Skip to main content

Analysis of Continuous Covariates and Dose-Effect Analysis

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Epidemiology

Abstract

When analyzing data from an epidemiological study, some features are rather specific for a particular study design. Those are dealt with among others in chapters “Descriptive Studies,” “Cohort Studies,” “Modern Epidemiological Study Designs,” and “Survival Analysis” of this handbook. Other features are generally relevant; see chapters “Rates, Risks, Measures of Association,” and “Impact and Confounding and Interaction.” This chapter focuses on the analysis of continuous covariates where it will be discussed how such variables can be modeled to capture their potential association with an outcome of interest and to best describe the shape of such an association. We present classical methods based on categorization and subsequent contingency table analysis. The major part of the chapter, however, deals with the analysis of continuous covariates using regression models commonly used in epidemiology (see also chapter “Regression Methods for Epidemiological Analysis” of this handbook). Each of the proposed techniques to model continuous covariates is illustrated by a real data example taken from a case-control study on laryngeal cancer and smoking as well as alcohol consumption that has been conducted in Germany during the 1990s. The chapter ends with practical recommendations and conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agresti A (2019) Categorical data analysis, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman DG, Lausen B, Sauerbrei W, Schumacher M (1994) Dangers of using “optimal” cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors. J Natl Cancer Inst 86:829–835

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Becher H (1993) The concept of residual confounding in regression models and some applications. Stat Med 11:1747–1758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becher H, Ramroth H, Ahrens W, Risch A, Schmezer P, Dietz A (2005) Occupation, exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and laryngeal cancer risk. Int J Cancer 116:451–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Becher H, Lorenz E, Royston P, Sauerbrei W (2012) Analysing covariates with spike at zero: a modified FP procedure and conceptual issues. Biom J 54:686–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bennette C, Vickers A (2012) Against quantiles: categorization of continuous variables in epidemiologic research, and its discontents. BMC Med Res Methodol 12:21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein S, Bernstein R (1998) Schaum’s outline of elements of statistics I: descriptive statistics and probability. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslow N, Day N (1980) Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume I – the analysis of case-control studies. IARC scientific publications no. 32. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslow N, Day N (1987) Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume II – the design and analysis of cohort studies. IARC scientific publications no. 82. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslow NW, Storer BE (1985) General relative risk functions for case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol 122:149–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilers PHC, Marx BD (1996) Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties. Stat Sci 11:89–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S, Senn SJ, Rothman KJ, Carlin JB, Poole C, Goodman SN, Altman DG (2016) Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. Eur J Epidemiol 31:337–350

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hastie T, Tibshirani R (1986) Generalized additive models. Stat Sci 1:297–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie T, Tibshirani R (1990) Generalized additive models. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heumann C, Schomaker M, Shalabh S (2016) Introduction to statistics and data analysis. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jedrychowski W, Becher H, Wahrendorf J, Basa-Cierpialek Z, Gomola G (1992) Effect of tobacco smoking on various histologic types of lung cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 118:276–282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lausen B, Schumacher M (1996) Evaluating the effect of optimized cutoff values in the assessment of prognostic factors. Comput Stat Data Ana 21:307–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lausen B, Lerche R, Schumacher M (2002) Maximally selected rank statistics for dose-response problems (2002). Biom J 44:131–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maclure M, Greenland S (1992) Tests for trend and dose response: misinterpretations and alternatives. Am J Epidemiol 135:96–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22:719–748

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mizon GE, Richard JF (1986) The encompassing principle and its application to testing non-nested hypothesis. Econometrica 54:657–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhäuser M, Becher H (1997) Improved odds ratio estimation by posthoc stratification of case-control data. Stat Med 16:993–1004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen MK, Schafer JL (2001) A two-part random-effects model for semicontinuous longitudinal data. J Am Stat Assoc 96:730–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perperoglou A, Sauerbrei W, Abrahamowicz M, Schmid M, on behalf of TG2 of the STRATOS initiative (2019) A review of spline function procedures in R. BMC Med Res Methodol 19:46

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Porta M, Gasull M, Pumarega J, Kiviranta H, Rantakokko P et al (2022) Plasma concentrations of persistent organic pollutants and pancreatic cancer risk. Int J Epidemiol 51:479–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson C, Boyle P, Hsieh CC, Macfarlane GJ, Maisonneuve P (1994) Some statistical considerations in the analysis of case-control studies when the exposure variables are continuous measurements. Epidemiology 5:164–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Royston P, Altman DG (1994) Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: parsimonious parametric modelling. Appl Stat 43:429–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royston P, Sauerbrei W (2008) Multivariable model-building: a pragmatic approach to regression analysis based on fractional polynomials for modelling continuous variables. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Royston P, Thompson SG (1995) Comparing non-nested regression models. Biometrics 51:114–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Royston P, Sauerbrei W, Becher H (2010) Modelling continuous exposures with a ‘spike’ at zero: a new procedure based on fractional polynomials. Stat Med 29:1219–1227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sauerbrei W, Perperoglou A, Schmid M, Abrahamowicz M, Becher H, Binder H, Dunkler D, Harrell FE Jr, Royston P, Heinze G, for TG2 of the STRATOS initiative (2020) State of the art in selection of variables and functional forms in multivariable analysis - outstanding issues. Diagn Progn Res 4:3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schisterman EF, Reiser B, Faraggi D (2006) ROC analysis for markers with mass at zero. Stat Med 25:623–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulgen G, Lausen B, Olsen JH, Schumacher M (1994) Outcome-oriented cutpoints in analysis of quantitative exposures. Am J Epidemiol 140:172–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Calster B, Steyerberg EW, Collins GS, Smits T (2018) Consequences of relying on statistical significance: some illustrations. Eur J Clin Investig 48(5):e12912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood SN (2017) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zatonski W, Becher H, Lissowska J, Wahrendorf J (1991) Tobacco, alcohol and diet in the etiology of laryngeal cancer – a population-based case-control study. Cancer Causes Control 2:3–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Bernhard Hader for corrections and proofreading.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heiko Becher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Becher, H., Schmid, M. (2023). Analysis of Continuous Covariates and Dose-Effect Analysis. In: Ahrens, W., Pigeot, I. (eds) Handbook of Epidemiology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6625-3_16-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6625-3_16-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6625-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6625-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics