Skip to main content

Collaborative Learning in Virtual Environments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Synthetic Worlds

Part of the book series: Integrated Series in Information Systems ((ISIS,volume 33))

  • 967 Accesses

Abstract

With regard to the increasing demand for facilities that allow self-directed learning, the Department for Educational Sciences at the University of Bielefeld in Germany initiated the project “E-Learning 3D” (EL3) in 2007. The project was designed to develop a virtual learning environment in which students as well as lecturers could interact without actually being on campus. It was expected that such a learning environment could serve as a complementary component of the university’s schedule of lectures. The EL3 project chose the virtual world Second Life (SL) as the infrastructure for the establishment of the required learning spaces. SL is an online-based system which allows the users to move and act in a seemingly three-dimensional space. At the outset of EL3, Second Life was a ubiquitous phenomenon throughout the media. Today, though the medial omnipresence of SL is gone, the number of users is nonetheless still rising. So far, more than 25 million accounts were registered worldwide for the multi-user virtual environment.This article will cover the genesis and decisions made during the process, as well as a description of the employed and adapted learning environments and tools of EL3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A consequent application of this possibility is the rather versatile holodeck on the area of EL3 (see below).

  2. 2.

    http://islandday.mixxt.de.

  3. 3.

    For example, in 2008 the project E-Learning 3D presented a cinema show with short films of students on its virtual beach on the European University Island.

References

  • Dearling, A. (1992). How to organise conferences, workshops, and training events: A guide for trainers and facilitators working in the ‘people services’. Harlow, Essex: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • E-Learning 3D (2009). Projekt EL3: E-Learning 3D. Universität Bielefeld. http://www.e-learning3d/Projekt. Accessed 14 Nov 2009.

  • Falk-Frühbrodt, C. (n.d.). Lerntypen II. Institut für integrative Lernen und Weiterbildung. http://www.iflw.de/wissen/lerntypen_II.htm. Accessed 05 Jan 2011.

  • Graeßner, G. (2008). Second Life: Wen interessiert es? Zielgruppen für wissenschaftliche Weiterbildung. Presentation at the E-Learning 3D forum on further training; hold Accessed 26 Feb 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeren, J. (2009). Lernorte der Second-Life-Repräsentanz E-Learning 3D: Didaktischer Einsatz und Nutzen für Großgruppen. In A. Schwill N. Apostolopoulo (Eds.), Lernen im Digitalen Zeitalter. Workshopband der Konferenz zur DeLFI 2009: Die 7. Fachtagung Informatik der Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. pp. 253–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimann, P. (1965). Didaktik 1965. In P. Heimann, G. Otto, & W. Schulz (Ed.), Unterricht: Analyse und Planung (pp. 7–12). Hannover: Herman Schroedel Verlag. http://www.worldcat.org/title/unterricht-analyse-und-planung/oclc/476304614?referer=di&ht=edition.

  • Linden Lab (2009). Current user metrics for Second Life. http://secondlife.com/xmlhttp/secondlife.php. Accessed 05 Jan 2011.

  • Mersch, A. (2008). E-Learning 3D: Potentiale und Schwächen dreidimensionaler Lehr-Lernumgebungen in virtuellen Welten. In R. Andersson, A. Bergs, U. Hoppe, U. Hübner, A. Knaden, K. Morisse, O. Vornberger, & H.-J. Wiese (Eds.), Tagungsband logOS 2008: Lernen Organisation Gesellschaft. Osnabrück: epOs media Verlag. Accessed 14 Nov 2009. http://beutel.lernenzweinull.de/el3artikel.pdf.

  • Ojstersek, N. (2008). Gestaltung und Betreuung virtueller Lernszenarien in Second Life. In V. Hornung-Prähauser, M. Luckmann, & M. Kalz (Eds.), Selbstorganisiertes Lernen im Internet: Einblick in die Landschaft der webbasierten Bildungsinnovationen( pp. 296–300). Innsbruck: Studien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pätzold, H. (2007). E-Learning 3-D: Welches Potenzial haben virtuelle 3-D-Umgebungen für das Lernen mit neuen Medien? Medienpädagogik Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung September, 1–20. Accessed 10 Nov 2009. http://www.medienpaed.com/2007/paetzold0709.pdf.

  • Pivec, M., &  Dziabenko, O. (2004). Game-based learning in universities and lifelong learning: “UniGame: Social skills and knowledge training” game concept. Journal of Universal Computer Science10, 14–26. Special Issue “Human Issues in Implementing eLearning Technology”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidbauer, P. (2008). Erlebnisraum virtuelle Welt: Sozial vernetztes Lernen in 3D. In Forum der Lehre 2008 Hochschule Augsburg: Räume, Welten, Dimensionen (pp. 49–54). Augsburg: Hochschule Augsburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulmeister, R. (2005). Lernplattformen für das virtuelle Lernen. München: Oldenbourg Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, W. (1965). Unterricht: Analyse und Planung. In P. Heimann, G. Otto, & W. Schulz (Eds.), Unterricht: Analyse und Planung (pp. 13–47). Hannover: Herman Schroedel Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, D. H., & Kim, W. Y. (2008). Applying TAM and flow theory to Cyworld user behaviour: Implication of the Web 2.0 user acceptance. Cyber Psychology & Behavior11(3), 378–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Städtler, H. (2008). Virtuelle Proxemik: Konzeption, Implementierung und Evaluation einer Komponente zur Bereitstellung proxemischer Information im e-Learning. Ph. D. thesis, University of Bremen, Bremen. http://elib.suub.uni-bremen.de/diss/docs/00011173.pdf.

  • Swertz, C. (2004). Didaktisches Design: Ein Leitfaden für den Aufbau hypermedialer Lernsysteme mit der Web-Didaktik. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walber, M. (2008). Evolution: Von 2D- zu 3D-Lernen. In V. Hornung-Prähauser, M. Luckmann, & M. Kalz (Eds.), Selbstorganisiertes Lernen im Internet: Einblick in die Landschaft der webbasierten Bildungsinnovationen (pp. 301–307). Innsbruck, Wien, Bozen: Studienverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessner, M., & Pfister, H.-R. (2007). Points of cooperation: Integrating cooperative learning into web-based courses. In U. Hoppe, S. A., & O. H. (Eds.), The Role of Technology in CSCL: Studies in Technology Enhanced (pp. 21–46). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis Schäffer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schäffer, D., Heeren, J. (2014). Collaborative Learning in Virtual Environments. In: Hebbel-Seeger, A., Reiners, T., Schäffer, D. (eds) Synthetic Worlds. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol 33. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6286-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics