Skip to main content

Contemporary Maya Food System in the Lowlands of Northern Yucatan

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethnobotany of Mexico

Abstract

Lowland Maya culture can be traced back to around 1200–1000 BC in the lowlands of Belize. Their subsequent expansion and settlement in the northern portion of the Yucatan Peninsula was possible, thanks to the integration of three agricultural systems that originated in other dry tropical forests but were also adapted to the lithosol–cambisol physiographic and edaphic sequences of Yucatan: the Mesoamerican milpa (Zea maysPhaseolus spp.—Cucurbita spp. complex), the South American conuco (Manihot esculentaXanthosoma sagittifoliumMaranta arundinaceaIpomoea batatas complex), and the family garden based on native tree species but also on species introduced from other areas of Mesoamerica or from Central and South America. Hunting, gathering, and fishing complemented Mayan food production since their arrival in Yucatan. Various studies have enumerated Mayan foods and dietary patterns based on the milpa production system that has persisted since Pre-Columbian times. Nevertheless, we lack comparable reports on how the contemporary Maya structure their food system and the relative contribution of each of its various components. In order to address this need, we studied a traditional Maya community in northern Yucatan by making inventories of food dishes and drinks elaborated in the community and the origin of their ingredients. We found 74 food dishes and drinks primarily produced with ingredients produced locally in the milpa. 91.9 % of them included Zea mays, 29.7 % included Cucurbita spp., 12.1 % included Phaseolus spp., 12.5 % included Capsicum spp., 6.7 % included Spondias, and 5.4 % included Cnidoscolus. Although they have economic and nutritional importance, other production systems, such as the family garden, are clearly secondary to the milpa in contributing to Xocén’s food supply. The culinary characteristics of different varieties of the cultivated species appear to have served as selective pressures for the generation and conservation of intraspecific diversity. Efforts to augment productivity of the milpa system through transforming it to a maize monoculture can yield significant changes to the food system with negative consequences to local nutrition, ecology, and culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Piperno DR, Ranere AJ, Holst I, Dickau R, Iriarte J. Starch grain and phytolith evidence for early ninth millennium B.P. maize from the Central Balsas River Valley, Mexico. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;13(106):5019–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ranere AJ, Piperno DR, Holst I, Dickau R, Iriarte J. The cultural and chronological context of early Holocene maize and squash domestication in the Central Balsas River Valley, Mexico. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;13(106):5014–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zizumbo-Villarreal D, Colunga-GarcíaMarín P. Origin of agriculture and plant domestication in West Mesoamerica. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2010;57:813–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zizumbo-Villarreal D, Flores-Silva A, Colunga-GarcíaMarín P. The Archaic Diet in Mesoamerica: incentive for milpa development and species domestication. Econ Bot. 2012;66:328–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pohl MD, Pope KO, Jones JG, Jacob JS, Piperno DR, de France S, Lenz DL, Gifford JA, Valdez F, Danfoth ME, Josserand JK. Early agriculture in the Maya Lowlands. Lat Am Antiq. 1996;7:355–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lentz DL. Plant resources of the ancient Maya: the paleo-ethnobotanical evidence. In: White CD, editor. Reconstructing ancient Maya diet. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press; 1999. p. 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clark JE, Hansen RD, Pérez-Suárez T. La zona maya en el Preclásico. In: Manzanilla L, López-Luján L, editors. Historia Antigua de México. Vol. I. México: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia-Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Porrúa; 2000. p. 435–510.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Colunga-GarcíaMarín P, Zizumbo-Villarreal D. Domestication of plants in Maya Lowlands. Econ Bot. 2004;58:101–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Toledo VM, Barrera-Bassols N, García Frapolli E, Alarcón-Chaires P. Uso múltiple y biodiversidad entre los mayas yucatecos (México). Interciencia. 2008;33:345–52.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gómez-Pompa A, Allen MF, Fedick SL, Jiménez-Osornio JJ. The Lowland Maya area. three Millennia at human-wildland interface. New York: The Haworth Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fedick SL. The managed mosaic. Ancient Maya agriculture and resource use. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rico-Gray V, Gómez-Pompa A, Chan C. Las selvas manejadas por los mayas de Yohaltún, Campeche, México. Biotica. 1985;10:321–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Flannery KV. Maya subsistence. Studies in memory of Dennis E. Puleston. Austin: Academic Press, University of Texas; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hernández-Xolocotzi E. La agricultura en la península de Yucatán. In: Beltrán E, editor. Los Recursos Naturales del Sureste. México: Instituto Mexicano de Recursos Naturales Renovables; 1959. p. 3–37.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zizumbo-Villarreal D, Simá P. Las prácticas de roza-tumba-quema en la silvicultura maya-yucateca y la regeneración de la selva. In: Uribe R, editor. Medio Ambiente y comunidades indígenas del Sureste: prácticas tradicionales de producción, rituales y manejo de recursos. SECUR-IV Comité Regional Villahermosa: UNESCO; 1988. p. 84–104.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Steggerda M. Maya Indians of Yucatan. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington Publications; 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hernández-Xolocotzi E, Levy T, Bello B. La roza-tumba-quema en Yucatán. In: Hernández-Xolocotzi E, Bello B, Levy T. Comps. La milpa en Yucatán; un sistema de producción agrícola tradicional. Tomo 2. Montecillos: Colegio de Postgraduados; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zizumbo-Villarreal D, Terán S. Las semillas de la cultura. Los agrosistemas tradicionales una alternativa de desarrollo. Boletín de la Escuela de Ciencias Antropológicas de la Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán. 1985;72:3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zizumbo-Villarreal D, Colunga-GarcíaMarín P, May-Pat F, Martínez-Castillo J, Mijangos-Cortés JO, Recursos fito-genéticos para la alimentación y la agricultura. In: Durán-García R, Méndez-González M, editors. Biodiversidad y Desarrollo Humano en Yucatán. Mérida, Yucatán: CICY, PPD-FMAM, CONABIO, SEDUMA; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wandsnider L. The roasted and the boiled: food composition and heat treatment with special emphasis on pit-hearth cooking. J Anthropol Archaeol. 1997;16:1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dering P. Earth-oven plant processing in Archaic period economies: an example from a semi-arid savannah in South-Central North America. Am Antiq. 1999;64:659–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Thoms AV. Rock of ages: propagation of hot-rock cookery in Western North America. J Archaeol Sci. 2009;36:573–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Benedict FG, Steggerda M. The food of the present day Maya indians of Yucatan. Contrib Am Archaeol. 1936;18:157–88.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Peraza López ME. Patrones alimenticios en Ichmul, Yucatán: sus determinantes socioeconómicas ecológicas y culturales. [Bachelor thesis]. Facultad de Antropología. Mérida: Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Luna Reyes I. Alimentación y consumo en una comunidad maya de Yucatán: Xocén. [Bachelor thesis]. Mérida: Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Terán S, Rasmussen C, Pat O. Las plantas de la milpa de los mayas. Mérida: Danida; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cázares-Sánchez E, Duch Gary J. La diversidad genética de variedades locales de maíz, frijol calabaza y chile, y su relación con características culinarias. In: Chávez-Servia JL, Tuxill J, Jarvis DI, editors. Manejo de la diversidad de los cultivos en los agroecosistemas tradicionales. Cali: Instituto Internacional de Recursos Filogenéticos; 2004. p. 250–5.

    Google Scholar 

  28. García E. Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen para adaptarlos a las condiciones de la República mexicana. Segunda edición. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  29. DETENAL. (Dirección de Estadística del Territorio Nacional.). Modificaciones al Sistema de Clasificación de Suelos FAO/ UNESCO. México: Secretaría de Programación y Presupuesto; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  30. INEGI. (2005). (On line) Available in http://www.microrregiones.gob.mx/catloc/contenido.aspx?refnac=311020174.

  31. Katz SH, Heidiger ML, Valleroy LA. Traditional maize processing techniques in the New world. Science. 1974;184(4138):765–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Paredes O, Guevara F, Bello LA. La nixtamalización y el valor nutritivo del maíz. Ciencias. 2007;3:60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Paredes O, Guevara F, Bello LA. Los alimentos mágicos de las culturas indígenas mesoamericanas. México: Fondo de cultura económica; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gallegos S, Pacheco J, Betancur D, Chel L. Extraction and characterization of soluble protein fractions from Phaseolus lunatus L. seeds. Arch Latinoam Nutr. 2004;54(1):81–8.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kuti JO, Kuti HO. Proximate composition and mineral content of two edible species of Cnidoscolus (tree spinach). Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 1999;53:275–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jacks TJ. Cucurbit seed protein and oil. ACS Symp Ser. 1986;312:249–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Raghavan S. Handbook of spices, seasonings and flavorings. Pennsylvania: Co. Technomic; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Salazar C, Zizumbo-Villarreal D, Brush S, Colunga-GarcíaMarín P. Earth Ovens (Píib) in the Maya Lowlands: ethnobotanical data supporting early use. Econ Bot. 2012;66(3):285–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Perales HR, Benz BF, Brush SB. Maize diversity and ethno linguistic diversity in Chiapas, Mexico. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(3):949–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Aguirre JA, Bellon MR, Smale M. A regional analysis of maize biological diversity in Southeastern Guanajuato, Mexico. Econ Bot. 2000;54(1):60–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hernández-Xolocotzi E. Consumo humano de maíz y el aprovechamiento de tipos con alto valor nutritivo. Memoria del Simposio sobre desarrollo y utilización de maíces de alto valor nutritivo. Chapingo: Colegio de Posgraduados. ENA; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tuz Chi LH. Así es nuestro pensamiento. Cosmovisión e identidad en los rituales agrícolas de los mayas peninsulares. [PhD thesis]. Programa de Doctorado Interuniversitario Antropología de Iberoamérica. Salamanca, España: Universidad de Salamanca; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gabriel M. Las ceremonias agrícolas de los campesinos mayas- representaciones de su cosmovisión. In: Barrera A, Gubler R, editors. Los mayas de ayer y hoy. Memorias del Congreso Internacional de Cultura Maya. México: Consejo Nacional para las Culturas y las Artes, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia; 2012. p. 1145–68.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Valdés JA, Vidal C. Orígenes míticos, símbolos y rituales en Chocholá y las tierras mayas del sur. In: Decimoctavo Simposio de Investigaciones Arqueológicas en Guatemala. Guatemala: Ministerio de Cultura y Deportes, Instituto de Antropología e Historia; 2005. p. 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Salinas MY, Soto MH, Martínez-Bustos F, González VH, Ortega RP. Análisis de antocianinas en maíces de grano azul y rojo provenientes de cuatro razas. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana. 1999;22:161–74.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ruvalcaba J. Vida cotidiana y consumo de maíz en la huasteca veracruzana. México: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Martínez Castillo J, Zizumbo-Villarreal D, Perales-Rivera H, Colunga-García Marín P. Intraspecific diversity and morphophenological variation in Phaseolus lunatus L. from the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Econ Bot. 2004;58:354–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Latournier L, Chávez JL, Pérez M, Hernández CF, Martínez R, Arias LM, Castañón G. Exploración de la diversidad morfológica de chiles regionales en Yaxcabá, Yucatán. México. Agronomía Mesoamericana. 2002;12(1):41–7.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Cázares-Sánchez E, Ramírez-Vallejo P, Castillo-González F, Soto-Hernández M, Rodríguez-González MT, Chávez-Servia JL. Capsaicinoids and preference of use in different morphotypes of chili peppers (Capsicum annum L.) of east central Yucatan. Agrociencia. 2005;39(6):627–38.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Aguilar Meléndez A, Morell PL, Roose ML, Seung CK. Genetic diversity and structure in semiwild and domesticated chiles (Capsicum annuum; Solanaceae) from Mexico. Am J Bot. 2009;96(6):1190–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ruenes MR, Casas A, Jiménez Osornio JJ, Caballero J. Etnobotánica de Spondias purpurea. Interciencia. 2010;35(4):247–54.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sherman PW, Billing J. Darwinian gastronomy: why we use spices. BioScience. 1999;49(6):453–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are very appreciative of the financial support of the Red Latinoamericana de Botánica—Andrew Mellon Foundation and the Programa del Mejoramiento del Profesorado PROMEP/103.5/09/4348 in providing scholarships for the doctoral studies and research of Carmen Salazar. Thanks to Maura Dzib Canul y Fátimo Canul Noh for their services in Maya to Spanish translation. We are most grateful to the families of Xocén, and especially, for their hospitality and help during fieldwork.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmen Salazar Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salazar, C., Zizumbo-Villarreal, D., Colunga-GarcíaMarín, P., Brush, S. (2016). Contemporary Maya Food System in the Lowlands of Northern Yucatan. In: Lira, R., Casas, A., Blancas, J. (eds) Ethnobotany of Mexico. Ethnobiology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6669-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics