge, P., Huyse, F. J., & Stiefel, F. C. (2006). Case and care complexity in the medically ill. Medical Clinics of North America, 90, 679–692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, W. J., & Baird, M. A. (1983). Family therapy and family medicine: Toward the primary care of families. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, G. L. (1977). The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science, 196, 129–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, G. L. (1980). The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 535–544.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, J. C., DeRubeis, R. J., Hollon, S. D., Dimidjian, S., Amsterdam, J. D., Shelton, R. C., et al. (2010). Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity: A patient-level meta-­analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 303, 47–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gawande, A. (2011). The hot spotters: Can we lower medical costs by giving the neediest patients better care? The New Yorker. Retrieved April 29, 2013, from http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/01/24/110124fa_fact_gawande

  • Grant, R. W., Ashburner, J. M., Hong, C. C., Chang, Y., Barry, M. J., & Atlas, S. J. (2011). Defining patient complexity from the primary care physician’s perspective: A cohort study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 155, 797–804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huyse, F., Stiefel, F., & deJonge, P. (2006). Identifiers or “red flags” of complexity and need for integrated care. Medical Clinics of North America 90 (2006) 703–712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine. (2002). Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. National Academy of Sciences. Retrieved April 29, 2013, from http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2002/Unequal-Treatment-Confronting-Racial-and-Ethnic-Disparities-in-Health-Care.aspx

  • Katerndahl, D. A., Wood, R., & Jaen, C. R. (2010). A method for estimating relative complexity of ambulatory care. Annals of Family Medicine, 8, 341–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kathol, R., Perez, R., Cohen, J., & Huyse, F. (2010). The integrated case management manual: Assisting complex patients regain physical and mental health. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, I. (2010). The emperor’s new drugs: Exploding the antidepressant myth. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kottke, T. E., & Pronk, N. P. (2009). Taking on the social determinants of health: A framework for action. Minnesota Medicine, 92, 36–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kupersmith, J. (2007). Managing patient and system complexities to improve the quality and outcomes of chronic care: papers from VA’s state-of-the-art conference: Managing complexity in chronic care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22, 373–444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, C. (2007). How normal behavior became a sickness. Binghamton, NY: Vail-Ballou Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebensohn-Chialvo, P., Crago, M., & Shisslak, C. M. (2000). The reflecting team: An innovative approach for teaching clinical skills to family practice residents. Family Medicine, 32, 556–560.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. S. (2006). Communimetrics: A communication theory of measurement in human service settings. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. M., & Sturmberg, J. P. (2009). Perturbing ongoing conversations about systems and complexity in health services and systems. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 15, 549–552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, M., Hibberd, C., Pratt, R., Cameron, I., & Mercer, S. (2011). Development and initial validation of the Minnesota Edinburgh complexity assessment method (MECAM) for use within the Keep Well Health Check. 2011, Healthier Scotland: Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, K. M., Schultz, E., Pineda, N., Lonhart, J., Chapman, T., & Davies, S. (2012). Care coordination accountability measures for primary care practice Prepared by Stanford University under subcontract to Battelle on Contract No. 290-04-0020 (AHRQ Publication No. 12-0019-EF). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Retrieved April 29, 2013, from http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/final-reports/pcpaccountability/index.html

  • National Committee for Quality Assurance. (2011). 2011 PCMH standards and guidelines. National Committee for Quality Assurance. Retrieved April 29, 2013, from http://www.iafp.com/pcmh/ncqa2011.pdf

  • Peek, C. J. (2009). Integrating care for persons, not only diseases. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 16, 13–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peek, C. J. (2010). Building a medical home around the patient: What it means for behavior. Families, Systems & Health, 28, 322–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peek, C. J., Baird, M. A., & Coleman, E. (2009). Primary care for patient complexity, not only disease. Families, Systems & Health, 27, 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peek, C. J., & Oftedahl, G. (2010). A concensus operational definition of Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) also known as health care home. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota and Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peek, C. J., & Van Riper, K. (2011). Level of care coordination needed. Unpublished instructional draft, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigott, H. E., Leventhal, H. M., Alter, G. S., & Boren, J. J. (2010). Efficacy and effectiveness of antidepressants: Current status of research. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 79, 267–279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pronk, N. P., Peek, C. J., & Goldstein, M. G. (2004). Addressing multiple behavioral risk factors in primary care. A synthesis of current knowledge and stakeholder dialogue sessions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27, 4–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, N. H., Furst, J. W., Swenson-Dravis, D. M., Agerter, D. C., Smith, A. J., Baird, M. A., et al. (2006). Innovative reflecting interview: Effect on high-utilizing patients with medically unexplained symptoms. Disease Management, 9, 349–359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Safford, M. M., Allison, J. J., & Kiefe, C. I. (2007). Patient complexity: More than comorbidity. The vector model of complexity. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(Suppl 3), 382–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar-Fraile, J., Sempere-Verdu, E., Mossakowski, K., & Bryan, J. (2010). “Doctor, I just can’t go on.” Cultural constructions of depression and the prescription of antidepressants to users who are not clinically depressed. International Journal of Mental Health, 39, 29–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargut, G., & McGrath, R. G. (2011). Learning to live with complexity. Harvard Business Review, 89(68–76), 136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starfield, B., Weiner, J., Mumford, L., & Steinwachs, D. (1991). Ambulatory care groups: A categorization of diagnoses for research and management. Health Services Research, 26, 53–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stiefel, F. C., Huyse, F. J., Sollner, W., Slaets, J. P. J., Lyons, J. S., Latour, C. H. M., et al. (2006). Operationalizing integrated care on a clinical level: The INTERMED project. Medical Clinics of North America, 90, 713–758.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trangle, M., Dieperink, B., Gabert, T., Haight, B., Lindvall, B., Mitchell, J. et al. (2012). Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement. Major depression in adults in primary care. http://bit.ly/Depr0512. Updated May 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, E. (2010a). Crazy like us: The globalization of the American psyche. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, E. (2010b). The Americanization of mental illness. The New York Times. Retrieved April 29, 2013, from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/10/magazine/10psyche-t.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

  • Weiner, J. P., Starfield, B. H., Steinwachs, D. M., & Mumford, L. M. (1991). Development and application of a population-oriented measure of ambulatory care case-mix. Medical Care, 29, 452–472.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, K. B. (2007). Managing complexity in chronic care: An overview of the VA state-of-the-art (SOTA) conference. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(Suppl 3), 374–378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weydt, A. P. (2009). Defining, analyzing, and quantifying work complexity. Creative Nursing, 15, 7–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B., Lindberg, C., & Plsek, P. (2008). Edgeware: Lessons from complexity science for health care leaders. Irving, TX: Plexus Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwarenstein, M., Treweek, S., Gagnier, J. J., Altman, D. G., Tunis, S., Haynes, B. et al. (2008). Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: An extension of the CONSORT statement. British Medical Journal, 337, a2390. doi: http://10.1136/bmj.a2390.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Macaran A. Baird MD, MS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baird, M.A., Peek, C.J., Gunn, W.B., Valeras, A. (2013). Working with Complexity in Integrated Behavioral Health Settings. In: Talen, M., Burke Valeras, A. (eds) Integrated Behavioral Health in Primary Care. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6889-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6889-9_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6888-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6889-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics