Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Technology Integration in the Most Favorable Conditions: Findings from a Professional Development Training Program

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Research on e-Learning and ICT in Education

Abstract

It is a consistent finding of research on ICT use in education that technology has failed to transform teaching and learning practices on a large scale. First- and second-order barriers have been identified as technology integration obstacles, and professional development training (PDT) programs are seen as the main tools to address such obstacles. Although the literature provides guidelines with respect to form, length, and content of PDT programs, there is very little research on how teachers’ backgrounds might influence the effectiveness of PDTs. In this multiple case study we focus on three teachers who participated in an extensive PDT program. Owing to their science education expertise, their constructivist beliefs, and high academic credentials, it was expected that they would integrate technology in their practices in transformative ways. The results show that the teachers integrated technology in practices that follow the dominant science education paradigm in Greece. Technology was mainly used for accessing web information and providing visualizations and multiple representations. Contrary to expectations, potential uses of technology that are common in science education literature (Osborne and Hennessy, Literature review in science education and the role of ICT: Promise, problems and future directions, 2003; Webb, International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 705–735, 2005) and would transform their teaching practices were not taken up although they were promoted in the PDT program. Finally, the three teachers were reluctant to recognize these potential uses of technology as serious challenges to the quality of their designs. In this work we discuss the implications of these findings for further research in in-service PDT programs on ICT pedagogy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Angers, J., & Machtmes, K. (2005). An ethnographic-case study of beliefs, context factors, and practices of teachers integrating technology. The Qualitative Report, 10(4), 771–794. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR10-4/angers.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apostolakis, E., Panagopoulou, E., Savvas, S., Tsagliotis, N., Pantazis, G., Sotiriou, S., Tolias, B., Tsagogeorga, A., & Kalkanis, G. (2006). Science: Teacher guide – 5th grade [In Greek]. Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baggott la Velle, L. M., McFarlane, A., John, P., & Brawn, R. (2004). According to the promises: The subculture of school science, teachers’ pedagogic identity and the challenge of ICT. Education, Communication & Information, 4, 109–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. J. (2000a). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(51), n51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. J. (2000b). How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online Serial], 1(2), 274–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. J., & Riel, M. M. (2000). Teacher professional engagement and constructivist-compatible computer use. (Tech. Rep. No. 7). CRITO, University of California at Irvine, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. Y. (2013). Teacher guidance to mediate student inquiry through interactive dynamic visualizations. Instructional Science, 41(5), 895–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 211–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condie, R., Munro, B., Seagraves, L., & Kenesson, S. (2007). The impact of ICT in schools – A landscape review. Coventry: Becta. Retrieved from http://publications.becta.org.uk/download.cfm?resID=28221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused. Computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demetriadis, S., Barbas, A., Molohides, A., Palaigeorgiou, G., Psillos, D., Vlahavas, I., et al. (2003). “Cultures in negotiation”: Teachers’ acceptance/resistance attitudes considering the infusion of technology into schools. Computers & Education, 41(1), 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dexter, S., Anderson, R. E., & Becker, H. J. (1999). Teachers’ views of computers as catalysts for changes in their teaching practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(3), 221–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, D., McGarr, O., & O’Reilly, J. (2011). A framework for teachers’ integration of ICT into their classroom practice. Computers & Education, 57, 1469–1483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R., & Treagust, D. (1998). Learning in science - From behaviourism towards social constructivism and beyond. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 3–26). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, D. C., Ringstaff, C., & Sandholtz, J. H. (1990). Teacher beliefs and practices Part I: Patterns of change. The evolution of teachers’ instructional beliefs and practices in high-access-to-technology classrooms. First-fourth year findings. ACOT Report #8. Retrieved from ftp://www.grsc.k12.ar.us/ISTESTUFF/New%20stuff/ACOT%20Report.pdf

  • Ertmer, P. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology implementation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., & York, C. (2007). Exemplary technology use: Teachers’ perceptions of critical factors. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(2), 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eteokleous, N. (2008). Evaluating computer technology integration in a centralized school system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 669–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. A., Morbey, M. L., Lotherington, H., Owston, R. D., & Wideman, H. H. (2002). Factors contributing to teachers’ successful implementation of ICT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 480–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2010). Teachers’ Use of Educational Technology in US Public Schools: 2009. First Look. NCES 2010-040. National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, M., & Sheingold, K. (1990). Accomplished teachers: Integrating computers into classroom practice. New York, NY: Bank Street College of Education Center for Children and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, M., & Sheingold, K. (1993). Commonalities and distinctive patterns in teachers’ integration of computers. American Journal of Education, 101(3), 261–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D. (2007). ICT and learning: Lessons from Australian classrooms. Computers & Education, 49(2), 385–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499–1509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinostroza, J. E., LabbĂ©, C., Brun, M., & Matamala, C. (2011). Teaching and learning activities in Chilean classrooms: Is ICT making a difference? Computers & Education, 57, 1358–1367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1259–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2007). Examining teachers’ beliefs about ICT in education: Implications of a teacher preparation. programme. Teacher Development, 11(2), 181–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karasavvidis, I. (2009). Activity Theory as a conceptual framework for understanding teacher approaches to Information and Communication Technologies. Computers & Education, 53(2), 436–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, N. (2008). Summary and reflections. In N. Law, W. J. Pelgrum, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study (pp. 263–277). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Law, N., & Chow, A. (2008a). Pedagogical orientations in mathematics and science and the use of ICT. In N. Law, W. J. Pelgrum, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study (pp. 121–179). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Law, N., & Chow, A. (2008b). Teacher characteristics, contextual factors, and how these affect the pedagogical use of ICT. In N. Law, W. J. Pelgrum, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study (pp. 181–219). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leftwich, A. T. O. (2007). Expert technology-using teachers: Visions, strategies, and development. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2005). Changes in educational beliefs and classroom practices of teachers and students in rich technology-based classrooms. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(3), 281–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q. (2007). Student and teacher views about technology: A tale of two cities? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 377–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163–188). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matzen, N. J., & Edmunds, J. A. (2007). Technology as a catalyst for change: The role of professional development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarr, O. (2009). The development of ICT across the curriculum in Irish schools: A historical perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 1094–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Glover, D. (2007). Into the unknown: The professional development induction experience of secondary mathematics teachers using interactive whiteboard technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 319–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C., & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers & Education, 51, 1523–1537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, C., Sullivan, T., Poirot, J., & Soloway, E. (2003). No access, no use, no impact: Snapshot surveys of educational technology in K-12. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36, 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, S., McRobbie, C. J., & Cooper, T. J. (2000). Exploring secondary mathematics teachers’ reasons for not using computers in their teaching: Five case studies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(1), 87–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • OFSTED. (2004). Report: ICT in schools: The impact of government initiatives five years on. London: OFSTED. Retrieved from http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/publications/index.cfm?fuseaction=pubs.displayfile&id=3652&type=pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., & Hennessy, S. (2003). Literature review in science education and the role of ICT: Promise, problems and future directions. Retrieved from http://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/19/04/41/PDF/osborne-j-2003-r6.pdf

  • Penuel, W., Fishman, B., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Player-Koro, C. (2013). Hype, hope and ICT in teacher education: A Bernsteinian perspective. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(1), 26–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prestridge, S. (2012). The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Computers & Education, 58, 449–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riel, M., & Becker, H. J. (2008). Characteristics of teacher leaders for information and communication technology. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (Vol. 20, pp. 397–417). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, J. H., & Reilly, B. (2004). Teachers, not technicians: Rethinking technical expectations for teachers. Teachers College Record, 106(3), 487–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidkunz, H., & Lindemann, H. (1992). Das forschend-entwickelnde unterrichtsverfahren problemlösen im naturwissen-schaftlichen unterricht. Essen: Westarp Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2008). Realising the potential of new technology? Assessing the legacy of New Labour’s ICT agenda 1997–2007. Oxford Review of Education, 34(6), 701–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shriner, M., Schlee, B., Hamil, M., & Libler, R. (2009). Creating teachers’ perceptual, behavioral, and attitudinal change using professional development workshops. Teacher Development: An International Journal of Teachers’ Professional Development, 13(2), 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P., Rudd, P., & Coghlan, M. (2008). Harnessing technology schools survey 2008: Report 2: Data. Coventry: BECTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southerland, S. A., Sowell, S., Blanchard, M., & Granger, E. M. (2011). Exploring the construct of pedagogical discontentment: A tool to understand science teachers’ openness to reform. Research in Science Education, 41(3), 299–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, L. (2010). Supporting the digitally able beginning teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1429–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tondeur, J., Hermans, R., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). Exploring the link between teachers’ educational belief profiles and different types of computer use in the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2541–2553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994). The “grammar” of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Braak, J., Tondeur, J., & Valcke, M. (2004). Explaining different types of computer use among primary school teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19, 407–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S., & Kollias, V. (2001). Information and communication technology and the problem of teacher training: Myths, dreams, and the harsh reality. Themes in Education, 2(4), 341–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, L., & Parr, J. M. (2010). Revisiting and reframing use: Implications for the integration of ICT. Computers & Education, 54, 113–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, M. E. (2005). Affordances of ICT in science learning: Implications for an integrated pedagogy. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 705–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 235–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikan, G., & Molster, T. (2011). Norwegian secondary school teachers and ICT. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(2), 209–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E., Mueller, J., Willoughby, T., Specht, J., & Deyoung, T. (2005). Teachers’ perceptions: Barriers and supports to using technology in the classroom. Education, Communication & Information, 5(2), 183–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H. (2012). ICT in English schools: Transforming education? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 21(1), 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design & methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Preschool Education, University of Thessaly, Argonafton & Filellinon, 38221, Volos, Greece

    Ilias Karasavvidis

  2. Department of Primary Education, University of Thessaly, Argonafton & Filellinon, 38221, Volos, Greece

    Vassilis Kollias

Authors
  1. Ilias Karasavvidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vassilis Kollias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilias Karasavvidis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Special Education, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece

    Charalampos Karagiannidis

  2. Department of Primary Education, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece

    Panagiotis Politis

  3. Department of Pre-School Education, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece

    Ilias Karasavvidis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Karasavvidis, I., Kollias, V. (2014). Technology Integration in the Most Favorable Conditions: Findings from a Professional Development Training Program. In: Karagiannidis, C., Politis, P., Karasavvidis, I. (eds) Research on e-Learning and ICT in Education. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6501-0_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation