Skip to main content

Laparoscopic Total and Supracervical Hysterectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Atlas of Single-Port, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Surgery

Abstract

Although described as a medical procedure since the second century, the concept of removing the uterus, or hysterectomy, for medical indications has undergone a profound journey from a shunned operation with almost 100 % mortality to one of the most common, nonobstetric operations performed today. Advances in instrumentation and minimally invasive techniques, described in this chapter, have made this a virtually outpatient procedure, with many indications and minimal complication rates. This chapter describes step-by-step techniques to achieve a minimally invasive approach to hysterectomy as well as indications and caveats to minimize medical mishaps. Mastery of the technique is transferable to other minimally invasive pelvic procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:1091–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Merrill RM. Hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 1997 through 2005. Med Sci Monit. 2008;14:CR24–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. US Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States 2006 with chartbook on trends in the health of Americans. Table 99. Hyattsville; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sutton C. Hysterectomy: a historical perspective. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;11:1–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Steptoe PC. Gynecological endoscopy-laparoscopy and culdoscopy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1965;72:535–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Reich H, de Cipro J, McGlynn F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg. 1989;5:213–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Summitt Jr RL, Stovall TG, Lipscomb GH, Washburn SA, Ling FW. Outpatient hysterectomy: determinants of discharge and rehospitalization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;17:1480–4; discussion 1484–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Semm K. Endoscopic subtotal hysterectomy without colpotomy; classic intrafascial Semm hysterectomy. A new method of hysterectomy by pelviscopy, laparotomy, per vaginam or functionally by total uterine mucosal ablation. Int Surg. 1996;81:362–414.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sepillian V, Della Badia C. Iatrogenic endometriosis caused by uterine morcellation during a supracervical hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(5 pt 2):1125–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Turner LC, Shepherd JP, Wang L, Bunker CH, Lowder JL. Hysterectomy surgical trends: a more accurate depiction of the last decade. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:277.e1–e7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Klauschie J, Wechter ME, Jacob K, Zanagnolo V, Montero R, Magrina J, Kho R. Use of anti-skid material and patient-positioning to prevent patient shifting during robotic-assisted gynecologic procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:504–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Richardson EH. A simplified technique for abdominal panhysterectomy. Surg Gynaecol Obstet. 1929;48:248–51.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson CK, Wallace S, Guiahi M, Sheeder J, Behbakht K, Spillman MA. Risk-reducing salpingectomy as preventative strategy for pelvic serous cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013;23:417–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bojahr B, Raatz D, Schonleber G, Abri C, Ohlinger R. Perioperative complication rate in 1706 patients after a standardized laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13:183–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kafy S, Huang JY, Al-Sunaidi M, Wiener D, Tulandi T. Audit of morbidity and mortality rates of 1792 hysterectomies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;3:55–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alpern M, Kivnick S, Poon KY. Outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uteri. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19:689–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Uccella S, Ceccaroni M, Cromi A, Malzoni M, Berretta R, De Iaco P, et al. Vaginal cuff dehiscence in a series of 12,398 hysterectomies: effect of different types of colpotomy and vaginal closure. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:516–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Blikkendaal MD, Twijnstra AR, Pacquee SC, Rhemrev JP, Smeets MJ, de Kroon CD, Jansen FW. Vaginal cuff dehiscence in laparoscopic hysterectomy: influence of various suturing methods of the vaginal vault. Gynecol Surg. 2012;9:393–400.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghomi A, Hantes J, Lotze EC. Incidence of cyclical bleeding after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12:201–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hilger WS, Magrina JF. Removal of pelvic leiomyomata and endometriosis 5 years after supracervical hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:772–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Johns A. Supracervical hysterectomy vs total abdominal hysterectomy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1997;40:903–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Parker WH, Fu YS, Berek JS. Uterine sarcoma in patients operated on for presumed leiomyoma and rapidly growing leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83:414–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Theben JU, Schellong AR, Altgassen C, Kelling K, Schneider S, Große-Drieling D. Unexpected malignancies after laparoscopic-assisted supracervical hysterectomy (LASH): an analysis of 1584 LASH cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287:455–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Einstein MH, Barakat RR, Chi DS, Sonoda Y, Alektiar KM, Hensley ML, Abu-Rustum NR. Management of uterine malignancy found incidentally after supracervical hysterectomy or uterine morcellation for presumed benign disease. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008;18:1065–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Boosz A, Lermann J, Mehlhorn G, Loehberg C, Renner SP, Thiel FC, et al. Comparison of re-operation rates and complication rates after total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and laparoscopy-assisted supracervical hysterectomy (LASH). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;158:269–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Einarsson JI, Suzuki Y, Vellinga TT, Jonsdottir GM, Magnusson MK, Maurer R, et al. Prospective evaluation of quality of life in total versus supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18:617–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen E. Zimberg MD, MSHA .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zimberg, S.E. (2014). Laparoscopic Total and Supracervical Hysterectomy. In: Escobar, P., Falcone, T. (eds) Atlas of Single-Port, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6840-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6840-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6839-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6840-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics