Skip to main content

Endoscopic Tools and Techniques for Tissue Removal and Ablation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Principles of Flexible Endoscopy for Surgeons

Abstract

The first snare polypectomy was performed by Wolff and Shinya in 1969 just 3 months after their report of the first successful complete colonoscopy. This rapid progression from a diagnostic procedure to therapeutic intervention illustrates the driving force for the endoscopic removal of tissue from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Significant advances have developed since Wolff and Shinya’s initial experience making colonoscopic polypectomy the most common therapeutic endoscopic procedure performed today. This chapter describes the tools and techniques used for removing tissue from the GI tract for therapeutic purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wolff WI. Colonoscopy: history and development. Am J Gastroenterol. 1989;84(9):1017–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Munro MG. Principles of radiofrequency energy for surgery. In: Feldman L, Fuchshuber P, Jones DB, editors. The SAGES manual on the fundamental use of surgical energy (FUSE). New York: Springer; 2012. p. 15–60.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Dunkin BJ, Lyons CD. Electrosurgical energy in gastrointestinal endoscopy. In: Feldman L, Fuchshuber P, Jones DB, editors. The SAGES manual on the fundamental use of surgical energy (FUSE). New York: Springer; 2012. p. 107–22.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Berstein DE, Barkin J, Reiner DK, et al. Standard biopsy forceps versus large-capacity forceps with and without needle. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;41(6):573–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Woods KL, Anand BS, DPhil RA, et al. Influence of endoscopic biopsy forceps characteristics on tissue specimens: results of a prospective randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49(2):177–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Abudayyeh S, Hoffman J, El-Zimaity HT, Graham DY. Prospective, randomized, pathologist-blinded study of disposable alligator jaw biopsy forceps for gastric mucosal biopsy. Dig Liver Dis. 2009;41:340–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Rex DK. Preventing colorectal cancer and cancer mortality with colonoscopy: what do we know and what do we want to know? Endoscopy. 2010;42:320–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gilbert DA, DiMarino AJ, et al. Status evaluation: hot biopsy forceps. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Technology Assessment Committee. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;38(6):753–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mönkemüller KE, Fry LC, et al. Histological quality of polyps resected using the cold versus hot biopsy technique. Endoscopy. 2004;36(5):432–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tappero G, Gaia E, et al. Cold snare excision of small colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;38(3):310–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Way JD. New methods of polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1997;7:413.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rey JF, Bellenhoff U, Neumann CS, Dumonceau JM. European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) guideline: the use of electrosurgical units. Endoscopy. 2010;42:764–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dobrowolski S, Dobosz M, Babicki A, et al. Prophylactic submucosal saline-adrenaline injection in colonoscopic polypectomy: prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:990–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Iishi H, Tatsuta M, Narahara H, et al. Endoscopic resection of large pedunculated colorectal polyps using a detachable snare. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44:594–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kouklakis G, Mpoumponaris A, Gatopoulou A, et al. Endoscopic resection of large pedunculated colonic polyps and risk of postpolypectomy bleeding with adrenaline injection versus endoloop and hemoclip: a prospective, randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(12):2732–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tada M, Shimada M, Murakami F, et al. Development of strip-off biopsy (in Japanese with English abstract). Gastroenterol Endosc. 1984;26:833–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kashimura K, et al. Comparison of various submucosal injection solutions for maintaining mucosal elevation during endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy. 2004;36:579–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sampliner RE. Barrett’s esophagus: electrocoagulation. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49(3):S17–S9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Franchimont D, Van Laethem J, Deviere J. Argon plasma coagulation in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2003;13(3):457–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Overholt BF, Panjehpour M, Halberg DL. Photodynamic therapy for Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia and/or early stage carcinoma: long term results. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58(2):183–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Overholt BF, Lightdale CJ, Wang KK, et al. Photodynamic therapy with porfimer sodium for ablation of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: international, partially blinded, randomized phase III trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:488–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shaheen NJ, Sharma P, Overholt BF, et al. Radiofrequency ablation in Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2277–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. May A, Gossner L, Pech O, et al. Local endoscopic therapy for intraepithelial high-grade neoplasia and early adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus: acute-phase and intermediate results of a new treatment approach. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002; 14:1085–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sharma VK, Wang KK, Overholt BF, et al. Balloon-based, circumferential, endoscopic radiofrequency ablation of Barrett’s esophagus: 1-year follow-up of 100 patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:185–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gondrie JJ, Peters FP, Curvers WL, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of Barrett’s esophagus containing high-grade dysplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:137–9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ganz RA, Overholt BF, Sharma VK, et al. Circumferential ablation of Barrett’s esophagus that contains high-grade dysplasia: a US multicenter registry. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:35–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gondrie JJ, Pouw RE, Sondermeijer CM, et al. Stepwise circumferential and focal ablation of Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia: results of the first prospective series of 11 patients. Endoscopy. 2008;40:359–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian J. Dunkin M.D., F.A.C.S. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dunkin, B.J. (2013). Endoscopic Tools and Techniques for Tissue Removal and Ablation. In: Marks, J., Dunkin, B. (eds) Principles of Flexible Endoscopy for Surgeons. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6330-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6330-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6329-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6330-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics